Why is the CL Auto so inefficent?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 10:29 AM
  #1  
tbonephile's Avatar
Thread Starter
4th Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Why is the CL Auto so inefficent?

I'm looking at these dyno graphs of stock 01 CL-S and they only make from 196-201 at the wheels, this is a drivetrain lose of almost 25% is it really this bad? I thought it was only 15% lose which would make like 220 at the wheels. Why is the drivetrain so inefficent?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 10:37 AM
  #2  
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 5
From: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Re: Why is the CL Auto so inefficent?

Originally posted by tbonephile
I'm looking at these dyno graphs of stock 01 CL-S and they only make from 196-201 at the wheels, this is a drivetrain lose of almost 25% is it really this bad? I thought it was only 15% lose which would make like 220 at the wheels. Why is the drivetrain so inefficent?
The CL-S auto isn't anymore inefficent than other auto tranny. Autos don't lose 15% manuals do. The CL-S 6sp dynos at 220. The CL-S auto is right where it should be in terms of drivetrain loss.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 11:12 AM
  #3  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Re: Re: Why is the CL Auto so inefficent?

Originally posted by Black CL-S 4-Life
The CL-S auto isn't anymore inefficent than other auto tranny. Autos don't lose 15% manuals do. The CL-S 6sp dynos at 220. The CL-S auto is right where it should be in terms of drivetrain loss.


Autos typically lose around 20-25%, so the auto CL-S is right on. The manual is loosing around 12-15%, which is also right on....
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 11:20 AM
  #4  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
the added Auto losses over the manual are mostly due to the torque converter....
If there is an ideal converter it should not add more losses
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 02:46 PM
  #5  
moomaster_99's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Wrong.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 03:02 PM
  #6  
civic4982's Avatar
SHIFT_over.so.I.can.see
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,760
Likes: 1
From: Lubbock, TX
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Wrong.
such an informative answer...
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 03:22 PM
  #7  
GS Dave's Avatar
Quicker than U Think
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
From: Jupiter, FL
20-25% is normal for an auto. The better the auro, the lower the loss. My GS is right around 19-20%.

Our car in both stick and auto loses more than most - part of that is due to it being FWD for whatever reason.
From what I've read, FWD is usually a little more efficient than RWD due to the added mechanical heft of the driveshaft, distance, and U-joints in the RWD. Again, this is secondhand knowledge though.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
Mar 4, 2016 08:59 AM
blacktsxwagon
5G TLX (2015-2020)
42
Oct 27, 2015 10:12 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
Oct 9, 2015 10:13 PM
malvothegreat
Car Parts for Sale
0
Sep 29, 2015 12:38 AM
jmaxima03
Member Cars for Sale
1
Sep 27, 2015 10:22 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:02 AM.