V6 or 3.2 badge?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 05:01 AM
  #1  
Iridium130's Avatar
Thread Starter
w.t.f., mate?
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: UC Santa Cruz / Anaheim Hills, CA
V6 or 3.2 badge?

Has anyone considered putting a V6 badge from an Accord V6 on the CL-P/CL-S? Maybe right above the front wheels on the fender flare area...or maybe putting on a 3.2 badge there. you guys think that would be nice or rice? Any Photoshop gurus wanna photoshop it in?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 06:39 AM
  #2  
bone_stock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Nah! To anybody who knows anything about IC engines 3.2 does mean V6/I6. There are no 4 cylinder engines in production with a displacement that large and are no production V8's with a displacement that small. That only leaves a V6/I6. Just my .02.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
pgatour1's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,969
Likes: 0
From: NY
You took the words right outta my mouth
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:00 PM
  #4  
tuRb0mikEy's Avatar
Who Needs a Type-S?
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: New York City
I have a few V6 emblems off my Accord and others if you're interested.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:08 PM
  #5  
IntegraVT's Avatar
Stealthy A-CL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 24
From: WNY, NJ
Originally posted by bone_stock
Nah! To anybody who knows anything about IC engines 3.2 does mean V6/I6. There are no 4 cylinder engines in production with a displacement that large and are no production V8's with a displacement that small. That only leaves a V6/I6. Just my .02.
Agreed...

However, there have been some bizzare engine configurations in the past. Mazda's 1.8L V6 and Porsche's 3.0L I4 come to mind.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:15 PM
  #6  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by IntegraVT


Agreed...

However, there have been some bizzare engine configurations in the past. Mazda's 1.8L V6 and Porsche's 3.0L I4 come to mind.
Yup, and Ferrari and BMW both have 3.5L V-8s in production now.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:38 PM
  #7  
Iridium130's Avatar
Thread Starter
w.t.f., mate?
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: UC Santa Cruz / Anaheim Hills, CA
what the hell happened to my post? I was just asking if a V6 or 3.2 emblem would look good on our car....sheesh. damn thread hijackers
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I wouldn't do it, I think that it would look dumb.

If you must, the 3.2 would look better than an accord V6 badge
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 12:52 PM
  #9  
CO-CL-S's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
From: Lafayette, CO USA
Originally posted by pgatour1
You took the words right outta my mouth
I don't see putting V6 on our cars either. I also don't see why
you carry a personal vendetta in your signature. YMMV
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 01:01 PM
  #10  
moomaster_99's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Hey Twiggy!! You gonna bring your car back up when you go home for Thanksgiving???
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 01:03 PM
  #11  
Iridium130's Avatar
Thread Starter
w.t.f., mate?
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: UC Santa Cruz / Anaheim Hills, CA
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Hey Twiggy!! You gonna bring your car back up when you go home for Thanksgiving???
I'd still have nowhere to park it, so no.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 01:21 PM
  #12  
bone_stock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally posted by someguy


Yup, and Ferrari and BMW both have 3.5L V-8s in production now.
Be careful now the Ferrari 355 designation does not mean 3.55 liters in displacement! The 355 designates 355 cubic centimeters per cylinder!!! The BMW engine you refer to I have never heard of. Is it from the 1950's or something?
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 02:11 PM
  #13  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by bone_stock


Be careful now the Ferrari 355 designation does not mean 3.55 liters in displacement! The 355 designates 355 cubic centimeters per cylinder!!! The BMW engine you refer to I have never heard of. Is it from the 1950's or something?
I was wong about the Ferrari, the F360 has a displacement of 3.6L and the F355 has one of 3.5L. Sorry about that. But 3.6L is still pretty small for a V-8

No, BMW offers a 3.5L V-8 in Europe. The current 535i has it and the outgoing 735i had it. The 735 is going to be replaced by the new 735i with a 3.6L V-8
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 02:56 PM
  #14  
bone_stock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally posted by someguy


I was wong about the Ferrari, the F360 has a displacement of 3.6L and the F355 has one of 3.5L. Sorry about that. But 3.6L is still pretty small for a V-8

No, BMW offers a 3.5L V-8 in Europe. The current 535i has it and the outgoing 735i had it. The 735 is going to be replaced by the new 735i with a 3.6L V-8
I beg to differ my man. The 735i and 535i were always I6's. Europe not withstanding. You'll have to prove to me that BMW ever made a V8 with less than 4.0 liters of displacement.
Once again I'll tell you Ferrari's numbering designation is not about enging displacment a la BMW. The Ferrari designation is about the capacity of a single cylinder. As mentioned above the 355 stands for the capacity of one cylinder. For displacement it would be 355 cubic centiliters x 8 cylinders.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 03:47 PM
  #15  
IntegraVT's Avatar
Stealthy A-CL Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 24
From: WNY, NJ
Originally posted by bone_stock


I beg to differ my man. The 735i and 535i were always I6's. Europe not withstanding. You'll have to prove to me that BMW ever made a V8 with less than 4.0 liters of displacement.
IIRC, the '94-'95 530i actually had a 3.0L V8 instead of the more typical 3.0L I6.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:14 PM
  #16  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by bone_stock


I beg to differ my man. The 735i and 535i were always I6's. Europe not withstanding. You'll have to prove to me that BMW ever made a V8 with less than 4.0 liters of displacement.
Once again I'll tell you Ferrari's numbering designation is not about enging displacment a la BMW. The Ferrari designation is about the capacity of a single cylinder. As mentioned above the 355 stands for the capacity of one cylinder. For displacement it would be 355 cubic centiliters x 8 cylinders.
You are wrong

From Car Magazine, Nov. 2001
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:22 PM
  #17  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally posted by someguy


You are wrong

From Car Magazine, Nov. 2001
Again, in an article about the new 7
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:26 PM
  #18  
astro's Avatar
Community Architect
robb m.
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 72,841
Likes: 660
From: ON
BMW absolutely made a 3litre V8 for the 5 series a few years ago...I girl at my university had one and I drove it frequently...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:28 PM
  #19  
someguy's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Houston
The F355 is 3.5L and the F360 is 3.6L
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:36 PM
  #20  
tankmonkey's Avatar
6 speed...
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: houston
Originally posted by bone_stock

As mentioned above the 355 stands for the capacity of one cylinder. For displacement it would be 355 cubic centiliters x 8 cylinders.
so you're saying the ferrari f355 has a 2.84 liter engine?

(355cc x 8 cylinders = 2840 cc engine)

seems a little small...
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 04:44 PM
  #21  
Iridium130's Avatar
Thread Starter
w.t.f., mate?
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: UC Santa Cruz / Anaheim Hills, CA
BASTARDS!!!! STOP HIJACKING MY THREAD!!!!!!!

Bastards. you and your ferrari talk.....shame on you all!!!
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 07:09 PM
  #22  
FTM-1's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,776
Likes: 1
From: Washington DC.
Well here is my take on the situation no I think its no need.
Don't be like the guy I was behind yesterday that had a 90-93 ACCORD station wagon with a Type R badge on it & a big exhast.
If I was in the mood & we were out on the highway I would have made hisType R badge look sily with my 3.2 TL badge.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 07:13 PM
  #23  
bioyuki's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,427
Likes: 1
From: Orange County, CA
If you really want to distinguish yourself go buy a Type-S badge from ACP and put it right behind and above the front wheel.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 08:05 PM
  #24  
MtBikR's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
I must say that you really should take a set back and look at this situation. The car already has too many detracting badges. The question of wheter to add more is no mute. The only question left is "What can I do to make my car look better?", Once again take another step back look at you car and go get some dental floss and Gu-Gone, You'll be a happy man.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2001 | 10:09 PM
  #25  
GOT PSI?'s Avatar
It's Go-Time.
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
From: Canucktown, BC
i WAS THINKIN' OF PUTTING ON MY "5.0" DECALS OFF MY 93' STANG...
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 03:04 AM
  #26  
Kwick-CL-ver-S's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Our cars are IMO sleek and classy... no need to have tacky distracting badges on them. If you are just dieing to have something on the side of thyour car, I really would perfer side markers over a 3.2 or V6 badge... Even Solara saw the error of there was and took of the badges off there doors for the 2002 models. However, if you fix up your car i.e. better rims, drop, engine mods, brakes, exhausts, etc... then finding actual words MUGEN or SPORT or somthing similar to AMG, M, TRD ect... putting redundent badges brings our cars down a notch in class. my .02
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 06:29 AM
  #27  
bone_stock's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl
I stand corrected on the European front. However, in an earlier post I said Europe not withstanding. I belive Astroboy was quoting a canadian g/f's BMW. I also believe that CAR magazine is a Brittish magazine, is it not? I still haven't seen proof that BMW ever had a 3.0 litre V8 in the USA.
It also appears that Ferrari does not follow suit from their racing cars. The Ferrari 333SP designation stands for cylinder displacement. However, their road cars appear to reflect total engine displacement. My bad!
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2001 | 08:13 AM
  #28  
tankmonkey's Avatar
6 speed...
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: houston
Originally posted by bone_stock
I stand corrected on the European front. However, in an earlier post I said Europe not withstanding. I belive Astroboy was quoting a canadian g/f's BMW. I also believe that CAR magazine is a Brittish magazine, is it not? I still haven't seen proof that BMW ever had a 3.0 litre V8 in the USA.
It also appears that Ferrari does not follow suit from their racing cars. The Ferrari 333SP designation stands for cylinder displacement. However, their road cars appear to reflect total engine displacement. My bad!
1994-5 bmw 530i sold in the u.s.a. was a 3.0 liter v8.

here's the link to edmunds
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
Dec 4, 2019 02:11 PM
Pham Alvan
2G TL (1999-2003)
38
Mar 16, 2016 09:17 AM
AJRozsa
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
Oct 5, 2015 07:50 PM
kmarqueling
Car Parts for Sale
1
Oct 3, 2015 01:14 AM
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
Sep 10, 2015 09:27 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.