type s with the newer mustang gt
11-18-2004, 02:45 PM
#1
Pres TeamMidnightInvasion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
type s with the newer mustang gt
I was on my way home from the mall with my girlfriend on an empty tank of gas. My gas guage light had been on for awhile. Anyways, Im coming up to a red light , and I see this mustang gt in the fastlane, so i switch into the slow lane and pull up next to him. He doesnt look over at all, so i reeved up my engine in neutral. He still nevered responded, so i just said screw it. I was almost out of gas anyways. So i just turned and started talking to my girlfriend. All sudden i hear him rev up his mustang and go, i look and he is taking off. I was like what, so i gunned it. All i see, is him hit second gear and that rear end go sideways. So then i take off he about 2-3 car lengths ahead of me. Then all a sudden i hear him grind third bad. That right there put me in the lead. I was like man that was a very fast mustang. When we finally caught up to traffic ahead of us, i slow down and i re-look at the badge, on the opposite side of the trunk it had BULLET. I was like that explains it. Lastly, i roll down my window and say your shit tight, and the guy just gives me a dirty disgusted look. I was like what ever man, dont get made at because you cant shift gears, and my shit is all stock. Anways, im sure he would of won no matter what, but i sure like to redo that race.
11-18-2004, 05:22 PM
#7
Doin' da crack shuffle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Philly and Bowie
Age: 46
Posts: 10,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamMidnightinvasion
Lastly, i roll down my window and say your shit tight, and the guy just gives me a dirty disgusted look.
Trending Topics
11-18-2004, 10:02 PM
#13
I NEED MONEY!
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Atlanta
Age: 37
Posts: 2,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jtkz13
A 99-04 GT will still beat most I/H 5AT's as long as its a 5 speed.
I thought the G35 could beat a GT...I guess not?
11-18-2004, 10:21 PM
#14
TQ > MPG
You cant base it off of what someone says on a msg board, especially a kill on the street.
Here is some generally accepted times for the cars you mentioned:
Stock CL-S auto - 14.9 @ 94mph
CL-S auto w/CAI & headers - 14.2 @ 98mph
G35C 6 speed stock - 14.1 @ 100mph
99-04 Mustang GT 5 speed stock - 14.2 @ 98mph
As you can see the modded CL-S & stock G35 & Stang are very close. Some examples will be a little quicker, some will be a little slower. But those numbers are very close to what the vast majority of people run.
From a roll, especially on the highway, a stock CL-S may be able to keep up with a 5 speed stang, and definitely should hold its own with a stock automatic 99+.
Here is some generally accepted times for the cars you mentioned:
Stock CL-S auto - 14.9 @ 94mph
CL-S auto w/CAI & headers - 14.2 @ 98mph
G35C 6 speed stock - 14.1 @ 100mph
99-04 Mustang GT 5 speed stock - 14.2 @ 98mph
As you can see the modded CL-S & stock G35 & Stang are very close. Some examples will be a little quicker, some will be a little slower. But those numbers are very close to what the vast majority of people run.
From a roll, especially on the highway, a stock CL-S may be able to keep up with a 5 speed stang, and definitely should hold its own with a stock automatic 99+.
11-18-2004, 10:28 PM
#15
Pres TeamMidnightInvasion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[/QUOTE]Bullitt has only 5 horsepower over a standard GT, at 265 hp. Bullitt is not that big of a deal.
I always thought the bullet had more hp, but i guess it has 275hp and 305lbs of torque. I could tell he had mods done. Not to mention this wasnt a straight up race, and i was on empty in a stock car. Anyways, that Mustang BULLIT took off fast. My Friend has a Mustang GT and it was not even close to being as fast as this BULLET.
I always thought the bullet had more hp, but i guess it has 275hp and 305lbs of torque. I could tell he had mods done. Not to mention this wasnt a straight up race, and i was on empty in a stock car. Anyways, that Mustang BULLIT took off fast. My Friend has a Mustang GT and it was not even close to being as fast as this BULLET.
11-19-2004, 12:33 PM
#19
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
They run 13.1-13.3 @ 104 - 106 Lets hope you can hook up 
Indeed, they are no joke. A guy had an automatic one at the track - stock - and couldn't manage to get into the 13's. The manual is a different car I've heard.
11-19-2004, 12:52 PM
#20
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
They run 13.1-13.3 @ 104 - 106 Lets hope you can hook up
yes I am going back to the Bridgestone SO3's after these PZero Nero are shot... I LUV those SO3's... best tire I ever owned.
11-19-2004, 01:01 PM
#21
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by Smitty
yes I am going back to the Bridgestone SO3's after these PZero Nero are shot... I LUV those SO3's... best tire I ever owned.
You are gonna need more than some SO3's for 370 whp. :burnoutsmiely:
11-19-2004, 03:16 PM
#24
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jtkz13
You cant base it off of what someone says on a msg board, especially a kill on the street.
Here is some generally accepted times for the cars you mentioned:
Stock CL-S auto - 14.9 @ 94mph
CL-S auto w/CAI & headers - 14.2 @ 98mph
G35C 6 speed stock - 14.1 @ 100mph
99-04 Mustang GT 5 speed stock - 14.2 @ 98mph
As you can see the modded CL-S & stock G35 & Stang are very close. Some examples will be a little quicker, some will be a little slower. But those numbers are very close to what the vast majority of people run.
From a roll, especially on the highway, a stock CL-S may be able to keep up with a 5 speed stang, and definitely should hold its own with a stock automatic 99+.
Here is some generally accepted times for the cars you mentioned:
Stock CL-S auto - 14.9 @ 94mph
CL-S auto w/CAI & headers - 14.2 @ 98mph
G35C 6 speed stock - 14.1 @ 100mph
99-04 Mustang GT 5 speed stock - 14.2 @ 98mph
As you can see the modded CL-S & stock G35 & Stang are very close. Some examples will be a little quicker, some will be a little slower. But those numbers are very close to what the vast majority of people run.
From a roll, especially on the highway, a stock CL-S may be able to keep up with a 5 speed stang, and definitely should hold its own with a stock automatic 99+.
Good post...
11-19-2004, 03:18 PM
#25
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always thought the bullet had more hp, but i guess it has 275hp and 305lbs of torque. I could tell he had mods done. Not to mention this wasnt a straight up race, and i was on empty in a stock car. Anyways, that Mustang BULLIT took off fast. My Friend has a Mustang GT and it was not even close to being as fast as this BULLET.
11-19-2004, 04:41 PM
#28
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 48
Posts: 9,940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
they would still own ya from a dig 
you follow me around all day or something?
I know better than to go from a dead stop (for now)..
...
11-19-2004, 04:44 PM
#29
Pres TeamMidnightInvasion
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington State
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Empty helps you alot -- considering the wieght per gallon of gas is ~7lbs...
11-19-2004, 05:21 PM
#30
TQ > MPG
Originally Posted by darrinb
joe,
u gotta remember prolly only less than 20-25% of stock gt's can run in the 14.2 range, most of em are between 14.4-14.6
u gotta remember prolly only less than 20-25% of stock gt's can run in the 14.2 range, most of em are between 14.4-14.6
Well, I havent really seen too many stock mustang's at the track. Most have at least gears/exhaust, which easily put the 99+'s in the 13's. Like I said before, my dad's bone stock 00 GT 5 speed would run 14.2-14.3 @ 98mph every time down. That was with crappy 2.2 60's also. At a decent track with a 2.0 60' (which has been done numerous times on stock tires) 13.9 is definitely possible.
If someone runs a mid 14 in a 5 speed 99+ GT than they need to learn how to drive, or go to a better prepped track. The auto's run mid 14's with a decent 60'.
As for the Mach 1, the automatic I believe is actually rated lower in tq, and the 5 speed's are underrated at 305hp. They make closer to 320hp at the crank (they dyno ~ 270rwhp)
11-20-2004, 01:33 AM
#31
///M POWER
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by jtkz13
Well, I havent really seen too many stock mustang's at the track. Most have at least gears/exhaust, which easily put the 99+'s in the 13's. Like I said before, my dad's bone stock 00 GT 5 speed would run 14.2-14.3 @ 98mph every time down. That was with crappy 2.2 60's also. At a decent track with a 2.0 60' (which has been done numerous times on stock tires) 13.9 is definitely possible.
If someone runs a mid 14 in a 5 speed 99+ GT than they need to learn how to drive, or go to a better prepped track. The auto's run mid 14's with a decent 60'.
As for the Mach 1, the automatic I believe is actually rated lower in tq, and the 5 speed's are underrated at 305hp. They make closer to 320hp at the crank (they dyno ~ 270rwhp)
If someone runs a mid 14 in a 5 speed 99+ GT than they need to learn how to drive, or go to a better prepped track. The auto's run mid 14's with a decent 60'.
As for the Mach 1, the automatic I believe is actually rated lower in tq, and the 5 speed's are underrated at 305hp. They make closer to 320hp at the crank (they dyno ~ 270rwhp)
your right, not to many stock gt's at the track, but i have witnessed 14.4-even as bad as a 15.2
1 more thing, i would say that less that 15% of bolt on auto cl-s can go 14.2, def not an avg time
11-20-2004, 03:18 PM
#32
Kicking your Ass
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Marietta
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamMidnightinvasion
Yea i know having to much gas weighs you down, but if you have too little then its harder for your fuel pump to grab gas.
That's why we have FPR's....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
justin.w13.walker
Car Parts for Sale
0
09-22-2015 02:21 PM