True or False?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 09:20 PM
  #1  
mr. big's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
True or False?????

A mechanic told me, that the CLS has a 70% chance of resulting in a failed transmission.......But if this were true, wouldnt the TLS also have the same since they share the same tranny?? Can this be possible? if so, thats kinda scary!
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #2  
Scooter's Avatar
'Cooter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
From: Shitside, Queens
yup...TL's and CL's share the same tranny
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 09:31 PM
  #3  
kensteele's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 10,121
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, Kansas
That is false.

It is only a 50% chance.

Either it will or it won't. 50, 50.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 09:33 PM
  #4  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Yes, they would have a very similar failure rates. They use the same drivetrain along with the TL pulling slightly more weight.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #5  
Nashua_Night_Hawk's Avatar
Happy CL-S Pilot
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,215
Likes: 1
From: Nashua, NH, USA
there is 10k failures out of 400,000 or 2.5% from where did you get the 70%?
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #6  
Tom2's Avatar
Unregistered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 45
From: New York
Originally posted by kensteele
That is false.

It is only a 50% chance.

Either it will or it won't. 50, 50.
Hahahhaha... If you flip a penny 99 times and it lands on heads each time, what are the chances of it landing on tails the next flip?
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 10:14 PM
  #7  
mr. big's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
a mechanic friend of mine says he had 4 customers w/ CLS and their trannys failed....all four sued acura and acura reimbursed the full amount of the vehicles back to the owners without accounting for depreciation....just a full refund
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 10:36 PM
  #8  
BC's Avatar
BC
nearsighted visionary
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Gresham, Oregon
50/50 Tom.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #9  
Amoeba's Avatar
Best D-Line in the NFL
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
From: Gainesville, Fl for college, Palm Beach Gardens, Fl at Home
u guys are ridicolous, its not 70% 50% or 20% its gotta be in single digits.
Old Jun 3, 2003 | 11:25 PM
  #10  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
it not that high but some people have more than one failure
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 12:07 AM
  #11  
RaptorCLS's Avatar
Dromaeosaurs/Velociraptor
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
From: Leander, TX
rates are ran on independant studies...in this mechanics case...he had a high rate of cls come in with the problem.....but overall with everyone out there, this number is small of course.

he was just basising it off his experience. nothing more
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 12:27 AM
  #12  
kensteele's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 10,121
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, Kansas
Originally posted by Tom2
Hahahhaha... If you flip a penny 99 times and it lands on heads each time, what are the chances of it landing on tails the next flip?
It's 50/50. If you flip a fair penny 99 times and it comes up 99 times in a row on heads, there's no guarantee it will come up heads on the 100th flip.

Assuming we have a fair penny meaning it's not rigged to favour one side or the other, if you think the odd are so great that it will be heads [again] on the 100th time, if you are so sure, let do it...you give me 100 to 1 odds, let's bet $10 and I'll take tails. If it lands heads, you get $10, if it lands tails I get $1000.

I think you know this. We're talking chances, not percentages. No fair penny anywhere can do better than 50/50 heads or tails on any one "fair" flip; each event is independent of the last and it can land either heads or tails...one outcome amongst two possibilities...50% heads, 50% tails.

Hehe, Tom you had to throw the random penny analogy in. Which doesn't apply to the Acuras since it's not a independent random event. I was sorta kidding about the 50/50 part on the Acura, it's not a 50% share but like the penny, tomorrow your tranny will fail...or it won't. The OP is really asking about what percentage of Acuras end up with failed trannys, not your chances of chosing an Acura whose tranny will fail. None of us know what you real chances are because we don't have all the facts...regardless. If Sacramento Acura has 20 CLs on the lot and sold 19 of them last week and this week all the new owners called back to complain of failed trannies....whoever buys that 20th CL this week...chances are their tranny will fail, say 95%. But that's not random since it appears that all the cars came from the same [manufacturing] lot. But if we knew Sacramento Acura traded Reno Acura for the 20th two months ago...different chances.

The percentage of failed trannies is in the single digits from what I hear. Even if you count the total number of [repeated] failures vs the total number of cars manufactured...still single digits.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:41 AM
  #13  
Tom2's Avatar
Unregistered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 45
From: New York
kensteele,

Yes, I know that you know that. And I know that you know that I knew that.

Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #14  
gto2050's Avatar
Someday pigs WILL fly!
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
From: Pequannock, NJ USA
Originally posted by Tom2
kensteele,

Yes, I know that you know that. And I know that you know that I knew that.

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:52 AM
  #15  
nate'sCLS's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,135
Likes: 0
From: SAC, CA
Sounds like there is something wrong with your mechanics sample. Probably best he didn't become a statistician.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #16  
gto2050's Avatar
Someday pigs WILL fly!
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
From: Pequannock, NJ USA
When Elvis died in 1977, there were only 37 Elvis impersonators. Today there are more than 48,000 in the world, and if this continues, by the year 2010 one out of three people in the world will be Elvis impersonators.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 10:56 AM
  #17  
TypeS_boi's Avatar
CL-S retired 10.17.06
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
From: CA
....you either got a good tranny or a bad one...from what I've read depending on the build date. % can't be that high
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:00 AM
  #18  
gto2050's Avatar
Someday pigs WILL fly!
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
From: Pequannock, NJ USA
I don't think it's anything. I have an early one and transmissions around mine have failed but mine has not. I think it's strictly random and obviously Acura does not believe it is as serious as we do. But...... they did extend the warranty on the trans for 100,000 miles.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #19  
Tom2's Avatar
Unregistered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 45
From: New York
Originally posted by gto2050
When Elvis died in 1977, there were only 37 Elvis impersonators. Today there are more than 48,000 in the world, and if this continues, by the year 2010 one out of three people in the world will be Elvis impersonators.
I've been alive for 1 Billion seconds.

How old am I?
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #20  
RandyMax's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,400
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim Hills, CA
Re: True or False?????

Originally posted by mr. big
A mechanic told me, that the CLS has a 70% chance of resulting in a failed transmission.......
This statement is TRUE. I guarantee your tranny will fail. The question is, WHEN? 50k miles or 500k miles?? :p
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:25 AM
  #21  
mc222's Avatar
I hate the Mets
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Philly Burbs
Originally posted by Tom2
I've been alive for 1 Billion seconds.

How old am I?
If you do the math - most people would say your 31 (rounded down) - BUT since we are not 1 yrs old when we are born - I believe that makes you 30 and almost 31 - right?
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #22  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by Tom2
I've been alive for 1 Billion seconds.

How old am I?
31.7 years old...
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #23  
mc222's Avatar
I hate the Mets
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Philly Burbs
Originally posted by scalbert
31.7 years old...
31 years, 251 days, 13 hours, 34 minutes, and 26 seconds! = 31.7 correct - But, you are 0 when your born so would that make a difference, who's right here?
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:35 AM
  #24  
Doc.Booty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 1
From: Myrtle Beach
Originally posted by gto2050
I know that you believe you understand what you think I said but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
:head explodes:
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:37 AM
  #25  
Scooter's Avatar
'Cooter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
From: Shitside, Queens
Re: Re: True or False?????

Originally posted by RandyMax
This statement is TRUE. I guarantee your tranny will fail. The question is, WHEN? 50k miles or 500k miles?? :p
if u wanna go that route, yer still wrong...according to yer logic, the answer is 100%...the question is when

the guy just got 70% out of thin air...he doesn't know...noone outside of Honda R&D knows...it's their lil secret

Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:39 AM
  #26  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by mc222
If you do the math - most people would say your 31 (rounded down) - BUT since we are not 1 yrs old when we are born - I believe that makes you 30 and almost 31 - right?
I could be wrong but if you take into account the decimal place you would be accounting for the portion of the first year. We determined that 1 billion seconds is 31.7 years based on there being 31,536,000 seconds in a year.

We are about 45% of the way through this year, or in the year 2003.45. Subtract 31.7 from 2003.45 and the result is 1971.75 or roughly a birth date of September of 1971 which would put him at 31 approaching 32.

But as I said, I could be wrong.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:45 AM
  #27  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by mc222
31 years, 251 days, 13 hours, 34 minutes, and 26 seconds! = 31.7 correct - But, you are 0 when your born so would that make a difference, who's right here?
They way I see it we are already accounting for the first year. To keep it simple, lets say someone is 1 million seconds old. That would put them at 0.03 years old or about 3.5 months. Just my take on it though.
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #28  
mc222's Avatar
I hate the Mets
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,994
Likes: 0
From: Philly Burbs
Originally posted by scalbert
I could be wrong but if you take into account the decimal place you would be accounting for the portion of the first year. We determined that 1 billion seconds is 31.7 years based on there being 31,536,000 seconds in a year.

We are about 45% of the way through this year, or in the year 2003.45. Subtract 31.7 from 2003.45 and the result is 1971.75 or roughly a birth date of September of 1971 which would put him at 31 approaching 32.

But as I said, I could be wrong.
Damn, I just cheated and looked up the answer - I now think you are right
Old Jun 4, 2003 | 01:19 PM
  #29  
Red-CL's Avatar
Doin' da crack shuffle
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,847
Likes: 0
From: Philly and Bowie
Re: Re: True or False?????

Originally posted by RandyMax
This statement is TRUE. I guarantee your tranny will fail. The question is, WHEN? 50k miles or 500k miles?? :p
Yes it is true, but every mechanical part fails over a peroid of time no matter who the manufacturer is.
Old Jun 5, 2003 | 09:27 AM
  #30  
Tom2's Avatar
Unregistered Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 45
From: New York
Originally posted by scalbert
They way I see it we are already accounting for the first year. To keep it simple, lets say someone is 1 million seconds old. That would put them at 0.03 years old or about 3.5 months. Just my take on it though.
Think about that for a second (no pun intended)..... If there's anything that can give you an idea about the difference between 1 million and 1 billion, this is it:

A person alive for 1 million seconds is 3.5 months old.

A person alive for 1 billion seconds is 32 years old.

How many BILLIONS is Bill Gates worth?

BTW, I'm 32 I was rounding.....
Old Jun 5, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #31  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Community Builder
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 169,046
Likes: 23,823
Originally posted by Tom2

A person alive for 1 million seconds is 3.5 months old.

A person alive for 1 billion seconds is 32 years old.

ACK...you didn't go and CALCULATE that yourself didja?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
Dec 4, 2019 02:11 PM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
Jan 20, 2016 11:43 AM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Oct 5, 2015 11:00 AM
SiClone
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
12
Oct 1, 2015 10:22 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
1
Sep 25, 2015 06:05 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 PM.