Sway Bars: Eibach or Comptech
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sway Bars: Eibach or Comptech
Hi:
I ma about to order sway bars and noticed that there are now two offerings, Eibach or Comptech.
Based on your experience, which one performs better?
Thanks,
Beach-CL
I ma about to order sway bars and noticed that there are now two offerings, Eibach or Comptech.
Based on your experience, which one performs better?
Thanks,
Beach-CL
#3
Happy CL-S Pilot
They have more.... too
1) Springs
2) Sways
3) Front Strut Bar (Bracket)
4) Rear Camber Kits
check the application guide at www.eibach.com
Here is the CLS applications:
<TABLE FRAME="border" BORDERCOLOR="#FFFFFF" BORDER="1" CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="3">
<TR>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=150>Product</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=50>Front</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=50>Rear</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=200>Comments</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=80>Part Number</TH>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">PRO-KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">2.0 in</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">1.7 in</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4041.140</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">ANTI-ROLL-KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">27 mm</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">23 mm</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4040.320</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">PRO-CONTROL-BAR</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4041.920</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">ALIGNMENT KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">Rear -2.0 / +4.0 degrees of adjustment.</TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">5.67090K</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
------------------
Black, Ebony, 3.2 CL Type-S, NAV.
- 3M clear bra, by Stonguard (full front bumper, and side mirrors, and partial hood)
- Acura Spoiler, Moonroof visor
- Splash guards, Winter mats, Trunk liner
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator
- HELMS Service Manual
- PIAA 19169 road lamps
- 03/19/01: Injen Polished CAI
- 04/13/01: 235/40/18 NITTO 555 on 18x7.5, +45 offset, Koing Imagine in Silver with wheels locks
1) Springs
2) Sways
3) Front Strut Bar (Bracket)
4) Rear Camber Kits
check the application guide at www.eibach.com
Here is the CLS applications:
<TABLE FRAME="border" BORDERCOLOR="#FFFFFF" BORDER="1" CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="3">
<TR>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=150>Product</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=50>Front</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=50>Rear</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=200>Comments</TH>
<TH class=TableHeader VALIGN=BOTTOM WIDTH=80>Part Number</TH>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">PRO-KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">2.0 in</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">1.7 in</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4041.140</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">ANTI-ROLL-KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">27 mm</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">23 mm</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4040.320</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">PRO-CONTROL-BAR</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">4041.920</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">ALIGNMENT KIT</TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP"></TD>
<TD class=TableText ALIGN="LEFT" VALIGN="TOP">Rear -2.0 / +4.0 degrees of adjustment.</TD>
<TD class=Part ALIGN="CENTER" VALIGN="TOP">5.67090K</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
------------------
Black, Ebony, 3.2 CL Type-S, NAV.
- 3M clear bra, by Stonguard (full front bumper, and side mirrors, and partial hood)
- Acura Spoiler, Moonroof visor
- Splash guards, Winter mats, Trunk liner
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator
- HELMS Service Manual
- PIAA 19169 road lamps
- 03/19/01: Injen Polished CAI
- 04/13/01: 235/40/18 NITTO 555 on 18x7.5, +45 offset, Koing Imagine in Silver with wheels locks
#4
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Follow this link and scroll down to "Suspension". There are two entries for sway bars...
http://www.autocarparts.com/search/r...el=157&trim=11
[This message has been edited by Beach-CL (edited 04-16-2001).]
http://www.autocarparts.com/search/r...el=157&trim=11
[This message has been edited by Beach-CL (edited 04-16-2001).]
#5
Happy CL-S Pilot
So who bought an Eibach Sways bars, and how do they compare to Comptech?
------------------
Black, Ebony, 3.2 CL Type-S, NAV.
- 3M clear bra, by Stonguard (full front bumper, and side mirrors, and partial hood)
- Acura Spoiler, Moonroof visor
- Splash guards, Winter mats, Trunk liner
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator
- HELMS Service Manual
- PIAA 19169 road lamps
- 03/19/01: Injen Polished CAI
- 04/13/01: 235/40/18 NITTO 555 on 18x7.5, +45 offset, Koing Imagine in Silver with wheels locks
------------------
Black, Ebony, 3.2 CL Type-S, NAV.
- 3M clear bra, by Stonguard (full front bumper, and side mirrors, and partial hood)
- Acura Spoiler, Moonroof visor
- Splash guards, Winter mats, Trunk liner
- Valentine V1 Radar Locator
- HELMS Service Manual
- PIAA 19169 road lamps
- 03/19/01: Injen Polished CAI
- 04/13/01: 235/40/18 NITTO 555 on 18x7.5, +45 offset, Koing Imagine in Silver with wheels locks
#6
Subie Dubie
Hey Beach,welcome.I can't comment on the Eibach's but i've had the Comptech sways on for about 3 weeks and they are awesome!!I took a drive yesterday on a windy "river" road that i've driven many times and it was like a whole new car.I'm sure the Eibachs are good,i've had their springs but i can't imagine they could be better.Good luck!
------------------
San Marino Red
Spoiler
Comptech Headers
Comptech Sways
------------------
San Marino Red
Spoiler
Comptech Headers
Comptech Sways
#7
aka gimmesomesugar
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is all I could find about the sways.
Stock: 27.2mm(front) 19mm(rear)
Eibach: 27mm(front) 23mm(rear)
Comptech: ???(front) ???(rear)
Anybody know the specs for the Comptech sways? I assume larger diameter bars would be better...would there be a case where larger is not necessarily better?
Stock: 27.2mm(front) 19mm(rear)
Eibach: 27mm(front) 23mm(rear)
Comptech: ???(front) ???(rear)
Anybody know the specs for the Comptech sways? I assume larger diameter bars would be better...would there be a case where larger is not necessarily better?
Trending Topics
#8
Suzuka Master
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Satin Slayer:
This is all I could find about the sways.
Stock: 27.2mm(front) 19mm(rear)
Eibach: 27mm(front) 23mm(rear)
Comptech: ???(front) ???(rear)
Anybody know the specs for the Comptech sways? I assume larger diameter bars would be better...would there be a case where larger is not necessarily better?</font>
This is all I could find about the sways.
Stock: 27.2mm(front) 19mm(rear)
Eibach: 27mm(front) 23mm(rear)
Comptech: ???(front) ???(rear)
Anybody know the specs for the Comptech sways? I assume larger diameter bars would be better...would there be a case where larger is not necessarily better?</font>
Here is the updated data:
Comptech data provided by tech support NOT sales:
Front: 27.2 mm 0.177 wall thickness (same O.D. as stock [uses the same rubber mounts as stock]).
Rear: 22 mm solid bar.
CL-S (OEM) to Comptech front increase is 13%. I calc'd this value by using the 0.177 mm thickness of the CL-S tubing vs the CL's 0.107 thickness (value provided by Comptech tech support). I used a tool available from ZDNet to calculate hollow torsion bars torsion values in lb-inches.
So, on the CLS, the front is 13% stiffer (if everyone is correct about the data). 27.2 mm bar with 0.177 wall thickness in front).
The rear increase specified by Comptech is based on the replacement of the CL's 18mm bar (not the CL-S 19mm bar):
(22^4)/(18^4) = 2.23 -> 123% increase in rear rate; Close enough to their claimed increase of 130% in the rear.)
If I adjust for the CLS rear 19mm solid bar, then I get the following calc:
(22^4)/(19^4) = 1.80 -> 80% increase over stock 19mm bar.
So, the claimed increase for a CL is:
front = 68% more and rear 130% more.
The CL-S calc'd increase for a CL-S is:
front = 13% more and rear 80% more.
So, the Comptech sway bars were developed for the Accord. The rates they spec (130% front increase/68% rear increase) are when comparing against the CL/TL (that is what they said). So, remember a stiffer rear bar than stock makes for more oversteer. And a stiffer front bar makes for more understeer.
I went through about 4 sets on my BMW to get is just right (perfect balance for my tastes -- a slight understeer, with power off oversteer (rwd car)).
(this was the best I could do...)
------------------
Silver 2001 CL-S with NAVI
- Mud guards
- Wheel locks
- Toyo T1S 235/45ZR17-97W* Proxies on 17x8" SSR Competition wheels (48lbs less than stock)
- Kevlar/SS Brake lines ordered
- Comptech headers & sways ready
- Silver AEM CAI ready
- 6 coats of Zaino magic
#9
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by EricL:
I posted the thread a while back, here is the data:
Here is the updated data:
Comptech data provided by tech support NOT sales:
Front: 27.2 mm 0.177 wall thickness (same O.D. as stock [uses the same rubber mounts as stock]).
Rear: 22 mm solid bar.
CL-S (OEM) to Comptech front increase is 13%. I calc'd this value by using the 0.177 mm thickness of the CL-S tubing vs the CL's 0.107 thickness (value provided by Comptech tech support). I used a tool available from ZDNet to calculate hollow torsion bars torsion values in lb-inches.
So, on the CLS, the front is 13% stiffer (if everyone is correct about the data). 27.2 mm bar with 0.177 wall thickness in front).
The rear increase specified by Comptech is based on the replacement of the CL's 18mm bar (not the CL-S 19mm bar):
(22^4)/(18^4) = 2.23 -> 123% increase in rear rate; Close enough to their claimed increase of 130% in the rear.)
If I adjust for the CLS rear 19mm solid bar, then I get the following calc:
(22^4)/(19^4) = 1.80 -> 80% increase over stock 19mm bar.
So, the claimed increase for a CL is:
front = 68% more and rear 130% more.
The CL-S calc'd increase for a CL-S is:
front = 13% more and rear 80% more.
So, the Comptech sway bars were developed for the Accord. The rates they spec (130% front increase/68% rear increase) are when comparing against the CL/TL (that is what they said). So, remember a stiffer rear bar than stock makes for more oversteer. And a stiffer front bar makes for more understeer.
I went through about 4 sets on my BMW to get is just right (perfect balance for my tastes -- a slight understeer, with power off oversteer (rwd car)).
(this was the best I could do...)
</font>
I posted the thread a while back, here is the data:
Here is the updated data:
Comptech data provided by tech support NOT sales:
Front: 27.2 mm 0.177 wall thickness (same O.D. as stock [uses the same rubber mounts as stock]).
Rear: 22 mm solid bar.
CL-S (OEM) to Comptech front increase is 13%. I calc'd this value by using the 0.177 mm thickness of the CL-S tubing vs the CL's 0.107 thickness (value provided by Comptech tech support). I used a tool available from ZDNet to calculate hollow torsion bars torsion values in lb-inches.
So, on the CLS, the front is 13% stiffer (if everyone is correct about the data). 27.2 mm bar with 0.177 wall thickness in front).
The rear increase specified by Comptech is based on the replacement of the CL's 18mm bar (not the CL-S 19mm bar):
(22^4)/(18^4) = 2.23 -> 123% increase in rear rate; Close enough to their claimed increase of 130% in the rear.)
If I adjust for the CLS rear 19mm solid bar, then I get the following calc:
(22^4)/(19^4) = 1.80 -> 80% increase over stock 19mm bar.
So, the claimed increase for a CL is:
front = 68% more and rear 130% more.
The CL-S calc'd increase for a CL-S is:
front = 13% more and rear 80% more.
So, the Comptech sway bars were developed for the Accord. The rates they spec (130% front increase/68% rear increase) are when comparing against the CL/TL (that is what they said). So, remember a stiffer rear bar than stock makes for more oversteer. And a stiffer front bar makes for more understeer.
I went through about 4 sets on my BMW to get is just right (perfect balance for my tastes -- a slight understeer, with power off oversteer (rwd car)).
(this was the best I could do...)
</font>
#10
Suzuka Master
I decided to install front and rear. IF I only install the rear, I will get more oversteer. If I install the Comptech front, I will get less oversteer than leaving the front in. I don't want the back coming around, unless I want it too.
I actually was wondering if I was out of my mind (about modding the car) this weekend. I was very happy with the car running through the hills at less than 100 MPH.
I'm staring to go, Hmmm. Did I really buy this car to enter a formula series?
But, I am hoping the effect of the sways will be negligible on the ride quality. If they screw my ride up, they are coming off. I felt the same way when I did the tires. I told the tire dealer, that if I didn't like 'em, they were coming back.
Hopefully, I will like them.
As a note, I like the look of the lowered car, but I need to try a ride in one with the Comptech sways and springs before I will do it (I need to go over a variety of surfaces, etc).
I think the car looks much better lowered the 1 to 1.5" that the Comptech (and other springs) do.
(just my opinion)
------------------
Silver 2001 CL-S with NAVI
[This message has been edited by EricL (edited 04-17-2001).]
I actually was wondering if I was out of my mind (about modding the car) this weekend. I was very happy with the car running through the hills at less than 100 MPH.
I'm staring to go, Hmmm. Did I really buy this car to enter a formula series?
But, I am hoping the effect of the sways will be negligible on the ride quality. If they screw my ride up, they are coming off. I felt the same way when I did the tires. I told the tire dealer, that if I didn't like 'em, they were coming back.
Hopefully, I will like them.
As a note, I like the look of the lowered car, but I need to try a ride in one with the Comptech sways and springs before I will do it (I need to go over a variety of surfaces, etc).
I think the car looks much better lowered the 1 to 1.5" that the Comptech (and other springs) do.
(just my opinion)
------------------
Silver 2001 CL-S with NAVI
- Mud guards
- Wheel locks
- Toyo T1S 235/45ZR17-97W* Proxies on 17x8" SSR Competition wheels (48lbs less than stock)
- Kevlar/SS Brake lines ordered
- Comptech headers & sways ready
- Silver AEM CAI ready
- 6 coats of Zaino magic
[This message has been edited by EricL (edited 04-17-2001).]
#11
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Scenic Sovereign Garden State. Joyzee
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by EricL:...snip...snip...snip
But, I am hoping the effect of the sways will be negligible on the ride quality. If they screw my ride up, they are coming off.,...snip...snip...snip
</font>
But, I am hoping the effect of the sways will be negligible on the ride quality. If they screw my ride up, they are coming off.,...snip...snip...snip
</font>
------------------
"01" CL Type-S
White\Black
Comptech Springs
Comptech Sways
Navigation System
Burlwood Shifter
Guards+Fenderwell Trim
PIAA16969
Smokers Package
My Car
#12
on bin laden
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, MN
Age: 44
Posts: 4,696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Al Uminum:
I will bet you one, NO, make that TWO Greek salads and two baloney sandwichs that those sways never come back off.
</font>
I will bet you one, NO, make that TWO Greek salads and two baloney sandwichs that those sways never come back off.
</font>
------------------
Black 2001 Type S
*Eibach Pro-Kit (Waiting to be installed)
*Xephyr Cold Air Intake
*PIAA 19169 Road Lamps
*Rockford 500a2 [FOR SALE]
*Pioneer 12" @ 400w (x2) [FOR SALE]
*77237-SOK-A02
---Still 2 rims not scratched---
#13
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Guys:
thanks for your replies. I had heard the numbers from Comptech but don't have much info. on the Eibachs. So I hope to hear from somebody who got them.
Regarding springs, I don't want to lower my car. I'd be happy to get stiffer springs (and shocks) if I knew it would not lower the car.
thanks for your replies. I had heard the numbers from Comptech but don't have much info. on the Eibachs. So I hope to hear from somebody who got them.
Regarding springs, I don't want to lower my car. I'd be happy to get stiffer springs (and shocks) if I knew it would not lower the car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM