s2000 gets bump in displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 18, 2003 | 12:24 AM
  #1  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
s2000 gets bump in displacement

2.2L


http://www.s2ki.com/forums/showthrea...hreadid=123834


http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=103050
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #2  
zeroday's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17,921
Likes: 15
damn...didn't someone here just buy one? I love the s2k...lack of low end tq was the only thing that turned me off. Maybe 2.2 will do the trick..Beautiful car; inside and out...can't wait to see how these changes play out.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 12:44 AM
  #3  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
zeroday,
yea DBOX picked up a used s2k. You are right. They are saying the redline will be a bit lower but the engine will pick up a bit more trq down low. Let's see. They should beef up the internals and drop the 2.4L block into it
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 01:04 AM
  #4  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
nothing a comptech SC won't fix. i'm really thinking about getting the SC for the s2000... but scared i'd be dead on the side of the road somewhere. then again i want it for the cl-s also. sure as hell can't do it to both...

as far as them saying ''updated instrumentation'' for 04...i don't want that. F1 style is the shit.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 01:34 AM
  #5  
darrinb's Avatar
///M POWER
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 1
From: West Bloomfield, MI
dbox

if u can only get 1 blower than get it on the s2k, its rwd and it will handle the power better. theres only soo much power u can put to a fwd drive car w/o having traction issues n shit.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 02:40 AM
  #6  
skinsfan202's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
i agree
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 10:23 AM
  #7  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by dbox
nothing a comptech SC won't fix. i'm really thinking about getting the SC for the s2000... but scared i'd be dead on the side of the road somewhere. then again i want it for the cl-s also. sure as hell can't do it to both...

as far as them saying ''updated instrumentation'' for 04...i don't want that. F1 style is the shit.

Honestly, don't be scared at all of the comptech SC. I drove an s2k w/ it and was not all that impressed. It's basically like driving a corvette w/ less tq still. It's a fun car but nothing BLAZINGLY fast or anything you should be scared of. Personally i'd save a few bucks and go w/ the vortech unit.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 10:28 AM
  #8  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
Originally posted by ghander
Honestly, don't be scared at all of the comptech SC. I drove an s2k w/ it and was not all that impressed. It's basically like driving a corvette w/ less tq still. It's a fun car but nothing BLAZINGLY fast or anything you should be scared of. Personally i'd save a few bucks and go w/ the vortech unit.
totally!
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #9  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally posted by ghander
Honestly, don't be scared at all of the comptech SC. I drove an s2k w/ it and was not all that impressed. It's basically like driving a corvette w/ less tq still. It's a fun car but nothing BLAZINGLY fast or anything you should be scared of. Personally i'd save a few bucks and go w/ the vortech unit.
the comptech unit is the vortech
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #10  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
TypeR,
Eaton doesn't make a unit for the s2k?
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #11  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
i'd rather have a more exciting exterior than .2 L, we'll see, i hope they aren't planning another ten year run before they update it.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 01:22 PM
  #12  
AgentDSS's Avatar
Black is a ***** to Clean
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Hollywood, California
Both Vortech and Comptech have blowers for the S2K
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #13  
jts1207's Avatar
Duck Fuke!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,975
Likes: 2
From: Back in NC
so no word on the coupe?
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #14  
blxmjx's Avatar
foolio at heart
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
i wouldnt even bother wasting my money on a comptech or a vortech blower for the s2k. They are both centrifugal blowers w/most of the power gained up top. The s2k needs the help in the lower-mid range of the powerband. If I were to drop a few g's on the s2k it would definitely be turbo. Someone needs to produce a twin screw supercharger kit for the s2k. Positive displacment ownz.
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #15  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by typeR
the comptech unit is the vortech

no difference at all? All the #'s i've seen show the vortech putting down more power, different boost settings or what?
Reply
Old May 18, 2003 | 10:00 PM
  #16  
Collective27's Avatar
Certified Lurker
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: East Hanover NJ
WOW, great news...cant wait to see how much torque is gained/interior upgrades...i may seriously look into this car next year, maby around this time, before the 05 comes out cause you will prob be able to get it for a good price then. Im just dreading seeing the dealers markup on the 04's when it comes out.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 01:12 AM
  #17  
gavriil's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
I doubt the 200 cc increase in displacement will the the "torque trick". So torque will go up from 153 to 167 let's say. And let's say it will peak at lower rpm than the current 7500. Say 6800 rpm. Big deal!

The Boxster with 2.7 liters and almost 200 pounds of torque feels it's crying for more. You get in the Boxster S and it's just...adequate with torque numbers of a CLS. Give me a break Honda. Where is the 3 liter V6?
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Originally posted by ghander
Honestly, don't be scared at all of the comptech SC. I drove an s2k w/ it and was not all that impressed. It's basically like driving a corvette w/ less tq still. It's a fun car but nothing BLAZINGLY fast or anything you should be scared of. Personally i'd save a few bucks and go w/ the vortech unit.

what! the comptech is cheaper than the vortech and i keep warranty. and in a small ass car 350hp is pretty damn blazingly fast to me. my shit goes sideways in between shifts now. you guys are not giving the s2000 enough credit.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 10:39 AM
  #19  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Originally posted by ghander
no difference at all? All the #'s i've seen show the vortech putting down more power, different boost settings or what?

vortech does have higher boost. and there are other differences. people on s2ki have had problems with the vortech but not 1 problem mentioned with the comptech. thats why i'd go comptech(and warranty).
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #20  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...0-02s2000.html

http://solar.innercite.com/comptech/441500.html


they are pretty different.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #21  
blxmjx's Avatar
foolio at heart
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
take a look at all the dynoplots of the vortech and comptech supercharger kits. they both have shit hp gains in the mid and low range. All the gains are way up top. There is a good peak hp gain at the end but the powerband sucks balls.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:07 AM
  #22  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Originally posted by blxmjx
take a look at all the dynoplots of the vortech and comptech supercharger kits. they both have shit hp gains in the mid and low range. All the gains are way up top. There is a good peak hp gain at the end but the powerband sucks balls.
wtf! we are talking about a high reving 9k redline engine here. since when has torque been hondas game? once that cars hits vtech....who the fuck needs torque?
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #23  
KCPreki11's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,773
Likes: 0
From: PA
Whoever wants to win the race...
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:12 AM
  #24  
blxmjx's Avatar
foolio at heart
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
yes, i know its a high revving motor. but wouldnt it be nicer to have a nice linear powerband from 4500 all the way to the 9k redline? That's why in my personal opinion turbo would be the way to go. Don't think I'm dissin the s2k. I have this in my garage too.


If there was gonna be any type of forcefeeding going on under my hood it'd be a turbo.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Originally posted by KCPreki11
Whoever wants to win the race...

not ALWAYS true. how do you explain my civic hatch (all motor, gsr engine si tranny and bolt ons) beating z28's and mustangs ALL DAY. i ran a 13.2 all motor...
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #26  
dbox's Avatar
whoXwanXsum
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,739
Likes: 0
From: HOUSTON
Originally posted by blxmjx
yes, i know its a high revving motor. but wouldnt it be nicer to have a nice linear powerband from 4500 all the way to the 9k redline? That's why in my personal opinion turbo would be the way to go. Don't think I'm dissin the s2k. I have this in my garage too.


If there was gonna be any type of forcefeeding going on under my hood it'd be a turbo.
i got your point, i'd rather have a turbo also but... i'd also like to keep my warranty. i think the car is plenty quick as is so i'm sure i'll be in love with the s/c. a friend of mine who turbo-ed the is300 i posted said he could do one for my s2000...i'd do it but since i bought an extended warranty i won't. is there anyway i could get the warranty money back? if so, i would turbo it...
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 11:28 AM
  #27  
blxmjx's Avatar
foolio at heart
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,634
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Originally posted by dbox
i got your point, i'd rather have a turbo also but... i'd also like to keep my warranty. i think the car is plenty quick as is so i'm sure i'll be in love with the s/c. a friend of mine who turbo-ed the is300 i posted said he could do one for my s2000...i'd do it but since i bought an extended warranty i won't. is there anyway i could get the warranty money back? if so, i would turbo it...
Ah, I see where you're coming from. I wish comptech woulda made the s2k supercharger similar to the cl type S supercharger. Something w/positive displacement. If you're worried about warranty stuff and can't get the money back then the comptech would definitely be the way to go for you. I've driven both a comptech and a vortech s2k and they both pull pretty good. The only thing that disappointed me was right when the car would start pulling crazy it was time to shift. Full boost on both kits felt like it came on right about 7500rpm. After 7500 the cars pull like a mofo tho.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 12:04 PM
  #28  
AcuraFan's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally posted by gavriil
I doubt the 200 cc increase in displacement will the the "torque trick". So torque will go up from 153 to 167 let's say. And let's say it will peak at lower rpm than the current 7500. Say 6800 rpm. Big deal!

The Boxster with 2.7 liters and almost 200 pounds of torque feels it's crying for more. You get in the Boxster S and it's just...adequate with torque numbers of a CLS. Give me a break Honda. Where is the 3 liter V6?
Where is the 3 liter V6? Thankfully, not in the S2000. Yes, the torque and hp would be nice...but it would totally screw the handling. Besides, I think the small displacement high revving niche is kinda cool.
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #29  
CLS2001_97124's Avatar
Revving at 9K...
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 1
From: Portland Oregon
With iVtec, I'm sure honda can squeez a little more torque than we think with 0.2 liter increase.... I actually much rather they just keep it the same, and change/update styling and handling... I think all the engineering/design done to this car is already very well rounded, I wouldn't want anything to be scraficed in order to just a little more torque. JIMO.

btw, I'm currently shopping for a 01 or 02 myself...
Reply
Old May 19, 2003 | 12:25 PM
  #30  
allmotor_2000's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: So Cal
Just drop the compression by 1.5 points on the 2.2 liter and turbocharge it... it will be insane!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
Feb 23, 2023 01:54 PM
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
Sep 28, 2018 04:27 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
Sep 29, 2015 10:43 PM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
Sep 28, 2015 05:43 PM
ceb
ILX
2
Sep 27, 2015 10:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:58 AM.