new rims--->16.5 pounds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:16 PM
  #41  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally posted by unsure
eric, do u know the tire weight 4 the toyos in 225/45/17 config? thanks
http://www.toyo.com/tires/tire_specsheet.cfm?id=2

20.9 lbs
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:30 PM
  #42  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
where did you get them from phone # and part #
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:32 PM
  #43  
scalbert's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
From: Woodstock, GA
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Depends...I think on 15-14 sec. cars its a 100lbs.... as you go faster....you need to lose more weight or gain more hp as it takes more power as speeds go up....everything is relative...
Actually is has more to do with the base weight and torque output. Imagine a 6000 lb truck with 500 lb/ft at 2k revs that can run a mid 15 second ET. Add 100 lbs to it and it won't even notice it.

Now take a 3000 lb car with 120 lb/ft at 5k revs (but 220 HP at 8k revs), add 100 lbs and you might see an ET two tenths (or more) slower.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:38 PM
  #44  
moomaster_99's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Originally posted by scalbert
Actually is has more to do with the base weight and torque output. Imagine a 6000 lb truck with 500 lb/ft at 2k revs that can run a mid 15 second ET. Add 100 lbs to it and it won't even notice it.

Now take a 3000 lb car with 120 lb/ft at 5k revs (but 220 HP at 8k revs), add 100 lbs and you might see an ET two tenths (or more) slower.
Pretty much what I was thinking...
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 03:53 PM
  #45  
EricL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,388
Likes: 1
From: Ninth Gate & So Cal
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Depends...I think on 15-14 sec. cars its a 100lbs.... as you go faster....you need to lose more weight or gain more hp as it takes more power as speeds go up....everything is relative...
Over 100 mph, the weight is going to start making very little difference.

You could have a 2000 lbs car and removing 100 lbs is quite nice.

You could have a SUV and removing the 100 lbs is almost undetectable.

Depending on the acceleration in the 1/4-mile and weight, the gain can be all over the map.

If anyone wants to "play" with the figures -- go here:

http://www.prestage.com/carmath/calc_etmph.asp

The problem with these "calculators" is they don't factor in a TON of factors like wind resistance (just for a start).

If you start with 200HP and 3500 lbs, it looks like the ET keeps increasing with each 200 lb drop. Here are some numbers:

Code:
weight    whp      et     drop   trap speed
------------------------------------------------
3500     200     15.11     -
3300     200     14.82    0.29
3100     200     14.51    0.31
2900     200     14.19    0.32
2700     200     13.86    0.33     98.36
2500     200     13.51    0.35    100.91
2300     200     13.14    0.37    103.75
2100     200     12.75    0.39    106.94
1900     200     12.33    0.42    110.57
1700     200     11.88    0.45    114.75
1500     200     11.39    0.49    119.62
1300     200     10.86    0.54    125.46
1100     200     10.28    0.58    132.64
 900     200      9.61    0.67    141.81
 700     200      8.84    0.77    154.18

As anyone can see, the percent drop in weight is increasing in proportion to the total vehicle weight. However, this calculator DOES NOT account for CD (coefficient of drag) and wind velocity. The end of speed MPH are the bottom are great if the car has no near zero frontal area and ultra low CD..

Look at the last figure and tell me that this is correct if you have a 200HP, 700-lb go-cart with the frontal area of a Meto/RTD buss (Trap speed of 154.18. I don't think so...)

The fixed numbers (xx-seconds per lbs of weight loss) are useless without context -- and beware of the calculators. They are good for "moving" small numbers around, but have some serious limitations...
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2002 | 06:05 PM
  #46  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
Originally posted by moomaster_99
Depends...I think on 15-14 sec. cars its a 100lbs.... as you go faster....you need to lose more weight or gain more hp as it takes more power as speeds go up....everything is relative...
Other way around...

I assume you've tried this at the track to make the statement?

Kinda like it takes a bit of power to drop into the 13's. Take a whole lot more to get into the 12's. And a bunch more to get into the 11's... 9's is insane ammount of HP

It's not a linear graph. And its about 170LBS per .1/sec on a car 3000lbs+

But ya, it's very relative...
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2002 | 02:59 PM
  #47  
mattg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,909
Likes: 388
From: OR
it would be silly of me to buy the lightest 18" wheels available and not get the lightest tires to match.

so if the t1s's are the lightest, thats what i'll get.

also, a good portion of the weight savings of these wheels is the rim itself, which is a good thing, since it's the outer most portion of the wheel. forged is a good thing
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM
AZuser
Automotive News
4
Sep 17, 2015 10:15 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
16
Sep 14, 2015 03:16 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
3
Sep 14, 2015 10:48 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:54 PM.