negative camber for performance?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
sidemarker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
negative camber for performance?

ok i was thinking

on a FWD car what if you set the rear wheels to have some negative camber. just enough where it dosent eat up the tires too much.

now would this improve the handling for the car??

sidemarker
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #2  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
in all honesty it probably wouldn't make any difference unless you were seriously tracking the car
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #3  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally posted by CLpower
in all honesty it probably wouldn't make any difference unless you were seriously tracking the car


you'll notice improved cornerning on turns and stuff, but for day to day driving it'll just eat up your tires so there is no point to it really.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #4  
pimpscls's Avatar
THE SILVER BULLET
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,659
Likes: 0
From: socal
yea, so in other words dont do it, b/c i dont think our cl's are great track cars
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 05:00 PM
  #5  
astro's Avatar
Community Architect
robb m.
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 72,841
Likes: 660
From: ON
i drove my TL around at -3 for over a year.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #6  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally posted by Astroboy
i drove my TL around at -3 for over a year.
We're not saying you can't do it astroboy,

i mean you can do it, shyt my camber on my gs-r was about -3 and i kept it that way for a long ass time cuz i loved taking corners so hard, after i got my camber kit it was a very noticeable change in cornering.

honestly, i think it's up to how you drive and if you are willing to take the risk of possibly having your tires wear out quicker.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 05:32 PM
  #7  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
I was the same way w/ my CL for a little while. Went through 2 sets of tires and said it wasn't worth it. The performance gains weren't that noticeable or near worth going through tires like that
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #8  
ChadT's Avatar
Spectacular Aroma About
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Negative camber on the rear is a waste in a FWD car as far as handling goes. (just more understeer) However, some negative camber on the front will make a huge difference in the way the car bites in corners.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #9  
sidemarker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,085
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Originally posted by ChadT
Negative camber on the rear is a waste in a FWD car as far as handling goes. (just more understeer) However, some negative camber on the front will make a huge difference in the way the car bites in corners.
so what about negative camber for all four wheels? would that improve handling even more?

sidemarker
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 06:27 PM
  #10  
Sly Raskal's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 30,991
Likes: 582
From: Fontana, California
Originally posted by sidemarker
so what about negative camber for all four wheels? would that improve handling even more?

sidemarker
the negative camber on my gs-r was higher in the front than the rear which i'm guessing helped in cornering and stuff.

if i recall the camber was -3 in front, and about -2 in the rear

but like chadT said, negative camber on the rear isn't that beneficial because our cars are fwd,

but on a rwd car, negative camber on all four tires does make a huge difference.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #11  
ChadT's Avatar
Spectacular Aroma About
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally posted by sidemarker
so what about negative camber for all four wheels? would that improve handling even more?

sidemarker
Sure, you want the handling to be balanced but you would only need a small amount of negative camber in the rear to keep the tire in optimum contact with the pavement because there is a lot less weight back there. The front will flex a lot more because it has more of a load on it so a lot of negative camber up front will help keep that outside tire flat to the pavement when doing serious cornering.
Reply
Old May 26, 2004 | 10:15 PM
  #12  
Allout's Avatar
Blown is Best
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,437
Likes: 15
From: Fresno, CA
Originally posted by ChadT
Negative camber on the rear is a waste in a FWD car as far as handling goes. (just more understeer) However, some negative camber on the front will make a huge difference in the way the car bites in corners.
I agree. I've got mine set up with -.50 in the front and 0.00 in the rear and it made it a lot more neutral.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrHeeltoe
1G TSX Tires, Wheels, & Suspension
20
Feb 23, 2023 01:54 PM
MrHeeltoe
2G TSX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
3
Sep 29, 2015 10:43 PM
San Yasin
2G RDX (2013-2018)
21
Sep 29, 2015 10:52 AM
MrHeeltoe
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
0
Sep 28, 2015 05:43 PM
thegipper
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 28, 2015 01:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:53 PM.