I would not get the navi also for the reason that i realy dont drive all that many places, and i dont think its worth $2000. And that dam "nipple" on top of the car from the onstar is horrendous. I gotta get to my dealership soon so we can get all the paper work done and whatnot so i can get one on order. My CL-S will most likley be 6 MT, spoiler, Blue on Black, mud guards, moonroof visor, if available body kit, and if i can somehow get them to put them on at no extra cost (doubt it) 01-02 type s wheels, reguler wood trim, not the aluminum (unless the black wood is somehow still available, i would def. get that) and thats all i can think of for now....o ya EXTENDED WARENTY.

 

You are right Shawn--it was "eternal"

 

Anyone see price info for the 6spd vs auto?

 

AM I missing something. The Cl-s closest (only?) competitor is the 3 coupe. THe CL-s is plenty fast but needed some suspension mods. The 6-speed is great, but no suspension mods? Makes no sense to me.

The Cl needed some Style. It is not selling well and you'd be hard pressed to know someone who knew what it was. The updates are too subtle. I do not understand at all. The Tl-s update in 2001 was pretty serious, you can easily distinguish a pre 2001 from the new ones. Why not the CL?

I am also lost with the interior. If it is luxury, it needs Real wood. If it is sporty it needs Real aluminum. It has Neither. Everyone nowadays slaps the chrome logo on the steering wheel.

Acura is so close to having a real winner here but it seems so far. Since no one is taking it seriously as a sports car, I say Acura should make is a luxo cruiser with Luxury features, support the CL aftermarket and let you boys do your thing (to make it sportier)........

Finally, evey manufacter has jumped on the RWD bandwagon, why not Honda?