Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2002, 10:05 AM
  #1  
1 Dog, 2 Cats and a G-Pig
Thread Starter
 
CLBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crap Arbor
Age: 44
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4

I've always wanted one, but they're pretty hard to find in MI... I don't know, I always thought they were really pretty cars... wondering about other people's opinions about those cars... also if anyone knew if they made convertibles of them?

Thanks
Old 12-10-2002, 10:08 AM
  #2  
Team Owner
 
Shawn S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never owned one, but I heard they were a maintenance nightmare.
Especially once the turbos get some miles on them.

No convertible that I remember, but there was a “Spyder” version with a retractable hardtop.
It was VERY pricey when new (50K), but I have no idea what they sell for now.

Shawn S
Old 12-10-2002, 10:08 AM
  #3  
Banned
 
jimcol711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Age: 44
Posts: 6,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they have alot of maintainance problems from what i understand, and they will all be out-of-warranty....they are very nice looking cars, fast too.
Old 12-10-2002, 10:16 AM
  #4  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
VR-4 Spyder was incredibly sexy:

http://www.alteredatmosphere.com/Joe...er/page_01.htm

You can't beat that!
Old 12-10-2002, 10:33 AM
  #5  
1 Dog, 2 Cats and a G-Pig
Thread Starter
 
CLBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crap Arbor
Age: 44
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it would be fun, but I also heard that maintenance was a nightmare... The VR4 Spyder looks awesome!!!

Any idea what they retail for now?
Old 12-10-2002, 10:42 AM
  #6  
Revving at 9K...
 
CLS2001_97124's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It use to be one of my favorite cars too.. that is until I found out that in their stock forms.. a VR4 couldn't hang with Nissan's 300Z turbo, Supra Turbo, or a RX7 turbo. The only good thing is that it is AWD.

IMO, I think I would rather get any of the other three cars I've listed instead of the VR4. Especially a 6 speed Supra Turbo.
Old 12-10-2002, 10:46 AM
  #7  
Three Wheelin'
 
gsrblack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had always like the car, but the quality kinda sucked. Very nice....the VR-4 Spyder was really sweet, especially with the spoiler that retracts on speed.

Just saw a black one parked outside the shopping center yesterday night...very nice. All shined up!

But will probably never consider getting one 'cause of the maintenance problems.
Old 12-10-2002, 01:36 PM
  #8  
1 Dog, 2 Cats and a G-Pig
Thread Starter
 
CLBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crap Arbor
Age: 44
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the maintenance problems factory, or is it just because people beat the crap out of them? Before getting my CL I was gonna get a 3000gt, but it had 7 owners in 4 years... Its got problem car written all over it!
Old 12-10-2002, 01:41 PM
  #9  
Someday pigs WILL fly!
 
gto2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Pequannock, NJ USA
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had a 91 3000GT. It was a great car but extremely heavy by todays standards. I never had a problem and I had one of the first ones. I loved and sold it for a profit and the end of the lease to a guy who was taking it to Germany. I'll do the same with my CL-S.
Old 12-10-2002, 01:53 PM
  #10  
teh Senior Instigator
 
CLpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 44,094
Received 978 Likes on 330 Posts
Originally posted by Shawn S
I never owned one, but I heard they were a maintenance nightmare.
Especially once the turbos get some miles on them.

No convertible that I remember, but there was a “Spyder” version with a retractable hardtop.
It was VERY pricey when new (50K), but I have no idea what they sell for now.

Shawn S

try 62K, the retractable hardtop added 20K to the price
Old 12-10-2002, 02:42 PM
  #11  
Safety Car
 
bkknight369's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Renton, WA
Age: 42
Posts: 3,991
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
wow thats some good info. Back before I even began driving, I wanted a 3000gt.

So, awd AND retractable hardtop? Dam thats cool. But the stock form wasnt that fast was it? I looked a while back, and it was not that fast for its price
Old 12-10-2002, 03:37 PM
  #12  
337
 
CLUofI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Iowa City/Des Moines
Posts: 3,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they run a 13.5 1/4
Old 12-10-2002, 07:37 PM
  #13  
Do it! U Only Live Once!
 
Pappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: WPB, Florida
Age: 77
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by CLUofI
they run a 13.5 1/4
You must be joking?
Old 12-10-2002, 08:07 PM
  #14  
13 Second CLS Defender :)
 
TheModMole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Philly
Age: 48
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(stock times)

0-30 mph: 1.9 seconds
0 - 60 mph : 5.4 seconds
0 - 100 mph : 13.6 seconds
1/4 mile - 13.7 mph

Not bad.. but for 60K new and twin turbo...not too graet huh ... Incidently: Stage 3 upgrades bring it up to 900+ HP and 11 second timeslips ... but then again it wont last too long... none have that did it

Lateral acceleration on 200' skidpad = .90g

5th gear�� rpm - 155 mph
6th gear�� rpm - 160 mph

Engine redline - 7,000 rpm

Speedometer runout @ 180 mph

Other specifications

Weight - 3781 pounds

Fule capacity - 19.8 gallons
Drag coefficient - .33 Cd
Wheelbase - 97.2 inches
Length - 179.7 inches
Width - 72.4 inches
Height - 49.3 inches
Interior Noise:
Idle - 46 dBA
Max, 1st Gear - 70 dBA
70 mph - 69 dBA
Old 12-10-2002, 11:15 PM
  #15  
do it yourself, !
 
langjae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bronx, NYC
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 96 Vr4 was my very first car. Its very expensive to mod. I got rid of it because I wanted sometihng classier and more luxury. But all in all no problems really and I drove it pretty hard. for 2 years.
Old 12-11-2002, 02:48 AM
  #16  
Racer
 
o snap its eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: san francisco
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its fast and looks nice but still the car is a mitsubishi. i dont like! i would pick a 300zx tt over a vr4
Old 12-11-2002, 03:22 PM
  #17  
1 Dog, 2 Cats and a G-Pig
Thread Starter
 
CLBean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Crap Arbor
Age: 44
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the looks though... Its just got this very distinctive look, I know another sports car would probably be better... When/If I have the money Prosche 911 Turbo!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pistacio
2G TL (1999-2003)
10
09-26-2015 09:45 AM
gavriil
Automotive News
11
01-13-2004 11:25 PM
gavriil
Automotive News
4
10-03-2003 07:17 AM
davo-cls
Car Talk
5
05-04-2001 09:22 PM



Quick Reply: Mitsubishi 3000GT VR4



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.