Interesting review of the CL.
#1
Soon to be, fairly famous
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting review of the CL.
Now, I don't really know when this was originally printed, I just came across it today
.Acura CL review
.Acura CL review
#5
www.drippinwet.com
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kingston, Pennsylvania
Age: 56
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
About the only thing not to like has to be the exterior design. Not that it's ugly or weird in any way: It just appears kind of, well, unremarkable compared with a lot of the cars in this market segment.
and also a hoot to drive, where the hell do they find these people
what are they looking for 1959 cadillac eldorado tailfins?
and also a hoot to drive, where the hell do they find these people
what are they looking for 1959 cadillac eldorado tailfins?
Trending Topics
#9
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: North Potomac MD
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I mentioned a long time ago that the SC400 was about as close a competitor as the CL has. But, I don't think that comparison would have flown very well since the CL is half the price but offers all of the goodies. Now that would have been a tail whipping in a review article. Did no journalist see this comparison that was immediatley obvious to me? This seems much more reasonable a comparison than to the BMW. I wonder what the SC400 was ever compared with?
Although the fact that the SC series was kind of a flop doen't make me feel so good.
Although the fact that the SC series was kind of a flop doen't make me feel so good.
#11
Soon to be, fairly famous
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JZ: Man I love the SC series. I thought the car was very classy (if accoutre'd right). I like the big coupe idea, and remember thinking you were correct way back when in your comparo of the CL and the SC. When I bought the car the almost 1.5 ft. difference in the BMW and the Acura was a big point with me. I wanted a couple with some SIZE. I am paying alot for this car (relatively) and I want my money's worth. Nothing even came close to the features/price on this car and I like the understated elegance of the Acura (I REALLY like the 3 series couple looks, but not for 42K. (that's what my neg. equity would have pushed the 37K car up to whereas I that same 5K pushed the Acura to 34K...you do the math...
On the Lexus's defense that Naka. stereo system was AWESOME!!!!!
dee
On the Lexus's defense that Naka. stereo system was AWESOME!!!!!
dee
#13
Pro
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JZ:
<STRONG>I mentioned a long time ago that the SC400 was about as close a competitor as the CL has.</STRONG>
<STRONG>I mentioned a long time ago that the SC400 was about as close a competitor as the CL has.</STRONG>
Since none of these cars in their American forms are canyon carvers, the RWD of the SC is kind of a wash in terms of performance. It does provide the feel of a RWD car, which is important to buyers willing to shell out that much, though.
(On a tangent, the JDM version of the SC was a complete bad-ass. The "Soarer" came with a 2.5 liter turbocharged engine, which enabled SC400-like output w/o the weight. It was considered to be a more luxurious version of the Supra TT.)
Originally posted by JZ:
<STRONG>But, I don't think that comparison would have flown very well since the CL is half the price but offers all of the goodies.</STRONG>
<STRONG>But, I don't think that comparison would have flown very well since the CL is half the price but offers all of the goodies.</STRONG>
It's pretty much the difference that determined why the 1998 LS400 was a sales success and the 1998 3.5RL was not. When people are affluent enough to afford the LS400/SC400/S-class/7-series, these things other than the listed amenities matter in great amounts.
Originally posted by JZ:
<STRONG>I wonder what the SC400 was ever compared with?</STRONG>
<STRONG>I wonder what the SC400 was ever compared with?</STRONG>
Originally posted by JZ:
<STRONG>Although the fact that the SC series was kind of a flop doen't make me feel so good.</STRONG>
<STRONG>Although the fact that the SC series was kind of a flop doen't make me feel so good.</STRONG>
[ 07-22-2001: Message edited by: DtEW ]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ITSJESTER
4G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
17
12-06-2018 02:29 AM
Sarlacc
Console & Computer Gaming
5
09-30-2015 02:15 PM