Have you gotten your letter from Honda about the PCM Upgrade???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2003 | 12:09 AM
  #41  
efx's Avatar
efx
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: marina del rey,ca,usa
Just got my letter today. On my 3rd Trans, 15,000 miles on it, 40,000 total. Seems to be running just fine at the present time. My question is what exactly can be affected by replacing the pcm and fuel pressure regulator. This is really for Jens or some who has specific knowledge on how our cars are affected. All options possible would give me a better informed decision.
Old 09-30-2003 | 05:36 AM
  #42  
JSuppi's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx, USA
Well..

Originally posted by efx
Just got my letter today. On my 3rd Trans, 15,000 miles on it, 40,000 total. Seems to be running just fine at the present time. My question is what exactly can be affected by replacing the pcm and fuel pressure regulator. This is really for Jens or some who has specific knowledge on how our cars are affected. All options possible would give me a better informed decision.
Read back a couple of post, Jens has already replied. Basically it's anyones guess on what the changes the PCM have made to the power band (if any). We need someone to do a baseline before, and after dyno of hp/torque band before and after the PCM has been replaced. I am still waiting for my letter, and if I get my letter and some free time on my hands, I would be willing to do the before and after snapshot (that is unless someone beats me to it), but alas I am still waiting for the letter.
Old 09-30-2003 | 07:40 AM
  #43  
RUF87's Avatar
Lead Footed
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,415
Likes: 15
From: Plano - Texas
Folks, I don't really believe that this mod would result in a HP gain on a dyno. There are many mods that improve performance, but don't show up as a net gain on a dyno. Light wheels or better rubber are a couple.

That said, if this mod actually helps reduce power transfer loss through the tranny, then it might. But as I currently understand the shift point improvement, it simply means the shift will have less delay and that will help in power transfer response times, but not in a power increase.


So, if it is a power transfer response time improvement, your times will improve due to less time wasted between the shift points . . that typically one of the benefits of a shift kit does for auto tranny's. Firmer shifts is another, but again I don't think that is the case here. If I'm wrong then it's a double bonus for us.

Ruf
Old 09-30-2003 | 08:57 AM
  #44  
Doc.Booty's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,391
Likes: 1
From: Myrtle Beach
I think the problem is with the way it shifts. I've pointed this out before:

Note that none of this is scientific, just observation.

People who seem to drive in D4 or SS most of the time have little or no tranny trouble. But people who drive in D5 have failing trannies left and right. I used to be in D4 until i hit highway speeds, although now I use SS 100% of the time. 1st tranny, 68k miles.

If you drive in D4 vs. D5, you'll notice that the shift points are different. I think the answer is in there somewhere.
Old 09-30-2003 | 10:33 AM
  #45  
Scooter's Avatar
'Cooter
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 11,172
Likes: 0
From: Shitside, Queens
Jens, are you "encouraged" by Acura to replace the ECU's for customers, or can we choose to not have this service performed???
Old 09-30-2003 | 11:07 PM
  #46  
sgmotoring's Avatar
Bleed Honda Blue
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 938
Likes: 3
From: Diamond Bar
I thought the new PCM felt weird. It actually felt like it take a little longer to down shift or less responsive. I Didn't like it that is why I swap my old PCM back.
Old 10-01-2003 | 04:17 PM
  #47  
flint's Avatar
Pro
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 625
Likes: 4
From: Cincinnati
I called American Honda on this one yesterday. They put me with a case manager who called me today saying he was going to try and find some answers for me. He called me back this evening and said info was really hard to come by because all of the coding is written in Japan. After talking with several honda techs to the best of his knowledge, the "fix" was to retard engine timing briefly during shifts reducing output for a moment which would have the effect of increasing the transmission's longevity. So there you have it. Don't do it unless you can live with slightly less power during shifts. I personally have put too much into upgrades to take a step back.
Old 10-01-2003 | 04:55 PM
  #48  
YuppieCL's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,493
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally posted by flint
After talking with several honda techs to the best of his knowledge, the "fix" was to retard engine timing briefly during shifts reducing output for a moment which would have the effect of increasing the transmission's longevity.
i can totally see this being true. i had my tranny replaced once, and after that particular ecu upgrade i did get better gas mileage, but i also noticed more torque steer between shift points. my neck would snap back while the car went from 1st to 2nd, 2nd to 3rd. i'd see the sense in increasing the life of the tranny by doing this new upgrade, but one can only assume that would compromise the amount of power between those particular shift points. i mean... why INCREASE the power on a historically faulty tranny....?
Old 10-01-2003 | 05:53 PM
  #49  
cnatra's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 683
Likes: 1
From: TX
got my notice yesterday

as much as I love this car it has been a dissappointing
experience dealing with Acura over the transmissiom issue

kind of wish I'd bought something else

next car won't be Acura/Honda

it's a shame becuase Honda pioneered the high end Japanese
car line with Acura but now they desperatley need to take a

lesson from Lexus & Infiniti

on customer service !!!!!!!!!!
Old 10-01-2003 | 07:53 PM
  #50  
God's Avatar
God
GOD Of ACURA-CL.COM
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
From: Lexington, S.C.
I would say let me be the ginny pig b/c i'm getting my car dynoed on the 11 up in charlotte but I'm sure as hell not going to let them put it in if its gonna make my car slower .
Old 10-11-2003 | 06:33 PM
  #51  
TL_Type_S's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
From: Illinois, USA
Got my letter today ... i'm gunna call and ask if i don't get the pcm upgrade and fuel pressure dealie.. will it void my 7yr/100k warranty....
Old 10-13-2003 | 06:18 AM
  #52  
maevonee's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Originally posted by ABreece
I think the problem is with the way it shifts. I've pointed this out before:

Note that none of this is scientific, just observation.

People who seem to drive in D4 or SS most of the time have little or no tranny trouble. But people who drive in D5 have failing trannies left and right. I used to be in D4 until i hit highway speeds, although now I use SS 100% of the time. 1st tranny, 68k miles.

If you drive in D4 vs. D5, you'll notice that the shift points are different. I think the answer is in there somewhere.
I Totally agree. I Always drive SS. only time im in D5 is when im eating. I drive my car everyday like im on a race track. i go through tires faster than u can imagine. yest im at 62K and im still on my first tranny!!! Comments On This?
Old 10-13-2003 | 06:21 AM
  #53  
PavDog's Avatar
Blackbird baby..
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, NoVA
Originally posted by ABreece
I think the problem is with the way it shifts. I've pointed this out before:

Note that none of this is scientific, just observation.

People who seem to drive in D4 or SS most of the time have little or no tranny trouble. But people who drive in D5 have failing trannies left and right. I used to be in D4 until i hit highway speeds, although now I use SS 100% of the time. 1st tranny, 68k miles.

If you drive in D4 vs. D5, you'll notice that the shift points are different. I think the answer is in there somewhere.
I *used* to drive in SS because of the tranny thing.. but one morning I was driving and the 2-3 shift felt/sounded like it missed! What was really strange is that there was absolutely nothing unusual about my driving; wasn't racing, temp was okay, shifted ~3500, etc. If anything the tranny may have been a little cool.. but it was still warmed up. I don't think the tranny is toasted yet (12k mi) but that missed shift put the fear into me.. I do alt #2 now--drive in D4 below 70ish MPH, then push to D5. (aka Warp Speed)

It *is* time to change the fluid tho..
Old 10-13-2003 | 06:23 AM
  #54  
PavDog's Avatar
Blackbird baby..
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, NoVA
Originally posted by cnatra
got my notice yesterday

as much as I love this car it has been a dissappointing
experience dealing with Acura over the transmissiom issue

kind of wish I'd bought something else

next car won't be Acura/Honda

it's a shame becuase Honda pioneered the high end Japanese
car line with Acura but now they desperatley need to take a

lesson from Lexus & Infiniti

on customer service !!!!!!!!!!


Next car won't be Honda/Acura.
Old 10-16-2003 | 05:46 PM
  #55  
cooljoecamel's Avatar
Live Fast, Drive Fast
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: VA
Got my letter this week



What to do, what to do?

Acura
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jriv7
2G TSX (2009-2014)
23
05-08-2020 05:50 PM
Soul_Deamon
Audio, Video, Electronics & Navigation
7
11-13-2018 04:44 PM
George Knighton
3G RLX (2013+)
25
07-21-2016 07:21 PM
udelslayer
1G RDX Problems & Fixes
12
05-06-2016 12:27 PM
HOWELLiNC
3G TL (2004-2008)
30
09-18-2015 11:12 PM



Quick Reply: Have you gotten your letter from Honda about the PCM Upgrade???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 AM.