First race on the track. OUCH! BROKEN HEART!
#1
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First race on the track. OUCH! BROKEN HEART!
Went to the track. First time. I'm COMPLETELY STOCK, 2002 CL-S
conditions:
- I had about 125-150 lbs of weight extra on my car (old rotors, 2 soccer bags, mad other
shit in trunk)
reaction time: 0.173
I1: 2.577
I2: 0.000
I3: 10.902
1/4: 17.018
Now someone, please, tell me why? I'm really wondering if my car is in good shape, or if it's just me that can't
I was in sportshift and held the brakes while reving at 2500rpm. As soon as the 3 yellow light lit, I was on the gas. From then, I just waited for 2nd to pop, then waited for 6800rpm, shift to 3rd, and waited for 6700rpm again...
What am I doing wrong, and please answer the following: What kind of times should I be expecting?!?!?
Help
conditions:
- I had about 125-150 lbs of weight extra on my car (old rotors, 2 soccer bags, mad other
shit in trunk)
reaction time: 0.173
I1: 2.577
I2: 0.000
I3: 10.902
1/4: 17.018
Now someone, please, tell me why? I'm really wondering if my car is in good shape, or if it's just me that can't
![Racing](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/racing.gif)
I was in sportshift and held the brakes while reving at 2500rpm. As soon as the 3 yellow light lit, I was on the gas. From then, I just waited for 2nd to pop, then waited for 6800rpm, shift to 3rd, and waited for 6700rpm again...
What am I doing wrong, and please answer the following: What kind of times should I be expecting?!?!?
Help
![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
#6
drop em like its hot
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Harlem, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it sounds like more than just an actuator. what were the conditions? under really bad conditions cl-s's have been known to run in the low 15's. 17 is just unacceptable under any circumstance.
do a search on the actuator, they do rob you of hp in higher end... but that alone wont put u in 17 seconds IMO.
do a search on the actuator, they do rob you of hp in higher end... but that alone wont put u in 17 seconds IMO.
#7
something witty
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orange County
Age: 44
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^ go a little easy, he said its his first time. anything is possible.
a 2.5 60' (im guessing thats the #1 time) will definately put you in the 16-17. work on your reaction and launch and you should have better results.
a 2.5 60' (im guessing thats the #1 time) will definately put you in the 16-17. work on your reaction and launch and you should have better results.
Trending Topics
#8
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reaction time has no bearing on the E/T. And a 2.5 60' doesn't even put a CL-S in the 16's... something else is wrong - a broken actuator sounds like a good start, but I don't think that problem alone is enough to account for such a high 1/4 time.
#10
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My first time at the track I ran a high 15 sec pass...and I have a supercharger. The launch is KEY!!! A 2.1 60 ft. gets me into the 13's and a 2.3 60 ft. holds me to low 14's. It makes ALL the difference.
Was your VSA off? The car cuts fuel if it detects traction loss...which ALWAYS happens in 1st/2nd gears.
Was your VSA off? The car cuts fuel if it detects traction loss...which ALWAYS happens in 1st/2nd gears.
#12
goldmemberererer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
I don't see why pepole say to turn off the VSA? It seems that when I turn off the VSA, and floor it from a stop...I get more wheelspin than when I keep VSA on?
And isn't berny's R/T fucking excellent? 0.173 is one of the lowest I've ever seen. Broken actuator is my guess too.
#13
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by goldmemberer
Simple. VSA cuts off power to re-gain traction. Turning it off means your launch depends on your skill, with which you can adjust to the conditions. Flooring it is only half the story here. With VSA, if you go over a certain threshold, you're losing power.
And isn't berny's R/T fucking excellent? 0.173 is one of the lowest I've ever seen. Broken actuator is my guess too.
And isn't berny's R/T fucking excellent? 0.173 is one of the lowest I've ever seen. Broken actuator is my guess too.
I'll go check out my actuator this afternoon, but how do I get my '60 lower?
And by the way, both runs, I would get killed by a corrado vr6 that did 15.39 1/4 mile!
![Frown](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
If I fix my actuator, lose the weight, work on a better '60, I'd get low 15's for sure, eh?
Unless they sold me a CL-P !"$/"/%$"$/%????
#14
Senior Moderator
AFAIK, .500 is a perfect R/T. <.500 is redlighting.
#15
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
AFAIK, .500 is a perfect R/T. <.500 is redlighting.
And you're not helping me find the problem, heheheh
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#16
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Cl-S
My first time at the track I ran a high 15 sec pass...and I have a supercharger. The launch is KEY!!! A 2.1 60 ft. gets me into the 13's and a 2.3 60 ft. holds me to low 14's. It makes ALL the difference.
Was your VSA off? The car cuts fuel if it detects traction loss...which ALWAYS happens in 1st/2nd gears.
Was your VSA off? The car cuts fuel if it detects traction loss...which ALWAYS happens in 1st/2nd gears.
#17
drop em like its hot
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Harlem, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15's are unacceptable as well. what were the conditions (temp, humidity)? check weather.com for the area and date where the track was and let us know.
also, the elevation, if its above sea level.
also, the elevation, if its above sea level.
#18
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rezurex
15's are unacceptable as well. what were the conditions (temp, humidity)? check weather.com for the area and date where the track was and let us know.
also, the elevation, if its above sea level.
also, the elevation, if its above sea level.
Humidity: 77%
kPA: 101.84
that's the day's statistics.... I want to get to the bottom of this... I'll start by check the actuator this afternoon, but what else could it be?
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#19
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm willing to bet if you can get your 60' to 2.1 or 2.2 then you'll easily be mid-15's. Your actuator will probably get you back a couple of tenths as well.
A good run for a bone stock CLS is high 14's, low 15's.
A good run for a bone stock CLS is high 14's, low 15's.
#20
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Cl-S
I'm willing to bet if you can get your 60' to 2.1 or 2.2 then you'll easily be mid-15's. Your actuator will probably get you back a couple of tenths as well.
A good run for a bone stock CLS is high 14's, low 15's.
A good run for a bone stock CLS is high 14's, low 15's.
I was brake torquing at 2200 rpm, my R/T was 0.17
So what the hell am I doing wrong, is the actuator gonna make a difference on my '60?
If not, then what am I doing wrong?
#21
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by F23A4
AFAIK, .500 is a perfect R/T. <.500 is redlighting.
Not necesarily. Tracks are converting to a different system now due to different rules in different classes of racing. Previously, a perfect reaction time for professional, and some sportsman drivers, was a .400. For the remaining sportsman competitors a .500-light was considered a perfect reaction time. Under the new changes, the timing system will be modified to display a perfect reaction time as .000 for all categories All of my local tracks (4 of them) have switched all classes to run a .000 a perfect light. Anything below a .000 (negative numbers) would be a red light. This makes it easier for everyone watching the racing, people moving from one class to another, etc. Also, tracks are switching to LED lighting instead of incandescent bulbs, these light up faster and are less prone to damage from the vibrations of louder cars.
#22
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrsteve
Not necesarily. Tracks are converting to a different system now due to different rules in different classes of racing. Previously, a perfect reaction time for professional, and some sportsman drivers, was a .400. For the remaining sportsman competitors a .500-light was considered a perfect reaction time. Under the new changes, the timing system will be modified to display a perfect reaction time as .000 for all categories All of my local tracks (4 of them) have switched all classes to run a .000 a perfect light. Anything below a .000 (negative numbers) would be a red light. This makes it easier for everyone watching the racing, people moving from one class to another, etc. Also, tracks are switching to LED lighting instead of incandescent bulbs, these light up faster and are less prone to damage from the vibrations of louder cars.
![Agree](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/agree.gif)
#25
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
trap speed...your ET mph...how fast were you going when you hit your 1/4 mile time.
fron't should be ran at about 25psi, rears at around 40psi. Care to correct me mtsteve? I'm not sure if that's 100% correct.
fron't should be ran at about 25psi, rears at around 40psi. Care to correct me mtsteve? I'm not sure if that's 100% correct.
#26
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
trap speed...your ET mph...how fast were you going when you hit your 1/4 mile time.
fron't should be ran at about 25psi, rears at around 40psi. Care to correct me mtsteve? I'm not sure if that's 100% correct.
fron't should be ran at about 25psi, rears at around 40psi. Care to correct me mtsteve? I'm not sure if that's 100% correct.
thanks for the psi info dem1k
#29
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
YOU GUYS ROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!
My actuator is broken, it doesn't rotate nor even budge when I rev over 4000rpm... getting it fixed at the beginning of the week, I will lose the weight off of my car and get back to you on the situation.
thanks again everyone!
My actuator is broken, it doesn't rotate nor even budge when I rev over 4000rpm... getting it fixed at the beginning of the week, I will lose the weight off of my car and get back to you on the situation.
thanks again everyone!
#30
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no problem...
however you got the trap speed thing confused. I meant that your trap speed is how fast in MPH you were going when you got the 17 second 1/4 mile time. Understand? Like...93mph? 95mph?
edit: looks like I'm a tad late on this lol...glad to see you found the problem
however you got the trap speed thing confused. I meant that your trap speed is how fast in MPH you were going when you got the 17 second 1/4 mile time. Understand? Like...93mph? 95mph?
edit: looks like I'm a tad late on this lol...glad to see you found the problem
![Woot](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/woot.gif)
#34
I need FI
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 42
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I already posted the temperature:
Temperature: 17C
Humidity: 77%
kPA: 101.84
I am sorry, I was doing 88mph after 17.018 secs...
Do you think the fixed actuator will make a difference?
Temperature: 17C
Humidity: 77%
kPA: 101.84
I am sorry, I was doing 88mph after 17.018 secs...
Do you think the fixed actuator will make a difference?
#38
still a Masshole
Haven't read all the responses but this is absolutely not true! I suxor at the launch and my first time at the track I did no worse than a 15.3 with 60' times from 2.4-2.8.
Originally Posted by farberstyle
^ go a little easy, he said its his first time. anything is possible.
a 2.5 60' (im guessing thats the #1 time) will definately put you in the 16-17. work on your reaction and launch and you should have better results.
a 2.5 60' (im guessing thats the #1 time) will definately put you in the 16-17. work on your reaction and launch and you should have better results.