UNCTYPE-S

an 04 rsx auto-?
an 04 wrx-?
an 04 tl auto-?
and 03 cl-s auto, which is around 14.6 or so.

can someone fill in the question marks

jimcol711

lol, CL-S auto is NOT 14.6. average is closer to 15.0

mrsteve

iTrader: (1)

First off, why do you need these times? Second, it is nearly impossible to come up with an accurate "average" of each cars performance because so much has to do with track preperation, weather conditions, driver error, and individual car condition.

My best guess would be

RSX Auto - 16.1
WRX Auto - 15.2
TL Auto - 15.0
CL-S Auto - 14.9

sushimaster

i think the real question here is should he get headers...the answer is an emphatic YES !

UNCTYPE-S

thank you for guessing

first off its not a big deal to know why, secondly all i needed was a guestimate and i got it, thanks.

Seattle Cl-S

http://www.car-stats.com/stats/default.aspx

UNCTYPE-S

i will just add to this thread instead of making another or going to aTL.

i saw on the car and driver site that thr reg 04 tl is at 14.7. but the a-spec is at 14.3, what upgrades are with the a-spec one.

pimpscls

the aspec was 6 speed and it was probably driven real well

UNCTYPE-S

bwuaahahahahah, thats hilarious. seeing as though my buddy has the 04 tl in auto and hes going to get the a-spec package put on. hahah, hes fucking clueless that think he knows his shit.\

ok thanks

allmotor_2000

Zha!

DarkSithCL

iTrader: (1)

aspec is all suspesion, wheels, brakes and then aero stuf with a splash of tiny aspec medallions...sad they don't touch the engine at all....

UNCTYPE-S

then if thats true, why is the a-spec .4 seconds faster in the 1/4 on average. something has to give.

anothercls

more traction from better tires and less wheel hop. the car doesn't lift off the ground as much due to stiffer suspension, maybe more aerodynamic.

UNCTYPE-S

and that knocks off .4 in the 1/4. if thats the case, im gonna go buy new springs and tires this week.