E-Manage NA Possibility??
#1
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E-Manage NA Possibility??
While getting ready this morning I realized something about my previous E-Manage NA tests on a TL-S. While it was not able to directly advance the timing due to a lack of a real crank reference or just a single coil signal; it should be able to indirectly advance timing.
Considering that most cars advance the timing when lower loads are calculated. It would stand to reason that by reducing the primary air flow signal enough could give extra timing. The needed fuel would the be added back in by directly extending the pulse width.
This is just a thought but one I will certainly be testing soon. But this is something I should have tested before. :o
Considering that most cars advance the timing when lower loads are calculated. It would stand to reason that by reducing the primary air flow signal enough could give extra timing. The needed fuel would the be added back in by directly extending the pulse width.
This is just a thought but one I will certainly be testing soon. But this is something I should have tested before. :o
#3
Intermediate
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: medford, nj
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scalbert
While getting ready this morning I realized something about my previous E-Manage NA tests on a TL-S. While it was not able to directly advance the timing due to a lack of a real crank reference or just a single coil signal; it should be able to indirectly advance timing.
Considering that most cars advance the timing when lower loads are calculated. It would stand to reason that by reducing the primary air flow signal enough could give extra timing. The needed fuel would the be added back in by directly extending the pulse width.
This is just a thought but one I will certainly be testing soon. But this is something I should have tested before. :o
Considering that most cars advance the timing when lower loads are calculated. It would stand to reason that by reducing the primary air flow signal enough could give extra timing. The needed fuel would the be added back in by directly extending the pulse width.
This is just a thought but one I will certainly be testing soon. But this is something I should have tested before. :o
Is there another alternative other than fooling the sensor?
#4
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by motioneffects
So it cant "really" advance timing. I remember a while back when you did a test with a voltage meter and said advancing the timing was able.
Is there another alternative other than fooling the sensor?
Is there another alternative other than fooling the sensor?
The problem is that it doesn't have a crank position reference to coordinate with the six individual signals. Had this been a single coil system it would work as there is a single signal to reference and timing can be determined easier.
However, I believe there is a way to get more timing in a round about manner. I plan on testing this soon too. By decreasing the MAP sensor value at WOT the ECU will calculate a lower load value and should run more timing. To offset the lean issue which would occur, you can extend the pulse with to get the A/F numbers where they should be. This is obviously hypothetical but has some ground to stand on; it just needs to be tested.
#5
Senior Moderator
I just hope someone will help you out and donate their car to a good cause..
In the meantime, we'll keep working on the UniChip and see if we can't come up with anything better..
In the meantime, we'll keep working on the UniChip and see if we can't come up with anything better..
#7
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
steve
i am gonna run the e-manage if the uni-chip doesnt work for me, it is possible to run it n/a with the right tuner
i am gonna run the e-manage if the uni-chip doesnt work for me, it is possible to run it n/a with the right tuner
The E-Manage main unit plus the required harnesses runs nearly $400 and that does not include the 28 wires installed nor the software. It would take about 2 - 3 hours to install it correctly and would not be PnP. The price for the PnP harness is available.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Trending Topics
#9
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jonesi
I just hope someone will help you out and donate their car to a good cause..
#10
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by darrinb
so u think i can get better gains from the uni-chip??
The E-Manage has no direct way to control timing advance which is critical to gaining power. The is the benefit of the Unichip.
#11
Lead Footed
Originally Posted by scalbert
I know of a couple I can use. I plan on testing the RES plate along with E-Manage during the dyno session.
![Drool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/drool.gif)
I've got cash stashed for RES already, only challenge will be get some for the e-manage set up . . . I might need to got to Vegas or buy a lotto ticket . . . or something. :P
Don't worry . . . I won't be using the RES funds . . .
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Ruf
#12
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by scalbert
Nope!!!
The E-Manage has no direct way to control timing advance which is critical to gaining power. The is the benefit of the Unichip.
The E-Manage has no direct way to control timing advance which is critical to gaining power. The is the benefit of the Unichip.
I like the emanage b/c it would allow more control and adjustments for newer mods rather then sending the chip back and/or going to a dealer each time..
#13
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jonesi
So you think the UniChip is the best alternative just a more expensive one..?!?
I like the emanage b/c it would allow more control and adjustments for newer mods rather then sending the chip back and/or going to a dealer each time..
I like the emanage b/c it would allow more control and adjustments for newer mods rather then sending the chip back and/or going to a dealer each time..
We'll see what we can get out of it though.
#18
COME AT ME BRO!
i just went to a shop called ptuning the do most of there biz threw there web site www.ptuning.com and they siad for my car they would defentily recomend the emange over and stand only system because it is a piggy back. and scalbert what is the RES???
#19
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by thescoundrel
Is this the same res plate that you made a long while ago? It was like an inch thick that sat ontop of the engine?
#20
Suzuka Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by evilone
i just went to a shop called ptuning the do most of there biz threw there web site www.ptuning.com and they siad for my car they would defentily recomend the emange over and stand only system because it is a piggy back. and scalbert what is the RES???
The RES plate is a device intended to enhance the resonance effect in the manifold which may increase power.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
11-16-2015 08:30 PM