Dyno'd my car today!!!
01-06-2004, 08:08 PM
#1
new cl, type-s and shxt
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sugarland, TX
Age: 42
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno'd my car today!!!
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
Trending Topics
01-07-2004, 12:51 AM
#12
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by Eggplant-EX
I thought we had 260 hp??
I thought we had 260 hp??
the engine makes 260 hp at the crank. the dyno measures power at the wheels. we have ~ 20% hp loss through the drivetrain.
:sqnteek:
01-07-2004, 02:47 AM
#18
Re: Dyno'd my car today!!!
Originally posted by BlackCL_Type-S
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
completely stock 01 Type-S with 5 spd auto with 56300 on the odometer, runnin Mobil 1 10w-30, approx. ambient 50-55 degrees
run 1 - HP: 199.5 TQ: 178.1
run 2 - HP: 202.1 TQ: 184.8
run 3 - HP: 205.5 TQ: 186.5
run 4 - HP: 207.5 TQ: 185.9
I think these numbers are pretty strong for bein a stock car, when taking into account drivetrain loss and such. What numbers are others seen'?
I think my first mod will prob be a header most likely the OBX unit mostly because of price, has there been any comparison reports between the OBX and Comptech header? whether one or the other has better flow characteristics?
My modded '03 CLS 6sp (with CT intake/headers/b-pipe/exhaust) dyno'd at CompTech with 236 WHP and 201 lbs. Tq. running Pilot Sport A/S 225/50ZR17s on stock rims. Ambient temp was between 55-60 degrees. CompTech said that the crank HP was probably between 300 to 307.
Do the mods... I'd do the intake and headers together first. You'll see a lot more gains with both since they compliment each other.
01-07-2004, 10:22 AM
#19
TQ > MPG
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
01-07-2004, 10:28 AM
#20
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by jtkz13
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
There's no way you have 300hp at the crank. A 70hp loss would be a slipping automatic, not a fwd manual transmssion. To find out what the engine is making all you have to do it take your dyno numbers and divide them by .85 (6 speed) or .77 (auto).
01-07-2004, 10:37 AM
#21
TQ > MPG
TypeR read the thread again.
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
01-07-2004, 11:07 AM
#22
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jtkz13
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
01-07-2004, 11:41 AM
#26
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by jtkz13
TypeR read the thread again.
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
TypeR read the thread again.
Hookid on Foniks is ur frend.
And btw, you say it has 23% parasitic loss, I say divide by .77, does that SEEM like the same thing to you?
01-07-2004, 11:46 AM
#27
TQ > MPG
I have always been told 15% for manual transmissions, and also consider that fwd's are a little more efficient than rwd so it's going to be a little less the standard for rwd.
A stock 6 speed shold in theory put down 221hp/197tq, which is pretty inline with what most people pull.
A stock 6 speed shold in theory put down 221hp/197tq, which is pretty inline with what most people pull.
01-07-2004, 02:28 PM
#31
new cl, type-s and shxt
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sugarland, TX
Age: 42
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by dfv3.2CL-S
what type of dyno machine was used for the test?
what type of dyno machine was used for the test?
01-07-2004, 03:35 PM
#32
Senior Moderator
Question: 207.5hp...doesnt that equate to about 260hp crank, assuming 25% drivetrain loss (auto) ???? (If 23% loss assumption then I'm seeing 255 crank hp.)
01-07-2004, 03:59 PM
#33
TQ > MPG
If it was a Mustang Dyno add another 3-5% parasitic loss because that style dyno actually puts the engine under load which is actually more accurate than the free-wheeling DynoJet style.
01-07-2004, 07:10 PM
#36
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by unsure
3000gt and reliability dont
3000gt and reliability dont
very nice......
01-08-2004, 11:46 AM
#39
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by unsure
NOOB ALERT!
:noob:
:P lol
NOOB ALERT!
:noob:
:P lol
this is noob?
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Pacific NW/Federal Way
Posts: 1933
maybe all this time he was on rambling forum!?!?!?!
01-08-2004, 01:04 PM
#40
I now drive an accord....
Originally posted by darrinb
this is horse shit the salesman told me 260
this is horse shit the salesman told me 260
The more you drive it the more it loses thats why the dyno's always show lower