Drove the Z today and very disapointed
#41
Originally posted by sidemarker
Z does not compete against
sc430
corvette
M coupe
boxster
mainly because these cars are well over 40k
and
Z does not compete against
sc430
corvette
M coupe
boxster
mainly because these cars are well over 40k
and
The SC430 is not due to being a luxury convertible and a cruiser, not a hard core sports car
#42
Originally posted by scalbert
Wow, after that other thread I can't beleive I am going to agree with you. Actually let me add, I agree 110%.
The Z is meant to be a driving car first and foremost. The CL is meant to get you to your destination in comfort and near luxury but with a sport appeal to it. Oh also, the Z only seats two...
Wow, after that other thread I can't beleive I am going to agree with you. Actually let me add, I agree 110%.
The Z is meant to be a driving car first and foremost. The CL is meant to get you to your destination in comfort and near luxury but with a sport appeal to it. Oh also, the Z only seats two...
#43
Originally posted by JRock
Come on now, watch any TV review, or look at any photo that's not an ad photo - just about any Nissan/Infiniti interior is junk.
Whenever each of you goes to look at the car that will replace your 3.2CL, you will be surprised just how few interiors in the same price range offer as much comfort and ergonomic equity.
Come on now, watch any TV review, or look at any photo that's not an ad photo - just about any Nissan/Infiniti interior is junk.
Whenever each of you goes to look at the car that will replace your 3.2CL, you will be surprised just how few interiors in the same price range offer as much comfort and ergonomic equity.
I don't think the G35's interior comes close to ours. I didn't like it one bit, but I've only driven the sedan. The cheap materials and placement of controls just didn't feel right, especially the power seat controls. Also, the manual shift mode felt weird and would start out in 4th gear, even if I was at a complete stop, is this normal on the G35?
#44
Guys...I think the reason were having a problem classifying the Z is that it doesn't really fit into any of the current "classes"
In a way...the CL-S is similar...where else can you get a sports coupe with as much quality, power and looks as the CL has for just over 30 grand??
The Z is the same, it doesn't fit with the upper level 2 seaters mainly because of price (a Z can be had for 26K)...but also because of HP. It doesn't fit with the lower "pony-car" class because it only has 2 seats and it's main focus is NOT straight line power. It also doesn't fit in the S2000s class because it doesn't have a drop top YET.
Why don't we just say that the Z is in it's own class and all get along??
In a way...the CL-S is similar...where else can you get a sports coupe with as much quality, power and looks as the CL has for just over 30 grand??
The Z is the same, it doesn't fit with the upper level 2 seaters mainly because of price (a Z can be had for 26K)...but also because of HP. It doesn't fit with the lower "pony-car" class because it only has 2 seats and it's main focus is NOT straight line power. It also doesn't fit in the S2000s class because it doesn't have a drop top YET.
Why don't we just say that the Z is in it's own class and all get along??
#45
Do you all know what class the Z is in?
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
#46
Originally posted by JZ
Do you all know what class the Z is in?
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
Do you all know what class the Z is in?
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
jinx dude....you owe me a coke
#47
Originally posted by Rod
[B... Even the few people that have had to use the backseat have good comments.[/B]
[B... Even the few people that have had to use the backseat have good comments.[/B]
I don't think the G35's interior comes close to ours. I didn't like it one bit, but I've only driven the sedan. The cheap materials and placement of controls just didn't feel right, especially the power seat controls. Also, the manual shift mode felt weird and would start out in 4th gear, even if I was at a complete stop, is this normal on the G35? [/B]
#48
Originally posted by JZ
Do you all know what class the Z is in?
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
Do you all know what class the Z is in?
The answer is.....well, for now it's in its own class. The other prominent members of the Z's class are currently absent.
Do we all remember when the 300ZX competed with the Supra, the 3000GT and the RX-7.
There's your class right there!! And, because three of those members are conspicuously absent, comparisons are difficult to come by.
The S2000, WRX etc. are in the group that used to include the Preluds, the 240SX and the Talon/Eclipse. These were the baby 4-banger brothers to the big boys.
Let's get one thing straight--the Boxster never was and never will be in the class of the 350Z. It, just like all the M cars are a league above the Z--closer to the G35 coupe, but still not in the same league.
And, even while the old 300Z used to square off against the Corvette every once and awhile those cars are not even close to one another--it was always a stretch of a comparison.
Just an FYI
#49
Originally posted by 02 Aegean CLS
I sold my last car within a week and got my CL-S one night I got drunk...couldn't drive...had to ride in the back seat. IT SUCKED! I never thought about it before. Now, during the test drives (I know this sounds weird and pretentious), but I want to know what it's like riding in the back.
Cheap materials? If that is the case...I will be looking at a different car...even though the performance/rear drive/price point is very attractive. I think the car makers are finallly starting to realize that the American public is not as dumb as everyone makes us out to be. Quite the opposite, instead. We want performance, value, AND luxury in a <i>somewhat</i> affordable car. As it stands, so far Acura is the frontrunner in this biz. Maybe, just maybe, Infiniti is gonna learn something. We'll see.
I sold my last car within a week and got my CL-S one night I got drunk...couldn't drive...had to ride in the back seat. IT SUCKED! I never thought about it before. Now, during the test drives (I know this sounds weird and pretentious), but I want to know what it's like riding in the back.
Cheap materials? If that is the case...I will be looking at a different car...even though the performance/rear drive/price point is very attractive. I think the car makers are finallly starting to realize that the American public is not as dumb as everyone makes us out to be. Quite the opposite, instead. We want performance, value, AND luxury in a <i>somewhat</i> affordable car. As it stands, so far Acura is the frontrunner in this biz. Maybe, just maybe, Infiniti is gonna learn something. We'll see.
Why don't you actually check out a G35 and decide on the interior quality and style by yourself. Do you always listen to movie critics when they tell you a movie that you want to see sucks???
#50
Originally posted by TypeSKiller
Why don't you actually check out a G35 and decide on the interior quality and style by yourself. Do you always listen to movie critics when they tell you a movie that you want to see sucks???
Why don't you actually check out a G35 and decide on the interior quality and style by yourself. Do you always listen to movie critics when they tell you a movie that you want to see sucks???
And no, I don't listen to movie critics. No more than I would listen to the somewhat incoherent raamblings of people such as yourself on a board like this. We were talking about interior quality, specs, etc. of a car; why you gotta go and make a comment like that is, well...not necessary. Thanks for your input, however. :pfawk:
#51
Originally posted by mikegunnz
Actually, the early-mid 90s 300ZX could be compared to the vettes of its time. Why? Because back then, the performance numbers were close, although the vette had a slight edge. And even price was close. The twin turbo Z, used cost over $40k.
Just an FYI
Actually, the early-mid 90s 300ZX could be compared to the vettes of its time. Why? Because back then, the performance numbers were close, although the vette had a slight edge. And even price was close. The twin turbo Z, used cost over $40k.
Just an FYI
#52
I still disagree. Performance-wise, yes, the two cars are close. But the Z was a technologically advanced twin turbo rice burner while the Corvette, especially at that time, was an antiquated, low-revving pushrod V8 without much identity. The Corvette has always been the head of the Mustang/Camaro/Firebird class (until recently when it has become a true sportscar).
What about the ZR-1? Out of the same price range, but definitely a very advanced car for it's time...
#54
Originally posted by 02 Aegean CLS
Uh, that's why I said "We'll see". Can't drive a G35 Coupe until November..
And no, I don't listen to movie critics. No more than I would listen to the somewhat incoherent raamblings of people such as yourself on a board like this. We were talking about interior quality, specs, etc. of a car; why you gotta go and make a comment like that is, well...not necessary. Thanks for your input, however. :pfawk:
Uh, that's why I said "We'll see". Can't drive a G35 Coupe until November..
And no, I don't listen to movie critics. No more than I would listen to the somewhat incoherent raamblings of people such as yourself on a board like this. We were talking about interior quality, specs, etc. of a car; why you gotta go and make a comment like that is, well...not necessary. Thanks for your input, however. :pfawk:
#55
Originally posted by sidemarker
i dont know how the hell they are going to tint the windows on the Z every time you open the door the windows go down about an inch
sidemarker
i dont know how the hell they are going to tint the windows on the Z every time you open the door the windows go down about an inch
sidemarker
#56
Originally posted by FDao
There's a fuse that you can pull to prevent the window from going down when the door is open. There's also a sensor by the door jamb that can also be disabled for tinting purposes.
There's a fuse that you can pull to prevent the window from going down when the door is open. There's also a sensor by the door jamb that can also be disabled for tinting purposes.
sidemarker
#57
every dealership i go to that has one says that you have to have the paperwork praticuly finished before even a test drive....what BS.....its not like its a lambo or porsche....damn rules
#58
They were giving me a hassle about driving the Z here as well. I usually have no problem getting a car out for a test drive, one advantage to my occupation. The salesman had to go talk to his boss, but he was on the phone, etc, etc. It lasted about 15 min, and i left him my number and told him, if and when you want to sell a car, call me for a test drive until then i'm not even talking financing, price, options, etc. There was a message on the machine on saturday (was looking friday), guess next week.
I mean come on, it's a 35k nissan.
About the market field.
I agree it kind of stands out right now. It's not a 'super' sports coupe like M coupe, vette; it's not a roadster; it's not a pony car. It's a 2 seater, sports car with some styling pizazz, good power, and bargain price (a compromise as expected, it won't have the refinement, won't have the all out power or extreme handling, but for the majority of people it'll have enough of each when weighed against it's price).
I think once they come with a roadster, it will have a true market to compete in, but for now it's stand alone.
I mean come on, it's a 35k nissan.
About the market field.
I agree it kind of stands out right now. It's not a 'super' sports coupe like M coupe, vette; it's not a roadster; it's not a pony car. It's a 2 seater, sports car with some styling pizazz, good power, and bargain price (a compromise as expected, it won't have the refinement, won't have the all out power or extreme handling, but for the majority of people it'll have enough of each when weighed against it's price).
I think once they come with a roadster, it will have a true market to compete in, but for now it's stand alone.
#59
Originally posted by roo97ss
They were giving me a hassle about driving the Z here as well. I usually have no problem getting a car out for a test drive, one advantage to my occupation. The salesman had to go talk to his boss, but he was on the phone, etc, etc. It lasted about 15 min, and i left him my number and told him, if and when you want to sell a car, call me for a test drive until then i'm not even talking financing, price, options, etc. There was a message on the machine on saturday (was looking friday), guess next week.
I mean come on, it's a 35k nissan.
About the market field.
I agree it kind of stands out right now. It's not a 'super' sports coupe like M coupe, vette; it's not a roadster; it's not a pony car. It's a 2 seater, sports car with some styling pizazz, good power, and bargain price (a compromise as expected, it won't have the refinement, won't have the all out power or extreme handling, but for the majority of people it'll have enough of each when weighed against it's price).
I think once they come with a roadster, it will have a true market to compete in, but for now it's stand alone.
They were giving me a hassle about driving the Z here as well. I usually have no problem getting a car out for a test drive, one advantage to my occupation. The salesman had to go talk to his boss, but he was on the phone, etc, etc. It lasted about 15 min, and i left him my number and told him, if and when you want to sell a car, call me for a test drive until then i'm not even talking financing, price, options, etc. There was a message on the machine on saturday (was looking friday), guess next week.
I mean come on, it's a 35k nissan.
About the market field.
I agree it kind of stands out right now. It's not a 'super' sports coupe like M coupe, vette; it's not a roadster; it's not a pony car. It's a 2 seater, sports car with some styling pizazz, good power, and bargain price (a compromise as expected, it won't have the refinement, won't have the all out power or extreme handling, but for the majority of people it'll have enough of each when weighed against it's price).
I think once they come with a roadster, it will have a true market to compete in, but for now it's stand alone.
sidemarker
#62
Since I just recently bought my CL-S MT, I have done a lot of car shopping recently.
In my mind, the Vette, M3 coupe were not in the same class, just a cut above only in terms of price. As 2 seat sports cars they are in the same class, but then so is a Lambo, Ferrari Enzo, and countless other 2 seat sports cars. Price is the big differentiating factor.
The S2000 was more in a class with the Z3's, SlK's, and Boxter's because of the drop top, but again the S2000's price puts in much more in line with the Z3 then the other two.
The Cl-S is more comparable to the G35 Coupe and BMW 3 Series Coupes, and ultimately that is the class I was deciding on.
Finally the Z was simply in a class of its own. I wanted one, but the dealers here are charging 5k over msrp and the wait is until December/January. And unfortunately, I need a car now.
In my mind, the Vette, M3 coupe were not in the same class, just a cut above only in terms of price. As 2 seat sports cars they are in the same class, but then so is a Lambo, Ferrari Enzo, and countless other 2 seat sports cars. Price is the big differentiating factor.
The S2000 was more in a class with the Z3's, SlK's, and Boxter's because of the drop top, but again the S2000's price puts in much more in line with the Z3 then the other two.
The Cl-S is more comparable to the G35 Coupe and BMW 3 Series Coupes, and ultimately that is the class I was deciding on.
Finally the Z was simply in a class of its own. I wanted one, but the dealers here are charging 5k over msrp and the wait is until December/January. And unfortunately, I need a car now.
#63
Originally posted by sidemarker
well i mean come on for a 30k+ car it should at least be just as nice as the cl.
the more i think about it the more i appreciate my cl-s
and the more i think about it the Z interior felt just like my brothers 00 eclipse
sidemarker
well i mean come on for a 30k+ car it should at least be just as nice as the cl.
the more i think about it the more i appreciate my cl-s
and the more i think about it the Z interior felt just like my brothers 00 eclipse
sidemarker
the cl is more luxury and the z is more power, that is what you are paying for.
#64
Hi folks. I haven't posted here for a while, used to follow the board because I was interested in a CL-S 6MT, but I have since decided to buy a Z. It (Chrome Silver, Touring, 6 speed) was delivered about a month ago, and I have to say, I made the right decision. The Z isn't all that hot inside. It's fairly plain, quite basic, and mostly plastic. However, that's the way it's supposed to be. My leather seats are great, very supportive and good looking. The driving position is excellent. The exterior way makes up for any interior faults. Basically, it's showcar level. People stare everywhere I go, mouths drop. The best aspects though, are the drive. The engine is great and the suspension is it's equal. The Z handles, to use an old cliche, like it's on rails.
Now, everybody keep in mind that I'm not dissing the CL. It's a nice car, a GREAT bargain for the price. However, if you're willing to sacrifice luxury for performance, the Z is more for you.
Now, everybody keep in mind that I'm not dissing the CL. It's a nice car, a GREAT bargain for the price. However, if you're willing to sacrifice luxury for performance, the Z is more for you.
#65
Originally posted by scalbert
I never said the M3 or M5, I said the M Coupe:
This is a two seater coupe designed to be a weekend track car. It also runs a 6 cylinder engine, albeit an I6 versus the Z's V6.
I never said the M3 or M5, I said the M Coupe:
This is a two seater coupe designed to be a weekend track car. It also runs a 6 cylinder engine, albeit an I6 versus the Z's V6.
Btw, an I6 is so much nicer-sounding than any V6, IMHO.
#67
Re: Drove the Z today and very disapointed
Originally posted by sidemarker
leather sucks. the plastic sucks and it feels like everything will break within the next year. it may look nice outside but the exterior just sucks ass
NO auto off for the headlights! WTF the back. well there is no back. dont think about putting anything back there or it will just end up on your lap while u are driving.
sidemarker
leather sucks. the plastic sucks and it feels like everything will break within the next year. it may look nice outside but the exterior just sucks ass
NO auto off for the headlights! WTF the back. well there is no back. dont think about putting anything back there or it will just end up on your lap while u are driving.
sidemarker
There is auto off on the headlights, but it is 5 minutes.
And the back, well its a 2 seater hatchback, i dont see any other way to divide the 2 parts of the car.
#68
Originally posted by sidemarker
but i thought the whole reason for the window to come down is to that u can open the door??
sidemarker
but i thought the whole reason for the window to come down is to that u can open the door??
sidemarker
This poses a problem when tinting, thus the fuse and/or door sensor can be used to prevent the window from dropping down for tinting purposes.
#69
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TypeSKid
[B]an //M coupe is NO comparison at all for a 350Z.
An //M coupe is priced in the $40's if not higher for a new one. It will MURDER a Z in ALL ASPECTS.
yeah ok
you can compare the z to whatever you want , and everyones gonna have a diff opinion about what classifies a car in each class. bottom line is its ppphhhhaaaaattt! and ofcourse thats my own personal opinion!!
[B]an //M coupe is NO comparison at all for a 350Z.
An //M coupe is priced in the $40's if not higher for a new one. It will MURDER a Z in ALL ASPECTS.
yeah ok
you can compare the z to whatever you want , and everyones gonna have a diff opinion about what classifies a car in each class. bottom line is its ppphhhhaaaaattt! and ofcourse thats my own personal opinion!!
#70
Originally posted by JRock
Whoah there! That's the first M Coupe I've ever found attractive. That thing looks wicked! Love it.
Btw, an I6 is so much nicer-sounding than any V6, IMHO.
Whoah there! That's the first M Coupe I've ever found attractive. That thing looks wicked! Love it.
Btw, an I6 is so much nicer-sounding than any V6, IMHO.
#73
Originally posted by scalbert
OK, then if everyone doesn't like my M Coupe comparo, then how about the Z3 Coupe 3.0i?? It is in the mid 30's in price, a two seater coupe and designed to be a weekend racer!!:P :P :P
OK, then if everyone doesn't like my M Coupe comparo, then how about the Z3 Coupe 3.0i?? It is in the mid 30's in price, a two seater coupe and designed to be a weekend racer!!:P :P :P
sidemarker
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sarlacc
Console & Computer Gaming
5
09-30-2015 03:15 PM