Don't be scared...
#41
Originally posted by 330RWHP
That's not my car... I WISH it was, but I can't even afford gears... I'm stuck w/ a 13.1 sec 96 GT (Waiting on struts to install suspension and I should be in the 12s n/a).
That's not my car... I WISH it was, but I can't even afford gears... I'm stuck w/ a 13.1 sec 96 GT (Waiting on struts to install suspension and I should be in the 12s n/a).
#42
Go Swede Racer..
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 35º15'N, 97º29'W
Age: 40
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 330RWHP
Not trying to flame b/c I do think the CL-S' are nice cars, but in all honesty, what does the CLS have over a 2003 Cobra?
Not trying to flame b/c I do think the CL-S' are nice cars, but in all honesty, what does the CLS have over a 2003 Cobra?
#43
Senior Moderator
As far as I understand it, a Cobra R costs
Originally posted by 330RWHP
You're right there.
Let's compare apples to apples then.
Stock for stock the Cobra will destroy an S2000 and will walk a NSX w/ little difficulty. The S2000 is right around the same price range as the Cobra and the NSX was, what, $65K? Hell, a 2001 stock Cobra will bitch slap the S2000 in the 1/4...
Think about this... 5.7L (346ci) Camaro SS came stock with 320hp and 325tq. 4.6L (281ci) Cobra (99/01 n/a) came stock with 320hp and 317tq. Stock for stock it's a driver's race. I hate how people always compared the GT to the SS when the SS and the 99/01 Cobra where in the same price range.
Why mess with F-bods when you can kick the crap out of Z06s all day long. A $35K car humiliating a $60K 5.7L "super car" seems like more of a slap in the face to GM than anything.
I doubt you could if you wanted to. The first couple times you shit yourself from 400rwtq would be embarrasing when you got out of the car.
You're right there.
Let's compare apples to apples then.
Stock for stock the Cobra will destroy an S2000 and will walk a NSX w/ little difficulty. The S2000 is right around the same price range as the Cobra and the NSX was, what, $65K? Hell, a 2001 stock Cobra will bitch slap the S2000 in the 1/4...
Think about this... 5.7L (346ci) Camaro SS came stock with 320hp and 325tq. 4.6L (281ci) Cobra (99/01 n/a) came stock with 320hp and 317tq. Stock for stock it's a driver's race. I hate how people always compared the GT to the SS when the SS and the 99/01 Cobra where in the same price range.
Why mess with F-bods when you can kick the crap out of Z06s all day long. A $35K car humiliating a $60K 5.7L "super car" seems like more of a slap in the face to GM than anything.
I doubt you could if you wanted to. The first couple times you shit yourself from 400rwtq would be embarrasing when you got out of the car.
Why anyone would pay 35 large for any non-corvette, non-Viper, non-Caddy American car is beyond me.
#44
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You notice he liked to throw out the NSX in the $80k range, but failed to include the Viper. Which is everything the Cobra is, but more power, better handling...and looks 100x better. I give much props to the 03 Cobra...but paying almost 15k over a GT for a blower and IRS which is a detriment in drag racing makes you wonder as well. And a Supra will still hand the Cobra its ass.
#45
cmng 2 a lawschool near u
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kansas City
Age: 39
Posts: 1,823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 330RWHP
You're right there.
Let's compare apples to apples then.
Stock for stock the Cobra will destroy an S2000 and will walk a NSX w/ little difficulty. The S2000 is right around the same price range as the Cobra and the NSX was, what, $65K? Hell, a 2001 stock Cobra will bitch slap the S2000 in the 1/4...
You're right there.
Let's compare apples to apples then.
Stock for stock the Cobra will destroy an S2000 and will walk a NSX w/ little difficulty. The S2000 is right around the same price range as the Cobra and the NSX was, what, $65K? Hell, a 2001 stock Cobra will bitch slap the S2000 in the 1/4...
Wait till I get the comptech blower put on, then I'll give you guys a run for your money
#46
East Coast Boost.!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Cobra is afast, but it still is a FORD, and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
#47
hahhaha....
Originally posted by Titand19
The Cobra is afast, but it still is a FORD, and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
The Cobra is afast, but it still is a FORD, and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
And back on cars... is there a better car with forced induction that has more horsepower or power for the money? In other words, is there another car that for 35k can take the cobra? Straight line, or even on the track?
#48
East Coast Boost.!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey Numbaonestunna, I think you are getting a little out of hand.
1. I was simply saying that in terms of Hp/liter, American technology is not up to par.
2. America does have the most patents per year, but patents do not always apply to technological inventions as you might think.
3. I agree that for 35K there are no STOCK cars taht can take the Cobra, I'm assuming that's what you meant.
4. My job is def not being a little fucking asshole and going off on someone for stating his/her opinion.
Who's the Jackass now?
1. I was simply saying that in terms of Hp/liter, American technology is not up to par.
2. America does have the most patents per year, but patents do not always apply to technological inventions as you might think.
3. I agree that for 35K there are no STOCK cars taht can take the Cobra, I'm assuming that's what you meant.
4. My job is def not being a little fucking asshole and going off on someone for stating his/her opinion.
Who's the Jackass now?
#49
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow this thread blew up since I last saw it.
Here goes *takes a deep breath*
The Cobras were only over rated in 99. The was a free recall to get that taken care of. The LS1 and 01 Cobra is a VERY good race assuming both driver's have equal skills. I would give the slight upper hand to the SS/WS6 because it can launch alot harder b/c it's not limited by the IRS like the Cobra. Give the SS to an average/decent driver and the Cobra to a great driver and my money would be on the Cobra. It is by no means, a "walking".
I have car payments, insurance, a speeding ticket, a speed contest ticket, and gas to pay for. My hours at work have been cut from 35hrs/week to 15-17 due to a corporate buyout. And yes, most of the cash invested in my car is in the motor.
Agreed
Find a new Vette, Viper, or Caddy (reason for being on this list is beyond me) for $35K then we'll talk.
More power. Yes (8.0L vs 4.6 ). Better Looks. I agree w/ you on this. I have loved the Viper for as long as I have been into cars. Both my email & AIM s/n have Viper in them. Handling? No. Not sure about the 03 Vipers (haven't done my homework), but the previous chassis/body was NOT a good corner carver. Trust me
Your paying $15K more for a BULLET-PROOF bottom end, a 6spd trans, and all new body panels, new interior and an IRS that gives a smoother ride and has survived a 9 second run. (FYI, the 03's IRS is much stronger than the 99/01's)
Agreed
Yeah, most imports w/ their small displacement engines do make more hp/liter. BUT, did you ever think there is something else that a V8 muscle car owner wants? There is this thing called TORQUE. Ever hear of it? You won't get that from a small displacement, high-revving import. PERIOD.
And I think that's it
Here goes *takes a deep breath*
Originally posted by darrinb
you cant compare a 99/01 cobra to a 99-02 ss or ws6, plain and simple the stang would get walked in an acceleration contest, those cobras were way overated in hp #'s
you cant compare a 99/01 cobra to a 99-02 ss or ws6, plain and simple the stang would get walked in an acceleration contest, those cobras were way overated in hp #'s
Originally posted by quikcls
how could you not afford gears if you've managed to get your stang to run low 13's? i hope you spent it all on you r motor?
how could you not afford gears if you've managed to get your stang to run low 13's? i hope you spent it all on you r motor?
Originally posted by the swede
blah blah blah..........CL-S is a very impressive car.
blah blah blah..........CL-S is a very impressive car.
Originally posted by F23A4
Why anyone would pay 35 large for any non-corvette, non-Viper, non-Caddy American car is beyond me.
Why anyone would pay 35 large for any non-corvette, non-Viper, non-Caddy American car is beyond me.
Originally posted by moomaster_99
You notice he liked to throw out the NSX in the $80k range, but failed to include the Viper. Which is everything the Cobra is, but more power, better handling...and looks 100x better. I give much props to the 03 Cobra...but paying almost 15k over a GT for a blower and IRS which is a detriment in drag racing makes you wonder as well. And a Supra will still hand the Cobra its ass.
You notice he liked to throw out the NSX in the $80k range, but failed to include the Viper. Which is everything the Cobra is, but more power, better handling...and looks 100x better. I give much props to the 03 Cobra...but paying almost 15k over a GT for a blower and IRS which is a detriment in drag racing makes you wonder as well. And a Supra will still hand the Cobra its ass.
Your paying $15K more for a BULLET-PROOF bottom end, a 6spd trans, and all new body panels, new interior and an IRS that gives a smoother ride and has survived a 9 second run. (FYI, the 03's IRS is much stronger than the 99/01's)
Originally posted by KC CL 1785
......there are also other cars that people buy OVER the mustang for reasons other than speed.
......there are also other cars that people buy OVER the mustang for reasons other than speed.
Originally posted by Titand19
The Cobra is afast, but it still is a FORD, and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
The Cobra is afast, but it still is a FORD, and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
And I think that's it
#50
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by bjs 3.5 se
Don't think so...........i got to race a couple of 03 Cobras and a couple Z06's in my 01 SS which ran 12.8@112 all day long......both times i slightly beat the Cobras...and both times i got beat by the Z06's......U may say driver error..but i got up to 130+mph on all my races.....so at that point ur not shiftin ne more...and a car will win cuz its faster...
Ne ways a stock cobra runs around a 12.9-13.1......@ the track...all the new 405 hp Z06 run around 12.4-12.7 with a good driver.
New stock ZO6's dyno about 347 RWHP...Cobras around 355rwhp.....but the Vette is over 500 lighter........its all weight to power
Don't think so...........i got to race a couple of 03 Cobras and a couple Z06's in my 01 SS which ran 12.8@112 all day long......both times i slightly beat the Cobras...and both times i got beat by the Z06's......U may say driver error..but i got up to 130+mph on all my races.....so at that point ur not shiftin ne more...and a car will win cuz its faster...
Ne ways a stock cobra runs around a 12.9-13.1......@ the track...all the new 405 hp Z06 run around 12.4-12.7 with a good driver.
New stock ZO6's dyno about 347 RWHP...Cobras around 355rwhp.....but the Vette is over 500 lighter........its all weight to power
380 (404 w/ a CAI and filter)
374
380
376
372
350 (poor guy )
363
383 (drop-in K&N)
360
The lowest one there equals 411.7hp at the crank (15% drivetrain loss)
MotorTrend ran the 03 at 12.7. And I hope everyone here realizes mag drivers aren't that great. So I don't know where you get 12.9-13.1. The lowest I have seen w/ my own eyes is a 12.5. He had the air silence removed (rubber snorkel on the stock airbox).
At 130mph, aerodynamics becomes quite a factor. The SS has a more streamlined design. Also, the LS1s have great top end...we all know this. But just because your not shifting, doesnt mean there cant be driver error. Hitting the rev limiter, hesitation, or you just got the jump on them early on. I don't know. I'm not stupid enough (anymore) to race that fast. I can't think of the peak RPMs of the 03s and SS's hp/tq power range. I know the 03 has peak torque down low around 3500...
#51
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Titand19
and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
and puts down a pretty crappy amount of HP/Liter esp for a FI car. To sum it all up, American engineering sucks.
As for the American engineering statement, seems to be coming from a lack of knowledge. GM powertrain is well more advanced in transmission technology than most of the Japanese counterparts. The electronic controls division has had significantly better knock monitoring and control system than nearly all other manufacturers. This is how the low tech GM L67 motor was able to achieve LEV status well before any other V6 engine got the same mark. And that same motor makes torque too, something most import engines lack.
Those are just a couple of examples, but there are many more. Take the Z06 for example, old school pushrod technology but with extreme engineering put into it and that is just the engine. Titanium exhaust and brakes of a race car but one’s which also last along with an incredible suspension. The overall vehicle is a testament to engineering when this product can be made available to the public for about $50k.
#52
in reply...
Originally posted by Titand19
Hey Numbaonestunna, I think you are getting a little out of hand.
1. I was simply saying that in terms of Hp/liter, American technology is not up to par.
2. America does have the most patents per year, but patents do not always apply to technological inventions as you might think.
3. I agree that for 35K there are no STOCK cars taht can take the Cobra, I'm assuming that's what you meant.
4. My job is def not being a little fucking asshole and going off on someone for stating his/her opinion.
Who's the Jackass now?
Hey Numbaonestunna, I think you are getting a little out of hand.
1. I was simply saying that in terms of Hp/liter, American technology is not up to par.
2. America does have the most patents per year, but patents do not always apply to technological inventions as you might think.
3. I agree that for 35K there are no STOCK cars taht can take the Cobra, I'm assuming that's what you meant.
4. My job is def not being a little fucking asshole and going off on someone for stating his/her opinion.
Who's the Jackass now?
"American Engineering sucks?"
You can see how someone who works in the engineering field might be offended.
Horsepower to liter is more difficult the larger your engine is. Rotating mass increases, frictional losses, increase, etc etc. Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
#53
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: in reply...
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Compare that to the E46 M3 which has 104 Hp/L
Or the S2000 which has 120 Hp/L
Or even the CL-S at 81.25 Hp/L
But with that said, the S2000 has a very low torque output. Torque accelerates the vehicle.
#54
Find beauty in dissonance
Re: in reply...
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
Horsepower to liter is more difficult the larger your engine is. Rotating mass increases, frictional losses, increase, etc etc.
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Horsepower to liter is more difficult the larger your engine is. Rotating mass increases, frictional losses, increase, etc etc.
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Hard to beat the 260/302 in a GT.
#55
East Coast Boost.!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NYC & LI
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Numbaonestunna, I do see where you could get offended. I did not have any intentions of offending anyone. Obviously my statement about American engineering was a bit harsh and to a part untrue. I just assummed you were some little kid cause that's what I interpreted from your reply. Most adults wouldn't go off on someone and call them a jackass without some proper justification. Interms of the technology part, I guess you got me there. Scalbert is backing you up also. In terms of the patents and America inventing the car I think I got you there. There is no point in having this arguement, where is LBC?
A bunch of the japanese luxury brands do put down close to the HP of a Cobra, Thht's only if price is not taken into consideration. The Q45 I believe puts down approx 340hp and it has plenty of torque. It's also NA. I guess it's a matter of preference. The majority of the members on this board could have easily purcahsed a Cobra, it's a matter of class vs. performance. Plus insurance on a Cobra beats the crap out of you.
A bunch of the japanese luxury brands do put down close to the HP of a Cobra, Thht's only if price is not taken into consideration. The Q45 I believe puts down approx 340hp and it has plenty of torque. It's also NA. I guess it's a matter of preference. The majority of the members on this board could have easily purcahsed a Cobra, it's a matter of class vs. performance. Plus insurance on a Cobra beats the crap out of you.
#56
Go Swede Racer..
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 35º15'N, 97º29'W
Age: 40
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 330RWHP
blah blah blah..........CL-S is a very impressive car.
blah blah blah..........CL-S is a very impressive car.
#57
still a Masshole
I love the Cobras for what they are...speed monsters! I also love the CLS for what it is a pretty good compromise of lux and speed.
No if only I could afford an E55 then I'd have the best of everything!
No if only I could afford an E55 then I'd have the best of everything!
#58
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Just taking the advertised crank values the Cobra has 83.7 Hp/L.
Compare that to the E46 M3 which has 104 Hp/L
Or the S2000 which has 120 Hp/L
Or even the CL-S at 81.25 Hp/L
But with that said, the S2000 has a very low torque output. Torque accelerates the vehicle...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that's why I said for that size. Go down even smaller to a motorcyce and you'll get even better values...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
Is there a Japanese or German motor that has better horsepower/liter efficiency for that size (4.6L) I'm not being facetious, I really am curious.
Just taking the advertised crank values the Cobra has 83.7 Hp/L.
Compare that to the E46 M3 which has 104 Hp/L
Or the S2000 which has 120 Hp/L
Or even the CL-S at 81.25 Hp/L
But with that said, the S2000 has a very low torque output. Torque accelerates the vehicle...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, that's why I said for that size. Go down even smaller to a motorcyce and you'll get even better values...
#59
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by numbaonestunna
Yeah, that's why I said for that size. Go down even smaller to a motorcyce and you'll get even better values...
Yeah, that's why I said for that size. Go down even smaller to a motorcyce and you'll get even better values...
So you wanted the same or larger engines with a better number. How about the the follwoing done without forced induction.
M5 = 80 HP/L
LS6 = 71 HP/L
and these two are NA...
But if forced induction is allowed then my CL-S6SC makes an effective HP/L value of about 115.6... :P
#60
Quicker than U Think
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Jupiter, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by scalbert
I would hold the rolleyes for a moment. The Cobra is blown to about 7.5 PSI boost (from what I recall) putting its effective displacement at about 6.9 liters This makes its effective HP/L value at 55.8.
So you wanted the same or larger engines with a better number. How about the the follwoing done without forced induction.
M5 = 80 HP/L
LS6 = 71 HP/L
and these two are NA...
But if forced induction is allowed then my CL-S6SC makes an effective HP/L value of about 115.6... :P
I would hold the rolleyes for a moment. The Cobra is blown to about 7.5 PSI boost (from what I recall) putting its effective displacement at about 6.9 liters This makes its effective HP/L value at 55.8.
So you wanted the same or larger engines with a better number. How about the the follwoing done without forced induction.
M5 = 80 HP/L
LS6 = 71 HP/L
and these two are NA...
But if forced induction is allowed then my CL-S6SC makes an effective HP/L value of about 115.6... :P
I hate the HP/Ltr arguement. Can't we just talk about what car is faster? Hp/litre is only relevent when discussing motors of similar size.
#61
Instructor
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 50
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
35K? How about the new lancer EVO. Just about equal in acceleration and a bit more nimble as well. But for my preference I'd take a cobra = more potential.
HP/liter is crap.
Here: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXCFP9&P=0
There's a little less than 480 hp per liter. You wanna put that in your car?
Also when coming up with HP/liter arguements, and ya calculate an engine with forced induction you are discounted it's effective displacement. If it's boosting 14.7 just double the liters for it's effective displacement. Absolute is 14.7.
In closing......... I like cars. They all do the same thing in soooooo many different ways.
HP/liter is crap.
Here: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXCFP9&P=0
There's a little less than 480 hp per liter. You wanna put that in your car?
Also when coming up with HP/liter arguements, and ya calculate an engine with forced induction you are discounted it's effective displacement. If it's boosting 14.7 just double the liters for it's effective displacement. Absolute is 14.7.
In closing......... I like cars. They all do the same thing in soooooo many different ways.
#63
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 54
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GS Dave
Heck, if you're talking modded, as a CL SC is, then hold on, there are 2.0 litre motors making 700+HP
I hate the HP/Ltr arguement. Can't we just talk about what car is faster? Hp/litre is only relevent when discussing motors of similar size.
Heck, if you're talking modded, as a CL SC is, then hold on, there are 2.0 litre motors making 700+HP
I hate the HP/Ltr arguement. Can't we just talk about what car is faster? Hp/litre is only relevent when discussing motors of similar size.
The HP/L arguement was brought up and as such the questions were responded to. But now you brought up another question, do we want to know which cars are faster or which cars are quicker...
#64
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lakewood, CA
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by GS Dave
Can't we just talk about what car is faster? Hp/litre is only relevent when discussing motors of similar size.
Can't we just talk about what car is faster? Hp/litre is only relevent when discussing motors of similar size.
#65
Team Owner
someone give me 15G please... then i will race u
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
08-04-2024 10:35 AM
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
429
11-04-2019 06:44 AM
CheeseyPoofs McNut
5G TLX (2015-2020)
35
10-11-2015 11:25 AM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM