CL-S vs. TL-S which is quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2002, 03:34 PM
  #1  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
AJP97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisville
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL-S vs. TL-S which is quicker?

I know we are not suppesed to magazine race, but I found it odd that c&d and motortrend got 0-60 times for the tl-s at 6.2 & 6.3. However, road and track has the tl-s at 7.0. Motortrend has the cl-s at 6.4 I believe and c&d was about 6.8. Basically, I was wondering if the tl-s and cl-s are geared the same and how far apart are they in weight. Does anyone have any opinions on which one is actually quicker. I would think the cl-s would be faster than the tl-s because of weight and the extra 2 doors. Please note I am only speaking about the AUTOMATIC tranny. So what are your thoughts and experiences on this? Thanks!
Old 04-11-2002, 03:35 PM
  #2  
on bin laden
 
fbazakos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bloomington, MN
Age: 44
Posts: 4,696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
magazine racing is not a good idea ... i've lined up next to one tl-s ... and i had a car length on 'em ... but some many factors ...
Old 04-11-2002, 03:36 PM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
here we go again..........



Both are equal. They both are getting near the same times at the track.
Old 04-11-2002, 03:39 PM
  #4  
Moderator Alumnus
 
mantis23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TL-S is slow. :P
Old 04-11-2002, 03:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally posted by mantis23
The TL-S is slow. :P
then that would mean the CLS is slow too.
Old 04-11-2002, 03:41 PM
  #6  
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
AJP97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisville
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not trying to start anything, I was just curious to see what everyone thought. Basically, I just want to know if the gearing in the auto tranny is the same in both cars and how much the weight difference is. I know it all depends on the driver and so forth, but I just wanted to get a feel for how quick they really are. I have only driven a cl-s auto and 6speed, but not a tl-s. Thanks for your input though.
Old 04-11-2002, 03:49 PM
  #7  
STi
 
4thGSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Windy City~Chicago, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL-S is faster no doubt!!!
Old 04-11-2002, 03:52 PM
  #8  
Instructor
 
hypno999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 49
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CLS is a bit faster because of it's lower weight, not by much though...
Old 04-11-2002, 04:01 PM
  #9  
2002 CLs w/Navi
 
Smitty02CLs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
that's right, here we go AGAIN..... Cls should be a tick faster because of the lower weight, however it's mostly depends on the driver.
Old 04-11-2002, 04:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Wow... the age old debate..... again.

The weight difference is pretty close... I think it's about 100 - 150 pounds or so. Not too sure about that. Speed wise... they should be within a couple of tenths of each other.

Although I had heard that the TL-S is faster after sunset b/c we have real fogs.... not 100% positive on that one.... only about 98% :P
Old 04-11-2002, 04:04 PM
  #11  
Racer
 
CharlesNguyen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Smitty02CLs
that's right, here we go AGAIN..... Cls should be a tick faster because of the lower weight, however it's mostly depends on the driver.
Correct, same engine, TL-S has approximately 100lbs more, so a tick slower...
Old 04-11-2002, 04:17 PM
  #12  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
CL-S nuff said.:P
Old 04-11-2002, 04:44 PM
  #13  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
ok let just say that the CLS is faster, cuz we all know it doesnt have the looks.
Old 04-11-2002, 04:51 PM
  #14  
Senior Moderator
 
Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: location location
Posts: 10,925
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
you mean it doens't look like a grandpa car?? cool!
Old 04-11-2002, 04:53 PM
  #15  
STi
 
4thGSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Windy City~Chicago, IL
Age: 43
Posts: 2,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Crazy AcurA
ok let just say that the CLS is faster, cuz we all know it doesnt have the looks.
Now you done it
Old 04-11-2002, 05:03 PM
  #16  
Burn some dust here
 
cob3683's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Age: 41
Posts: 5,709
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
My moms Denali
Old 04-11-2002, 05:17 PM
  #17  
Racer
 
CLS-D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TLS is wayyyy slower. And you know that it should be, it weights about a ton more, and engine has about 30 hp less.
I also hear that their tranny blowz after about 10k miles, unlike super strong tranny in the the CLS.... :wackit:
Old 04-11-2002, 05:34 PM
  #18  
Instructor
 
codehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 229
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by juniorbean
The weight difference is pretty close... I think it's about 100 - 150 pounds or so. Not too sure about that. Speed wise... they should be within a couple of tenths of each other.
The dealer said 200 lbs., but I see only 48 lbs. difference on the Acura site--3558 v.s 3510. (Of course manual is 64 lbs. lower still.)
Old 04-11-2002, 05:36 PM
  #19  
Instructor
 
codehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 229
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by CLS-D
The TLS is wayyyy slower. And you know that it should be, it weights about a ton more, and engine has about 30 hp less.
I also hear that their tranny blowz after about 10k miles, unlike super strong tranny in the the CLS.... :wackit:
LOL--I guess yer just screwin' with the TL guys, but of course it's the same hp etc.
Old 04-11-2002, 05:55 PM
  #20  
Suzuka Master
 
NOVAwhiteTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Northern VA
Age: 43
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CL-S hands down now that we have a manual.

if its auto vs. auto it should be fairly the same. but there are two factors
1. tl is a little heavier
2. tl has a 17X6.5inch rim vs. our 17X7inch so i guess weight of rotating mass could play a factor
Old 04-11-2002, 06:12 PM
  #21  
f-a-b-o-l-o-u-s
 
my2sense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
all your CLs are belong to Kylie.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pham Alvan
2G CL (2001-2003)
35
05-18-2021 06:48 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
105
08-18-2019 10:38 PM
MetalGearTypeS
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
6
08-29-2016 08:28 PM
Timmy18
5G TLX (2015-2020)
78
10-17-2015 03:58 PM
RSpyder
Car Parts for Sale
5
09-30-2015 12:46 AM



Quick Reply: CL-S vs. TL-S which is quicker?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.