Bypass valve directly connected to throttle body
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bypass valve directly connected to throttle body
Is it possible to connect the air-bypass valve directly to the throttle body, instead of cutting the pipe? Actually, I know its possible, but does it work the same? Anybody know?
![](http://www.tta89.com/nedyno/6a.jpg)
#2
*Hella* isn't a word.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: T.W.D.Y.A, CA
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm no expert, but I wouldn't put the bypass valve up that high cause U'd never want water to go that high. The Valve dones't totally prevent water from going up the pipe, but most of it will be sucked out theoretically. But do u want that much water that close to the throttle body and have the Valve do it's job at that point? Probably not.
#3
Gotta Get an SUV :-(
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK
Age: 52
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would think that the purpose of the bypass valve is to prevent a vacuum from occuring when the end of the tube is under water. If this is the case then it shouldn't matter where you put it on the tube as long as the bypass valve isn't under water too.
Try sucking through a straw with a hole in it. It doesn't matter where the hole is you still will not get water up the straw.
Try sucking through a straw with a hole in it. It doesn't matter where the hole is you still will not get water up the straw.
#4
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
I can't find the post itself, but somone on the TL board did that and it didn't work out to well. Bottom line is that it's designed to be put about mid-way on the intake per the directions that come with it. I wish I could find the topic about this, but I can't seem to locate it. Anyway, I would change it ASAP.....
#6
Gotta Get an SUV :-(
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK
Age: 52
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats weird. I wonder why you would lose power. Does the valve cause turblence or suck in hot air?
If the valve is working correctly it should be doing nothing except being a tube unless the end gets plugged.
If the valve is working correctly it should be doing nothing except being a tube unless the end gets plugged.
#7
Drifting
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lafayette, CO USA
Age: 79
Posts: 2,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Jake
Thats weird. I wonder why you would lose power. Does the valve cause turblence or suck in hot air?
If the valve is working correctly it should be doing nothing except being a tube unless the end gets plugged.
Thats weird. I wonder why you would lose power. Does the valve cause turblence or suck in hot air?
If the valve is working correctly it should be doing nothing except being a tube unless the end gets plugged.
Trending Topics
#9
Team Owner
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hellertown, Pa. USA
Age: 57
Posts: 20,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would be concerned that under WOT (Wide Open Throttle), there would be so much vacuum generated that close to the throttle it might cause the bypass to open and draw in air that isn’t filtered as efficiently as if it went through the K&N down below.
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
#10
Someday pigs WILL fly!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Pequannock, NJ USA
Posts: 3,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Shawn S
I would be concerned that under WOT (Wide Open Throttle), there would be so much vacuum generated that close to the throttle it might cause the bypass to open and draw in air that isn’t filtered as efficiently as if it went through the K&N down below.
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
I would be concerned that under WOT (Wide Open Throttle), there would be so much vacuum generated that close to the throttle it might cause the bypass to open and draw in air that isn’t filtered as efficiently as if it went through the K&N down below.
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
#12
Originally posted by Shawn S
I would be concerned that under WOT (Wide Open Throttle), there would be so much vacuum generated that close to the throttle it might cause the bypass to open and draw in air that isn’t filtered as efficiently as if it went through the K&N down below.
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
I would be concerned that under WOT (Wide Open Throttle), there would be so much vacuum generated that close to the throttle it might cause the bypass to open and draw in air that isn’t filtered as efficiently as if it went through the K&N down below.
Just a guess of course, but why risk it for aesthetics ?
Shawn S
I would never have thought that you had to cut the $200 dollar exhaust pipe into two pieces.
![EEK!](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
I'm going to fix it this week.
Anyways, As far as the vacuum sucking the valve open under WOT. There is actually very little vacum at WOT, also why would it make a difference where it is in the pipe? Its solid.
And the losing power comment? I dont see how....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycdaniel
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
8
12-17-2019 10:58 AM
mrkingstonvi
Member Cars for Sale
2
02-22-2016 01:53 PM