B-pipe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #1  
bargamento's Avatar
Thread Starter
blah....
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
B-pipe

noobie here,
interested in installing b-pipe with stock mufflers. did a quick search but to no avail. wanna keep the stock look because this will be my patrol vehicle . (can't be taggin ricers if i have a coffee can myself.) would this mod increase hp?...or just a waist of time due to the stock restricted mufflers? thanks

2003 CL3.2 Type S 6speeeed.
Comptech Springs
otherwise stock
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
o1s's Avatar
o1s
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,186
Likes: 7
From: Tallahassee Fl.
probably not enough hp to notice a gain. stock exhaust flows really well.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2006 | 11:52 PM
  #3  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
i had the b-pipe with stock mufflers, gives it a more throaty sound.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 07:46 AM
  #4  
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
You shouldn't do anything then. The B-pipe will increase your noise, & not give any gains.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 08:16 AM
  #5  
Nitin's Avatar
But I just got here
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,048
Likes: 55
From: MD
Will the B-pipe provide any gains with the Comptech mufflers? I've run out of mods to do, haha. Unless of course I want to get nitrous or a supercharger.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 08:22 AM
  #6  
03silvertypeS's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,612
Likes: 7
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Nitin
Will the B-pipe provide any gains with the Comptech mufflers? I've run out of mods to do, haha. Unless of course I want to get nitrous or a supercharger.
i'd imagine not much, unfortunately for me, i just did comptech headers/cat-back exhaust at the same time, so i really can't say if the exhaust made any difference (besides the wonderful sound). From what i understand though, the only way to really get a gain from the exhaust is cat-back w/ b-pipe and that's maybe 1-2hp. The real gain with exhaust is when you do it w/ forced induction, but that's a big step (with a large price tag).
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 08:50 AM
  #7  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
well, the b-pipe on the car is the most restrictive area, and it isn't all that restrictive, but in terms of cat-back, the b-pipe is the essential part.

IMO, header > hi-flow cat > b-pipe > any muffler of your choice. some will say otherwise in terms of the cat. stock it's pretty good, but if you went beyond a CAI on the intake side, you will see gains from a hi-flow cat.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 11:26 AM
  #8  
barbeau82's Avatar
People call me Butterbar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
ok,but who else besides comptech makes an aftermarket b-pipe? I just bent the crap out of mine and need a new one, so I just ordered a new stock pipe because from what i hear, the stock set up is compariable to many aftermarket set ups....
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 12:57 PM
  #9  
CleanCL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,679
Likes: 12
From: New York, USA
just the b-pipe, only comptech.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 01:14 PM
  #10  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Here are some real numbers when I had Comtech do some testing on my CLS 6MT back in '03.

CT I/H/BP/E: 236 WHP, 201 FT-LBS TQ
+ CT SC: 305 WHP, 262 FT-LBS TQ
+ quiet inserts: 296 WHP, 256 FT-LBS TQ

Link to CT Dynos

Other CT testing showed that installing the CT BP added 2-3 WHP with CT I/H/E and 5-6 WHP with CT I/SC/H/E.

It's the sum of all mods; I/H/BP/E or I/SC/H/BP/E that makes the most of each individual mod.

Also, adding the CT BP will increase the interior noise level to something like a droning sound. Adding the CT quiet inserts to the CT exhaust will deaden most of the droning, but will kill any gains from the CT BP.

Further more, the CT exhaust does flow a little better than the OEM exhaust, making as much as 3-4 more WHP. So in conclusion, adding the CT BP with the OEM exhaust is a waste of time/money; unless you also plan to do CT I/SC/E as well.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #11  
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
CT I/H/BP/E: 236 WHP, 201 FT-LBS TQ
That TQ # is lower from what it does stock. Is that a result of loosing too much back pressure?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 03:12 PM
  #12  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
That TQ # is lower from what it does stock. Is that a result of loosing too much back pressure?
Let's compare apples/apples. Unfortunately, I didn't get a baseline dyno at CT before modding. However, based on a number of other baseline dyno's I've seen in the past, stock CLS 6MT's have dyno'd as follows:

WHP: 215-221
WTQ: 191-197

I've dismissed the dyno numbers that are abnorally low or high. So I'm going with the average range that agree with the fact that there's typically between a 15-17% loss at the front wheels based on the stock numbers of: 260 HP/232 torque (lb-ft) at the crank.

So I would disagree that there was a loss in TQ, albeit only a small gain (4-10 WHP), normally aspirated.

Remember, dyno's results from different chassis dynamometer can vary greatly. The import numbers are the gains measured on a given dynamometer on a particular day and time (weather is a big factor too).
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #13  
fuzzy02CLS's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 16,847
Likes: 223
From: South FL
My 6MT did 206 TQ bone stock. I've seen others around the 205 mark as well. The 190's are for auto's. Done on a dyno jet.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 04:47 PM
  #14  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Originally Posted by fuzzy02CLS
My 6MT did 206 TQ bone stock. I've seen others around the 205 mark as well. The 190's are for auto's. Done on a dyno jet.


Originally Posted by NSX-Tuner
"Remember, dyno's results from different chassis dynamometer can vary greatly. The import numbers are the gains measured on a given dynamometer on a particular day and time (weather is a big factor too)."
Not to mention that many dyno's are out of spec. CT's dyno had been calibrated by the factory. In addition, CLS autos usually dyno'd with about 2-3% less than the MT's at CT.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 05:05 PM
  #15  
03 CL TypeS's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
You know what they say... dyno #s mean nothing unless they're used to compare before/after mods performance, on the same dyno, and with the same atmospheric conditions (if possible).

There's also a certain type of dyno that always typically rates lower results, I believe it's called a Mustang dyno (no pun intended, lol). My old CRX dyno'd at 170whp / 141lb-ft on a Mustang dyno yet it was a mid 13-sec car on street tires, go figure.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 05:32 PM
  #16  
ThinJim's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 10
From: 3rd rock
Then there are exceptions..
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #17  
ThinJim's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 10
From: 3rd rock
Originally Posted by NSX-Tuner
Let's compare apples/apples. Unfortunately, I didn't get a baseline dyno at CT before modding. However, based on a number of other baseline dyno's I've seen in the past, stock CLS 6MT's have dyno'd as follows:

WHP: 215-221
WTQ: 191-197


Then there are exceptions..
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 08:28 PM
  #18  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
once again all my mods were dynoed before and after
stock 194.2 hp torque 185.7
224 hp torque 195.1 comptech headers,exhaust ---home made intake 10-23-01
227hp torque no-change v-tech 2-16-02
231.1 torque 195.6 3X pulleys unorthodox 8-26-02
237.1 torque 195.5 ice box comptech 7-3-03
241.1 torque 199.9 b-pipe 11-11-03
All work has been done at Garage Kwai Arl.hts Il. phone 1-847-259-6960 Ben Wong owner
Best time 14.10 @100.07 Mph Union Wisc.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 08:47 PM
  #19  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
Not worth the money unless you are boosted. Buy a Comptech Icebox instead.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 09:28 PM
  #20  
johntypes's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Park Ridge, IL 60068
mrsteve
I dont understad what you mean.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #21  
mrsteve's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 36,474
Likes: 249
From: Leesburg, Virginia
$400 for 4whp? Not worth it.

Spend $250 on an intake for 10whp
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 10:07 PM
  #22  
typeR's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,588
Likes: 48
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by 03 CL TypeS
You know what they say... dyno #s mean nothing unless they're used to compare before/after mods performance, on the same dyno, and with the same atmospheric conditions (if possible).

There's also a certain type of dyno that always typically rates lower results, I believe it's called a Mustang dyno (no pun intended, lol). My old CRX dyno'd at 170whp / 141lb-ft on a Mustang dyno yet it was a mid 13-sec car on street tires, go figure.
my dyno was done on a mustang dyno also 257/232
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2006 | 10:33 PM
  #23  
Allout's Avatar
Blown is Best
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,437
Likes: 15
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by mrsteve
$400 for 4whp? Not worth it.

Spend $250 on an intake for 10whp
Or save up for some used CT Headers and keep your eye out.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 01:06 AM
  #24  
samkws's Avatar
Comptech Freak
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,555
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
I have a b-pipe on my TL-P and it gives me more mid-range power overall and better acceleration from 60-100mph
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 01:37 AM
  #25  
Titand19's Avatar
East Coast Boost.!
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,365
Likes: 0
From: NYC & LI
The dollar per hp ratio is low for the B-pipe. Not a good investment unless you desire more power from other mods, in that case you can use all it's potential.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 06:37 AM
  #26  
NSX-Tuner's Avatar
boosted is best
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,289
Likes: 4
From: .
Originally Posted by samkws
I have a b-pipe on my TL-P and it gives me more mid-range power overall and better acceleration from 60-100mph
I can't say for sure, but isn't the CL-P and TL-P OEM b-pipes smaller than the CL-S and TL-S b-pipes? If this is true, then upgrading to a CT b-pipe on P models may be worth the investment if there's significantly more hp gain.

But I do agree with what other's have said, for the Type-S models, unless you're going FI, don't waist your money on a CT b-pipe. Get a CAI instead.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #27  
dj5's Avatar
dj5
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 50
From: Rocket City
I have the b-pipe on my '02 TL-S with stock mufflers. Can't tell any diference as far as power is concerned. The exhaust has a little deeper tone and not the drone as other have mentioned. I had the Comptech exhaust as well, but it was too loud for my taste so I sold them. I picked up my b-pipe used for $250. I couldn't justify paying the price of a new pipe.

I had run out of mods so this was my last bolt on mod.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
brianlin87
Car Parts for Sale
35
Sep 18, 2008 10:57 AM
Junior34
Car Parts for Sale
22
Aug 3, 2005 11:03 PM
sidemarker
Car Parts for Sale
26
Aug 27, 2004 12:16 AM
Chaptorial
2G CL (2001-2003)
17
Feb 12, 2004 09:46 AM
NSX-Tuner
Car Parts for Sale
14
Nov 22, 2003 02:17 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.