AWESOME race with a highly-modded 911TT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2004, 06:23 PM
  #41  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Haha.. you would!
Old 11-29-2004, 07:00 PM
  #42  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
Originally Posted by cls6sp03
Very nice!!! But I'm happy with my modest 305/262 WHP/TQ... well sorta... But I think I'd be even happier with 350... or would I?
the next time we race i'll have 350+



just an FYI
Old 11-29-2004, 07:46 PM
  #43  
Moderator Alumnus
 
mantis23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Carrollton, Texas
Age: 46
Posts: 17,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
awesome run!
Old 11-29-2004, 07:47 PM
  #44  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts



ImageEvent ownz you Matt.
Old 11-29-2004, 11:27 PM
  #45  
CL-S retired 10.17.06
 
TypeS_boi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CA
Age: 47
Posts: 1,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you think your tranny/clutch is holding up? I love hearing bout your kills man, you really need to mount a vid cam in your car!
Old 11-29-2004, 11:27 PM
  #46  
Blown is Best
 
Allout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fresno, CA
Age: 63
Posts: 4,437
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
The look on that guys face must have been priceless.

It's pretty interesting that:
1) With a simple spring swap out, you can get to 8psi
2) Run your gas down low and throw in one of those 5 gallon containers of high octane
3) Hook up your laptop and add back in some advance
you probably would have left him.
Old 11-30-2004, 08:30 AM
  #47  
drop em like its hot
 
rezurex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: West Harlem, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 2,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn allmotor.... damn..!! do you have stock axles? i would love to see a track run with DR's... keep it up man
Old 11-30-2004, 09:25 AM
  #48  
Racer
 
fiveoh-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
I believe the dyno #'s are raw values, although I could be wrong. It was on a 'lame' axle dyno A friend dyno'd his G35C on that dyno as well as a dynoject and the 'lame' axle dyno showed 11whp more, so I am quite happy with the way that particular 'lame' axle dyno has been calibrated for not having the front wheels on a roller.

Torque was 360.x ft-lbs

This is my 2nd race with a 911TT... the first one (I assume) was a stock one with the X50 package which I pulled on slightly in 4th gear. This 911TT was obviously much quicker. I have also raced a 360 Modena which I destroyed and an E55 AMG which was pretty much an even race. Note that all these are on 91-octane with my timing retarded about 5 degrees at 6psi.

Dyno #'s can be 'lame' or whatever... I don't really care. The car is quick, that's all I need to know
Axle or roller dyno, I'm sure you're CLS is very quick. The problem I have w/ your car running low 12's or even dipping into the 11's (like mrsteve thinks it can) is that your car's race weight is probably around 3600lbs...and as we all know it takes A LOT of power to move that mass. Given that the 419hp an 360trq was on an axle dyno, the real #'s w/ regular road conditions and the parastytic loss (that a roller dyno would add) are realistically more like 350-360hp and 300-310trq. With optimal road, weather and elevation w/ that power and that weight, the best your car would run is high 12's low 13's @ 105-107mph. That's ridiculously fast for a CLS, but not exactly a 911TT eater. That's not to say that you didn't beat him or outdrive him, but car vs car, the 911TT wins.

I'd love for you to prove this wrong - it'd be really impressive. I'm sure we'd all love to see your track slip showing a CLS can actually run low 12's w/ the "big dogs".
Old 11-30-2004, 09:28 AM
  #49  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
His previous set up made 70 wheel horsepower less and ran 12.9 @111 on street tires.


EDIT: Also, I make approx. 120 whp less than him and I trapped at 108. You are underestimating these cars, DRASTICALLY

And I highly doubt the loss on a roller dyno vs. the axle dyno is 70 whp. That's nearly 20%. He stated that the dyno is calibrated very well and usually is within 11 whp of a dynojet.
Old 11-30-2004, 09:29 AM
  #50  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Also, I make approx. 120 whp less than him and I trapped at 108. You are underestimating these cars, DRASTICALLY
Old 11-30-2004, 09:57 AM
  #51  
Suzuka Master
 
scalbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
Given that the 419hp an 360trq was on an axle dyno, the real #'s w/ regular road conditions and the parastytic loss (that a roller dyno would add) are realistically more like 350-360hp and 300-310trq. With optimal road, weather and elevation w/ that power and that weight, the best your car would run is high 12's low 13's @ 105-107mph.
As Steve mentioned, allmotor's last set up made less power and ran quicker than what you stated. I'm not sure what angle you are looking at the numbers but portion/level of the power curve utilized when racing and the gearing of the 6MT CL-S, makes for a strong pull.

The difference between a Dynapack and a Dynojet is not as you alluded. It may be about 3% - 5% depending on various factors. You are suggesting an engine dyno difference which is not the case here. Him making 419 WHP on a Dynapack may equate for about 400 WHP on a Dynojet. Had he made 419 crank HP, that would translate to about 350 WHP on a Dynojet; about what you mentioned. It appears you are mistaken about what type of dyno was performed.

As another example, I made 369 WHP with my SC/IC CL-S6. Granted, it probably would have taken his last turbo set up but not this one. And I was running about 1.5 PSI more boost.
Old 11-30-2004, 10:15 AM
  #52  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well... I already hit 12.9 @ 111.87 mph after making 347 whp on the SAME dyno... so 74 whp extra is quite a bit!! It's good to be skeptical... I doubt the car will hit 11's... even if it traps 120+mph, there's a lot more to running 11's than just raw hp.
Old 11-30-2004, 10:18 AM
  #53  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
Is that 419hp SAE net or gross, and was it a roller dyno or one of those lame axle dynos? What type of torque #s are you making? What are your 60' times - thing sounds like it'd be a beast to launch.

If that 911TT is trapping in the 120+ range, he should be pulling deep into the 11's.....and if you're hanging w/ him I'd assume your 12.xx means very low 12's and that your 11X. mph is 119. I'm not trying to flame - I'm just trying to put all of this together......I mean it's not everyday you see/hear of a CLS taking out a 911TT. Any videos of the dyno pull or the low 12 run?

Why are you still going by allmotor....isn't that an oxymoron?
There's a video floating around on the day I ran the 12... albeit the actual pass on tape was a 13.4 @ 108 or something (1200 feet elevation). There's also a video of me running a 13.5 @ 103 NA somewhere.

I didn't take a video of the dyno... but all of the data was published in Turbo Mag (Dec issue), so take a look.
Old 11-30-2004, 10:53 AM
  #54  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tranny + clutch are fine!
Old 11-30-2004, 11:51 AM
  #55  
Drifting
 
evilstorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Age: 42
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unbelievable! you continue to impress and keep us proud!
Old 11-30-2004, 12:23 PM
  #56  
Racer
 
fiveoh-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
There's a video floating around on the day I ran the 12... albeit the actual pass on tape was a 13.4 @ 108 or something (1200 feet elevation). There's also a video of me running a 13.5 @ 103 NA somewhere.

I didn't take a video of the dyno... but all of the data was published in Turbo Mag (Dec issue), so take a look.
I'm not trying to bash the axle dyno, but they're known for being quite generous (10-15% more favorable). I'll have to hunt down the issue of Turbo Mag. So if 12.9 is an honest #, the 70hp increase should get you into the low to mid 12's... but that 70hp will also make it tougher to launch. Sorry for being so skeptical.
Old 11-30-2004, 12:57 PM
  #57  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
^ you should be
Old 11-30-2004, 12:57 PM
  #58  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
I'm not trying to bash the axle dyno, but they're known for being quite generous (10-15% more favorable). I'll have to hunt down the issue of Turbo Mag. So if 12.9 is an honest #, the 70hp increase should get you into the low to mid 12's... but that 70hp will also make it tougher to launch. Sorry for being so skeptical.
I completeley understand... I don't plan on going to the track unless I have some control of the traction issue
Old 11-30-2004, 01:04 PM
  #59  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Or I beat your 12.9 @111
Old 11-30-2004, 01:07 PM
  #60  
Safety Car
 
ghost_masterCL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere in Denver, CO
Age: 39
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's On!!!!!
Old 11-30-2004, 04:17 PM
  #61  
Advanced
 
Punk em all 733's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chatsworth, CA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might be taling about 996TTx50, if it's true here's his mods:


Performance Mods: Ultimate Motorworks Stage V Zero Clearance turbos, ceramic coated, ported and polished, with custom wastegates * RUF exhaust * Custom ported/polished/ceramic coated headers * GIAC custom programming with 1.3 bar / 19 lbs. boost (programmed for 100 octane) * Gemballa sport air intake system and air inlet distributor * GT2 intercoolers * Aquamist methanol/water injection system (boost actuated direct spray into the intake) * Aquamist methanol/water intercooler sprays (boost and manually actuated) * La Bree Motorsport custom racing pipes * Bailey diverter valves * K&N air filter * Techart coilovers * Techart sway bars (front and back) * Cargraphic alloy strut tower bar * Brembo 14in / 380mm Evolution brakes * Performance Friction Carbon Metallic brake pads * HRE 540R wheels (11.5 rear and 8.5 front) * Michelin Pilot Sport Cups (315 rear) * 2004 spark plugs

Non-Performance Mods: SmarTire tire pressure monitoring * AEM wideband air fuel gauge * K40 radar detector and laser diffuser * RUF stainless steel pedals * Carbon fiber steering wheel, shift knob and parking brake * Silver Porsche crest * Paris Audio garage door opener * Bumper plugs * Clear side markers * Ash tray delete console * 35% tinted windows


He posts at SVTperformance, and he believes he traps north of 130 mph. He regulary takes out Lambos, highly modded cobras...etc, don't know how you kept up with that beast, but non the less great race.


Is this what it looked like??

Old 11-30-2004, 04:38 PM
  #62  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
No... his car was silver and I doubt it had ALL those mods!! This one had very nice wheels... exhaust.. BIG brakes.. no tint at all.
Old 11-30-2004, 08:35 PM
  #63  
goldmemberererer
 
goldmemberer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: West Hills, CA
Posts: 1,736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 911TT w/ the mods you mentioned, in my estimation, should've reeled you in a lot faster, but frankly, I'm not all that surprised either. When I was in your car, the temp was 85+ ... and judging by how cold it's been in the Valley lately, I'm sure your car is putting out an incredible amount of power.

Stability-wise though, how was the match up against the 911TT w/ huge wing, etc.? When do you think he would've let off, if at all? Also, was this on the 101 or on Valley Circle? Cause 130 mph on a surface road is like whoa
Old 11-30-2004, 08:45 PM
  #64  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^---werd, especially on Valley Circle...shits curvy

btw, when do I get a ride in this beast
Old 11-30-2004, 10:56 PM
  #65  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Valley Circle...
Old 12-01-2004, 12:33 PM
  #66  
Racer
 
fiveoh-tl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattg
^ you should be
I think you'e kidding, but if you're not, why would "should" I be? This doesn't add up, and the #'s don't completely make sense....the power he's making, the times he's pulling w/ the power he says he makes, etc. It's hard to believe and when something like this is claimed it should be questioned. No reason why everyone should take every story or claim as 100% truth.......after all the explanation of this forum used to be "fiction or non-fiction - beat an M5....yeah sure you did".
Old 12-01-2004, 01:02 PM
  #67  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
There are quite a few of us now that could hang with or beat an M5 up till around 110 MPH
Old 12-01-2004, 01:24 PM
  #68  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
juniorbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The QC
Posts: 28,461
Received 1,760 Likes on 1,046 Posts
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
I think you'e kidding, but if you're not, why would "should" I be? This doesn't add up, and the #'s don't completely make sense....the power he's making, the times he's pulling w/ the power he says he makes, etc. It's hard to believe and when something like this is claimed it should be questioned. No reason why everyone should take every story or claim as 100% truth.......after all the explanation of this forum used to be "fiction or non-fiction - beat an M5....yeah sure you did".
Agreed. I don't think he should be sorry either. He didn't bash or hate, just asked. Most people bullshit on this board.... so it can't hurt to question.

Plus, Allmotor hasn't tracked his new setup yet... so even he doesn't know what it can run. You can speculate all you want, but the fact is it hasn't been tested yet. I personally think that he can beat his old time of 12.9 now... but by how much?? I have no idea, and we won't know for sure until the next video
Old 12-01-2004, 01:38 PM
  #69  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
I think you'e kidding, but if you're not, why would "should" I be? This doesn't add up, and the #'s don't completely make sense....the power he's making, the times he's pulling w/ the power he says he makes, etc. It's hard to believe and when something like this is claimed it should be questioned. No reason why everyone should take every story or claim as 100% truth.......after all the explanation of this forum used to be "fiction or non-fiction - beat an M5....yeah sure you did".
By the way... there is a video of my running a 13.5 @ 103 NA... so figure what an additional 150whp does!! General rule-of-thumb... 1mph per 10whp. It makes sense cuz I was at around 340whp for the 111mph run.
Old 12-01-2004, 02:29 PM
  #70  
Lead Footed
 
RUF87's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Plano - Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 3,415
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
I think it's time to put our $$$ where our BS is . . . :P

The idea is to place odds on Allmotors times with his new set up.

Say for example we could have a range from 11.5 to 12.99 . . . closest to the pin wins . . bragging rights

And those that guess over 12.99 get to

I'd guess based on his previous set up running 12.9s I say he's good for 12.45 with no more mods to the suspension . . . 11.9s with.

Ruf
Old 12-01-2004, 03:30 PM
  #71  
///M POWER
 
darrinb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: West Bloomfield, MI
Age: 39
Posts: 15,299
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
comparing 1/4 times between him in the porche really doesnt say much, the porche being 4wd would slaughter him out the hole, but from a roll its a totally new game
Old 12-01-2004, 05:24 PM
  #72  
Blown LS6!!
 
Seattle Cl-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
w/ that power and that weight, the best your car would run is high 12's low 13's @ 105-107mph. That's ridiculously fast for a CLS, but not exactly a 911TT eater. That's not to say that you didn't beat him or outdrive him, but car vs car, the 911TT wins.

I'd love for you to prove this wrong - it'd be really impressive. I'm sure we'd all love to see your track slip showing a CLS can actually run low 12's w/ the "big dogs".
I trap 13.6 @ 106 with 19's and my Mustang dyno only showed 240whp/217tq.
Old 12-01-2004, 05:48 PM
  #73  
Senior Moderator
 
mattg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: OR
Age: 48
Posts: 22,909
Received 388 Likes on 196 Posts
Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
I think you'e kidding, but if you're not, why would "should" I be?
well you are the guy that said my 14.1 @ 99 time slips were BS, until junior came and set you straight.

and here you are underestimating again.



but i am just messing w/ you. you are being fairly courteous.



ps, my car dynod 301 whp and ran a 13.25 @ 105.7 w/ 75 shot on a 80 degree day.
Old 12-02-2004, 02:46 AM
  #74  
AC
Drifting
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,074
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
By the way... there is a video of my running a 13.5 @ 103 NA... so figure what an additional 150whp does!! General rule-of-thumb... 1mph per 10whp. It makes sense cuz I was at around 340whp for the 111mph run.
I didn't know that. Although it makes sense...I dyno about 40 to 50 WHP more than stock and I run about 4 to 5 tenths quicker.

I would have to agree with this "logic"

How does FWD affect high speed rolls? I know AWD typically lose to RWD at high speeds given cars have same "configs" in terms of power to the wheel.

Mrsteve, bunch of us AMG guys will rent out Capitol again in January...I should be in the 11's then with the cold weather...hopefully
Old 12-02-2004, 03:29 PM
  #75  
Bagged hybrid
 
BoostedM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: da bay
Age: 45
Posts: 1,498
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You guys also have to factor in the driver....ram can shift pretty well from the videos i've seen.
Old 12-02-2004, 03:40 PM
  #76  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
mrsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes on 175 Posts
Originally Posted by AC
Mrsteve, bunch of us AMG guys will rent out Capitol again in January...I should be in the 11's then with the cold weather...hopefully
I'll be down. Let me know and I'll come show you how a FWD car launches.


How long in the year do they stay open? I wanna go tomorrow night but their schedule on their site only goes through the end of November.


EDIT: Hopefully i'll be close to a 12.9 @ 110 MPH by January.
Old 12-03-2004, 08:29 AM
  #77  
Racer
 
numbaonestunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LBC
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
um....

Originally Posted by allmotor_2000
Sure... I don't mind. Most mod'd cobras would take me quite easily as those things run very fast stock! But, PM me... I'm down for it!

Not if you're "almost tying" worked Porsches.!!!! Running a couple modded cobras will give you a good baseline though, especially from a dig because "most" of us know exactly how our cars run (60 ft, trap speed, ET) so you can get a good feel for how your car does in comparison...
Old 12-03-2004, 08:37 AM
  #78  
Racer
 
numbaonestunna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: LBC
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was just thinking...

...the exact same thing. 996TTx50 will give you a run... I only hear him wanting to try. I think he knocked out a 600/600 '03 Cobra, so running him will probably be some humble pie for you. =) But that is one *sweet* car... <drool>

-JTL


Originally Posted by Punk em all 733
You might be taling about 996TTx50, if it's true here's his mods:


Performance Mods: Ultimate Motorworks Stage V Zero Clearance turbos, ceramic coated, ported and polished, with custom wastegates * RUF exhaust * Custom ported/polished/ceramic coated headers * GIAC custom programming with 1.3 bar / 19 lbs. boost (programmed for 100 octane) * Gemballa sport air intake system and air inlet distributor * GT2 intercoolers * Aquamist methanol/water injection system (boost actuated direct spray into the intake) * Aquamist methanol/water intercooler sprays (boost and manually actuated) * La Bree Motorsport custom racing pipes * Bailey diverter valves * K&N air filter * Techart coilovers * Techart sway bars (front and back) * Cargraphic alloy strut tower bar * Brembo 14in / 380mm Evolution brakes * Performance Friction Carbon Metallic brake pads * HRE 540R wheels (11.5 rear and 8.5 front) * Michelin Pilot Sport Cups (315 rear) * 2004 spark plugs

Non-Performance Mods: SmarTire tire pressure monitoring * AEM wideband air fuel gauge * K40 radar detector and laser diffuser * RUF stainless steel pedals * Carbon fiber steering wheel, shift knob and parking brake * Silver Porsche crest * Paris Audio garage door opener * Bumper plugs * Clear side markers * Ash tray delete console * 35% tinted windows


He posts at SVTperformance, and he believes he traps north of 130 mph. He regulary takes out Lambos, highly modded cobras...etc, don't know how you kept up with that beast, but non the less great race.


Is this what it looked like??

Old 12-03-2004, 10:27 AM
  #79  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
allmotor_2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: So Cal
Age: 49
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C'mon... I would not run a RWD or AWD car from the dig - what's the point of that? We all know the CL will get creamed.
Old 12-03-2004, 02:32 PM
  #80  
'07 November = STI
 
legendaryCL98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 39
Posts: 3,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i raced one of these once


let me try to find my thread from a long time ago..

ah! here it is! https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=130782

anywho, nice kill allmotor!

arent u gonna change your plate to N-V-ME ?


Quick Reply: AWESOME race with a highly-modded 911TT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.