Anyone has before and after 1/4mile times with the OBX headers?
#1
Happy CL-S Pilot
Thread Starter
Anyone has before and after 1/4mile times with the OBX headers?
Anyone has before and after 1/4mile times with the OBX headers?
Till Oct 12, I do not know how much improvment I can expect? Any clue?
Till Oct 12, I do not know how much improvment I can expect? Any clue?
#3
Cost Drivers!!!!
well,
if by obx you mean COMPTECH It really depends. I really didn't see too much of difference but i didn't run under ideal race conditions. Don't be disappointed if you don't see a huge improvement as you will only be in vtec 2.5x, through 1st and 2nd gear and half way through 3rd if you are lucky.
if by obx you mean COMPTECH It really depends. I really didn't see too much of difference but i didn't run under ideal race conditions. Don't be disappointed if you don't see a huge improvement as you will only be in vtec 2.5x, through 1st and 2nd gear and half way through 3rd if you are lucky.
#6
I LOVE MY CAR
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
if the gains are 0.4 sec... then I should expect 14.4s in 60s weather.
if the gains are 0.4 sec... then I should expect 14.4s in 60s weather.
#7
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
if the gains are 0.4 sec... then I should expect 14.4s in 60s weather.
if the gains are 0.4 sec... then I should expect 14.4s in 60s weather.
Trending Topics
#8
I LOVE MY CAR
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Chicago, IL (South Burbs)
Age: 45
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
You should see less because of your wider rims/tires.
You should see less because of your wider rims/tires.
Wouldn't the additional traction off the line (from wider tires) be more beneficial than extra drag would be harmful??
#9
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by Dom418
I still don't understand this concept...
Wouldn't the additional traction off the line (from wider tires) be more beneficial than extra drag would be harmful??
I still don't understand this concept...
Wouldn't the additional traction off the line (from wider tires) be more beneficial than extra drag would be harmful??
stock
215/50/17 792 revs/mile
NNH
235/40/18 794 revs/mile
#10
PACDAT
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: mississauga, canada
Age: 45
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Zapata
at the start yes but over th 1/4 his tires need to rotate more to travel 1/4 mile...hence slower times.
stock
215/50/17 792 revs/mile
NNH
235/40/18 794 revs/mile
at the start yes but over th 1/4 his tires need to rotate more to travel 1/4 mile...hence slower times.
stock
215/50/17 792 revs/mile
NNH
235/40/18 794 revs/mile
#11
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by jucee187
yes but what if the combined weight or rims and tires weigh less than the stocks?..
yes but what if the combined weight or rims and tires weigh less than the stocks?..
#12
PACDAT
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: mississauga, canada
Age: 45
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so how much lighter does a 18 inch tire and rim combined have to be .. to be the equivalent to having on 17inch stock rims/tires? to produce the same numbers?
so the bottom scenario would be ideal?:
wider lighter rims/tires VS stock 17s?
so the bottom scenario would be ideal?:
wider lighter rims/tires VS stock 17s?
#13
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by jucee187
so how much lighter does a 18 inch tire and rim combined have to be .. to be the equivalent to having on 17inch stock rims/tires? to produce the same numbers?
so the bottom scenario would be ideal?:
wider lighter rims/tires VS stock 17s?
so how much lighter does a 18 inch tire and rim combined have to be .. to be the equivalent to having on 17inch stock rims/tires? to produce the same numbers?
so the bottom scenario would be ideal?:
wider lighter rims/tires VS stock 17s?
Real quick though.....
optimal setup?
you'd want lightweight rims that are small in diameter but more wide than stock. You get traction off the line w/o compromising top end.
you can go to this site and check the difference between stock and aftermarket. It will give you the difference in the total revolutions/ mile. Then I know there is a equation or weight reduction to E.T. factor that EricL has posted a number of times.
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
#16
Cost Drivers!!!!
Here are some good discussions:
http://www./tech/wheel_weights.html
http://www.mysportscar.com/features/wheelweight.htm
http://www.wheelweights.net
http://integra.vtec.net/wheels/rotation.html
http://www.acura-cl.com/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=008076
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...light=unsprung
http://www./tech/wheel_weights.html
http://www.mysportscar.com/features/wheelweight.htm
http://www.wheelweights.net
http://integra.vtec.net/wheels/rotation.html
http://www.acura-cl.com/cgi-bin/ulti...c&f=1&t=008076
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...light=unsprung
#18
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by jimcol711
jesus christ, i should have paid more attention in calculus!!!! fuck that shit, someone have the cliff notes on this??
jesus christ, i should have paid more attention in calculus!!!! fuck that shit, someone have the cliff notes on this??
Lightweight rims OWNZ!!!! I'd say it's more worthwhile than headers. Get 17inch wheels. 18's look better but don't perform as well.
#19
Full-Time IDIoT---DoH!!!
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: DUMB ISLAND
Age: 42
Posts: 4,654
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
10 Posts
zapata's golden on this one
Lightweight 17s will kick so much ass that its not even funny...shit the Rota Battle (so what they are rotas) in 17x7.5 weigh 17.5 lbs which is pretty good, combine that w/a 225/45/17 tire and you will kick some major arse!
Lightweight 17s will kick so much ass that its not even funny...shit the Rota Battle (so what they are rotas) in 17x7.5 weigh 17.5 lbs which is pretty good, combine that w/a 225/45/17 tire and you will kick some major arse!
#22
I watched an interesting show on this topic. Before I learned about the rotating interia crap, I always assumed that a car with lower profile tires would out-perform a car with taller sidewalls. My logic was you could corner faster on short sidewalls.
That's true. The catch is the more weight, the more HP it takes to spin that weight, so you lose power (proof is swapping a steel flywheel for an aluminum one). Dropping say 9 lbs off of the flywheel in a car (depends on the gearing of course), can make the car feel like it's gained 25HP!!!!!!!
They tested the same car with 15", 16", 17" and 18" wheel/tire combos on a road course. The 15" were slowest (do to the poor corning), but intereting enough, the 18" weren't much better. You picked up the cornering, but you couldn't accelerate as fast with the added weight! The 17" were marginally better than the 16"! Pretty cool and usefull info!
That's true. The catch is the more weight, the more HP it takes to spin that weight, so you lose power (proof is swapping a steel flywheel for an aluminum one). Dropping say 9 lbs off of the flywheel in a car (depends on the gearing of course), can make the car feel like it's gained 25HP!!!!!!!
They tested the same car with 15", 16", 17" and 18" wheel/tire combos on a road course. The 15" were slowest (do to the poor corning), but intereting enough, the 18" weren't much better. You picked up the cornering, but you couldn't accelerate as fast with the added weight! The 17" were marginally better than the 16"! Pretty cool and usefull info!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
09-21-2015 07:51 PM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
37
09-15-2015 06:41 PM