Anyone ever use a G-TECH Pro
#1
Sick Spd Owner
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Columbus, OH
Age: 46
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone ever use a G-TECH Pro
See here: http://www.gtechpro.com/ for info
AND
here: http://www.edmunds.com/news/innovati...7/article.html for a review.
A friend of mine has one, im gonna try it out this weekend.
AND
here: http://www.edmunds.com/news/innovati...7/article.html for a review.
A friend of mine has one, im gonna try it out this weekend.
#2
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Personally, I think it's good to measure gains from mods (differences between runs).... however, not necessarily the best way to measure your 1/4 mile. Anyway, below are some links. The second link looks best as it's a comparison....
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...ighlight=Gtech
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...ighlight=Gtech
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...ighlight=Gtech
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...ighlight=Gtech
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#4
Senior Moderator
I have one and it's really accurate if used correctly. If used incorrectly it is inaccurate ![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I've used it at the track and was always w/i a couple of 100ths of the track time.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I've used it at the track and was always w/i a couple of 100ths of the track time.
#5
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Originally posted by Mike
I've used it at the track and was always w/i a couple of 100ths of the track time.
I've used it at the track and was always w/i a couple of 100ths of the track time.
Still.... most people would only believe slips over a G-Tech time
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Trending Topics
#10
Smack My B*tch Up
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: W. Bloomfield, MI
Age: 45
Posts: 6,213
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got the Tazzo(www.tazzo.com) , but I have'nt tested it at the track, it seems to function well.
#11
Happy CL-S Pilot
I am looking for the next generation Gtech Competition...
This one: http://www.gtechpro.com/competition.html
This one: http://www.gtechpro.com/competition.html
#12
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by Nashua_Night_Hawk
I am looking for the next generation Gtech Competition...
This one: http://www.gtechpro.com/competition.html
I am looking for the next generation Gtech Competition...
This one: http://www.gtechpro.com/competition.html
That's the ticket... However, you might want to call Tesla, as the software is "evolving"...
Summit Racing is supposed to be the current vendor of choice for the units (this info may be out of date now…)
The previous units can have "problems" with accuracy if the car has a good deal of aero lift at the end of a 1/4-mile run (pitch). This generally accounts for overly optimistic end-of-run velocities (when compared to the strip's trap velocity).
The squat/lift, on take off, will also screw-up the reading of the older GTech (the amount of error can be very small or large depending on the springs, power, weight transfer, etc)
YMMV
#13
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by Samer007
I got the Tazzo(www.tazzo.com) , but I have'nt tested it at the track, it seems to function well.
I got the Tazzo(www.tazzo.com) , but I have'nt tested it at the track, it seems to function well.
Just for fun, you might want to see how well it does with some bumps in the road...
#15
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by juniorbean
Wow... is it really that accurate? I know it's advertised pretty accurate.. but advertising and real world performance are two different things.
Still.... most people would only believe slips over a G-Tech time
Wow... is it really that accurate? I know it's advertised pretty accurate.. but advertising and real world performance are two different things.
Still.... most people would only believe slips over a G-Tech time
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I agree, most ppl scoff at the gtech, but most of them have never used one either.
#16
Suzuka Master
Yes and No... Good, Ok, and ???. It depends...
Originally posted by Mike
Yup, if you take a minute to set it up correctly it works like a champ. Scalbert will back me up on this too
I agree, most ppl scoff at the gtech, but most of them have never used one either.
Yup, if you take a minute to set it up correctly it works like a champ. Scalbert will back me up on this too
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I agree, most ppl scoff at the gtech, but most of them have never used one either.
Well.... I've talked to the guys at GTECH, and it’s a good tool for what it does, but, it can give you some "errors" depending on the situation. It does a very good job if you lucky enough to have a mount that doesn't move around much (I've been lucky that way). Ask Scalbert about the 5-mph+ end-of-trap speed errors that he mentioned vs. small ET error he mentioned some time ago. I puzzled over this for a while and could account for the 2-3 MPH vs. trap speed, but couldn't "account" for the 5 MPH end-of-quarter-mile speeds that some people were getting (Scalbert mentioned this). It took a few more weeks to figure out what was going on; it turns out that depending on your configuration (springs, spoiler, etc), you can get a high read at the end of the run due to the uneven lift on the car (from front-to-rear). This is dependent on the velocity squared. Depending on what springs are in the CLS and addition or lack of a spoiler, the lift from front-rear lift can be cancelled-out or significant.
The other issue concerns "being a good GTECH 'helper'/’user’. You are probably pretty careful and use the same stretch of road (yes/no)? When doing this, the "repeatability" of the unit, based on my own experience is excellent (same temp, conditions, mods == very close times). However, once the car is on a slight grade and/or has bumps, the readings don't average out.
Sounds like I'm bashing it -- NO! I'm suggesting that it can work very well and has some rather good uses and the current unit will never work out as a 1/4-mile standard. Even the new one that is coming out really needs 3-accelerometers AND 3-coriollis force/angular rate sensors (similar to the yaw sensor in the Navi) to make sure that the errors from bumps, pitch, yaw, and other effects are totally corrected.
Rate sensor (1 of 3):
![](http://www.spp.co.jp/sssj/koriori.jpg)
Accelerometers (1 of 3):
LINK: http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/CCRMA/...00000000000000
#17
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: LONG ISLAND NY
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have posted quite a few times about my use of g tech
i always use it in the same location and try to do runs when weather conditions are similar
my car is not modded(k/n not a real mod)
so for me, it has been a great tool to improve my launch technique and to compare the different uses of our trans
i have been able to bring my 1/4 times(only g tech timed) down from 15.2 to a low of 14.5 quite a significant improvement
are they real numbers, NO, but they are great for comparitve purposes. knowing that the variables are tiny.
is it a good/great tool, yes
if you plan to mod, great way to check improvements
i have not even played with measuring g forces cause i really don't care
whole other world available for autox nuts
my .02
i always use it in the same location and try to do runs when weather conditions are similar
my car is not modded(k/n not a real mod)
so for me, it has been a great tool to improve my launch technique and to compare the different uses of our trans
i have been able to bring my 1/4 times(only g tech timed) down from 15.2 to a low of 14.5 quite a significant improvement
are they real numbers, NO, but they are great for comparitve purposes. knowing that the variables are tiny.
is it a good/great tool, yes
if you plan to mod, great way to check improvements
i have not even played with measuring g forces cause i really don't care
whole other world available for autox nuts
my .02
#18
Advanced
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dracut, MA
Age: 57
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a brand new G-tech Pro, sitting in its unopened box, that I got free when I bought a full set of BFG KDWS tires for my SHO a while back (BFG was running a promotion last year). I was thinking of putting up on eBay, but never got around to it. I have no use for it.
Mike
Mike
#20
At he track I used G-Tech and 1/4m ET was right on but trap speed was as Eric said at least 5mph fast. Summary, if you want to know what you're going to run in the 1/4 G-Tech will give good indication of actual ET capability but 0-60 and trap speed in 1/4 not accurate!
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#21
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Woodstock, GA
Age: 53
Posts: 9,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Yes and No... Good, Ok, and ???. It depends...
Originally posted by EricL
Ask Scalbert about the 5-mph+ end-of-trap speed errors that he mentioned vs. small ET error he mentioned some time ago.
Ask Scalbert about the 5-mph+ end-of-trap speed errors that he mentioned vs. small ET error he mentioned some time ago.
In agreement with Mike, it was consistant at the track with ideal road conditions when talking about ETs. The trap speed was high but mostly repeatable.
That high trap speed still bugs me though... But again, on the road, it may not be accurate but it shoudl be repeatable when run at the same location.
BTW, I don't use their mount. I use a strap on the armrest to keep it from moving too much.
#22
Suzuka Master
Re: Re: Yes and No... Good, Ok, and ???. It depends...
Originally posted by scalbert
[B]Yes, it is all about the set up and repeatable runs at the same location. This cannot be used on the open roads as a absolute number. But it can be used for comparision if run in similar conditions and at the same location.
[B]Yes, it is all about the set up and repeatable runs at the same location. This cannot be used on the open roads as a absolute number. But it can be used for comparision if run in similar conditions and at the same location.
In agreement with Mike, it was consistant at the track with ideal road conditions when talking about ETs. The trap speed was high but mostly repeatable.
That high trap speed still bugs me though... But again, on the road, it may not be accurate but it shoudl be repeatable when run at the same location.
The pitch due to the squat is one issue at the start of run -- this can have a large impact on the ET.
The pitch at the end of run (due to aero effects) will have a large impact on the velocity as computed by the 1-axis accelerometer...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
rcs86
Car Parts for Sale
3
08-02-2016 06:52 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
AcuraKidd
Non-Automotive & Motorcycle Sales
0
09-25-2015 11:18 PM
4drviper
3G TL Tires, Wheels & Suspension
2
09-23-2015 07:42 PM