330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2002, 08:07 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
oce01acura32cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: la habra, ca
Age: 38
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!

ONLY HAS 225 AND KEEPS UP WITH A TYPE S? WTF?!?! someone explain!
Old 06-26-2002, 08:14 PM
  #2  
It's Go-Time.
 
GOT PSI?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canucktown, BC
Age: 54
Posts: 2,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are u comparing a 330ci to a 01' CL-P?
Old 06-26-2002, 08:32 PM
  #3  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The bimmer is almost 400lbs lighter... which will make a substantial difference. Being that the 330CI is RWD, stock vs stock, the BMW will get a better launch with a 5 or 6 speed manual transmission. As all of the weight transfers to the rear of the car when you launch. Helping a RWD car, but a big burdon on a FWD car.
Old 06-26-2002, 08:42 PM
  #4  
Pro
 
someguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SiGGy
The bimmer is almost 400lbs lighter... which will make a substantial difference. Being RWD stock vs stock, the BMW will get a better launch too with a 5-6 speed manual. As all of the weight transfers to the rear of the car when you launch. Helping a RWD car, but a burdon on a FWD car.
Where are you getting this 400lbs lighter from? The 6-speed CL without Nav. is "only" around 150lbs heavier. Makes a difference though. But, the BMW is RWD. The gearing seems to favor the CL. It just seems to be a RWD and overall balance issue and the fact that the BMW has 245s on the back.
Old 06-26-2002, 08:45 PM
  #5  
Advanced
 
frryy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, like Siggy said, the near 50:50 weight distribution helps alot on the launch. And so does RWD. Not to mention an Inline6 engine. Oh and Manual doesn't hurt either. What else? Hmm... Oh yea, they come with thicker tires stock. (the sport package does anyways: Front 235/Rear 245)
Old 06-26-2002, 08:45 PM
  #6  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by someguy


Where are you getting this 400lbs lighter from? The 6-speed CL without Nav. is "only" around 150lbs heavier. Makes a difference though. But, the BMW is RWD. The gearing seems to favor the CL. It just seems to be a RWD and overall balance issue and the fact that the BMW has 245s on the back.
Ya its closer to 300 and i was thinking of the auto, not the manual CLS.

And the few I thought out cars (auto) were closer to 3600+ lbs... from the people who have weighed them.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:03 PM
  #7  
I love my CL-S
 
WiLd~CL~TYPS-@SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: canada
Age: 42
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
400Ibs is bullshit

the stick 330ci is 1490kg
the cl-s is 1563kg
Old 06-26-2002, 09:16 PM
  #8  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by WiLd~CL~TYPS-@SS
400Ibs is bullshit

the stick 330ci is 1490kg
the cl-s is 1563kg

did you read all of the thread before posting this?

I was hittin the crack pip at 400, but I weas thinking our CLS (auto) weight more than they do. I remember someone weighed theirs and it was quite a bit heavier than 3500lbs
Old 06-26-2002, 09:24 PM
  #9  
I love my CL-S
 
WiLd~CL~TYPS-@SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: canada
Age: 42
Posts: 1,409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SiGGy



did you read all of the thread before posting this?
nah..i dont need to read them..i have the mag myself

and there are web sites you can check for their spec.

www.bmw.com

www.acura.com
Old 06-26-2002, 09:26 PM
  #10  
Pro
 
someguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Houston
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SiGGy


Ya its closer to 300 and i was thinking of the auto, not the manual CLS.

And the few I thought out cars (auto) were closer to 3600+ lbs... from the people who have weighed them.
Well, if they have acually weighed in at 3600+, that is heavy. A lot more than the Acura's quoted weight.

I weighed my E46 328Ci at 3220, still not too light :o
Old 06-26-2002, 09:27 PM
  #11  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by WiLd~CL~TYPS-@SS


nah..i dont need to read them..i have the mag myself

and there are web sites you can check for their spec.

www.bmw.com

www.acura.com
DUH

ummm i was trying to show I corrected myself... Which is why i asked if you read the entrie thread. And those numbers don't match what others have weighed them in at. (CLS)
Old 06-26-2002, 09:27 PM
  #12  
Powered By HONDA
 
Type S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere
Age: 49
Posts: 2,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no no no..magazine compares 330ci to cls...and i know its hp is a bit less than cls..but maybe it is more expensive than cls..i am not sure....cls (auto) can smoke 328ci or 330ci or 330xi (all auto) at any time..anywhere..and manual cls can take manual 3 series too..
Old 06-26-2002, 09:28 PM
  #13  
Subie Dubie
 
Red Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: PDX
Age: 70
Posts: 5,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BMW performance always makes it seem like they have more ponies under the hood.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:28 PM
  #14  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by someguy


Well, if they have acually weighed in at 3600+, that is heavy. A lot more than the Acura's quoted weight.

I weighed my E46 328Ci at 3220, still not too light :o
Ya I was a bit shocked to hear some of the weights of other peoples CLS(s) (auto)

35xx if i remember correctly, someone was at the strip and did it. I could swear someones was close to 3600, but mabye they had a system in their car.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:56 PM
  #15  
Instructor
 
Driven's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also has to do with the mfr's methods of rating power and also friction loss. BMWs tend to be conservatively rated....you can see this when you dyno the car...not too bad a difference in the stated rating and the actual output at the wheel. Those who have dyno'd their type S know what the difference is on the Acuras. But at the same time, I'm not afraid to take on a Mustang since Ford likes to play with the numbers to make that "pony" look good. Doh!
Old 06-26-2002, 09:59 PM
  #16  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
oce01acura32cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: la habra, ca
Age: 38
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
does 100lbs really make that much of a diff?
Old 06-26-2002, 10:15 PM
  #17  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
hey magazine readers... you forget one thing.... CLS (auto) makes about 200hp to the wheels, and the 330ci makes about 200hp to the wheels (5-speed).

Also, may i add the magazines say the CLS 6-speed and 330ci manual are equal. I think some said 5.8 for the 330ci, and 5.9 for the 6-speed CLS. Remember the CLS 6-speed is around 220 hp to the wheels?


So it makes sense, the 330ci is RWD and has 200hp to the wheels.

And the CLS 6-speed is around 220hp to the front wheels.


So thats why they are soo close in 0-60 :P
Old 06-26-2002, 10:59 PM
  #18  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by oce01acura32cl
does 100lbs really make that much of a diff?


every 100lbs of static weight is (approximately) .1 of a second difference in the 1/4 mile. Or 1 car length of difference (since every 1/10 of a second difference is 1 car lenght when you race). So if you had 2 exact cars with identical weight drivers. And then you threw some 200lb passener in one of them. The car with the extra 200lbs of weight would be 2 car lenghts behind the other. And theoretically .2 of a second difference,

I'm not sure on the 0-60 differences. And the 1/4 mile differences I just posted are approximate.
Old 06-26-2002, 11:33 PM
  #19  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
oce01acura32cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: la habra, ca
Age: 38
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
whoa. i wanna get rims but i think they are heavy as fuck! kmc floss 18inch
Old 06-26-2002, 11:56 PM
  #20  
Moderator Alumnus
 
SiGGy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lenexa, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by oce01acura32cl
whoa. i wanna get rims but i think they are heavy as fuck! kmc floss 18inch

hmm, I can't remember the equation. But the weight of your wheels is handled differently because the engine has to turn them. Hopefully somone will chime in with the differences...

oh well, if they look pimp, fuk it. Who cares. Not like we drive the fastest thing anyway...
Old 06-27-2002, 07:57 AM
  #21  
the name says it all
 
krazyplaya213's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tn
Age: 39
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
duh!!!!

hello hp really doesnt matter .....torqe is what counts!!!!
Old 06-27-2002, 08:27 AM
  #22  
Burning Brakes
 
JSuppi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Houston, Tx, USA
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by SiGGy


Ya I was a bit shocked to hear some of the weights of other peoples CLS(s) (auto)

35xx if i remember correctly, someone was at the strip and did it. I could swear someones was close to 3600, but mabye they had a system in their car.
And not to mention they probably didn't get out of the car when they where on the scales at the strip. I weighed in, and my car (with me in the car of course damn 200+ pounds ) the car weighed in a little over 3600..

I had removed the box, so the system shouldn't have mattered much (if at all).
Old 06-27-2002, 08:36 AM
  #23  
Banned
 
bone_stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: duh!!!!

Originally posted by krazyplaya213
hello hp really doesnt matter .....torqe is what counts!!!!
I agree! Also, in a street car it is where that torque peaks in the rev range. Idealy peak torque would be low on the rev range and then hold that peak to red line.
Old 06-27-2002, 08:42 AM
  #24  
Changin bulbs since '73
iTrader: (1)
 
Loseit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chi-town burbs
Age: 50
Posts: 8,111
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 4 Posts
Horsepower sells cars and torque wins races.
Old 06-27-2002, 10:00 AM
  #25  
S/C'd Accord Coming Soon!
 
BNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA | Houston, TX (Weekends)
Age: 47
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Torque doesn't win any races unless you have rev range and gearing to take advantage of it.

Just look at the Jetta TDI!!! 150ft/lbs of torque but only 90 something HP! It runs low to mid 18's in the 1/4 mile!
Old 06-27-2002, 10:59 AM
  #26  
Unregistered Member
 
Tom2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 3,472
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Re: 330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!

Originally posted by oce01acura32cl
ONLY HAS 225 AND KEEPS UP WITH A TYPE S? WTF?!?! someone explain!
Simple..... The BMW has 225 German horses and the CL-S has 260 Japanese horses. We all know that German horses are much more powerful than Japanese horses
Old 06-27-2002, 11:11 AM
  #27  
'Big Daddy Diggler'
 
bigman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Yonkers NY
Age: 43
Posts: 11,016
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I think it has to do with gearing. BMW has a more linear torque and horse power curve, were as the cl/tl have to wait to vtec to make any fuss
Old 06-27-2002, 11:12 AM
  #28  
Shift_3.5 Auto
 
ThoroDredCLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: MD <> VA
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: 330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!

Originally posted by Tom2


Simple..... The BMW has 225 German horses and the CL-S has 260 Japanese horses. We all know that German horses are much more powerful than Japanese horses
Old 06-27-2002, 11:46 AM
  #29  
BMW Owner
 
cakennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cell Block 4
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Type S
cls (auto) can smoke 328ci or 330ci or 330xi (all auto) at any time..anywhere..and manual cls can take manual 3 series too..
You guys are too much sometimes...I think you've been reading the Racing Stories forum too much. You forgot the rest of the CL-S kill list: Z28, Mustang GT, 911 turbo, WRX, Corvette...
Old 06-27-2002, 12:40 PM
  #30  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
oce01acura32cl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: la habra, ca
Age: 38
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
na torque can't have anything to do with winning races. we also have a lot more torque then the 330ci. the bimmer has less torque than the cl-p! damn bmw overrated, and c&d making the cl look bad. we should sue for false something...well, at least beat someones ass for it
Old 06-27-2002, 12:57 PM
  #31  
Banned
 
bone_stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BNut
Torque doesn't win any races unless you have rev range and gearing to take advantage of it.

Just look at the Jetta TDI!!! 150ft/lbs of torque but only 90 something HP! It runs low to mid 18's in the 1/4 mile!
Torque from a diesel engine is measured differently than that of a gasoline engine. Not comparable!
Old 06-27-2002, 01:11 PM
  #32  
BMW Owner
 
cakennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cell Block 4
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bone_stock


Torque from a diesel engine is measured differently than that of a gasoline engine. Not comparable!
Torque is torque, hp is hp. It doesn't matter if it comes from a gasoline engine, diesel engine, electric motor, or some guy turning a pipe wrench.

The "cult of torque" likes to say that "you buy hp, but you drive torque", and other witticisms not necessarily frounded in truth. Obviously, torque and hp are simply mathematical expressions that, when taken together, can describe the power characteristics of an engine.

And saying "torque wins races" is ridiculous. The faster car wins the race; there are so many variables to the quickness of a car that it can't be boiled down to a three-word phrase. Why do you think racecar engines make much more hp than torque, relative to passenger cars?
Old 06-27-2002, 01:52 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
bone_stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by cakennedy


Torque is torque, hp is hp. It doesn't matter if it comes from a gasoline engine, diesel engine, electric motor, or some guy turning a pipe wrench.

Not exactly true! In the early 70's horsepower and torque ratings changed from JAE standards to SAE standards. Typically, diesel engines still quote JAE numbers while gasoline engines quote SAE numbers.
Old 06-27-2002, 02:18 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
moomaster_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Somewhere between here and there, yet neither.
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OOOHHH!!!! You guys are getting me all wet talking with these big acronyms about torque and horses.....:-*
Old 06-27-2002, 05:12 PM
  #35  
S/C'd Accord Coming Soon!
 
BNut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lafayette, LA | Houston, TX (Weekends)
Age: 47
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by bone_stock
Not exactly true! In the early 70's horsepower and torque ratings changed from JAE standards to SAE standards. Typically, diesel engines still quote JAE numbers while gasoline engines quote SAE numbers.
Good point but can you PROVE that VW rates their engine torque using JAE standards rather than SAE standards?
Old 06-28-2002, 10:51 PM
  #36  
Instructor
 
codehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 229
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally posted by Loseit
Horsepower sells cars and torque wins races.
Eh? You can have torque up the wazoo and be slower than heck (but can pull two boats and yank a tree stump out at the same time). It's all about torque over the operating range (rpm), which makes horsepower. Horsepower implies a good product of rpm & torque. If you don't have horsepower, you aren't going to win a race, period.
Old 06-28-2002, 11:00 PM
  #37  
Instructor
 
codehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 229
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: 330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!

Originally posted by oce01acura32cl
ONLY HAS 225 AND KEEPS UP WITH A TYPE S? WTF?!?! someone explain!
In addition to what others have said--can't vouch for the accuracy, but I read in a review that the 330ci's top speed is 125 mph, while the CL-S's is 150 mph. So at least that the 330ci can't always keep up.

Old 06-28-2002, 11:33 PM
  #38  
Advanced
 
frryy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually their ECU cuts the fuel at about 137mph. I know from experience, duuuuude, if you know what I mean.
Old 06-28-2002, 11:56 PM
  #39  
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
 
Black CL-S 4-Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Sure it can can hang from a launch but the CL-S kills it on the highway.
Old 06-29-2002, 08:21 AM
  #40  
Retired. Not available.
 
SilverKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by cakennedy


You guys are too much sometimes...I think you've been reading the Racing Stories forum too much. You forgot the rest of the CL-S kill list: Z28, Mustang GT, 911 turbo, WRX, Corvette...
So you are saying auto CLS wont beat auto 330ci? You are wrong, buddy. I beat one at the track :P


Quick Reply: 330ci Horsepower?!?!?!?!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.