3.5l Info/e-mail...
3.5l Info/e-mail...
I finally received e-mail from "Doug" (RE: 3.5 short block/Rick Case)
Here is the basic info:
1. Doug is working on his Benz career, it's taking up most of his time, and has not allowed him to dabble with building motors at this time.
2. There seems to be very little in it for Doug (the margins are very small). Forget about trying to get a lower price from him.
3. Direct quote: "If you know of any legit offers for a new "crate" motor short block with gaskets for $2500, I'll consider building a few more as my time allows. Price includes the first $100 of shipping."
REPLY RECEIVED 3/30/2003 (And this is not an April fools joke -- OK?)
Here is the basic info:
1. Doug is working on his Benz career, it's taking up most of his time, and has not allowed him to dabble with building motors at this time.
2. There seems to be very little in it for Doug (the margins are very small). Forget about trying to get a lower price from him.
3. Direct quote: "If you know of any legit offers for a new "crate" motor short block with gaskets for $2500, I'll consider building a few more as my time allows. Price includes the first $100 of shipping."
REPLY RECEIVED 3/30/2003 (And this is not an April fools joke -- OK?)
EricL, u planing to do a 3.5 upgrade. I just got my tax return back and i'm considering the upgrade now. I'm from Orange County, not far from you, did he say how much shipping would be to California?
Is it basically a short block swap? Any sideaffects other then MORE POWER?
Is it basically a short block swap? Any sideaffects other then MORE POWER?
Hey typeR, i know that you had the conversion done, what do you think about it. What are the dyno numbers. HP, TQ? I'm either considering the 3.5 upgrade or Venom NOS kit. What's your average 1/4mile times with stock tires 13.9-14.1?
I can get you a brand new MDX block for $1500... but the problem is this:
(1) Are the guys in Florida just slapping the CL-S heads onto the MDX block
-OR-
(2) They swapping CL-S pistons to the MDX shortblock, but use the crank, rods etc.
One of the problems is the rod-ratio... I am working on some scenarios.... so if you guys are serious... maybe we can do a 'group engine build'
(1) Are the guys in Florida just slapping the CL-S heads onto the MDX block
-OR-
(2) They swapping CL-S pistons to the MDX shortblock, but use the crank, rods etc.
One of the problems is the rod-ratio... I am working on some scenarios.... so if you guys are serious... maybe we can do a 'group engine build'
Originally posted by AcuraTLSFan
Hey typeR, i know that you had the conversion done, what do you think about it. What are the dyno numbers. HP, TQ? I'm either considering the 3.5 upgrade or Venom NOS kit. What's your average 1/4mile times with stock tires 13.9-14.1?
Hey typeR, i know that you had the conversion done, what do you think about it. What are the dyno numbers. HP, TQ? I'm either considering the 3.5 upgrade or Venom NOS kit. What's your average 1/4mile times with stock tires 13.9-14.1?
Trending Topics
Originally posted by ghander
i think he turned it in as a core
i think he turned it in as a core
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by typeR
no i do still have my 3.2 the 2 center pistons and associated rings need re built but the bottom end is brand new...the insurance company tried one step at a time fix which ended up costing them about 8K
no i do still have my 3.2 the 2 center pistons and associated rings need re built but the bottom end is brand new...the insurance company tried one step at a time fix which ended up costing them about 8K
hmm, how much you wanna get rid of it for?
Hey S,
I can't remember exactly but what was the result of the 3.5 on ur CLS, 45hp and 45tq.
Also I kinda have the same question as Allmotor. The pistons, conecting rods, crank, block, and gaskets are all replaced with the ones from an MDX correct.
Juker008
I can't remember exactly but what was the result of the 3.5 on ur CLS, 45hp and 45tq.
Also I kinda have the same question as Allmotor. The pistons, conecting rods, crank, block, and gaskets are all replaced with the ones from an MDX correct.
Juker008
Originally posted by ghander
won't happen lou. The block of the 3.5 will be stamped j35
won't happen lou. The block of the 3.5 will be stamped j35
teh Senior Instigator
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally posted by typeR
again no...you can use your own j32a2 block....its only the crank area that need be changed ,the bottom end
again no...you can use your own j32a2 block....its only the crank area that need be changed ,the bottom end
sweet
Originally posted by allmotor_2000
The 3.5 won't show anything... unless you use an MDX block.
300cc upgrade would NEVER give 45whp... I don't know what TypeR dynoed... I guess around 245whp... am I right?
The 3.5 won't show anything... unless you use an MDX block.
300cc upgrade would NEVER give 45whp... I don't know what TypeR dynoed... I guess around 245whp... am I right?
We have just about completed the car we are working on with the 3.5 upgrade. About the only thing we have left to figure out is which gaskets and timing covers to use. Our customer is going a little beyond just a swap, so it is taking longer than we had originally thought--forged pistons and rods.
It is a pretty straight forward swap. There are several options that you can work with. If you just swap over the block from the MDX, the compression ratio ends up being 10.86:1 with the stock CLS/TLS heads--perfect if you want to run all motor or with nitrous.
Once we complete this, I will be able to get pricing to everyone. I have a feeling this will be a relatively affordable option for many who want more power.
Thanks
Dean
It is a pretty straight forward swap. There are several options that you can work with. If you just swap over the block from the MDX, the compression ratio ends up being 10.86:1 with the stock CLS/TLS heads--perfect if you want to run all motor or with nitrous.
Once we complete this, I will be able to get pricing to everyone. I have a feeling this will be a relatively affordable option for many who want more power.

Thanks
Dean
I don't think using the MDX block is the correct thing to do... its definately cheaper... like $1300 + gaskets + labor! However... that combination won't make good power at high RPMs! Rod/stroke isn't optimal. I think utilizing the 3.2 block with MDX crank, maybe stock rods w/ custom pistons should yield 11.5:1 compression (or whatever you want). I am doing some calculations on block height. Ideally to optimize the rod-ratio... you need custom rods.
With the 3.5 block.. you use the 3.5 timing belt etc. but 3.2 head-gaskets with the 3.2 heads.
You can also weld the crank journals, bo 0.010 or 0.020 over and make a 3.6 to 3.8 liter!
With the 3.5 block.. you use the 3.5 timing belt etc. but 3.2 head-gaskets with the 3.2 heads.
You can also weld the crank journals, bo 0.010 or 0.020 over and make a 3.6 to 3.8 liter!
I am very interested in the 3.5L upgrade, especially if Dean can package it and its affordable. My biggest question is where the heck can I get it installed? If Florida is the only answer then I don't think I'd get it. If there was somewhere closer that could do it I'd be saving up those pennies
Originally posted by TLRunner
allmotor_2000...dude...uhm...the 3.2 and 3.5 blocks are the same part number
allmotor_2000...dude...uhm...the 3.2 and 3.5 blocks are the same part number
Allmotor,
Plz explain to me the differences and benifits with using an MDX crank and an MDX block.
Is the MDX block of larger bore than the CLS?
U said that 300cc more would not be able to achieve a 45hp bump. TypeR said that the only dyno that he's seen is the one that Doug supplies and his results were around 250. I can aggree with u that u can't achieve a 45hp bump with just a mear 300cc. Thats why I am also asking if that 250 was also with headers?
One more question. The power curve falls off before red line. Now is that due to the larger displacement and the cams off the CLS? If so then would a more aggressive high lobe allow extended power untill redline?
Juker008
Plz explain to me the differences and benifits with using an MDX crank and an MDX block.
Is the MDX block of larger bore than the CLS?
U said that 300cc more would not be able to achieve a 45hp bump. TypeR said that the only dyno that he's seen is the one that Doug supplies and his results were around 250. I can aggree with u that u can't achieve a 45hp bump with just a mear 300cc. Thats why I am also asking if that 250 was also with headers?
One more question. The power curve falls off before red line. Now is that due to the larger displacement and the cams off the CLS? If so then would a more aggressive high lobe allow extended power untill redline?
Juker008
Originally posted by Juker008
Allmotor,
.
Is the MDX block of larger bore than the CLS?
U said that 300cc more would not be able to achieve a 45hp bump. TypeR said that the only dyno that he's seen is the one that Doug supplies and his results were around 250. I can aggree with u that u can't achieve a 45hp bump with just a mear 300cc. Thats why I am also asking if that 250 was also with headers?
Juker008
Allmotor,
.
Is the MDX block of larger bore than the CLS?
U said that 300cc more would not be able to achieve a 45hp bump. TypeR said that the only dyno that he's seen is the one that Doug supplies and his results were around 250. I can aggree with u that u can't achieve a 45hp bump with just a mear 300cc. Thats why I am also asking if that 250 was also with headers?
Juker008
Originally posted by typeR
i'd say your mistaken...mines stamped j35a4,theres A2, j32a2,a1,30a ect...i dont see there's anyway they could be the same part number but have different engine stamps
i'd say your mistaken...mines stamped j35a4,theres A2, j32a2,a1,30a ect...i dont see there's anyway they could be the same part number but have different engine stamps
So... what I am saying is this... NA dynoes... scalbert (header, intake) makes 246whp... others who have similar mods make 240'ish whp. 3.5 upgrade makes 250whp... it might be a 10whp jump on the 3.2 and more on the torque side... but it doesn't give 45whp!!
The bore is the same... I don't know for sure yet but I think the 3.5 block is taller to accomodate the longer stroke. I am sure the combustion chamber volume is more on the MDX to lower compression a tad.
I haven't checked all the figure yet!
The bore is the same... I don't know for sure yet but I think the 3.5 block is taller to accomodate the longer stroke. I am sure the combustion chamber volume is more on the MDX to lower compression a tad.
I haven't checked all the figure yet!

