Nashua_Night_Hawk

Any one checked this new ride?

It is 215Hp over 3000lbs @ $35k. Chrysler claims 0-60 in 6.5s.

No NAV.. but fully loaded as it is.

Ah if it was 280-300 HP and @ $30K it would be a killer!...

It look nice, RWD, nice interrior... As it is now and @ $35k, I would go with Mazda RX-8 or Z350/G35!

mc222

This thing will go the way of the Do-Do bird just as fast as the retro Thunderbird

DigiBox

Is this the car that is built off the CLK chasis, along with the CLK 320 engine?

fuzzy02CLS

iTrader: (2)

Yes. It's a nice car other then having not enough power. Huge ass rims/tires 19 front 20 rear. But will you pay $35K for a Chrysler?

r10apple

The worst car I ever owned was a Chrysler-lemoned a Sebring--twice!
Dad had a couple of Grand Cherokee's-lemoned, twice...
I'll never, ever own another...

Scrib

I thought the Crossfire was to have a much bigger motor than that.

devnull

Yup, what a dissapointment (par for moPAR)

RandyMax

It's a MB SLK, not CLK.

1SICKLEX

It's built off the 8 year old SLK platform. Though an 8 year old SLK platform is better than a new Chrysler one. I think it's weirdand silly and small and why did they make it? If it was 20k, it would be killa, for 35k, they are smoking pot. I mean, it's more of a blantant copy of the TT than the 350Z.