1/4 mile times for stock TL or CL
#1
Go Cubs!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: orlando
Age: 44
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1/4 mile times for stock TL or CL
Not the type S versions, but I want to know the best 1/4 mile times for a CL-P or TL-P, stock.........I could of sworn there was a guy running high 14's, the people on the celica boards are saying that they can't even run low 15's...need some help here.
#3
Go Cubs!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: orlando
Age: 44
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not to be mean but that was an ignorant post, honestly you sound just like some of the celica people. The type S and GTS are equal...nuff said, ive owned both cars. Best NA GTS ive seen on the board was 13.7.....don't see that NA for the Cl-S.
#4
Doin' da crack shuffle
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Philly and Bowie
Age: 46
Posts: 10,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3.2cl-s
not to be mean but that was an ignorant post, honestly you sound just like some of the celica people. The type S and GTS are equal...nuff said, ive owned both cars. Best NA GTS ive seen on the board was 13.7.....don't see that NA for the Cl-S.
Our cars aren't dedicated sports cars.
They're "Luxury Sport Coupes".
The SRT4 is faster too but which of the three would you rather have?
Hmmm
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
Fast go kart or all around nice vehicle?
#5
Originally Posted by Red-CL
Our cars aren't dedicated sports cars.
They're "Luxury Sport Coupes".
The SRT4 is faster too but which of the three would you rather have?
Hmmm![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
Fast go kart or all around nice vehicle?
They're "Luxury Sport Coupes".
The SRT4 is faster too but which of the three would you rather have?
Hmmm
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
Fast go kart or all around nice vehicle?
As for what one would rather have, they each have their own appeal. Most women will choose a Celica. Most modern age hot rodders will choose the SRT-4 (fastest FWD production vehicle in the history of automobile for under 20K - can't blame them for choosing it). And people like me and most others on this board will choose the CL/TL because of what the car is: a sport luxury coupe or sedan!
#6
I
Originally Posted by CL Platano
Stock I think they run mid 15's, by the way Celicas are slow.
Now, a 2.2 4 banger cl is slow!
#7
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by 3.2cl-s
not to be mean but that was an ignorant post, honestly you sound just like some of the celica people. The type S and GTS are equal...nuff said, ive owned both cars. Best NA GTS ive seen on the board was 13.7.....don't see that NA for the Cl-S.
LOL... there's a NA CL-S running 13.30s
Trending Topics
#9
Go Cubs!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2002
Location: orlando
Age: 44
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmmm....nevermind then...o well.
I was never trying to compare the two cars anyways, I was just sticking up for the TL and Cl on the celica board. now I just got this quote about how CLS 6spd's run high 14's
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by faisalrollaxrs
The TL Auto (A.K.A fancy word: sportshift) with 225 HP low 15s??. It is hard to believe man. If they had a stick shift, I would still find it hard to believe it, but with auto and heavy weight (officially 3500 lbs) it seems impossible to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by NoRulzAt140 Mph
WERD!
6 SPD CL-S' run high 14's.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was never trying to compare the two cars anyways, I was just sticking up for the TL and Cl on the celica board. now I just got this quote about how CLS 6spd's run high 14's
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by faisalrollaxrs
The TL Auto (A.K.A fancy word: sportshift) with 225 HP low 15s??. It is hard to believe man. If they had a stick shift, I would still find it hard to believe it, but with auto and heavy weight (officially 3500 lbs) it seems impossible to me.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
quote
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by NoRulzAt140 Mph
WERD!
6 SPD CL-S' run high 14's.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#10
Instructor
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cerritos, CA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3.2cl-s
not to be mean but that was an ignorant post, honestly you sound just like some of the celica people. The type S and GTS are equal...nuff said, ive owned both cars. Best NA GTS ive seen on the board was 13.7.....don't see that NA for the Cl-S.
#11
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mahopac, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by koolmonkey999
no way in hell any type s is equal to a gts and there are ppl on the board who did run 13.7 N/A
#13
Lead Footed
typeR has run 13s as well
. . . 13.7s if I recall correctly.
As for stock vs stock (TypeS), I never lost to a stock or even slightly modded GTS.
I know that there are a lot more mods available for the GTS so it's not a fair comparison to say who would in a fully modded scenario. If you want to go there and change the comparison, I'd just get a different car than the TL and whip up on 13sec GTS all day long.
I had a TL before theTypeS and it was ok and would hang with a stock GTS.
Ruf
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
As for stock vs stock (TypeS), I never lost to a stock or even slightly modded GTS.
I know that there are a lot more mods available for the GTS so it's not a fair comparison to say who would in a fully modded scenario. If you want to go there and change the comparison, I'd just get a different car than the TL and whip up on 13sec GTS all day long.
I had a TL before theTypeS and it was ok and would hang with a stock GTS.
Ruf
#16
Instructor
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cerritos, CA
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RUF87
typeR has run 13s as well
. . . 13.7s if I recall correctly.
As for stock vs stock (TypeS), I never lost to a stock or even slightly modded GTS.
I know that there are a lot more mods available for the GTS so it's not a fair comparison to say who would in a fully modded scenario. If you want to go there and change the comparison, I'd just get a different car than the TL and whip up on 13sec GTS all day long.
I had a TL before theTypeS and it was ok and would hang with a stock GTS.
Ruf
![Nod](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/nod.gif)
As for stock vs stock (TypeS), I never lost to a stock or even slightly modded GTS.
I know that there are a lot more mods available for the GTS so it's not a fair comparison to say who would in a fully modded scenario. If you want to go there and change the comparison, I'd just get a different car than the TL and whip up on 13sec GTS all day long.
I had a TL before theTypeS and it was ok and would hang with a stock GTS.
Ruf
#17
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High 15s at 88?
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
#19
Lead Footed
Originally Posted by Originally Posted by fiveoh-tl
Who ran 13's w/ no power adder (and we're talking CLS/TLS)???
Originally Posted by Hobo
n/a != no mods
So in that case, a stock TypeS will take a stock GTS.
Ruf
#20
Lead Footed
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
High 15s at 88?
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
![](http://www.car-stats.com/stats/graphs/threedline.aspx?img=1064)
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
. . . . and to go with that, here's a quote from Edmunds on the GTS
"The engine, a 180-hp 1.8-liter four, is best when used above 6,000 rpm. It is here that the VVT-i variable valve timing system changes over to the aggressive profile. The feeling is like having your very own little jet afterburner kick in. For maximum acceleration, and for the one-two shift in particular, care must be taken to keep the revs as high as possible. The engine's redline is 7,800 rpm, but a few hundred extra revs can be gained until the limiter kicks in.
With practice, 0 to 60 mph can be done in 6.9 seconds, and the quarter-mile achieved in 15.4 seconds at 91.6 mph."
So, it looks like even a TL-P will take a GTS when comparing apples to apples.
Ruf
#21
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
High 15s at 88?
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
![](http://www.car-stats.com/stats/graphs/threedline.aspx?img=1064)
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
I don't believe those numbers for a second. Not a single TL-P has run lower than 15.0 at the track even with I/H/E/Pulleys/Tires/etc... how the hell does a stock TL-P do it in 15.2? Actually... most stock TL-S's run 15.2 @ 93,
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
High 15s at 88?
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
![](http://www.car-stats.com/stats/graphs/threedline.aspx?img=1064)
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
I once ran a brand new (at that time) 2002 Alti 3.5SE with my TL-P rental and held a bumper on him from a stop light to about 1/4 mile. (Even with my 02 Maxima, I dont sleep on any 2G TL.)
#23
Lead Footed
Originally Posted by mrsteve
I don't believe those numbers for a second. Not a single TL-P has run lower than 15.0 at the track even with I/H/E/Pulleys/Tires/etc... how the hell does a stock TL-P do it in 15.2? Actually... most stock TL-S's run 15.2 @ 93,
Also, I ran 14.7s stock . . . . just wheels and tires.
Ruf
#25
I
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
High 15s at 88?
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
![](http://www.car-stats.com/stats/graphs/threedline.aspx?img=1064)
Here's what I found for TL-P:
Car-Stats.com Report for 2000 Acura 3.2TL
Obtained from C&D March, 2000
0-60: 6.7 Transmission: Automatic
1/4 Mile: 15.2
1/4 Speed: 93
0-30: 2.5
0-40: 3.7
0-50: 5.1
0-70: 9
0-80: 11.5
0-90: 14.3
0-100: 20.9
Didn't Willdogs have a video of his 0-100 run? That car seemed pretty quick for not being a type S.
#27
Three Wheelin'
To add to my above post, the track conditions and weather were very good that day, which of course helped. Sixty foot time was 2.27. 1/8th time was 9.667. Then I bought lightweight SSR's but could only manage a 15.1. But with all those miles I decided I might be fighting a clogged converter, weak MAP sensor or someother sensor, coils, who knows. So much could be worn out that I'm fighting a stupid battle. So I will not go back, but I was shooting for a 14.8 as a goal. I will say this, that the now completed install of the thermoblock spacers along with the cooling mods and I/H/P makes for a strong running engine that still does not use any oil.
#28
still a Masshole
Originally Posted by Hobo
n/a != no mods
So technically speaking we have had a few n/a CLSs in the 13s (allmotor, typeR, and a few other CLS6s with i/h/e).
Oh and stock CLS6s are generally mid-14s at 96mph with the occasional low 14s (14.1-14.3) in there.
my stock TLS was a 15.2@93 and I believe that the TLPs/CLPs are mid to high-15s at 88-90mph from what I've read.
#30
1/4 14.4 at 95
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: long island ny
Age: 47
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
lol i must have a freak my car is an auto with just intake my best is a 14.4 . so mabe with out the intake my best would be a 14.5 ............ my car is a type s
#31
still a Masshole
Originally Posted by ga2000
lol i must have a freak my car is an auto with just intake my best is a 14.4 . so mabe with out the intake my best would be a 14.5 ............ my car is a type s
#33
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally Posted by 3.2cl-s
not to be mean but that was an ignorant post, honestly you sound just like some of the celica people. The type S and GTS are equal...nuff said, ive owned both cars. Best NA GTS ive seen on the board was 13.7.....don't see that NA for the Cl-S.
#34
Floyd Mayweather Jr.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The City of Syrup Screwston, Texas
Posts: 14,078
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
BTW:whocares: about 1/4 numbers they aren't the end all be all numbers for performance. From a roll a CL-S will take down a GTS with ease. Like I stated in an earlier thread I've beaten a modded GTS before rather easily.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IIDXholic
Car Parts for Sale
23
10-08-2015 07:53 AM