Load index??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2006, 07:56 PM
  #1  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
laee3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Load index??

Alright so I ordered Kumo ecsta ASX off of tirerack last weekend and salesmanager calls me that TSX comes with load index of 93 pounds. Kumho ecsta ASX is 92 rated. He says probably nothing will happen given that i live in central california. Also Kumho ecsta ASX is Z-rated. I know many of the forum member is running this tires. Size I got was 225/40/18. What do you guys think? What are the chance that I might get a flat tire? I usually drive with one person on the passenger seat and pretty much nothing in the trunk. So let me know what you guys think.
Old 09-28-2006, 08:24 PM
  #2  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
laee3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as i searched the forum you could get side bubbles or something if you run lower load index tires than what they recoomened. what exactly is this?
Old 09-29-2006, 09:51 AM
  #3  
Instructor
 
Joeys'TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Carolina
Age: 49
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
don't have any idea
Old 09-29-2006, 10:46 AM
  #4  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Tirerack has all the info you need about tires.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=35

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/tiretech.jsp
Old 09-29-2006, 11:11 AM
  #5  
Racer
Thread Starter
 
laee3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 42
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah I read that, it just basically tells me to run as high as i can but since i'm running 92 rather than 93, what am i really compromising?? I heard that you can get bubbles in the side walls. I'm not sure the "sidewall" here is referrering to fenders or the sidewalls on the tirewall, does anybody know what it is really?
Old 09-29-2006, 11:33 AM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
The load capacity of the 92 rating is 44 lbs less than the 93 rating per tire. so, that's really nothing to worry about.
Old 09-29-2006, 12:59 PM
  #7  
Team Owner
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
^^ is that a static load rating or a dynamic load rating?
Old 09-29-2006, 02:37 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
JTso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 7,285
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
^^
Good question. I'm not sure and couldn't find any further info other than just numbers. However, the max load capacity is rated at the max air pressure of the tire. Most tires are inflated to approx. 32 psi and the max can be as high as 50 psi. So, it depends on the tire and the current inflated pressure, I guess it's possible to excess the load capacity if the car is fully loaded with people and luggage. Car weight + people + luggage.
Old 09-29-2006, 02:47 PM
  #9  
Team Owner
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I've always assumed it was a static rating and that you would just take the weight of the car, add 850 (max weight capacity I believe), multiply by the F/R weight ratio and then divide by two to get the required load rating per tire. If its dynamic then the forces on a tire could be quite high, particularly braking into a sharp turn (as an example).
Old 10-06-2006, 06:07 PM
  #10  
B A N N E D
 
925tsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jerzey
Age: 44
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
did you get the tires on the car yet? how are they?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
knight rider
Car Talk
9
03-04-2016 08:59 AM
joflewbyu2
5G TLX (2015-2020)
139
10-08-2015 11:16 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
snorf
2G RDX (2013-2018)
7
09-17-2015 10:04 PM
Mike Bertram
2G TL (1999-2003)
9
09-10-2015 09:27 AM



Quick Reply: Load index??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 AM.