Blizzak WS70
#1
Almost Doctor
Thread Starter
Blizzak WS70
So this weekend I went and picked up a set of the new Blizzak WS70 winter tires in 205/60-16. Last fall I purchased a set of 16" 7-spoke wheels off of a 2005 Accord EX V6 for the winter setup. I was reluctant to go to 16" due to the HUGE decrease in handling performance but 16" for a winter setup is ideal in terms of cost and tire sizing. I bought a set of "A" center caps to replace the "H" from the factory wheels, just to round out the look. There hasn't been any snow yet in Boston so I don't know how they will work but every review I read was overwhelmingly positive. Here's how my winter setup looks:
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T7oP-9yGFJY/TQexKhurVzI/AAAAAAAAAEg/5eraYgS7bTo/s1600/IMAG0023-1_web.jpg)
What do you think?
![](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_T7oP-9yGFJY/TQexKhurVzI/AAAAAAAAAEg/5eraYgS7bTo/s1600/IMAG0023-1_web.jpg)
What do you think?
#4
Ya, that seems to be the most popular package (it's what I run). But I went with a little more wheel (16x7, et45 versus I think 16x6.5 et50 or et55 for the Honda wheels). I'm on my 3rd winter and I'm quite confident that any perceived decrease in handling will be due to the snow tires not the change to a 16" wheel size. I run a fairly unknown/unsung snow tire (Semperit (Continental) Sportgrip, 205/60x16 92H). I'd say they behave more like an aggressive all season tire (though it is a true winter tire as it's branded with the snowflake). This tire continues to impress me with it's dry road handling characteristics (as well as it's ability in heavy rain) and it's good enough in the New England snow. So.... I don't think the move to 16" wheels alone will necessarily take a huge bite out of the car's handling. But.... using a fairly aggressive snow tire like the WS70..... that may be a different story.
#6
Almost Doctor
Thread Starter
The car hasn't exhibited any understeer or hydroplaning in heavy rain. Although I'm not sure if it was due to a poor road surface but in an emergency stop scenario in heavy rain, ABS activated. Something I haven't ever seen with my summer setup. I attributed it to the fact that the tires aren't designed for extreme water expulsion and the fact that they only had about 25 miles on them (still greasy).
Coming from Minnesnowta, I have always been attracted to the aggressive winter tires. There is a huge difference in climates however. Winter here in the city means temps hovering around freezing and when it snows, it is melted next week. In Minnesota, the snow piles up and piles up with temperatures FAR below freezing. All side roads, neighborhoods, and country roads have a 3" snowpack on the surface. Thus, snow/ice traction is a serious concern. I guess here, a less aggressive tire would be well suited. It'll perform well during the few snow accumulations we get without detracting too much from the awesome handling of our cars. Since I plan on moving back to MN as soon as I finish my PhD, I guess the Blizzaks were still a good investment.
#7
Yeah, the combination of the aggressive winter tread and larger sidewall is surely to blame. The steering is quite "sloshy" and not anywhere near as responsive. Although, I was surprised that they are super quiet even at 80+MPH.
The car hasn't exhibited any understeer or hydroplaning in heavy rain. Although I'm not sure if it was due to a poor road surface but in an emergency stop scenario in heavy rain, ABS activated. Something I haven't ever seen with my summer setup. I attributed it to the fact that the tires aren't designed for extreme water expulsion and the fact that they only had about 25 miles on them (still greasy).
Coming from Minnesnowta, I have always been attracted to the aggressive winter tires. There is a huge difference in climates however. Winter here in the city means temps hovering around freezing and when it snows, it is melted next week. In Minnesota, the snow piles up and piles up with temperatures FAR below freezing. All side roads, neighborhoods, and country roads have a 3" snowpack on the surface. Thus, snow/ice traction is a serious concern. I guess here, a less aggressive tire would be well suited. It'll perform well during the few snow accumulations we get without detracting too much from the awesome handling of our cars. Since I plan on moving back to MN as soon as I finish my PhD, I guess the Blizzaks were still a good investment.
The car hasn't exhibited any understeer or hydroplaning in heavy rain. Although I'm not sure if it was due to a poor road surface but in an emergency stop scenario in heavy rain, ABS activated. Something I haven't ever seen with my summer setup. I attributed it to the fact that the tires aren't designed for extreme water expulsion and the fact that they only had about 25 miles on them (still greasy).
Coming from Minnesnowta, I have always been attracted to the aggressive winter tires. There is a huge difference in climates however. Winter here in the city means temps hovering around freezing and when it snows, it is melted next week. In Minnesota, the snow piles up and piles up with temperatures FAR below freezing. All side roads, neighborhoods, and country roads have a 3" snowpack on the surface. Thus, snow/ice traction is a serious concern. I guess here, a less aggressive tire would be well suited. It'll perform well during the few snow accumulations we get without detracting too much from the awesome handling of our cars. Since I plan on moving back to MN as soon as I finish my PhD, I guess the Blizzaks were still a good investment.
Trending Topics
#8
registered pw
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: south central pa
Age: 49
Posts: 38,821
Received 354 Likes
on
252 Posts
The pirellis that i put on aren't too bad either. cornering, forget it. I was taking a corner a little too fast, aka about the same speed on all seasons, and i had to get off the gas and let it correct itself.
I know how to drive on snows, but sometimes forget the deep tread.
I know how to drive on snows, but sometimes forget the deep tread.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thnworld
Car Parts for Sale
1
09-18-2006 04:42 PM