Who would win in a race?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #1  
str8 tsx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Who would win in a race?

How does the Mercedes C230 Kompressor stack up against the TSX as far as performance goes? I've read some numbers on the C230 and it seems fairly similar to the TSX. Anyone ever race one?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 01:11 AM
  #2  
Alin10123's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, Ga.
Hmm... doubt it. Although the C230 only has 20lbs more torque. Since it's a V6, it probably gets a lot more power at the low end where out power doesn't kick in until you get the RPM's up.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:25 AM
  #3  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
The C230 Kompressor, at least according to a comparo done a while back by one of the car mags between the the TSX, C230, and 9-3, is slower than the TSX to 60 and in the quarter mile.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 08:53 AM
  #4  
SimpleWhite's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 850
Likes: 1
From: ATL-NJ
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
The C230 Kompressor, at least according to a comparo done a while back by one of the car mags between the the TSX, C230, and 9-3, is slower than the TSX to 60 and in the quarter mile.
I believe that cause if you've ever drove a MB you'd notice as to how heavy these cars feel and drive. On a roll their not too bad but the weight is always a noticable factor when I used to drive my fathers E class back in the day.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 09:03 AM
  #5  
iamhomin's Avatar
04 remembrance
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: NJ
My friend had the C230...it's definitely slower than the TSX, AT or MT.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #6  
Howard911s's Avatar
HOWARD911S
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
C230 is a 4 banger.....not V6, if im right, i believe its a supercharged 1.8 liter, I believe the V6 is C320 not the 230...... speedwise, should be pretty even, depend on if its C230 5 speed auto or 6 speed stick and vice versa for tsx..
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #7  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by Howard911s
C230 is a 4 banger.....not V6, if im right, i believe its a supercharged 1.8 liter, I believe the V6 is C320 not the 230...... speedwise, should be pretty even, depend on if its C230 5 speed auto or 6 speed stick and vice versa for tsx..
Actually, the new C230 uses a 2.5L V6. The older C230 Kompressor, which was what the OP was asking about, is indeed the supercharged 4-cylinder.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 10:10 AM
  #8  
Howard911s's Avatar
HOWARD911S
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Actually, the new C230 uses a 2.5L V6. The older C230 Kompressor, which was what the OP was asking about, is indeed the supercharged 4-cylinder.
wow, 2.5 super charged v6, how much power does that new baby pump out now? thanks for the info.. something new everyady....

i almost wanted to get C230 sport package too..car look so beautiful to me, but i didnt wanna pay out door price of 7K more for same equipment as tsx...
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #9  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
Originally Posted by Howard911s
wow, 2.5 super charged v6, how much power does that new baby pump out now? thanks for the info.. something new everyady....

i almost wanted to get C230 sport package too..car look so beautiful to me, but i didnt wanna pay out door price of 7K more for same equipment as tsx...
The 2.5L V6 in the new C230 is not supercharged. It makes something in the neighborhood of 200 hp and 189 ft-lbs. of torque, I think.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #10  
Howard911s's Avatar
HOWARD911S
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
From: los angeles
Engine 2,496-cc DOHC 24-valve 90° V-6. High-pressure die-cast alloy cylinder block. Alloy heads. Counter-rotating balance shaft.

Net power 201 hp @ 6,200 rpmNet torque 181 lb-ft @ 2,700 - 5,000 rpmCompression ratio 11.2:1Fuel requirement Premium unleaded gasoline.Fuel and ignition system ME 9.7 engine management. Integrated sequential multipoint fuel injection and ignition with individual cylinder control of fuel spray, spark timing and antiknock. Electronic throttle. One high-energy ignition coil and spark plug per cylinder. 100,000-mile spark-plug intervals.
Intake system Dual overhead camshafts with continuously variable intake and exhaust timing. Magnesium 2-stage resonance intake manifold increases intake runner length at lower rpm for improved response. Electropneumatic turbulence flaps at start of intake path help increase intake airflow speed at midrange rpm for greater air-fuel mixture swirling and stronger, more complete combustion.
Manual Transmission Standard fully synchronized 6-speed with direct-action short-throw shifter and clutch-starter interlock.
Automatic Transmission Optional 7-speed automatic. Electronically controlled shifting. Driver-adaptive programming adjusts shift points to the driver's current driving style. Touch Shift allows driver to manually downshift and allow upshifts by nudging the shift lever left or right from the Drive position. Shift into Optimum Gear programming allows one-touch selection of the best gear for maximum acceleration or engine braking by holding the shift lever to the left of Drive for one second. Driver-selectable Comfort mode starts vehicle moving in 2nd gear or a second Reverse gear, and upshifts at lower rpm, to help improve control on slippery surfaces. Instrument-cluster readout of selected gear range and Standard/Comfort mode.
Drive configuration Rear-wheel drive
Rear axle ratio 3.27:1
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
Tsx536's Avatar
Rep'n Taxbrain.com
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,075
Likes: 3
From: N. Cali-forn-i-a
I was able to easily take one on the freeway a couple of weeks back. But I guess I don't count

...I would think a TSX with reflash and a couple of mods would be able to take one though.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #12  
sauceman's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 6
From: Windsor-Quebec corridor
The C230, as well as the C230 Kompressor are both significantly slower than the TSX.

I was almost head to head with the old Kompressors in my 95 Accord.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2006 | 08:50 PM
  #13  
gdcwatt's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 453
Likes: 3
From: Toronto
90-degree V6?! Well, there's something to rub in.

I remember a few years ago when MB started making this type of engine, stating something like "uncompromising in every way...blah, blah, blah... and sharing the same cylinder bore spacing as our V8's so that the blocks can be machined on the same production line, for further efficiency."

Sure, I know that there are now some seemingly wierd V arrangements, with corresponding crank offsets, like in F1, that work just fine.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 01:36 PM
  #14  
Alin10123's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,788
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, Ga.
Originally Posted by sauceman
The C230, as well as the C230 Kompressor are both significantly slower than the TSX.

I was almost head to head with the old Kompressors in my 95 Accord.
Hmm... guess i'm wrong then. Nevermind...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 03:44 PM
  #15  
Reach's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,036
Likes: 1
From: ffx.va.us
I smoked a C230, bone stock we both had temporary tags and it was too good to pass up.

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28550
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
4
Aug 15, 2019 12:58 PM
F-C
Motorsports News
33
Aug 22, 2018 09:53 AM
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
Oct 13, 2015 10:56 AM
0opie
2G CL (2001-2003)
0
Sep 22, 2015 04:15 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
16
Sep 14, 2015 03:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:41 AM.