TSX Vs Integ GSR
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TSX Vs Integ GSR
tried to race me from 3 stoplights it was close for all of first gear. but when i got to second i was pulling away significantly. by 3rd i had at least 2 cars on him.
we stopped in a lot and chatted. he gave me good props. his car had IHE on it and a couple other small bolt ons.
needless to say he was rather impressed. i also think one of the reasons my car was that much faster is the fact i have an unexplicable ability to shift extreemly fast with the TSX. the double conical syncros of the 6MT allow shifts so fast that i do full throttle shifts all the time when racing and i never missed a gear yet.
they commented how incredible it sounded scratching 2nd and 3rd gears. they thought i had an automatic because they never heard the engine free spin between gears.
anyway i dont usually race people but since the GSR was lowered and looked like a couple kids i figured it might be a good run.
based on previous experience and when i had the prelude type Sh i raced an integra several years back in that car and beat it about the same.
based on what i know about the prelude by comparason i wouldnt be suprised if the TSX and my old Lude were about neck and neck. i know i ran a 15.1 at sealevel totally stock. i wonder what the TSX would do.
i live at 6500 feet above sealevel and the best times i could get with my lude here was a whopping 16.4 sec 1/4
we stopped in a lot and chatted. he gave me good props. his car had IHE on it and a couple other small bolt ons.
needless to say he was rather impressed. i also think one of the reasons my car was that much faster is the fact i have an unexplicable ability to shift extreemly fast with the TSX. the double conical syncros of the 6MT allow shifts so fast that i do full throttle shifts all the time when racing and i never missed a gear yet.
they commented how incredible it sounded scratching 2nd and 3rd gears. they thought i had an automatic because they never heard the engine free spin between gears.
anyway i dont usually race people but since the GSR was lowered and looked like a couple kids i figured it might be a good run.
based on previous experience and when i had the prelude type Sh i raced an integra several years back in that car and beat it about the same.
based on what i know about the prelude by comparason i wouldnt be suprised if the TSX and my old Lude were about neck and neck. i know i ran a 15.1 at sealevel totally stock. i wonder what the TSX would do.
i live at 6500 feet above sealevel and the best times i could get with my lude here was a whopping 16.4 sec 1/4
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PixelHarmony
Nice!
but try racing a Type-R, my friend pulled alot more of me off the line. That'll be a different race ![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Ponder](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ponder.gif)
you know my old 2001 Acura TL got a change to race a type R once and even with IHE i beat him a couple times. i ran into the guy at a party about a week later and he thought i had a type S. unfortunatly the TL didnt have a type S option in 2001. in his case though i suspect that his mods actually made his car slower than stock.
the same thing happend to a friend of mine with a 2001 Lude. he had a mugen exhaust, DC ceramic coated headers and a type S intake.
when he raced his lude againce a totally stock lude of the same year his car was actually slower. they even switched cars and same results, no matter who drove the car it was still slower than the stock car.
the ITR is a great car dont get me wrong. but ive been in both and im sorry to say that an ITR isn't that much faster than a GSR in stock form.
2 car lengths in the 1/4 equates to about .4-.5 secs different at these speeds that our cars finish the 1/4 with. i had at least 2 cars on the GSR by third. my guess an ITR would be probly about even with me. you would need a 1/4 drag strip and a light to be able to tell what car is actually faster. i think the R would be by a couple tenths.
#5
ATCer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MQMH_03
how can performance mods made a car slower than stock? unless he had a big system and heavy rims?...
You can actually read through a lot of articles in magazines where they do testing, and a combination of mods CAN reduce your horse power. You actually need to do more research than finding out what numbers were put out by a dyno given on each specific mod. Some don't work well together. Usually if you stick w/ one company, you will see gains, however mixing and matching can actually reduce your final numbers.
#6
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm interesting. He just has a AEM CAI and a Tabanbe RM Exhuast. I guess his car is also faster since he has no backseats or spare (I forgot to mention that).
#7
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think one of the reasons some mods slow the car down is because you have to consider the fact that just because a stock exhaust is smaller than aftermarket doesnt mean it robs power. it actually increases torque. and much more than you think goes into building an exhaust. many people get peak HP with an exhause and other bolt ons. but when you take away the torque you have to wait longer to bennifit from the high end power.
for the same reasons the TSX doesnt feel as fast as it is because the torque curve is flat. old VTEC engines build or make more HP when the RPM's come up. the iVTEC engines make better use of low end torque early on.
for the same reasons the TSX doesnt feel as fast as it is because the torque curve is flat. old VTEC engines build or make more HP when the RPM's come up. the iVTEC engines make better use of low end torque early on.
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by Bass Mechanic
the ITR is a great car dont get me wrong. but ive been in both and im sorry to say that an ITR isn't that much faster than a GSR in stock form.
2 car lengths in the 1/4 equates to about .4-.5 secs different at these speeds that our cars finish the 1/4 with. i had at least 2 cars on the GSR by third. my guess an ITR would be probly about even with me. you would need a 1/4 drag strip and a light to be able to tell what car is actually faster. i think the R would be by a couple tenths.
2 car lengths in the 1/4 equates to about .4-.5 secs different at these speeds that our cars finish the 1/4 with. i had at least 2 cars on the GSR by third. my guess an ITR would be probly about even with me. you would need a 1/4 drag strip and a light to be able to tell what car is actually faster. i think the R would be by a couple tenths.
Also, at 95mph, a typical trap speed for this type of car, you are traveling around 140' per second, or 14' per .10 second. Since the car is about 15' long, a two car lead will result in around a .2 second better 1/4 time.
#11
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ks112
how do you do a full throttle shift?? do you leave the gas peddal pinned and then press the clutch and shift??
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
#12
Originally Posted by Bass Mechanic
it's an aquired skill you need to practice it yes. you hol;d the gas and shift without lifting.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
#13
Senior Moderator
I'm somewhat surprised as the former owner of a 98 GS-R. In honesty, back when I was 21, 22 I used to race Preludes and never lost and all it had was an AEM intake. In fact the only race I ever lost in that car was to a Turboed Eagle Talon Tsi and that was from a roll.
#14
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by Bass Mechanic
it's an aquired skill you need to practice it yes. you hol;d the gas and shift without lifting.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#15
Originally Posted by MQMH_03
how can performance mods made a car slower than stock? unless he had a big system and heavy rims?...
#16
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
Originally Posted by MQMH_03
how can performance mods made a car slower than stock? unless he had a big system and heavy rims?...
#17
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by domn
I'm somewhat surprised as the former owner of a 98 GS-R. In honesty, back when I was 21, 22 I used to race Preludes and never lost and all it had was an AEM intake. In fact the only race I ever lost in that car was to a Turboed Eagle Talon Tsi and that was from a roll.
The gsr came in auto?
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#19
All I can say is that I smell B.S. in this thread.
A perfectly working GSR with name brand mods is faster than a 6-speed TSX. Unless the GSR vtec system was working, no way would a gsr lose by TWO cars. I seen gsr with I/H/E keep up neck to neck with RSX-S, and we all know a RSX-S is faster than a 6-speed TSX.
A perfectly working GSR with name brand mods is faster than a 6-speed TSX. Unless the GSR vtec system was working, no way would a gsr lose by TWO cars. I seen gsr with I/H/E keep up neck to neck with RSX-S, and we all know a RSX-S is faster than a 6-speed TSX.
#21
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by mickey513
All I can say is that I smell B.S. in this thread.
A perfectly working GSR with name brand mods is faster than a 6-speed TSX. Unless the GSR vtec system was working, no way would a gsr lose by TWO cars. I seen gsr with I/H/E keep up neck to neck with RSX-S, and we all know a RSX-S is faster than a 6-speed TSX.
A perfectly working GSR with name brand mods is faster than a 6-speed TSX. Unless the GSR vtec system was working, no way would a gsr lose by TWO cars. I seen gsr with I/H/E keep up neck to neck with RSX-S, and we all know a RSX-S is faster than a 6-speed TSX.
We're talking fractions of a second here. Its very possible.
I saw a guy run a 16 flat in a S2000 at the drag strip so the biggest factor is always the driver.
stock to stock , a gsr and tsx should be fairly neck and neck, a true drivers race.
#26
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bass Mechanic
it's an aquired skill you need to practice it yes. you hol;d the gas and shift without lifting.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
it's kind of hard to really understand how fast of a shift im talking about unless you have seen it done before but if i were to guess how long it actually takes to shift 1 gear to the next its probly just less than .1-.2 of a second. the secrit is to hit the clutch and back off at the same time grabbing the next gear.
i dont know if its because im a drummer that my hands and feet are so quick. but people who have seen me do it are pretty impressed when they see it.
i should also make clear there is absolutly no gear grinding between shifts. it happens so fast the engine appears to shift like an automatic because the engine literally goes from 7200 rpm to the rpm of the next gear without getting a chance to free spin.
#27
WDP Is Faster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wanna make a video of you doing it?
Rep points for you from me if you do it!!! I'd love to see you shift that fast..maybe i'll learn something from it.
REloaded
![Clap](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/clap.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
REloaded
#28
Master Graphic Artist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northbrook, IL
Age: 40
Posts: 2,859
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just watch some best motoring videos. That's the speed I think most people would shift at, the only thing is making it smooth. I don't know how fast this guy thinks he can shift, but I'm sure it'll be just as fast as a BMI racer.
#29
Originally Posted by Bass Mechanic
you know my old 2001 Acura TL got a change to race a type R once and even with IHE i beat him a couple times. i ran into the guy at a party about a week later and he thought i had a type S. unfortunatly the TL didnt have a type S option in 2001. in his case though i suspect that his mods actually made his car slower than stock.
the same thing happend to a friend of mine with a 2001 Lude. he had a mugen exhaust, DC ceramic coated headers and a type S intake.
when he raced his lude againce a totally stock lude of the same year his car was actually slower. they even switched cars and same results, no matter who drove the car it was still slower than the stock car.
the ITR is a great car dont get me wrong. but ive been in both and im sorry to say that an ITR isn't that much faster than a GSR in stock form.
2 car lengths in the 1/4 equates to about .4-.5 secs different at these speeds that our cars finish the 1/4 with. i had at least 2 cars on the GSR by third. my guess an ITR would be probly about even with me. you would need a 1/4 drag strip and a light to be able to tell what car is actually faster. i think the R would be by a couple tenths.
the same thing happend to a friend of mine with a 2001 Lude. he had a mugen exhaust, DC ceramic coated headers and a type S intake.
when he raced his lude againce a totally stock lude of the same year his car was actually slower. they even switched cars and same results, no matter who drove the car it was still slower than the stock car.
the ITR is a great car dont get me wrong. but ive been in both and im sorry to say that an ITR isn't that much faster than a GSR in stock form.
2 car lengths in the 1/4 equates to about .4-.5 secs different at these speeds that our cars finish the 1/4 with. i had at least 2 cars on the GSR by third. my guess an ITR would be probly about even with me. you would need a 1/4 drag strip and a light to be able to tell what car is actually faster. i think the R would be by a couple tenths.
i've seen a race tl-s vs itr, it was stock or with iceman coldair. and my friend on the itr wasnt the greatest shifter but the tl-s had no chance. i've seen it my self. few rounds too. and the itr is much faster then the gsr.
#30
Blown LS6!!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, WA
Age: 51
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fdl
We're talking fractions of a second here. Its very possible.
I saw a guy run a 16 flat in a S2000 at the drag strip so the biggest factor is always the driver.
stock to stock , a gsr and tsx should be fairly neck and neck, a true drivers race.
I saw a guy run a 16 flat in a S2000 at the drag strip so the biggest factor is always the driver.
stock to stock , a gsr and tsx should be fairly neck and neck, a true drivers race.
I ran a 16.5 my very first time down the track w/ the blower. All I know is I had the pedal pinned to the floor and was only making smoke for the first 60'... Even someone in an auto can mess up, so driving a manual is ALWAYS driver dependant given fairly close cars.
#31
WDP Is Faster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by euroStyle
I dont know about that. they must have been some crappy drivers.
i've seen a race tl-s vs itr, it was stock or with iceman coldair. and my friend on the itr wasnt the greatest shifter but the tl-s had no chance. i've seen it my self. few rounds too. and the itr is much faster then the gsr.
i've seen a race tl-s vs itr, it was stock or with iceman coldair. and my friend on the itr wasnt the greatest shifter but the tl-s had no chance. i've seen it my self. few rounds too. and the itr is much faster then the gsr.
#32
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Cl-S
I ran a 16.5 my very first time down the track w/ the blower. All I know is I had the pedal pinned to the floor and was only making smoke for the first 60'... Even someone in an auto can mess up, so driving a manual is ALWAYS driver dependant given fairly close cars.
as for me beating the ITR i wouldnt think the altitude has much to do with it but i do live at 6500 feet above sealevel. i would expect it to affect both cars exactly the same but perhaps a 4 cyl has even less torque than a v6 at altitude?
i can tell you that the difference between sealevel and here is almost a full second so i definitly wouldnt brag about 1/4 times i could run here. i could however make a comparason to what i ran with my lude and my TL at the same elevation.
#34
Stokeless
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South East Daygo
Age: 45
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can pull away from a GSR no problem =) done it a few times on the freeway. Never had the chance to try from a stop though. So I believe the story. We maybe heavier but we have ALOT more torque than the GSR and from stop light to stop light that is what is gonna be the determining factor in the race.
#35
Originally Posted by Stokeless_TSX
I can pull away from a GSR no problem =) done it a few times on the freeway. Never had the chance to try from a stop though. So I believe the story. We maybe heavier but we have ALOT more torque than the GSR and from stop light to stop light that is what is gonna be the determining factor in the race.
Um....166 torque and 3300lbs+ doesn't = a faster car than a GSR.
#36
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally Posted by mickey513
Um....166 torque and 3300lbs+ doesn't = a faster car than a GSR.
I haven't tried a GSR myself, but I believe it would be a very tight race, but at the advantage of the TSX nonetheless. It would obviously be a driver's race though.
#37
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Age: 53
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you know what guys, for thoes of you that dont belive what im saying and are trying to put up all the numbers to prove otherwise, let me just say.
the TSX is a faster car than the GSR plain and simple. when i raced him we were about even through 1st gear. i can tell you that because of his higher redline i had to shift to 2nd before he did but after i got to 2nd i began pulling away noticably. by the end of 2nd i was at least 1 car ahead and when i hit 3rd i got another car length at least.
it depends on what your definition of close is. if you call that close then great but in my opinion that wasnt really as close as i would have expected. you have to realise that the GSR has the old VTEC motor. it has less torque less HP and of course does weigh less.
but if you consider all the bennifits of the TSX and the fact that it makes it's torque way before the GSR does. the TSX holds it's torque nearly the same across the entire RPM range. its easy to see how the TSX can still oversome the weight issue with a fatter torque curve. the GSR like a lot of old VTEC engines doesnt really make gobs of power untill it gets a lot closer to the redline.
also the gearing of the TSX is a lot better spaced and gears matched to that engine.
also i would be willing to lay odds that the TSX would easily pull away from a GSR especially at highway speeds because the 6MT in the TSX IMO seems to have some of the best gearing on the highway i have ever seen.
when i had my old 98 Lude SH on the highway it really needed another high gear the 4th to 5th jump was kinda drastic and many 5 speed trannys are the same way.
the TSX is a faster car than the GSR plain and simple. when i raced him we were about even through 1st gear. i can tell you that because of his higher redline i had to shift to 2nd before he did but after i got to 2nd i began pulling away noticably. by the end of 2nd i was at least 1 car ahead and when i hit 3rd i got another car length at least.
it depends on what your definition of close is. if you call that close then great but in my opinion that wasnt really as close as i would have expected. you have to realise that the GSR has the old VTEC motor. it has less torque less HP and of course does weigh less.
but if you consider all the bennifits of the TSX and the fact that it makes it's torque way before the GSR does. the TSX holds it's torque nearly the same across the entire RPM range. its easy to see how the TSX can still oversome the weight issue with a fatter torque curve. the GSR like a lot of old VTEC engines doesnt really make gobs of power untill it gets a lot closer to the redline.
also the gearing of the TSX is a lot better spaced and gears matched to that engine.
also i would be willing to lay odds that the TSX would easily pull away from a GSR especially at highway speeds because the 6MT in the TSX IMO seems to have some of the best gearing on the highway i have ever seen.
when i had my old 98 Lude SH on the highway it really needed another high gear the 4th to 5th jump was kinda drastic and many 5 speed trannys are the same way.
#38
13 sec. car, 14 sec tires
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: chicago
Age: 39
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by reloaded
I agree with you...ITRs are faster...they're faster than the RSX-S. RSX-S will walk on a regular stock TL no doubt.
itr's are a hair faster than a type s stock for stock.
Im very skeptical of the claims that a tsx can run l5.1 stock. i dont think thats the case, ill give it mid 15s at best. Ive had extensive experience in a tsx 6 speed that has led me to this conclusion.
IMHO, a gsr and a tsx are a drivers race.
#39
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally Posted by firedc5
Im very skeptical of the claims that a tsx can run l5.1 stock. i dont think thats the case, ill give it mid 15s at best. Ive had extensive experience in a tsx 6 speed that has led me to this conclusion.
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM