-22c = 0-60 in 6.95 Seconds!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-09-2004, 06:56 PM
  #1  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
-22c = 0-60 in 6.95 Seconds!

I thought my car felt a lot quicker today so I decided to do a 1/4 mile run with my Beltronics Vector. My best run in the summer was a 0-60 in 7.23 seconds with the 1/4 coming at 15.85 seconds.

I'll let the pictures do the talking:





The launch was the hardest part with it being so bloody cold but I got the tires warmed up enough to stick and get a good run in.


What I want to know is can anyone figure out how much horsepower the engine is making given these specs?
Old 01-09-2004, 07:48 PM
  #2  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hey...where is larchmont. Can this put to rest our cold vs hot debate?

http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/show...&threadid=5525
Old 01-12-2004, 02:08 AM
  #3  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by fdl
Hey...where is larchmont. Can this put to rest our cold vs hot debate?
I thought we already did.

Although I still wonder.

BTW....Dan, do you have the MT or AT?? Pardon me for not knowing!
I woulda thought for sure it's MT, but I actually checked "Who Posted" on the MT "check-in" thread, and it looks like you're not on there, so..... does that mean you did 6.95 with the AT????

Also BTW, not to be too anal and worry about two-hundredths of a second..... but the thing says 6.95.
So why are you saying 6.97?
Old 01-12-2004, 02:40 AM
  #4  
Registered AssHat
 
Lung Fu Mo Shi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Age: 46
Posts: 3,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
Also BTW, not to be too anal and worry about two-hundredths of a second..... but the thing says 6.95.
So why are you saying 6.97?
He's Canadian?
Old 01-12-2004, 08:02 AM
  #5  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
I thought we already did.

Although I still wonder.

BTW....Dan, do you have the MT or AT?? Pardon me for not knowing!
I woulda thought for sure it's MT, but I actually checked "Who Posted" on the MT "check-in" thread, and it looks like you're not on there, so..... does that mean you did 6.95 with the AT????

Also BTW, not to be too anal and worry about two-hundredths of a second..... but the thing says 6.95.
So why are you saying 6.97?
Yes it was the MT. And I goofed on the title. My 3rd run was 6.97 but the best run was my 5th @ 6.95 seconds.
Old 01-12-2004, 08:03 AM
  #6  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
He's Canadian?


I might have a touch of mad cow disease..... :busted:
Old 01-12-2004, 08:29 AM
  #7  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally posted by Lung Fu Mo Shi
He's Canadian?
Yes, our clocks work differently up here in Canada

Dan, what exactly is this Beltrinic Vector and how accurate are they? and how does it work? The fact that the same unit got you a 7.23 in the summer definently puts that cold vs hot debate to rest.
Old 01-12-2004, 09:09 AM
  #8  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by domn
Yes, our clocks work differently up here in Canada

Dan, what exactly is this Beltrinic Vector and how accurate are they? and how does it work? The fact that the same unit got you a 7.23 in the summer definently puts that cold vs hot debate to rest.

http://www.beltronics.com/fx.html

The Beltronics Vector FX2 is a G-Force meter that can accurately measure cornering forces an acceleration rates. It does 0-60, 1/4 mile, and 60-0. Road and Track did an article on the FX2 about a year ago and they found that the accuracy was actually better than what the manufacturer specs show. 0-60 and 1/4 mile are accuate to 0.05 seconds.

I'll upload a better picture of my setup when I get home tonight.
Old 01-12-2004, 10:05 AM
  #9  
Racer
 
dnl2ba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this stock?
Old 01-12-2004, 10:52 AM
  #10  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by dnl2ba
Is this stock?
Yep.

I was running 94 octane but I was also running 94 octane when I did the 7.23sec run in the summer.
Old 01-12-2004, 12:20 PM
  #11  
Audi Driving Snob
 
TinkySD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you do it over the same stretch of road? I don't know about your model but in general accelerometers are easily thrown off by minor changes in road slope. Did you make a two way run over the same stretch to cancel that out?

I'm not trying to be a pessimist or anything just wondering as they could be confounding factors.
Old 01-12-2004, 01:34 PM
  #12  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great questions, Tinky.

But regardless, both the summer and winter times that he got are PFG. I'll take either one. And I fully believe both of them.
Old 01-12-2004, 01:58 PM
  #13  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by TinkySD
Did you do it over the same stretch of road? I don't know about your model but in general accelerometers are easily thrown off by minor changes in road slope. Did you make a two way run over the same stretch to cancel that out?

I'm not trying to be a pessimist or anything just wondering as they could be confounding factors.
Actually purely by coincedence it was on the same road. We have a really long straight road behind the office that isn't used by anyone but us so I tend to use it for any performance tests. I didn't do a run in each direction but it really shouldn't matter because it's totally flat. I can drive from end to end and the the g-meter won't change more than 0.02g the whole way. It was paved only a year ago so there really isn't any bumps or anything else that could potentially influence the test. Beltronics has added a lot of filtering to the FX-2 that compensates for normal road variations. It also recalibrates itself before each run so as long as the grade remains somewhat constant througout the run it won't affect the results.
Old 01-12-2004, 02:32 PM
  #14  
Pro
 
kiteboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Dan, do think your car might be more broken in than in the summer?
Old 01-12-2004, 02:59 PM
  #15  
Instructor
 
KJLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 804
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the performance is difference is more relted to the car being broken in more now, rather than due to cold air.

I believe those figures. i tested my car with a digital camera recording the dash, and estimate 7- 7.5 sec.

BTW, do you have the vector adjusted for vehicle weight, Cd, etc?

i have been thinking of purchasing one, and wanted to know if you can increase the accuracy by adjusting the variables per car.
Old 01-12-2004, 02:59 PM
  #16  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by kiteboy
Hey Dan, do think your car might be more broken in than in the summer?
That's entirely possible, but I had 3000+ KM in the summer and I'm just a little over 6000 now. I guess I'll have to do another run next summer!
Old 01-12-2004, 03:32 PM
  #17  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally posted by KJLite
I think the performance is difference is more relted to the car being broken in more now, rather than due to cold air.

I believe those figures. i tested my car with a digital camera recording the dash, and estimate 7- 7.5 sec.

BTW, do you have the vector adjusted for vehicle weight, Cd, etc?

i have been thinking of purchasing one, and wanted to know if you can increase the accuracy by adjusting the variables per car.
The weight and Cd is used mostly for horespower measurements. I've entered the weight but I don't know the Cd and frontal area of the TSX.

There is an adjustment for rollout which is the distance you travel before the clock starts. This makes the biggest difference for the 0-60 times. I've set it to the same settings you would have at a drag strip so the numbers should be comparable to the ones in the magazine (i think it's 12").
Old 11-08-2004, 07:17 AM
  #18  
04 remembrance
 
iamhomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great numbers!

Have you done a test with your intake?
Old 11-08-2004, 08:00 AM
  #19  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Another thread, brought back from the dead.

But I wonder if Dan has re-tested with the Injen?
Old 11-08-2004, 08:04 AM
  #20  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,355
Received 631 Likes on 507 Posts
Holy resurection!
Old 11-08-2004, 08:16 AM
  #21  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I haven't retested with the Injen intake because I removed the g-meter before I had my center console replaced and I haven't reinstalled it yet. I was actually going to do it tonight because I'm curious what gains I'll see. I ran 7.2 0-60 when it was around this temperature last year so I'll use that as a baseline.
Old 11-08-2004, 08:25 AM
  #22  
04 remembrance
 
iamhomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice, btw, where'd you purchase the G-meter?
Old 11-08-2004, 08:29 AM
  #23  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Wow...Dan broke 7 sec in the 0-60 without any major mods. Nice...
Old 11-08-2004, 08:29 AM
  #24  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by iamhomin
Nice, btw, where'd you purchase the G-meter?
Mine came straight from the factory which is like 5 minutes from where I live. I think they sell them at Circuit City in the US though.
Old 11-08-2004, 06:11 PM
  #25  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are nice numbers, sometimes i feel my car can pull the same ,
Old 11-08-2004, 06:28 PM
  #26  
Just dial 1911
 
joerockt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Dan, how did you mount that thing?
Old 11-08-2004, 06:30 PM
  #27  
Team Owner
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
You talking 0-60 kph?
Old 11-08-2004, 06:34 PM
  #28  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
It's in my CD storage bin so I can close the door to keep it out of sight.
Old 11-08-2004, 06:35 PM
  #29  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by jlukja
You talking 0-60 kph?
nope.
Old 11-08-2004, 06:37 PM
  #30  
Just dial 1911
 
joerockt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
It's in my CD storage bin so I can close the door to keep it out of sight.
I saw that, but how did you mount it to the bin? Brackets?
Old 11-08-2004, 06:47 PM
  #31  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I just removed the suction cups from the bracket and screwed it into place.
Old 11-08-2004, 06:48 PM
  #32  
Just dial 1911
 
joerockt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 12,144
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Very nice. I think I want something like this. Gadgets are phun
Old 11-08-2004, 06:53 PM
  #33  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
for gadgets!
Old 11-09-2004, 09:31 AM
  #34  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 11-09-2004, 09:34 AM
  #35  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
for gadgets!
Me likey gadgets. I have too many though, so I'm gonna have to start getting rid of some.
Old 11-10-2004, 02:45 PM
  #36  
Pro
 
TSX Hokie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Age: 44
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan, does your gadget do 60-0 as well? It would be interesting to switch tires and see how the braking time changes. My theory is that the TSX would brake alot better with decent tires.
Old 11-10-2004, 02:48 PM
  #37  
Photography Nerd
Thread Starter
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
It does do 60-0 but I haven't tried it yet. You have to configure something in the menu but I'll try it out sometime.

That's a good theory and I think you're correct.
Old 11-10-2004, 02:48 PM
  #38  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old 11-10-2004, 02:52 PM
  #39  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by TSX Hokie
Dan, does your gadget do 60-0 as well? It would be interesting to switch tires and see how the braking time changes. My theory is that the TSX would brake alot better with decent tires.
That seems to be the concensus. The stock tires just don't cut it.
Old 11-10-2004, 03:11 PM
  #40  
Suzuka Master
 
ClutchPerformer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 5,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
Holy resurection!
It's that time of the year again! (cold)


Quick Reply: -22c = 0-60 in 6.95 Seconds!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 PM.