Is K&N CAI different for MT and AT???
11-02-2005 | 03:24 AM
#1
Thread Starter
C'mon, man! Row yer own.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: WDMIA
Is K&N CAI different for MT and AT???
Is there a difference between the K&N CAI for AT and MT TSX's? Someone told me there is, but I can't figure out why that would be. Is he just full of it?
11-02-2005 | 07:41 AM
#2
send me a link to JDM??
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Well,
All the intakes (expect the icebox) give you more power at the high end of the rev band. So I guess there would be a difference because with a manual (assuming you arn't in SS mode in the auto) you can shift at 7k everytime. But physically there is no difference.
All the intakes (expect the icebox) give you more power at the high end of the rev band. So I guess there would be a difference because with a manual (assuming you arn't in SS mode in the auto) you can shift at 7k everytime. But physically there is no difference.
11-02-2005 | 08:07 AM
#3
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
Is there a difference between the K&N CAI for AT and MT TSX's? Someone told me there is, but I can't figure out why that would be. Is he just full of it?
11-02-2005 | 09:15 AM
#4
Thread Starter
C'mon, man! Row yer own.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: WDMIA
Originally Posted by JTso
No difference in fitment.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lanechanger
Member Cars for Sale
4
10-13-2015 10:56 AM
