TSX Review - The Auto Channel (12/24/03)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2004, 05:11 PM
  #1  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
TSX Review - The Auto Channel (12/24/03)

Ran accross another positive review. Never heard of this website though. Found the review by doing search on "TSX".

http://www.theautochannel.com/news/2...25/169355.html

Note the 0-60 time.

Edit Note: Sorry all, I had pasted the wrong link. Its corrected now.
Old 01-05-2004, 05:35 PM
  #2  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
I clicked the link and all I got was a rundown of cars that are at the auto show.
Old 01-05-2004, 05:51 PM
  #3  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Try the link again. I originally posted an incorrect link but have since corrected the error.
Old 01-05-2004, 10:08 PM
  #4  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0-60: 7.2 (6MT)


Nice get, Jlukja.
Old 01-06-2004, 01:30 AM
  #5  
Pro
 
Buff-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
0-60: 7.2 (6MT)

Nice get, Jlukja.
Wow, next thing you know it will be faster than the TL?

Old 01-06-2004, 02:24 AM
  #6  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The last thing I want to do is quote Ronald Reagan, but, "There you go again!"

The TL on a bad day SMOKES 7.2.
Old 01-06-2004, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Team Owner
Thread Starter
 
jlukja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 20,558
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
To be fair, I got this dejavu feeling reading the review. I don't know if its because I read many reviews prior to purchasing my TSX or if this review is too close, almost word-for-word, to some review I read in the past. I haven't made any comparisons but it may be a reprinted review from another source. However, if it is then they should have given credit to the original source.
Old 01-06-2004, 10:51 AM
  #8  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did a quick Google search on a few portions of the review, and nothing turned up that's anything close to verbatim. Anyway, yeah, a lot of it is similar to what a lot of other reviews said, but then again most of the reviews sound alike, especially the portions where they're just describing the car.

If there's one particular part of the review that you're talking about, how about just picking out a couple of phrases from it and googling it? That'll tell you real fast if it was a real rip-off.
Old 01-06-2004, 11:53 AM
  #9  
Intermediate
 
BeN_RENAMED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Quebec, Canada
Age: 45
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
The TL on a bad day SMOKES 7.2.
You really think the TL will be better than 7.2 sec ?
Old 01-06-2004, 12:37 PM
  #10  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BeN
You really think the TL will be better than 7.2 sec ?
Lemme get this straight: You think it ISN'T???????

I'm hardly the world's biggest TL fan, but gotta tell ya, I don't think ANYBODY hasn't gotten better than 7.2.

Let's see.... Just got my copy of Consumer Reports, the issue where they review the TL.
Let's see what they got................ 6.7 sec.
Old 01-06-2004, 01:03 PM
  #11  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
And I bet that 6.7 was the Auto. The 6MT is high 5's, low 6's.
Old 01-06-2004, 01:20 PM
  #12  
More On
 
larchmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was.
Old 01-06-2004, 01:49 PM
  #13  
Pinky all stinky
 
phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 20,664
Received 189 Likes on 117 Posts
Originally posted by BeN
You really think the TL will be better than 7.2 sec ?
Definitely. MT got the Accord V6 to go from 0-60 in 7.2 seconds, and you know the Accord only comes with an automatic in sedan form. Edmunds got a flat 7.0 seconds 0-60 time by turning off VSA and stomping the gas pedal. They even wrote that no brake torquing was done to achieve that time.

I don't see how the TL, with a stronger engine and an available MT, could be slower than the Accord.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IBankMouse
1G TSX (2004-2008)
8
06-13-2020 12:53 PM
johnalfa
Car Parts for Sale
7
11-05-2015 06:44 PM
blacktsxwagon
5G TLX (2015-2020)
42
10-27-2015 10:12 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
10-09-2015 10:13 PM
Eggs999bacon
2G TSX (2009-2014)
10
09-24-2015 10:08 AM



Quick Reply: TSX Review - The Auto Channel (12/24/03)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:26 PM.