Is rear-wheel drive in the future?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:12 AM
  #1  
pending
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is rear-wheel drive in the future?

I think an interesting question is if, when, and how would Acura change the lower-line cars to rear-wheel drive?

I find these progressive developments fascinating. First there's the denial, then there's the push forward, then the resistance from the "purists" or "conservatives," and finally the widespread acceptance.

Wholesale name changes and drops have happened since the CRX. In the 80's, Honda said a 6 for the Accord is not necesssary. More recently, the first Civics came out that did not have double wishbones front and rear (does anyone buy Honda's reason that struts would increase interior room?). If these last two things happened, then going to rear-wheel drive can happen.

Some issues would be how to synchronize the Honda and Acura lines. Obviously, the TSX can't be rear-wheel drive unless the Accord is also. Or can it? If the Accord becomes rear-wheel drive, then what happens to the Civic? In my opinion, having a rear-wheel drive Accord and a front-wheel drive Civic would not be unacceptable. And then what happens to the TL? If the TSX and Accord become rear-wheel, that pretty much assumes the TL is also. Turning the coin over, couldn't the TL be rear-wheel while keeping the TSX front-wheel, thus differentiating the TL and TSX further, which would be desirable? Finally, how about the RSX?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:37 AM
  #2  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,437
Likes: 638
From: Orlando, Fl
History does not point in that direction. Honda/Acura will stay in the VW/Audi like niche it finds itself now. Other than perhaps the new RL, the Acura line will follow the Honda line with FWD layouts for the mainstream sedans. There's no indication Acura will follow Lexus, Infiniti in distancing itself from the main stream sedans they evlove from. While I'd love it, RWD on any Accord is just too expensive and makes no sense for Honda.
The change away from double wishbone on the Civic was pure economics. It's cheaper and easier to make.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 05:50 AM
  #3  
pending
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's what I felt about the struts up front on the Civic also.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #4  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
What do you think? Honda/Acura don't believe in RWD, let alone AWD cars at all. I mean they should offer AWD at least eventually if they want to beat Lexus and still be beating Infiniti.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #5  
pending
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
What do you think? Honda/Acura don't believe in RWD, let alone AWD cars at all. I mean they should offer AWD at least eventually if they want to beat Lexus and still be beating Infiniti.
I'm thinking this also. Honda eventually budged on a 6 for the Accord when the competition forced it to. With the present unexpected competition from Infiniti (in addition to Lexus), Acura might eventually yield to rear-wheel and all-wheel. I mean, radical change is not unprecedented for Honda.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
peti1212
ILX
22
Jan 5, 2022 05:14 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
9
Feb 25, 2020 09:57 AM
TLDude876
Car Talk
134
Dec 28, 2016 03:18 PM
Yumcha
Automotive News
16
Sep 14, 2015 03:16 PM
PortlandRL
Car Talk
2
Sep 14, 2015 12:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.