Lack of torque sometimes?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2004, 06:58 PM
  #1  
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lack of torque sometimes?

The TSX is fun to drive, however, i just noticed now that sometimes the TSX really does need more torque for quicker accelerations when the light turns green. 166lbs torque doesn't cut it sometimes. maybe i should turn off VSA in these situations? Some idiot in a sentra (not se-r) cut me off because she wanted to get to the left lane faster. but, i wanted to show her who's boss, but sportshift mode is too slow? i think i'll leave my car in auto all the time, so that no person trys to get ahead of me and cut me off again from a stop. i got pissed a little and i gave her the nice from outside my window. she looked ordinary to me too.
Old 04-19-2004, 08:42 PM
  #2  
04 remembrance
 
iamhomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...huh?

Yes, the TSX is low on torque, but don't blame the torque for being cut by a regular sentra, you probably didn't floor it enough to get the acceleration desired.

And no intention of flaming, but why would you give her the finger when she drove faster to cut you off? It's not like you both were going at the same rate.
Old 04-19-2004, 10:06 PM
  #3  
Race Director
Thread Starter
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was just pissed cause i had a bad day.
Old 04-20-2004, 01:58 AM
  #4  
Burning Brakes
 
gilboman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by iamhomin
...huh?

Yes, the TSX is low on torque, but don't blame the torque for being cut by a regular sentra, you probably didn't floor it enough to get the acceleration desired.

And no intention of flaming, but why would you give her the finger when she drove faster to cut you off? It's not like you both were going at the same rate.
if it was a manual regular sentra, the auto tsx prolly wont be able to outaccelerate it from a stop.
Old 04-20-2004, 07:52 AM
  #5  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally posted by gilboman
if it was a manual regular sentra, the auto tsx prolly wont be able to outaccelerate it from a stop.
STFU Gilbo,

Get me somebody with a manual Sentra and we'll find out.
Old 04-20-2004, 08:21 AM
  #6  
Burning Brakes
 
gilboman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by domn
STFU Gilbo,

Get me somebody with a manual Sentra and we'll find out.
you really think an auto TSX is gonna be faster off the line than a manual sentra?????

let me put it bluntly, an auto TSX is in the low to mid 8 seconds range for 0-60, a manual regular sentra is faster than that. they are in the high 7's

i just didnt want to be so clear to hurt the auto owner's feelings.

but you could take one with ease on the highway (non SE-R and non Spec V's)
Old 04-20-2004, 08:28 AM
  #7  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Like I said Gilbo, get me an MT Sentra and we'll find out.

Lets find out about an Auto TSX vs an SE-R/V on the highway as well.
Old 04-20-2004, 08:38 AM
  #8  
Burning Brakes
 
gilboman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by domn
Like I said Gilbo, get me an MT Sentra and we'll find out.

Lets find out about an Auto TSX vs an SE-R/V on the highway as well.
what's interesting about the sentra is the older regular ones (b4 2002 but same look as the current ones) had

Horsepower 145 hp @ 6,400 rpm
Torque 136 lb.-ft. @ 4800 rpm
2674 lbs

in this form, a manual sentra will take out an auto TSX with ease

but the new regular ones probably wont outaccelerate the auto TSX..so just make sure its a 2002+ regular sentra and you're ok domm.

Horsepower – 126 hp @ 6000 rpm
Torque – 129 lb-ft @ 2400 rpm
Old 04-20-2004, 08:39 AM
  #9  
Racer
 
93Kewl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TSX is fun to drive, however, i just noticed now that sometimes the TSX really does need more torque for quicker accelerations when the light turns green. 166lbs torque doesn't cut it sometimes.
Perhaps the single-most reason that swayed me away from a TSX (especially when paired with an auto tranny). More torque does make a difference in the situation you explained above. One of the reasons I love my 9-3 is all that low-end torque goodness (232lbs@2500). I never feel a lack of "off the line" or low end grunt power when I need or want it.

For years people harped on HP. I think now more and more people are starting to learn that torque is just as important when you need to "pull off the line". Even VW is pushing this in their latest round of commercials.
Old 04-20-2004, 08:42 AM
  #10  
Burning Brakes
 
gilboman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 93Kewl
Perhaps the single-most reason that swayed me away from a TSX (especially when paired with an auto tranny). More torque does make a difference in the situation you explained above. One of the reasons I love my 9-3 is all that low-end torque goodness (232lbs@2500). I never feel a lack of "off the line" or low end grunt power when I need or want it.

For years people harped on HP. I think now more and more people are starting to learn that torque is just as important when you need to "pull off the line". Even VW is pushing this in their latest round of commercials.
actually, torque is way more important than hp when pulling off the line. unless you are in the top quarter of the rev range, torque is more important, its what accelerates you. its what you feel and not feel when you stomp on the gas, you feel torque, not hp.
Old 04-20-2004, 09:15 AM
  #11  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Gilboman, you should read this thread it will clear up your misconception about torque vs. HP: http://www.acura-tsx.com/forums/show...8954#post28954
Old 04-20-2004, 09:29 AM
  #12  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
A sentence from LeeLee

"Yes, torque is a good thing. Yes, more of it is better. And yes, you should ignore it and look at HP alone - it's far more productive that way.
I can't agree with that, the ignoring tourque part.
Old 04-20-2004, 09:38 AM
  #13  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
I think what he is trying to say is that crankshaft torque doesn't mean much. More is better but it totally depends on how the car is geared. HP is a function of torque.
Old 04-20-2004, 09:45 AM
  #14  
Photography Nerd
 
Dan Martin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 44
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
A H1 Hummer's engine with 208HP @ 3800 RPM and 440 ft/lb of torque @ 1900 RPM actually puts down 14,000 ft/lb of torque at the wheels with the help of the geared hubs. Our TSX puts out over 1,000 ft/lbs in first gear at the wheels.
Old 04-20-2004, 12:59 PM
  #15  
Racer
 
tehCOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for a four cylinder engine without any forced induction... i'd like to say this engine has a good amount of torque output... but hey, thats just me.
Old 04-20-2004, 01:25 PM
  #16  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Dan Martin
HP is a function of torque.
Exactly. The great thing about HP is that is is a function of torque AND gearing (rpms). HP is king as far as acceleration times. I got into a HUGE argument with someone a while back about this. He just didnt get it.

How much torque do you think an F1 car has? Not a whole hell of alot (relatively speaking).
Old 04-20-2004, 01:34 PM
  #17  
Old timer
 
JRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: .
Posts: 9,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't care, you can have your high rpm horsepower all day long and I'll take my low rpm function of horsepower (aka torque) since I spend most of my time lower in the rpm range on a daily commute.
Old 04-20-2004, 01:39 PM
  #18  
 
dabuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
gilbo luvs to stir things up
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
knight rider
Car Talk
9
03-04-2016 08:59 AM
Skirmich
2G TL (1999-2003)
4
10-01-2015 12:59 PM
hpfiend
2G RL (2005-2012)
1
09-27-2015 06:59 AM
Rcelestino93
3G TL Problems & Fixes
0
09-23-2015 10:01 PM



Quick Reply: Lack of torque sometimes?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.