IS300 vs. TSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-22-2004, 05:51 PM
  #121  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Still the worst of the Losers.

Nothing else I'll say. It's like kicking someone who's already down.



and



sauceman is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 05:56 PM
  #122  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
LOL. Sauceman, I may not agree with you but have to admit that you are one funny dude.
darth62 is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 05:58 PM
  #123  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I guess...
sauceman is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 08:33 PM
  #124  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,011
Received 697 Likes on 418 Posts
I used to have a 2000 Honda Accord MT, 4-cyl 150 hp, before I got my TSX. I KNOW my 5AT is faster. It doesn't just feel faster, it's physics. When I pass other cars it takes less time and it does it quicker.

In that Accord, a passenger timed me doing 9 seconds 0-60 and that wasn't a real "launch" or anything. I've also seen times quoted for that car in magazines at 9.1 seconds or so. There's no way in hell the 200 hp 5AT TSX is slower than my old car. It's gotta do at most 8.5 if not less, and it's definitely got more juice when passing.
Belzebutt is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 08:46 PM
  #125  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I had a 1996 Honda Accord 4AT before the current TSX. That vehicle had 137 Torque compared to the 166 in the TSX. It was also about 300 pounds light (which, in theory, would come close to doing away with the advantage in torque). Yet, I notice a big, big improvement in performance.
darth62 is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 09:06 PM
  #126  
Kenpachi Teichou
 
oneilc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jlukja
ahh yes, the search nazi
oneilc is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 09:11 PM
  #127  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by oneilc
ahh yes, the search nazi
genius...

We have them for a reason.
CGTSX2004 is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 09:39 PM
  #128  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RMATIC09 is offline  
Old 11-22-2004, 10:29 PM
  #129  
5th Gear
 
kavallerie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 56
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
IS comparo

Hey all-


Great site. i'm new to the group, and i thought i'd comment on this discussion because i own both cars. . . sort of- my IS is the Sportcross model (e-shift auto only). i've only had the TSX a week, but it seems that the two cars have comparable performance in real world driving situations. That being said, the differences become more apparent when you get in the twisities on a back road. The TSX feels more agile in that it has lighter steering and a more responsive throttle. The Lexus, especially being a "wagon" of sorts, has a heavier feel, but leaves stop lights with more authority and has very good visibilty over the hood. All of this is subjective, and i mostly agree with those who aren't concerned with the bragging rights of precise measurements. When all is said and done i'm picking the TSX for the quality of the shifter (has a better one ever been made?!) and the level of dirver involvement. It reminds me of my 2000 Prelude, only a lot more grown up. We can put the x-mas tree in the Sportcross, and it's great on long trips when it's just me and my wife, but on those backroads it's just not as fun to drive. And the mileage isn't even close. . .


Kav

(and boy, i hope Acura paint is better than Lexus paint. . . tons of chips on the IS)
kavallerie is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 06:29 AM
  #130  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
genius...

We have them for a reason.


If you have a problem with that, I have no problem with giving you negative rep, and I'm sure many others don't either.

Wow this thread really is a troll magnet.
sauceman is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 06:36 AM
  #131  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,345
Received 630 Likes on 506 Posts
Originally Posted by sauceman


If you have a problem with that, I have no problem with giving you negative rep, and I'm sure many others don't either.

Wow this thread really is a troll magnet.
You got that right.
biker is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 07:51 AM
  #132  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by kavallerie
Hey all-


Great site. i'm new to the group, and i thought i'd comment on this discussion because i own both cars. . . sort of- my IS is the Sportcross model (e-shift auto only). i've only had the TSX a week, but it seems that the two cars have comparable performance in real world driving situations. That being said, the differences become more apparent when you get in the twisities on a back road. The TSX feels more agile in that it has lighter steering and a more responsive throttle. The Lexus, especially being a "wagon" of sorts, has a heavier feel, but leaves stop lights with more authority and has very good visibilty over the hood. All of this is subjective, and i mostly agree with those who aren't concerned with the bragging rights of precise measurements. When all is said and done i'm picking the TSX for the quality of the shifter (has a better one ever been made?!) and the level of dirver involvement. It reminds me of my 2000 Prelude, only a lot more grown up. We can put the x-mas tree in the Sportcross, and it's great on long trips when it's just me and my wife, but on those backroads it's just not as fun to drive. And the mileage isn't even close. . .


Kav

(and boy, i hope Acura paint is better than Lexus paint. . . tons of chips on the IS)

Nice comparo and Welcome to the site !
dom is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 08:24 AM
  #133  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 12,011
Received 697 Likes on 418 Posts
Originally Posted by kavallerie
Hey all-


Great site. i'm new to the group, and i thought i'd comment on this discussion because i own both cars. . . sort of- my IS is the Sportcross model (e-shift auto only). i've only had the TSX a week, but it seems that the two cars have comparable performance in real world driving situations. That being said, the differences become more apparent when you get in the twisities on a back road. The TSX feels more agile in that it has lighter steering and a more responsive throttle. The Lexus, especially being a "wagon" of sorts, has a heavier feel, but leaves stop lights with more authority and has very good visibilty over the hood. All of this is subjective, and i mostly agree with those who aren't concerned with the bragging rights of precise measurements. When all is said and done i'm picking the TSX for the quality of the shifter (has a better one ever been made?!) and the level of dirver involvement. It reminds me of my 2000 Prelude, only a lot more grown up. We can put the x-mas tree in the Sportcross, and it's great on long trips when it's just me and my wife, but on those backroads it's just not as fun to drive. And the mileage isn't even close. . .


Kav

(and boy, i hope Acura paint is better than Lexus paint. . . tons of chips on the IS)

So there we have it, the TSX is clearly 10x better.




I kid, I kid...
Belzebutt is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 09:04 AM
  #134  
Old fart
 
TSX 'R' US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 20,455
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by kavallerie
Hey all-


Great site. i'm new to the group, and i thought i'd comment on this discussion because i own both cars. . . sort of- my IS is the Sportcross model (e-shift auto only). i've only had the TSX a week, but it seems that the two cars have comparable performance in real world driving situations. That being said, the differences become more apparent when you get in the twisities on a back road. The TSX feels more agile in that it has lighter steering and a more responsive throttle. The Lexus, especially being a "wagon" of sorts, has a heavier feel, but leaves stop lights with more authority and has very good visibilty over the hood. All of this is subjective, and i mostly agree with those who aren't concerned with the bragging rights of precise measurements. When all is said and done i'm picking the TSX for the quality of the shifter (has a better one ever been made?!) and the level of dirver involvement. It reminds me of my 2000 Prelude, only a lot more grown up. We can put the x-mas tree in the Sportcross, and it's great on long trips when it's just me and my wife, but on those backroads it's just not as fun to drive. And the mileage isn't even close. . .


Kav

(and boy, i hope Acura paint is better than Lexus paint. . . tons of chips on the IS)
awesome writeup!!

I rarely see the IS-wagons out there...only seen one so far.
TSX 'R' US is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 09:28 AM
  #135  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the IS wagons, but like TRU said, i dont see many.
RMATIC09 is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 09:58 AM
  #136  
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
supraken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by darth62
I had a 1996 Honda Accord 4AT before the current TSX. That vehicle had 137 Torque compared to the 166 in the TSX. It was also about 300 pounds light (which, in theory, would come close to doing away with the advantage in torque). Yet, I notice a big, big improvement in performance.

On that note, my friend had a '94 EX, same numbers I think as your '96, also 4AT. We've tested the 0-60 to be about 9.4-9.5 sec.

I think power-to-weight-ratio wise, they're about the same as TSX, but like discussed before tranmission/gearing has alot to do with it, as well as rotational mass, physical conditions, etc. I guess that's where the improvement in performance comes in mainly. Not that I really care about 0-60 times... like darth said, as long as it has enough passing power, etc I'm happy with it

I also have this impression that PWR is not a linear curve realtive to performance.... like the speed curve will drop off as the power keep increasing...dunno how to explain it...
supraken is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:08 AM
  #137  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i cant believe threads like this are still goin on
dzuy is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:10 AM
  #138  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
i cant believe threads like this are still goin on
I can't believe you took the time to post that.

CGTSX2004 is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:11 AM
  #139  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
I can't believe you took the time to post that.

i cant believe you took the time to reply
dzuy is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:13 AM
  #140  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
i cant believe you took the time to reply
Hey, I'm

CGTSX2004 is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:14 AM
  #141  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Hey, I'm

i never saw that bored smiley

haha almost as funny as and
dzuy is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:17 AM
  #142  
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
CGTSX2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beach Cities, CA
Posts: 24,299
Received 378 Likes on 198 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
i never saw that bored smiley

haha almost as funny as and
Actually, the smiley is pretty good too. There really are a lot of undiscovered smileys.
CGTSX2004 is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:18 AM
  #143  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
Actually, the smiley is pretty good too. There really are a lot of undiscovered smileys.
yea, i think the troutslapping is dying down haha

people are of it
dzuy is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:19 AM
  #144  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
dom is offline  
Old 11-23-2004, 10:45 AM
  #145  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by dzuy
yea, i think the troutslapping is dying down haha

people are of it
Nice. You had to whore (render useless) a perfect thread for finding out and hunting down trolls!

J/k. I think the IS vs TSX subject really has been beaten to death with this thread, lol

So to domn for :padlock:
sauceman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tsx_boy
1G TSX Performance Parts & Modifications
4
12-13-2019 08:33 PM
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
12-04-2019 02:11 PM
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
01-23-2016 01:25 PM
GWEEDOspeedo
Car Parts for Sale
4
01-15-2016 10:39 PM
ceb
ILX
2
09-27-2015 10:56 AM



Quick Reply: IS300 vs. TSX



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.