IS300 vs. TSX
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Age: 44
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS300 vs. TSX
I'm getting offered the demo 2004 IS300 with < 1,000 miles w/navi for about $27K. That's a bit cheaper than the new TSX w/navi.
Both are great cars to drive, IS300 has a better punch because it's a V6. It's really a toss-up. What would you guys take?
Both are great cars to drive, IS300 has a better punch because it's a V6. It's really a toss-up. What would you guys take?
#2
Senior Moderator
IS300 = Better overall performance, maybe better reliability
TSX = More luxury far better interior and Exterior styling (although its subjective), More space. Fuel economy (IS is terrible)
What the TSX loses in performance it more than makes up for in other areas. If you plan on using the back seat and care about space and MPG then TSX it should be.
TSX = More luxury far better interior and Exterior styling (although its subjective), More space. Fuel economy (IS is terrible)
What the TSX loses in performance it more than makes up for in other areas. If you plan on using the back seat and care about space and MPG then TSX it should be.
#3
I'm back, biatch.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Age: 43
Posts: 5,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1SICKLEX would've loved this thread.
Too me, the IS is a little old now. I think its due for a redesign soon. Also Acura Navi > * Navi. But if your into snob appeal, you'll probably get more from the Lexus.
Too me, the IS is a little old now. I think its due for a redesign soon. Also Acura Navi > * Navi. But if your into snob appeal, you'll probably get more from the Lexus.
#4
Team Owner
A search could have helped. https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16044
#5
ATCer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Age: 49
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS300 is as big a slush box as the TSX is, even though it has a 6. If you want old styling, with great possibilities for engine upgrades, go IS. You want new styling, w/ nothing really exciting yet on the market to boost power, go TSX.
Both cars have positives and negatives, but you mention punch, so I am guessing you are looking for overall performance or capabilities w/ performance.![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Stock for stock, the IS runs probably the same in regards to punch/ quickness. Don't forget the IS weighs a whole lot more than the TSX. Styling is big to me, and the current IS is old looking and soon to be extinct.
Both cars have positives and negatives, but you mention punch, so I am guessing you are looking for overall performance or capabilities w/ performance.
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
Stock for stock, the IS runs probably the same in regards to punch/ quickness. Don't forget the IS weighs a whole lot more than the TSX. Styling is big to me, and the current IS is old looking and soon to be extinct.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
That's an I6 and not a V6 and I would still take the TSX. The IS300 just seems too damn small, even for me. Plus those gauges are just
.
In fact, the IS has less rear legroom than a Toyota Corolla.
![Yuck](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yuck.gif)
In fact, the IS has less rear legroom than a Toyota Corolla.
Thats just it, some things are too big for some people to overlook. When I got an look of the IS's interior I knew there was no way I could buy that car. Too small and ugly. But that may not matter to others. All depends on the situation.
#9
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
I was faced with the same dilema a year ago, I was offered a demo IS for $28.5k out the door (no navi tho), but after I put my deposit down, I started to regret and was evetually turned away by:
1. outdated/plastic looking interior
2. somewhat racer boy image (it used to be my dream car before it and its taillights got played out by the so-called ricers)
3. extrememly cramped rear seat (not that I use it....)
4. Higher maintanence cost and gas
5. SNOW (not that you have to worry about this)
I got my deposit back very soon, test drove the TSX the same day and realizing that its handling and performance wasn't that far off from the IS (at least for regular, spirited driving). I was glad that I made that choice, never regretted.
It's ironic how the IS was my dream car during college and when I was able to afford it, I chose another car over it...
1. outdated/plastic looking interior
2. somewhat racer boy image (it used to be my dream car before it and its taillights got played out by the so-called ricers)
3. extrememly cramped rear seat (not that I use it....)
4. Higher maintanence cost and gas
5. SNOW (not that you have to worry about this)
I got my deposit back very soon, test drove the TSX the same day and realizing that its handling and performance wasn't that far off from the IS (at least for regular, spirited driving). I was glad that I made that choice, never regretted.
![Clap](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/clap.gif)
It's ironic how the IS was my dream car during college and when I was able to afford it, I chose another car over it...
#10
Old fart
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
That's an I6 and not a V6 and I would still take the TSX. The IS300 just seems too damn small, even for me. Plus those gauges are just
.
In fact, the IS has less rear legroom than a Toyota Corolla.
![Yuck](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yuck.gif)
In fact, the IS has less rear legroom than a Toyota Corolla.
oh..and the IS look is soooo yesterday...
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#11
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by cmf
Don't forget the IS weighs a whole lot more than the TSX. Styling is big to me, and the current IS is old looking and soon to be extinct. ![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
I don't mean to be picky, but the IS weighs about the same as the TSX.....actually IS weighs about 50lbs less than a TSX.... just want to be fair to the cars..
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The next IS is nice IMO.....
![](http://mysite.verizon.net/ellenju/MVC-002F.jpg)
![](http://mysite.verizon.net/ellenju/MVC-003F.jpg)
#17
who's right, who's wrong?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 46
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CGTSX2004
![Chuckle](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/chuckle.gif)
That's saying a lot considering how good Foose is at making just about anything look good.
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
#18
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by jaydub
He's so awesome to talk to also.
He drew a one-of-a-kind picture on a poster of one of his cars at last year's SEMA show for me. ![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![Ecstatic](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ecstatic.gif)
![Excited](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/excited.gif)
I would really like to meet him. His shop isn't too far from where my parents live in Cali. Big fan of his work on Overhaulin'. Did you see the Corvette that they worked on?
![Drool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/drool.gif)
#19
who's right, who's wrong?
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 46
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah that's a definite "not to miss" show.
I also met Courtney this year at SEMA, she's pretty damn cute in person. I didn't have the guts to tell her that though.
![Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#20
Everyday Joe
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hampton Roads, VA (Smithfield)
Age: 49
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll chime in as I looked long and hard at the IS over the summer before I got the TSX.
I loved the I6 and the smooth power. Not mind-blowing power but very smooth. I did really like the look from all angles but the rear end is definitely getting played out. The interior is not "luxorious" but is definitely a love/hate thing. The back seat is small...so small that it would not fit a baby seat and allow for a person in the front seat. Gas mileage is bad too. Still, I loved it....
I love my TSX and am glad that I got it instead of the IS. The new IS will make the old IS look very dated (more so than now) and the TSX is a better rounded package in my mind.
I loved the I6 and the smooth power. Not mind-blowing power but very smooth. I did really like the look from all angles but the rear end is definitely getting played out. The interior is not "luxorious" but is definitely a love/hate thing. The back seat is small...so small that it would not fit a baby seat and allow for a person in the front seat. Gas mileage is bad too. Still, I loved it....
I love my TSX and am glad that I got it instead of the IS. The new IS will make the old IS look very dated (more so than now) and the TSX is a better rounded package in my mind.
#21
Race Director
The 05MY comparison is not all that fair considering the TSX is just in its second year and the IS is in its 7th and thankfully last. A better comparison will be the upcoming 06 IS250 (concept probably shown early next year).
#22
I test drove the IS a few times before getting the Acura (automatic and manual trans.). I didn't think the IS handled all that well or was quick and it reminded me too much of my Corolla. The TSX just felt overall like a better car (manual transmission). I wouldn't think of buying a TSX with an automatic and would get the IS300 instead. The first TSX I drove was automatic and I lost all interest in the car until I drove the manual a few months later.
#23
Advanced
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: LA, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd been looking at an IS for months before I started getting serious about buying a new car. Mostly because there were a bunch of used ones out there and really no used TSXs. I went and test drove an IS, it was nice, kinda cramped, not layed out very well, the fuel economy sucked. It was pretty fun to drive. I told the dealer I was going to test drive the A4 and the TSX, then probably come back. Never did, hell I didn't even make it to the Audi dealership. After getting some finances in order I went and bought the TSX. After driving my gf's A4 I know I didn't miss anything there either.
#25
Advanced
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 47
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
esk, my experience was exactly the same as yours. The first time I test drove a TSX auto, the dealer sat beside me and asked me to floor it on a straight road, I floored it, and he asked proudly, "Feel the acceleration?" I was like ehhh, thats it? I didn't feel anything. The I went out to test drive IS-300 (the RWD is really sweet and engine is smooth, but the interior is so small, I felt my left arm had no place to rest on), Accord EX-V6 (Love it a lot, but its ugly exterior...), etc and finally I came back to TSX to give it a final try because of its handling and nice interior, and this time I got the 6-speed, and i have never regretted ever since. A lot quicker IMO.
#26
I feel the need...
A good friend of mine has happily driven an IS for a few years - I really liked it and thought about buying one until I saw the TSX. IMO Acura has much better interior, very tastefull and classy exterior. Like everyone, I'd love more power but then again I also love getting 34mpg on the freeway.
Personally, I think Navi is overrated, my only regret -- not getting the 6MT.
Personally, I think Navi is overrated, my only regret -- not getting the 6MT.
#27
Pro
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I think navi is underrated, while 6mt is overrated... especially on these forums.
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
Originally Posted by PistonFan
A good friend of mine has happily driven an IS for a few years - I really liked it and thought about buying one until I saw the TSX. IMO Acura has much better interior, very tastefull and classy exterior. Like everyone, I'd love more power but then again I also love getting 34mpg on the freeway.
Personally, I think Navi is overrated, my only regret -- not getting the 6MT.
Personally, I think Navi is overrated, my only regret -- not getting the 6MT.
#28
woooo!!
Originally Posted by SirWaWa
front end of that lexus kinda looks like camry headlights
![Roll Eyes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
#29
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally Posted by drkangel348
I think navi is underrated, while 6mt is overrated... especially on these forums.
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself...
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself...
![Lame](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/lame.gif)
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#30
Teh seX
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: unknown
Age: 40
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drkangel348
I think navi is underrated, while 6mt is overrated... especially on these forums.
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
ok.. its not a performace car at all but you love what rtr is doing with the non-performance oriented tsx? hahaha
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
btw: navi and 6mt are underrated here..
#31
Race Director
Originally Posted by drkangel348
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
#32
Race Director
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The TSX is a sporty car, it's a mix of luxury and sportiness, it';s just not a FAST sporty car. It has great handling, and it is quick, and with aftermarket mods it sure as hell can become a performance car.
The cars still a baby, give her time, she will grow....
The cars still a baby, give her time, she will grow....
#33
Outnumbered at home
My biggest issue with the IS, already mentioned here, is the atrocious gas mileage. The car is nothing resumbling fast (in the 7s with auto and 6's with stickshift) but gets gas mileage rated the same as my wifes toyota highlander. That engine is a piece. But when I drove it the damn thing handled amazing. AM going to give it that. But seems a little old to me now.
But back to the first post, that seems like a pretty good deal. It will hold its value well, service will be awesome, and it is a lexus (name recognition has to count for something). TSX is a better overall car but it is still a nice car
But back to the first post, that seems like a pretty good deal. It will hold its value well, service will be awesome, and it is a lexus (name recognition has to count for something). TSX is a better overall car but it is still a nice car
#35
Burning Brakes
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto
Age: 55
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drkangel348
I think navi is underrated, while 6mt is overrated... especially on these forums.
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
I got an auto for my TSX mainly because its not a performance car.
Its a 4 door daily driver semi-luxury car, but its not a performance car at all.
Sure cars like the S2000 and 350Z should only be driven with a 6mt but a 4 door sedan marketed for entry luxury? no.
A car like that should be able to drive itself... although I think what Realtime racing is doing with the TSX is awesome. my
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#36
6 speed yo!
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: bay area, ca
Age: 37
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by supraken
I was faced with the same dilema a year ago, I was offered a demo IS for $28.5k out the door (no navi tho), but after I put my deposit down, I started to regret and was evetually turned away by:
1. outdated/plastic looking interior
2. somewhat racer boy image (it used to be my dream car before it and its taillights got played out by the so-called ricers)
3. extrememly cramped rear seat (not that I use it....)
4. Higher maintanence cost and gas
5. SNOW (not that you have to worry about this)
I got my deposit back very soon, test drove the TSX the same day and realizing that its handling and performance wasn't that far off from the IS (at least for regular, spirited driving). I was glad that I made that choice, never regretted.
It's ironic how the IS was my dream car during college and when I was able to afford it, I chose another car over it...
1. outdated/plastic looking interior
2. somewhat racer boy image (it used to be my dream car before it and its taillights got played out by the so-called ricers)
3. extrememly cramped rear seat (not that I use it....)
4. Higher maintanence cost and gas
5. SNOW (not that you have to worry about this)
I got my deposit back very soon, test drove the TSX the same day and realizing that its handling and performance wasn't that far off from the IS (at least for regular, spirited driving). I was glad that I made that choice, never regretted.
![Clap](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/clap.gif)
It's ironic how the IS was my dream car during college and when I was able to afford it, I chose another car over it...
#37
Baka Unco
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, you could buy a used 2001 IS for about $18k then spend about $8-9k for a turbo setup and have a little sedan with RWD and 400+ whp (which would be cool), for about the same price of a TSX. But then you still have a LITTLE sedan, which may as well have been a coupe for the lack of space in the back seat and trunk.
#38
Pro
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by tsxhondatuner
wow that is weird. it happened to me also with my dream car. Except i was tossed between an EVO and the TSX. i thought i could never get an EVO cause i couldn't afford it but then when i was able to i chose the TSX. i never regretted my decision though...but id still like an EVO
#39
My Garage
I was in the Subaru ship, downpayment check in hand, with my pre-pickup factory washed 04 STI gleaming in the lot, waiting to be driven home that night. They handed me a newly cut (non-factory) key because they "lost" the factory key. One of the employees took it home with him and when they contacted him he said he didnt have it.
Was way too sketchy. When I asked them to have the locks changed, they said I would have to pay to have that done. I told them they were crazy, they were the ones who lost the key!!!! Anyway, 5 days later i walked into Acura to price out a TL, saw the TSX, then saw the price tag, and never looked back, bought it the next day after a test drive. Aint love grand?
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
![Dance](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dance.gif)