I Did It Again
#1
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
I Did It Again
A few weeks ago I had posted that I had travelled 1094Km with a single tank. It was worth 43mpg/36 US mpg.
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
#3
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I Did It Again
Originally posted by sauceman
A few weeks ago I had posted that I had travelled 1094Km with a single tank. It was worth 43mpg/36 US mpg.
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
A few weeks ago I had posted that I had travelled 1094Km with a single tank. It was worth 43mpg/36 US mpg.
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
#4
Senior Moderator
Re: I Did It Again
Originally posted by sauceman
A few weeks ago I had posted that I had travelled 1094Km with a single tank. It was worth 43mpg/36 US mpg.
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
A few weeks ago I had posted that I had travelled 1094Km with a single tank. It was worth 43mpg/36 US mpg.
Well, I just lasted this last single fill for 1056Km, slightly lower, but I wasn't trying to get a good mileage until I realized this morning when I had 700km that I still had gas for another 300+ Km. Still, I got 41mpg / 34.2Mpg US.
And that was with... 73litres. (I know some of you still don't believe me, but hey, that's how it is anyway)
Maybe your car is special?
#6
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
And the thing is, Domn, theoretically, you should be able to get even better mileages since you have the 5AT.
But I do drive very moderately, at around 65mph on the highway, and driving beyond 1000km on a single tank requires that you drive around 90% highway. So it doesn't happen very often that I can get that sort of performance, because the fill lasts me for a few days, and I don't usually drive 90%+ of highway. It's more like 60% highway / 40% urban.
But I do drive very moderately, at around 65mph on the highway, and driving beyond 1000km on a single tank requires that you drive around 90% highway. So it doesn't happen very often that I can get that sort of performance, because the fill lasts me for a few days, and I don't usually drive 90%+ of highway. It's more like 60% highway / 40% urban.
#7
Senior Moderator
My two long highway drivers were both with 4 people in the car and with the AC on 90% of the time. Maybe thats had an effect on mileage. But I thought my 700km was great.
I'm getting 26-27MPG in 80 City/ 20 Hwy now. I take it your in the car alone and the AC's off?
I'll have to try a long trip with no AC and only 2 people in the car.
I'm getting 26-27MPG in 80 City/ 20 Hwy now. I take it your in the car alone and the AC's off?
I'll have to try a long trip with no AC and only 2 people in the car.
Trending Topics
#8
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO USA
Age: 52
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by domn
My two long highway drivers were both with 4 people in the car and with the AC on 90% of the time. Maybe thats had an effect on mileage. But I thought my 700km was great.
My two long highway drivers were both with 4 people in the car and with the AC on 90% of the time. Maybe thats had an effect on mileage. But I thought my 700km was great.
#9
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by domn
.....I'll have to try a long trip with no AC and only 2 people in the car.
.....I'll have to try a long trip with no AC and only 2 people in the car.
#10
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by wolfeacura
You use A/C in Toronto?
You use A/C in Toronto?
We'll see who's laughing when your getting your butt kicked by a Canadian in the NFL pool
Larch, I thought AC does'nt have much of an effect as my city numbers are always pretty identical with or without it on. But seeing 1000km+ makes me question that?
#13
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Yes. And 1056Km was 660 miles.
Domn, I usually am alone, but with the trunk full of work stuff. And as soon as it is more than 20°C outside, I usually use the A/C, so yes, I have been relying a lot on the A/C.
Domn, I usually am alone, but with the trunk full of work stuff. And as soon as it is more than 20°C outside, I usually use the A/C, so yes, I have been relying a lot on the A/C.
#14
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
Don't worry at all about the A/C -- it makes very, very little difference in this car.
Don't worry at all about the A/C -- it makes very, very little difference in this car.
#15
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by sauceman
I'll try and make a comparison some time for you, Larch. I'd say about a 5-7% difference.
I'll try and make a comparison some time for you, Larch. I'd say about a 5-7% difference.
For sure, it's less than most of us ever thought.
#16
Instructor
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
Don't worry at all about the A/C -- it makes very, very little difference in this car.
Don't worry at all about the A/C -- it makes very, very little difference in this car.
My guess is rolling the windows down produces a LOT of drag, maybe even more than the AC compressor. My Saab 9000 was like that - actually did better with the windows up and the AC on - and that car wasn't nearly as slippery as the TSX.
I suppose if you can get by just tilting the sunroof up you'll do better than with AC.
#17
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by lshenretty
I'm sure larch is right about this. Seems like there may be something about this elsewhere on the board.
My guess is rolling the windows down produces a LOT of drag, maybe even more than the AC compressor. My Saab 9000 was like that - actually did better with the windows up and the AC on - and that car wasn't nearly as slippery as the TSX.
I suppose if you can get by just tilting the sunroof up you'll do better than with AC.
I'm sure larch is right about this. Seems like there may be something about this elsewhere on the board.
My guess is rolling the windows down produces a LOT of drag, maybe even more than the AC compressor. My Saab 9000 was like that - actually did better with the windows up and the AC on - and that car wasn't nearly as slippery as the TSX.
I suppose if you can get by just tilting the sunroof up you'll do better than with AC.
Good point -- When we talk about whether the A/C makes a difference, COMPARED TO WHAT? Compared to no A/C but with the windows open, or compared to no A/C but with the windows closed (which usually doesn't happen, not in those conditions anyway)?
THAT probably makes a big difference.
#18
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Good point. I want to compare AC on and off, both with windows closed. I too believe it is much worst with windows open, the car becomes a parachute. Maybe the tilt sunroof would be a good solution, but even then...
#19
Advanced
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Congratulations!
My question is this: How did you put 72 litres in the tank? If I'm not mistaken the tank is rated at 60 something. Do you have special top of techniques or have you discovered a secret compartment?
An even bigger question is, where did you find the courage to use up all 70 litres? Usually when the light comes on and 100 or so km have passed I'm already sweating bullets!
Good, inspirational news though, especially in these days of high gas prices (just paid over $1.00 a litre for the first time!).
My question is this: How did you put 72 litres in the tank? If I'm not mistaken the tank is rated at 60 something. Do you have special top of techniques or have you discovered a secret compartment?
An even bigger question is, where did you find the courage to use up all 70 litres? Usually when the light comes on and 100 or so km have passed I'm already sweating bullets!
Good, inspirational news though, especially in these days of high gas prices (just paid over $1.00 a litre for the first time!).
#20
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally posted by MikeL
Congratulations!
My question is this: How did you put 72 litres in the tank? If I'm not mistaken the tank is rated at 60 something. Do you have special top of techniques or have you discovered a secret compartment?
An even bigger question is, where did you find the courage to use up all 70 litres? Usually when the light comes on and 100 or so km have passed I'm already sweating bullets!
Good, inspirational news though, especially in these days of high gas prices (just paid over $1.00 a litre for the first time!).
Congratulations!
My question is this: How did you put 72 litres in the tank? If I'm not mistaken the tank is rated at 60 something. Do you have special top of techniques or have you discovered a secret compartment?
An even bigger question is, where did you find the courage to use up all 70 litres? Usually when the light comes on and 100 or so km have passed I'm already sweating bullets!
Good, inspirational news though, especially in these days of high gas prices (just paid over $1.00 a litre for the first time!).
I think this is because there is a chamber for gas expansion. This happens because it is always much cooler in the gas station's tank then the air temperature. So once it's in your gas tank, it will heat up and expand, and create a lot of pressure, and even fill. So you got this chamber to block all spills and gas vapours, but you can fill it up. DO NOT FILL IT UP ALL THE WAY LIKE I DO UNLESS YOU ARE IMMEDIATELY TAKING OFF TO DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF OVER 100KM. Otherwise, you may have problems.
When you immediately drive after, you burn gas as fast as it expands, so basically, you almost drive for 100km for free. If the temperature difference is great, it may even be more.
And I know this way of filling up the car completely invalidates gas stations' anti-emission systems, but it doesn't wreck them.
Also, to answer your question, since I drive a lot, I get to understand the fuel gauge's pattern pretty well. I know when it's time to stop, usually to about ½ a litre before sputtering out. Today I drove with the empty gas light on for 232Km.
But it doesn't mean each car is calibrated the same. Even on my old 95 EX Accord, when it was newer, I would be able to drive for 80Km with the light on, and in the end, I would be able to drive for only about 30 Km, so the gauge eventually might change in "performance" and catch you off your guards. But the best remedy is always (at least in my case), to have a little red 5L cannister filled with gas. You'll have an extra 50-60km of gas in there in case you run out.
#22
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by sauceman
You will easily fill your tank up to 60-62 litres when you're really dry. Then, if you draw back the nozzle until you see the tip of it, and pour very gently some more gas in, you will be able to add some 10 extra litres.
I think this is because there is a chamber for gas expansion. This happens because it is always much cooler in the gas station's tank then the air temperature. So once it's in your gas tank, it will heat up and expand, and create a lot of pressure, and even fill. So you got this chamber to block all spills and gas vapours, but you can fill it up. DO NOT FILL IT UP ALL THE WAY LIKE I DO UNLESS YOU ARE IMMEDIATELY TAKING OFF TO DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF OVER 100KM. Otherwise, you may have problems.
When you immediately drive after, you burn gas as fast as it expands, so basically, you almost drive for 100km for free. If the temperature difference is great, it may even be more.
And I know this way of filling up the car completely invalidates gas stations' anti-emission systems, but it doesn't wreck them.
Also, to answer your question, since I drive a lot, I get to understand the fuel gauge's pattern pretty well. I know when it's time to stop, usually to about ½ a litre before sputtering out. Today I drove with the empty gas light on for 232Km.
But it doesn't mean each car is calibrated the same. Even on my old 95 EX Accord, when it was newer, I would be able to drive for 80Km with the light on, and in the end, I would be able to drive for only about 30 Km, so the gauge eventually might change in "performance" and catch you off your guards. But the best remedy is always (at least in my case), to have a little red 5L cannister filled with gas. You'll have an extra 50-60km of gas in there in case you run out.
You will easily fill your tank up to 60-62 litres when you're really dry. Then, if you draw back the nozzle until you see the tip of it, and pour very gently some more gas in, you will be able to add some 10 extra litres.
I think this is because there is a chamber for gas expansion. This happens because it is always much cooler in the gas station's tank then the air temperature. So once it's in your gas tank, it will heat up and expand, and create a lot of pressure, and even fill. So you got this chamber to block all spills and gas vapours, but you can fill it up. DO NOT FILL IT UP ALL THE WAY LIKE I DO UNLESS YOU ARE IMMEDIATELY TAKING OFF TO DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF OVER 100KM. Otherwise, you may have problems.
When you immediately drive after, you burn gas as fast as it expands, so basically, you almost drive for 100km for free. If the temperature difference is great, it may even be more.
And I know this way of filling up the car completely invalidates gas stations' anti-emission systems, but it doesn't wreck them.
Also, to answer your question, since I drive a lot, I get to understand the fuel gauge's pattern pretty well. I know when it's time to stop, usually to about ½ a litre before sputtering out. Today I drove with the empty gas light on for 232Km.
But it doesn't mean each car is calibrated the same. Even on my old 95 EX Accord, when it was newer, I would be able to drive for 80Km with the light on, and in the end, I would be able to drive for only about 30 Km, so the gauge eventually might change in "performance" and catch you off your guards. But the best remedy is always (at least in my case), to have a little red 5L cannister filled with gas. You'll have an extra 50-60km of gas in there in case you run out.
#24
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Originally posted by domn
Interesting, even trying your technique, which I do every time I fill up I can only fit at most 55L of gas. And I get about 550 to 600km with that. The tank is 65L, So I figured no more would go?
Interesting, even trying your technique, which I do every time I fill up I can only fit at most 55L of gas. And I get about 550 to 600km with that. The tank is 65L, So I figured no more would go?
#27
Stuck in Purgatory
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southwestern OH
Age: 49
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by kuraki502
hey sauceman, what are your tire pressures at? i want those mileage too!!!
hey sauceman, what are your tire pressures at? i want those mileage too!!!
36 PSI = 36 mpg (overinflated)
32 PSI = 32 mpg (normal)
26 PSI = 26 mpg (underinflated)
etc.
#28
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 62
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by sauceman
When you immediately drive after, you burn gas as fast as it expands, so basically, you almost drive for 100km for free. If the temperature difference is great, it may even be more.
When you immediately drive after, you burn gas as fast as it expands, so basically, you almost drive for 100km for free. If the temperature difference is great, it may even be more.
Not that I don't believe > 30 mpg is possible, I know it is. Hell, I got 32 mpg on a trip with my CLS. So I'm sure 35 is possible for us, but this is not the reason.
#29
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
No I'm not saying it is THE reason. I think it helps, but only at great temperature changes, like over 20°C.
It is mostly because I make a point of driving smoothly, that I get the good mileages. But that don't mean I don't drive the shit out of my car sometimes, but I save that for the weekend spins.
It is mostly because I make a point of driving smoothly, that I get the good mileages. But that don't mean I don't drive the shit out of my car sometimes, but I save that for the weekend spins.
#30
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
March 31st: 36mpg
Bringing this thread back to life!
I just did my second best mileage, but not in summer. 1101km with 72.5L.
This means 35.9mpg
Average weather was sunny and dry in the first 500km, then wet and with a front wind of about 20-30kph for the remaining trip.
Temperatures were between 4 and 13°C.
I find it interesting that I'm now being able to reach those mileages in cooler weathers. I used to be able to do it only in 20°C + weathers.
But here's the real kicker: Octane of gas used was 87.
And my questions are: Granted, 87 octane imposes a decrease in performance. Very noticeable if you ask me. But does it really decrease fuel mileage? My latest experience tends to show it isn't so.
Also, where did we get the info that fuel mileage would be worst with 87? I can't seem to remember Honda ever saying something about this.
I guess I'll try and look into this further.
I just did my second best mileage, but not in summer. 1101km with 72.5L.
This means 35.9mpg
Average weather was sunny and dry in the first 500km, then wet and with a front wind of about 20-30kph for the remaining trip.
Temperatures were between 4 and 13°C.
I find it interesting that I'm now being able to reach those mileages in cooler weathers. I used to be able to do it only in 20°C + weathers.
But here's the real kicker: Octane of gas used was 87.
And my questions are: Granted, 87 octane imposes a decrease in performance. Very noticeable if you ask me. But does it really decrease fuel mileage? My latest experience tends to show it isn't so.
Also, where did we get the info that fuel mileage would be worst with 87? I can't seem to remember Honda ever saying something about this.
I guess I'll try and look into this further.
#31
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by sauceman
Bringing this thread back to life!
I just did my second best mileage, but not in summer. 1101km with 72.5L.
This means 35.9mpg
Average weather was sunny and dry in the first 500km, then wet and with a front wind of about 20-30kph for the remaining trip.
Temperatures were between 4 and 13°C.
I find it interesting that I'm now being able to reach those mileages in cooler weathers. I used to be able to do it only in 20°C + weathers.
But here's the real kicker: Octane of gas used was 87.
And my questions are: Granted, 87 octane imposes a decrease in performance. Very noticeable if you ask me. But does it really decrease fuel mileage? My latest experience tends to show it isn't so.
Also, where did we get the info that fuel mileage would be worst with 87? I can't seem to remember Honda ever saying something about this.
I guess I'll try and look into this further.
I just did my second best mileage, but not in summer. 1101km with 72.5L.
This means 35.9mpg
Average weather was sunny and dry in the first 500km, then wet and with a front wind of about 20-30kph for the remaining trip.
Temperatures were between 4 and 13°C.
I find it interesting that I'm now being able to reach those mileages in cooler weathers. I used to be able to do it only in 20°C + weathers.
But here's the real kicker: Octane of gas used was 87.
And my questions are: Granted, 87 octane imposes a decrease in performance. Very noticeable if you ask me. But does it really decrease fuel mileage? My latest experience tends to show it isn't so.
Also, where did we get the info that fuel mileage would be worst with 87? I can't seem to remember Honda ever saying something about this.
I guess I'll try and look into this further.
But that's just my theory.
#32
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
I'm thinking more or less along those lines too.
When the ECU "hears" knock, it will retard cam and fire. It doesn't necessarily mean the amount of fuel injected is increased. Just that it is detonated with less efficiency. But if, by cruising at 55mph, that extra efficiency isn't needed anyway, then it all cancels down. Right? Wrong?
When the ECU "hears" knock, it will retard cam and fire. It doesn't necessarily mean the amount of fuel injected is increased. Just that it is detonated with less efficiency. But if, by cruising at 55mph, that extra efficiency isn't needed anyway, then it all cancels down. Right? Wrong?
#33
I'm the Firestarter
Sauceman I have to ask, since you travel so much, how do you find the time to moderate this board? Do you post from the road, getting internet access in every hotel you visit?
#34
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
I'm an addict to this place, so I find the time!
I'm back home every night, except for a round trip every 3 months.
I usually do the moderating stuff early in the morning, then leave for work.
But days like today, I took it off. Last week and weekend were exhausting, so today was dedicated to resting.
I'm back home every night, except for a round trip every 3 months.
I usually do the moderating stuff early in the morning, then leave for work.
But days like today, I took it off. Last week and weekend were exhausting, so today was dedicated to resting.