Everybody with a 6 speed manual: Can somebody explain how this works???
Everybody with a 6 speed manual: Can somebody explain how this works???
im in first gear, and when im going and shift at 2000 rpm to 2nd gear, it drops 500 rpm to 1500 rpm..... when im in 1st and go to 3000 rpm and shift to 2nd, it drops 1000 rpm, when i shift at redline from 1st to second, it drops 2500 rpm..... how does this work, im totally confused....
Because they're gear ratios.
For example, the first gear ratio is 3.267:1. So, when the engine is turning 2000 rpm the transmission output shaft is turning 612 rpm (2000/3.267=612). Second gear is 1.88:1, so the same 612 rpm of the output shaft now equals 1150 engine rpm (612*1.88=1150), a drop of 850 erpm.
If, instead, you shift from 1st to 2nd at 3000 erpm, you'd drop to about 1700 erpm (3000/3.267*1.88=1726), a difference of 1300 erpm.
When you make a 1-2 shift at redline, say 7000 erpm, you'd go to about 4000 erpm. And so on. The RPM change from gear A to gear B (upshift or downshift) is ERPM / gear ratio A x gear ratio B. (Forgetting that the car decelerates a little between shifts.)
Hope that helps!
For example, the first gear ratio is 3.267:1. So, when the engine is turning 2000 rpm the transmission output shaft is turning 612 rpm (2000/3.267=612). Second gear is 1.88:1, so the same 612 rpm of the output shaft now equals 1150 engine rpm (612*1.88=1150), a drop of 850 erpm.
If, instead, you shift from 1st to 2nd at 3000 erpm, you'd drop to about 1700 erpm (3000/3.267*1.88=1726), a difference of 1300 erpm.
When you make a 1-2 shift at redline, say 7000 erpm, you'd go to about 4000 erpm. And so on. The RPM change from gear A to gear B (upshift or downshift) is ERPM / gear ratio A x gear ratio B. (Forgetting that the car decelerates a little between shifts.)
Hope that helps!
I think that what Un-Kut is making reference to is the revs in one gear vs. the previous gear, and not the revs dropping between shifts.
If I understand correctly your question, you want to know why revs drop more rpms at higher rpms than at lower rpms. Essentially, it's all about the ratios of the transmission. Essentially, then ratios depict the relationship between the number of revs of the output of the transmission, vs. the input shaft. In our TSXs, the ratios are as follows:
Gear / Ratio
1st / 3.27
2nd / 1.88
3rd / 1.36
4th / 1.03
5th / 0.83
6th / 0.66
What I believe you're asking is: when shifting from 1st to 2nd, revs drop from 2000 to 1500 (-500), or from 3000 to 2000 rpm (-1000), or from 7100 rpm to 4600 rpm (-2500). The key to understanding that is to understand that the difference in rpms will be the result in the difference between your input and output shafts. Since at a given speed your output shaft spins at the same speed, the difference when shifting gears is dictated by the ratio of 2nd gear to 1st gear ratios. Another way of saying this is that the relationship between the two rpm values is not a difference (one minus the other), but a division (one into the other)
That number would be derived as the quotient of your 2nd gear ratio divided into your 1st gear ratio, or 1.88/3.27 = 0.575. That is to say that, for a given speed, your engine will spin in second gear at 57.5% of the revs that it would in first gear. Using your example, you would find the following relationship:
Revs in 1st / Revs in 2nd / Absolute Difference
2000 / 1150 / -850
3000 / 1725 / -1275
7100 / 4082 / -3018
As you can see, the absolute difference in rpms increases as engine speed increases, more than 3000 at redline, and less than 1000 at 2000 rpm.
I hope this helps.
Chris
If I understand correctly your question, you want to know why revs drop more rpms at higher rpms than at lower rpms. Essentially, it's all about the ratios of the transmission. Essentially, then ratios depict the relationship between the number of revs of the output of the transmission, vs. the input shaft. In our TSXs, the ratios are as follows:
Gear / Ratio
1st / 3.27
2nd / 1.88
3rd / 1.36
4th / 1.03
5th / 0.83
6th / 0.66
What I believe you're asking is: when shifting from 1st to 2nd, revs drop from 2000 to 1500 (-500), or from 3000 to 2000 rpm (-1000), or from 7100 rpm to 4600 rpm (-2500). The key to understanding that is to understand that the difference in rpms will be the result in the difference between your input and output shafts. Since at a given speed your output shaft spins at the same speed, the difference when shifting gears is dictated by the ratio of 2nd gear to 1st gear ratios. Another way of saying this is that the relationship between the two rpm values is not a difference (one minus the other), but a division (one into the other)
That number would be derived as the quotient of your 2nd gear ratio divided into your 1st gear ratio, or 1.88/3.27 = 0.575. That is to say that, for a given speed, your engine will spin in second gear at 57.5% of the revs that it would in first gear. Using your example, you would find the following relationship:
Revs in 1st / Revs in 2nd / Absolute Difference
2000 / 1150 / -850
3000 / 1725 / -1275
7100 / 4082 / -3018
As you can see, the absolute difference in rpms increases as engine speed increases, more than 3000 at redline, and less than 1000 at 2000 rpm.
I hope this helps.
Chris
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
Because they're gear ratios.
For example, the first gear ratio is 3.267:1. So, when the engine is turning 2000 rpm the transmission output shaft is turning 612 rpm (2000/3.267=612). Second gear is 1.88:1, so the same 612 rpm of the output shaft now equals 1150 engine rpm (612*1.88=1150), a drop of 850 erpm.
If, instead, you shift from 1st to 2nd at 3000 erpm, you'd drop to about 1700 erpm (3000/3.267*1.88=1726), a difference of 1300 erpm.
When you make a 1-2 shift at redline, say 7000 erpm, you'd go to about 4000 erpm. And so on. The RPM change from gear A to gear B (upshift or downshift) is ERPM / gear ratio A x gear ratio B. (Forgetting that the car decelerates a little between shifts.)
Hope that helps!
For example, the first gear ratio is 3.267:1. So, when the engine is turning 2000 rpm the transmission output shaft is turning 612 rpm (2000/3.267=612). Second gear is 1.88:1, so the same 612 rpm of the output shaft now equals 1150 engine rpm (612*1.88=1150), a drop of 850 erpm.
If, instead, you shift from 1st to 2nd at 3000 erpm, you'd drop to about 1700 erpm (3000/3.267*1.88=1726), a difference of 1300 erpm.
When you make a 1-2 shift at redline, say 7000 erpm, you'd go to about 4000 erpm. And so on. The RPM change from gear A to gear B (upshift or downshift) is ERPM / gear ratio A x gear ratio B. (Forgetting that the car decelerates a little between shifts.)
Hope that helps!
Trending Topics
I'll have to go try it out, but I got the gear ratios from the Acura TSX specs on the Acura web site. Unless the ratios listed are wrong, or if earlier TSXs had different ratios, this should be impossible. :weird:
Originally Posted by JTso
Hmm... I shift at 7500 rpm to second gear and the rpm is above 5000 rpm.
And I guess the ECU doesn't log that in unless it's a mis-shift and you go beyond 8k right?
The ECU has been reflashed by Hondata and the upper rpm limit is now 7600. The internal is stock. I don't think there is any problem with running the rpm that high once in a while. I did mis-shift once and the rpm went way up.
Originally Posted by JTso
Hmm... I shift at 7500 rpm to second gear and the rpm is above 5000 rpm.
The Acura site says 1.88, though. What are we missing?
Originally Posted by JTso
DC headers, UR Pulleys, Ran High flow CAT, Hondata, which intake & exhaust?
Originally Posted by jwood_04TSX
Holy Crap, your tach flys up soooooo fast!! What are you engine mods again JTso??
DC headers, UR Pulleys, Ran High flow CAT, Hondata, which intake & exhaust?
DC headers, UR Pulleys, Ran High flow CAT, Hondata, which intake & exhaust?
Originally Posted by JTso
That video was taken over a year ago. It was equipped with Hondata reflash, K&N CAI, DC header, Carsound cat, Tanabe SMH and big bored TB.
Originally Posted by JTso
The ECU has been reflashed by Hondata and the upper rpm limit is now 7600. The internal is stock. I don't think there is any problem with running the rpm that high once in a while. I did mis-shift once and the rpm went way up. 

lol you luv the blinking red light...
Wish we had 11,000 rpms, I hate it when I run out of rpms
Originally Posted by JTso
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
Yeah, when I was going through those calculations I thought the same thing. When I 1-2 shift at 7500, I stay on the high cam. Do you know what gives? I must be missing something in my calculations (the nature of my answer is correct, but the math doesn't match reality). Is that 2nd gear ratio wrong? If 1st is really 3.267, and 7500 to 5000 is what we're getting, that means 2nd has to be around 2.18, doesn't it? The rpm observations of the OP bear that math out, too.
The Acura site says 1.88, though. What are we missing?
The Acura site says 1.88, though. What are we missing?
Originally Posted by vwong
You're missing the fact that in between shift, the car still accelerates rather than deccelerate like you mentioned earlier. Unless you take 2 seconds to shift from 1st to 2nd, then your car will deccelerate in between shift. But if you're shifting very quickly (like fraction of a second), then the car continues to accelerate but at a slower rate than when it was in gear.
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
6.33 sec, not bad at all. I need to work on my launch. You did that with VSA on, too. Do you find it better with or without VSA on?
. So, I try to launch without wheel hops or tire spins, as either one will kill time. VSA gives me the feedback I need to make the necessary corrections.
Originally Posted by JTso
I've tested with and without VSA and it makes no difference. Remember the movie "Initial D"? The guy was trained driving with a cup of water in the car, and try not to spill it. Well, the VSA is my "cup of water"
. So, I try to launch without wheel hops or tire spins, as either one will kill time. VSA gives me the feedback I need to make the necessary corrections.
. So, I try to launch without wheel hops or tire spins, as either one will kill time. VSA gives me the feedback I need to make the necessary corrections.Any ideas on the gear ratio dilemma?
Originally Posted by vwong
You're missing the fact that in between shift, the car still accelerates rather than deccelerate like you mentioned earlier. Unless you take 2 seconds to shift from 1st to 2nd, then your car will deccelerate in between shift. But if you're shifting very quickly (like fraction of a second), then the car continues to accelerate but at a slower rate than when it was in gear.

I'm with Peter thinking that the ratios we obtained are wrong. either the 1st gear ratio is too high, or the 2nd gear ratio is too low... any more info anyone?
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
Are you being facetious? Is it obvious and I'm just not getting it? 


I tested it tonight, and if I shift at 7400 rpm, i end up in 2nd around 5400 rpm, which gives me a .730 ratio differential between 1st and 2nd gear, instead of the .575 we originally calculated.
Originally Posted by peter_bigblock
Are you being facetious? Is it obvious and I'm just not getting it? 

Another possibility is the stored flywheel momentum keeping the rpm up. The faster it spins, the less rpm it drops. On the other hand, the rpm in between shifts tend to drop faster for light weight flywheels which might be closer to the math calculation earlier.
FWIW, I think I've figured it out. Watching JTso's video, the speedo as he shifts from 1-2 does continues to rise from around 36 to around 41 mph by the time 2nd is fully engaged. Doing some quick math, at 41 in 2nd you'd be around 4970 rpm with stock-size tires. Allowing for some imprecision in the tach, speedo, etc, that accounts for the difference in rpms. Vwong's explanation was right on! (So, basically, that means vwong figured it out and I'm just confirming it.)
The car continues to accelerate, albeit at a much lower rate, between shifts -- unless, like he said, you take too long to shift. My G-Tech actually shows it on the acceleration curve. It's less steep at each shift but still sloped up -- accelerating, but at a lower rate than when in gear.
I know what you're thinking: I'm a genius. Probably smarter than JTso. Fortunately, what I lack in automotive knowledge I make up for in humility...
The car continues to accelerate, albeit at a much lower rate, between shifts -- unless, like he said, you take too long to shift. My G-Tech actually shows it on the acceleration curve. It's less steep at each shift but still sloped up -- accelerating, but at a lower rate than when in gear.
I know what you're thinking: I'm a genius. Probably smarter than JTso. Fortunately, what I lack in automotive knowledge I make up for in humility...
While on the subject of shifting...
At what RPM do you all typicall upshift in everyday, around town driving? Is there an optimal or recommended RPM for general upshift? I don't figure it's good to drive around redlining all day.
At what RPM do you all typicall upshift in everyday, around town driving? Is there an optimal or recommended RPM for general upshift? I don't figure it's good to drive around redlining all day.
Originally Posted by mgoblue003
While on the subject of shifting...
At what RPM do you all typicall upshift in everyday, around town driving? Is there an optimal or recommended RPM for general upshift? I don't figure it's good to drive around redlining all day.
At what RPM do you all typicall upshift in everyday, around town driving? Is there an optimal or recommended RPM for general upshift? I don't figure it's good to drive around redlining all day.
Originally Posted by joerockt
3-3.5K seems to work for me.



= JTso