View Poll Results: Trade in Your 1st Gen for the 2010 v6?
Yes
4.90%
No
76.47%
Maybe
18.63%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

Anyone Gonna Make the Switch to the 2010 v6?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:03 PM
  #1  
TSX69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 1,433
From: NC
Question Anyone Gonna Make the Switch to the 2010 v6?

Now that prices & details have emerged about the 2010 v6 TSX - anyone gonna make the switch?

2010 TSX Pricing
Last but not least, Acura has set the pricing for the 2010 TSX.
2010 TSX (2.4L 5AT/6MT) - $29,310*
2010 TSX Tech (2.4L 5AT/6MT) - $32,410*
2010 TSX V6 (3.5L 5AT) - $34,850*
2010 TSX V6 Tech (3.5L 5AT) - $37,950*
*add $810 to these prices for destination and handling.

3.5-liter, VTEC® V-6 engine, producing 280 horsepower and 254 lb-ft of torque
Sequential SportShift 5-speed automatic transmission (Although similar in design to the transmission available with the 4-cylinder engine, the transmission mated to the V-6 engine is more robust to handle the substantial increase in horsepower and uses different gear ratios to take advantage of the V-6’s abundant torque.)
Sport-tuned exhaust system with dual outlet tips
Upgraded charging system with a heavy-duty battery
Split five-spoke, 18 X 8-inch diameter aluminum wheels
Michelin Pilot P235/45R18 all-season tires
Exclusive suspension tuning with special rate front springs and recalibrated dampers
Expanded use of Electronic Control Mount (ECM) system to control Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH)
Active Sound Control (ASC) noise cancellation system
Upgraded braking system (Special rear brake pads are used that deliver improved stopping power. In addition, the V-6 model makes use of a larger brake master cylinder, a revised pedal ratio, and a new brake booster to deliver more performance-minded braking feel.)
Revised front fascia opening for improved engine cooling
Strut system for easy hood opening
V-6 emblem on rear trunk lid
Easier-to-read Navigation screen with reduced glare compared to the 2009 TSX (Technology Package—also on I-4 model)

Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:12 PM
  #2  
TSX69's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,846
Likes: 1,433
From: NC
Red face Title

The title was supposed to say "Anyone Gonna Make the Switch to the 2010 v6?" Not sure what happened.

I chose Maybe. ~$5,000 for the above seems a little steep but I do like the current TSX more than the TL so in about a year when I am ready to purchase, the v6 TSX might do. Hopefully by then one of them will have ventilated seats.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
shmork53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Portland OR
I will consider it when they get a 6sp with it. Until then I would rather get the 4 with the MT and put on the upcoming supercharger for the same price.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:30 PM
  #4  
BigLizard's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,125
Likes: 11
From: Pacific Northwest, blah.
Originally Posted by TSX69
The title was supposed to say "Anyone Gonna Make the Switch to the 2010 v6?" Not sure what happened.

I chose Maybe. ~$5,000 for the above seems a little steep but I do like the current TSX more than the TL so in about a year when I am ready to purchase, the v6 TSX might do. Hopefully by then one of them will have ventilated seats.
Changed it for ya
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #5  
JB08's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by shmork53
I will consider it when they get a 6sp with it. Until then I would rather get the 4 with the MT and put on the upcoming supercharger for the same price.
I hear you, but I'm wondering how all that tq and hp will flow to frontwheels without torque steer. I am assuming the V6 will also be FWD?!?
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 10:10 PM
  #6  
icemiko's Avatar
Instructor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, B.C.
No because I don't really like the design, I rather get a used 07-08 TL-S.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 11:05 PM
  #7  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
No, too much $$$ for a 280hp FWD car. If it was $34-35K with the tech package I would get it. I love the TSX, but I'll take the G37x sedan or even a loaded Maxima first.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2009 | 11:56 PM
  #8  
shmork53's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: Portland OR
Originally Posted by JB08
I hear you, but I'm wondering how all that tq and hp will flow to frontwheels without torque steer. I am assuming the V6 will also be FWD?!?
The only other option out there for the V6 TSX would be AWD, and that is at least 2 to 3 years out. Yes torque steer will be an issue, but with added weight with the V6 it might make torque steer a little more noticeable. The only way to tell is drive them, but the lack of a MT is deal breaker.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 12:07 AM
  #9  
DLTSX6MT's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
From: CT
"Make the Switch to the 2010 v6?"

Not without an MT, and not for $38k
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 12:15 AM
  #10  
visuelz's Avatar
East Coast Crew
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
time for us TSX to shine! I think we'll be faster than the base TL
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 12:23 AM
  #11  
150shot's Avatar
Advanced
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Forgot about the Maxima- "IF" I was in the market for a car like this- 4 door sedan, high 200hp, sporty type feel, overall value ( as TSX is )- I dont think a $38k TSX can hang with what you get with a Maxima.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 12:50 AM
  #12  
04-6mt-atx's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 4
From: texas
I voted no.. of course I'm fighting of the strong desire for a new Camaro SS/RS manual. I was a GM guy long before Honda and trying stay away from the same shortcomings in my '96 T/A & '00 Z28. Not to mention GM is on the edge of collapse
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 03:46 AM
  #13  
zot09's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: CA
hahaha nooooooooo way, it's almost $39k for a V6 with the tech package. That's ridiculous!

135i/used 335i ftw

edit: yeah, I know, of course you would have more features in the TSX but the driving involvement in the BMW's would more than make up for it
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 05:10 AM
  #14  
godfather2's Avatar
Time to Climb
15 Year Member
Photoriffic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,422
Likes: 65
From: Little Rock, AR
umm, no
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 05:54 AM
  #15  
Audioserf's Avatar
boost owns
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 3
From: CT
Absolutely not. No manual transmission, and my car is only a 3" pulley and K-Pro away from being faster than a V6 TSX anyway, with the added bonus of not looking like a concept car from the original "Robocop".
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 08:02 AM
  #16  
SHYUperman's Avatar
J M U ... DUUUKEESSSS
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,267
Likes: 266
From: Chantilly VA
If I really had to choose between the two cars, I'd go with the V6 TSX over the TL.

But really, I think both cars are ugly and for the amount of money, I'd get something else like a Maxima. Seeing how Acura has been going, my next car will not be an Acura
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #17  
xjohnkdoex's Avatar
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 1
From: nassau county, ny
no. i'm planning to drive my TSX into the ground. and between now and the ground, i hope the s/c or reflash options comes out for the 07/08.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 08:32 AM
  #18  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
I hate to bitch, but no chance. Between its looks, lack of MT and ridiculous price I can't imagine how Acura could push me away any further. Isn't the idea to keep customers in the brand?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 10:16 AM
  #19  
robles325's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
are there any pics of this new tsx??
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #20  
PACman's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 21
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by robles325
are there any pics of this new tsx??
It looks the same as the 2nd gen. Go to acura.com, and select future vehicles.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #21  
eve's Avatar
eve
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
No. I like having no car payments.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 04:13 PM
  #22  
DiaBando's Avatar
gistered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 788
Likes: 3
From: Allentown, PA
no mt...design makes me sick....not a chance.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 06:01 PM
  #23  
msmching's Avatar
Ex-King of Pasadena
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,033
Likes: 0
From: CA, 91107
if the pricing is right as what you mentioned. V6 for 38k? Nope. rather go infiniti/bmw's..
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #24  
JB08's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Car & Driver has published their first impressions and most of the comments here appear to be well founded:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...t_drive_review
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #25  
Daffunda's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
From: MI
No 6spd auto. Step up to the plate man.

Chevy Malibu/Aura/G8/G6 etc has 6spd auto.
Toyota Camry/ES/IS/ has 6spd. IS-F, Lexus LS has 8!
Ford Fusion/Milan/MKZ/MKS all have 6spd.

Even Chrysler has 6spd. (really crappy one)

Then there is Honda, still in 5spd land.

For those who think that 5spd is good enough, didn't they say that when 4spd was the norm and 5spd auto came out?

And yes, no MT just disappoints me. Standard 5spd auto with a torque converter.... At least make it a DCT like the Audi's, and then we'll talk.

Last edited by Daffunda; Jun 6, 2009 at 07:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 07:22 PM
  #26  
cor6bro's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 5
From: South Eastern, PA
No real chance of an upgrade to the V6 TSX while in its current format. Sounds a bit over-priced based on the initial specs. Besides, no MT and lack of a LSD are the real deal breakers for me.

I was hoping that Acura could have pulled out a few surprises with this one, but it's looking like they've totally given up on "the sport" aspect.

The pricing for this model reminds me of the initial pricing problem associated with the RL's debut. It was priced higher than the market would sustain. - Kinda leaning towards the G37 at this point.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2009 | 11:48 PM
  #27  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
it's ironic that the banner at the bottom of this thread says "more power and fuel efficiency" the new Infiniti G sedan with 328hp.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 12:01 AM
  #28  
04-6mt-atx's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 345
Likes: 4
From: texas
Originally Posted by Mokos23
it's ironic that the banner at the bottom of this thread says "more power and fuel efficiency" the new Infiniti G sedan with 328hp.
almost like Acura is going the opposite direction than it should.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 11:58 AM
  #29  
Audioserf's Avatar
boost owns
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 3
From: CT
Wait a minute, they plan to charge $38k for this thing?!

Hahahahahaha. I will actually point and laugh at anyone I see driving one on the road.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #30  
robles325's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
in my honest opinion i do not like how they are making the tsx size bigger. i like the size of my 05. now to me the car's size is becoming just a little like the new acura tsx.. but just maybe 1 or 2 inches smaller. maybe more. but i like the simplicity of the smallness of the first gen tsx's.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #31  
Fibonacci's Avatar
I feel the need...
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 14,957
Likes: 515
From: Motown
Originally Posted by robles325
in my honest opinion i do not like how they are making the tsx size bigger. i like the size of my 05. now to me the car's size is becoming just a little like the new acura tsx.. but just maybe 1 or 2 inches smaller. maybe more. but i like the simplicity of the smallness of the first gen tsx's.

Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 08:46 AM
  #32  
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Likes: 54
IMHO, if I was looking to spend that kind of money...I would rather pay just a little more coin to get a loaded new CTS. 304hp I think and the car itself is delicious in every sense of the word.

You could probably get a pretty good deal on them right now.

Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 11:02 AM
  #33  
npolite's Avatar
Pro
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 707
Likes: 7
From: Drexel Hill, PA
You will (hopefully) see an initial spike for the people that really want the TSX with a V6 and a sharp decline after that. I would be surprised if 10% of the sales will be V6s after the dropoff. Acura has shot themselves in the foot for charging the TL's pricing for a TSX. And as most people have already mentioned, they will look at a 328i, G37 or IS350 before paying 38k for a TSX. If they came in around 2k above what the 4cyl version is selling for just like the Accord I think more people would buy it.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #34  
CarbonGray Earl's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 168
Nope. Like just about everyone else, I'd rather spend that kind of cash on something else.

Or save and buy something a couple of years old with more power, RWD, manual, and with tuning options.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 12:34 PM
  #35  
Audioserf's Avatar
boost owns
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 3
From: CT
$38k. I still can't believe it. There are so many better options for that much money. If present styling/drivetrain trends continue, I will 100% not be in an Acura product whenever I move on from my car.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #36  
deepen03's Avatar
Proud Acura Owner
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 484
Likes: 32
From: Sayreville, NJ
alright the price of the 2010 tsx v6 fully loaded is $37,000.

why not just go and buy the TL? thats ridiculous. the TL is around the same price and you would get a much better car.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 01:26 PM
  #37  
Audioserf's Avatar
boost owns
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 3
From: CT
For $37k, why buy any current Acura offering?
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 02:20 PM
  #38  
xjohnkdoex's Avatar
where is my garage?!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 1
From: nassau county, ny
Originally Posted by Audioserf
For $37k, why buy any current Acura offering?
^^this pretty much sums it up. it's not economical anymore. and you can get a car with the same amount of HP, or more, for that money, and it'll probably be a better looking car with RWD/AWD.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2009 | 11:46 PM
  #39  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
acura should've started charging these prices a long time ago. now, since acura has been known as value luxury for so long it is a hard pill to swallow to pay $38K for a TSX V6. Look at Lexus and now Infiniti. People still buy their cars even if they are all more expensive than Acura.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 05:54 AM
  #40  
Audioserf's Avatar
boost owns
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 3
From: CT
They're also (subjectively, I know) more attractive vehicles, and offer the choice of RWD or AWD.

$38k for a FWD V6 sedan is simply asinine, and there are better options available in that price range. Acura are shooting themselves in the foot.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.