2005 TSX vs. 2005 Mazda6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-18-2004, 06:32 PM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
uworich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Age: 41
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 TSX vs. 2005 Mazda6

and so the battle begins...
i was just wondering what everyone else thinks of these 2 cars... which one would YOU choose?
Old 11-18-2004, 06:38 PM
  #2  
Racer
 
pandimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North of Los Angeles
Age: 47
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i highly investigated the mazda 6 and that was my personal choice until i drove a tsx.

No navi on the 6, and the old transmission of the first 2 years was really rough.
Old 11-18-2004, 06:43 PM
  #3  
fdl
Senior Moderator
 
fdl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Age: 49
Posts: 21,672
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by uworich
and so the battle begins...

The battle began a year and a half ago. You mind find some useful info by searching.

Personally I wouldnt mind having one of them Mazdaspeed 6's with 260 HP.
Old 11-18-2004, 06:48 PM
  #4  
CG is the place to be...
 
knthornt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Age: 42
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by pandimus
i highly investigated the mazda 6 and that was my personal choice until i drove a tsx.

No navi on the 6, and the old transmission of the first 2 years was really rough.

Funny... when I was looking at cars (before I ordered my 05) the Mazda 6 was on my list. One of the big reasons I didn't get the mazda was lack of navigation, but the dealer ensured me that the 2005 Mazda 6 would have it.

Just another reason to not listen to everything the dealer says.
Old 11-18-2004, 06:58 PM
  #5  
04 remembrance
 
iamhomin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Asking on a TSX forum?

Old 11-18-2004, 07:15 PM
  #6  
Instructor
 
t_dot_porkchop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Age: 47
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mazda = ford
Old 11-18-2004, 07:27 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
pcdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: TOronto
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did look at the Mazda3 and Mazda6 before getting the TSX..

For the TSX u get better resale value, better reliability and better equipment, and interior.
Old 11-18-2004, 07:33 PM
  #8  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,233 Likes on 823 Posts
I wanted the Nav, still couldn't figure out why the 2004 Mazda 3 had a NAV option but the Mazda 6. If the 6 had Nav I may have one now.
Old 11-18-2004, 07:34 PM
  #9  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other day I went on a Patriots board and asked who was going to win the Super Bowl - Pats or Eagles. I don't know why they all said the Pats were a lock
Old 11-18-2004, 07:36 PM
  #10  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,233 Likes on 823 Posts
Originally Posted by jcg878
The other day I went on a Patriots board and asked who was going to win the Super Bowl - Pats or Eagles. I don't know why they all said the Pats were a lock
So strange, I asked the same question on the Giants board and they also said the Pats would win....
Old 11-18-2004, 07:37 PM
  #11  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
So strange, I asked the same question on the Giants board and they also said the Pats would win....
How many members - besides yourself - were logged on? I'm betting there's probably a solid 8 or so without bags on their heads
Old 11-18-2004, 07:38 PM
  #12  
9th Gear
 
MTL_TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
heres the thing, mazda6 looks awesome with all the body kit and everything,
except the fact that the interior is crap,
on the over hand the tsx looks awesome, but to equip it the same way as the mazda6 you'll need to pay maybe 2k more to get the spoiler and the aero kit which makes it very pricey, but if you had the money really worth it. the interior of the tsx is awesome, except that it is smaller than the mazda 6.

if you have the money go for the tsx, otherwise well the mazda6 is just as nice i guess,
i'm still debating myself...
Old 11-18-2004, 07:38 PM
  #13  
Racer
 
scheißterhöffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
I, like many others, had it narrowed to those two. The key turnoff to me regarding the 6 was the styling. A little too boy racer for me, particularly the taillights and side sills (which I know are optional, but I think it looks too bland rental car-ry without), like it would get old fast. I still really like it, and the pic of the Mazdaspeed 6 in this month's C&D looks pretty good (side sills on current 6 are a little tacky, they seem a little more restrained in this pic), but I was trying to choose a car to drive for 7-10 years, and I thought the 6 was something I would outgrow in its current form. But I think I would have been pretty happy with one too, it was a pretty close decision.
Old 11-18-2004, 07:39 PM
  #14  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,233 Likes on 823 Posts
Originally Posted by jcg878
How many members - besides yourself - were logged on? I'm betting there's probably a solid 8 or so without bags on their heads
Even the 8 were logged in as Guest with a powerful firewall so not to be identified.....
Old 11-18-2004, 07:40 PM
  #15  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6 wagon =
Old 11-18-2004, 07:41 PM
  #16  
Obnoxious Philadelphian
 
jcg878's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 5,549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
Even the 8 were logged in as Guest with a powerful firewall so not to be identified.....
Maybe Tom Coughlin was logged on to see what people thought about his quarterback decision. At least you guys have a reason to watch now - to see if Manning goes down <6x/game
Old 11-18-2004, 07:42 PM
  #17  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,233 Likes on 823 Posts
Originally Posted by jcg878
6 wagon =

Yep, thats the one. I am a wagon freak. I was so close to getting a Magnum but then I saw the Dodge emblem.....
Old 11-18-2004, 07:44 PM
  #18  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Two points: first, I willhave to disagree with those who say this isn't a good forum for these sort of questions. In general, I find about 90% of the posters here to be very balanced - particularly when discussing vehicles like the M6, M3, and the Legacy GT.

Second, just so you know, Consumer Reports dropped the M6, RX8,and Mazda MPV from their recommended lists because all three vehicles had very poor reliablity scores.
Old 11-18-2004, 07:55 PM
  #19  
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
mg7726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NYC
Age: 46
Posts: 2,913
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i can't stand the rear ricer lights...car looks ok, interior is no TSX hotness.
Old 11-18-2004, 07:59 PM
  #20  
Race Director
 
RMATIC09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NY
Age: 38
Posts: 12,434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tsx hands down IMO
Old 11-18-2004, 08:10 PM
  #21  
Racer
 
pandimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North of Los Angeles
Age: 47
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its kinda obvious that if you ask in this board which car is better a m6 or the tsx, your gonna get the tsx. Personally i think the m6 is a good car, if you cant afford a tsx go for the 6. Your going to get the majority of the same options for a heck of a lot less in price.

If you wanna here opinions of the m6 guys go to either

mazda6club.com

or

msprotege.com
Old 11-18-2004, 08:33 PM
  #22  
Instructor
 
samir786's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Age: 44
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
42% residual after 3 years man. mazda's can't hold thier value.
Old 11-18-2004, 08:43 PM
  #23  
Stokeless
 
Stokeless_TSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: South East Daygo
Age: 45
Posts: 2,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would never buy a mazda just for the simple fact they are owned by Ford now and I HATE FORDS!!! The car looks ok from the outside has good power BUT look at the interior. No comparison. The luxuary feel with the sporty edge the TSX has can't be found in the 6. I was actually looking to get a 350z or g35. G35 was a lil high on my price range the 350z didn't have the back seat option like the old 300zx's used to. the 2 by 2 version. So that counted those two cars out for me. Then I was looking at an RSX type S and heard about the TSX but never saw it. Saw one on the show room floor and I have to have it. Signed on the line and drove off happily ever after. =)
Old 11-18-2004, 09:03 PM
  #24  
Instructor
 
Sutto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, FL
Age: 45
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Stokeless_TSX
BUT look at the interior. No comparison. The luxuary feel with the sporty edge the TSX has can't be found in the 6.


I was actually looking at the Mazda6 as my first choice because I thought the TSX was more expensive than it is. The exterior of the 6 is alright but the interior doesn't come anywhere close to the TSX...it feels like a cheap car with leather on the seats.

Another thing is, as was said before, it's a Mazda (Ford). Acura has a little more snob appeal.
Old 11-18-2004, 09:16 PM
  #25  
White and Nerdy
 
Godwhacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cranberry, PA
Age: 53
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t_dot_porkchop
mazda = ford
= bad transmissions.

(sorry, needed to finish the algebraic equation there)

Everyone I have known who owned a Ford product has complained about the transmission not holding up over time.

As for the Eagles, Patriots and Giants...NAAAAH! its the Steelers!
Old 11-18-2004, 09:41 PM
  #26  
Cruisin'
 
somberlaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda came along way

Mazda 6 is a good car. The interior of both the M6 and the M3 is decent. I was considering the M6 myself, but when you add the options that come standard in the TSX (leather, nice stereo and all), it ends being as expensive as TSX. So why bother with a Mazda when you can buy an Acura for about the same price?
However, I still think that Mazda RX8 is one of the best cars out there. I wish I can have and RX8 and a TSX....
Old 11-18-2004, 10:14 PM
  #27  
Boy Genius
 
lokman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Secret Laboratory
Age: 49
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although Mazda is owned by Ford, my personal impression is that Mazda is still light years ahead of the Blue Oval in terms of design, styling and quality.

I like the Mazda6's styling in V6 top level trim, but the 4-cylinder looks like a highly decontented version (at least low-end Accords don't look too different from their top-of-the-line models). However, having driven primarily Toyotas and Hondas/Acuras over the past 7 years, I was disappointed by the quality of the Mazda6 interior when I sat in it. The switchgear and feel of certain plastics and seat materials just didn't measure up to an Accord or Civic, let alone an Acura. That said, if I were in the market for a new car, the dollars would be the deciding factor between a Mazda6 or TSX if the difference were great enough.
Old 11-18-2004, 10:16 PM
  #28  
Boy Genius
 
lokman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Secret Laboratory
Age: 49
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forgot to mention that CR's dropping of the Mazda6 from their recommended list for reliability reasons is also going to have a negative impact on my evaluation of said car. Too bad, because my family did have a 929 Serenia and MX-3 Precidia that never had any problems at all in over 5 years of ownership of each car.
Old 11-18-2004, 10:27 PM
  #29  
Advanced
 
Montag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm in the same situation. Although I'm not buying for a while I've looked at the Mazda 3 and 6 along with the TSX of course. Here's where I stand so far:

I actually love the styling of the Mazda 3 and even liked it after driving one but my two kids are getting older and I worry about the small size. I have a Civic EX right now but I think I need something bigger. If I was young and single and money was more of a concern, I would probably go for the 3.

I like the 6 as well but I when you equip it similarly it isn't all that much cheaper than the TSX and you'll likely make some of that up in resale. I also agree with scheißterhöffer that the 6 looks a little too boy-racer. I'm 43 and need something more befitting of my mature and responsible nature.

I'm also concerned a bit by reviews of the 6 that mention the high levels of road noise. Car and Driver was especially turned off by this. After years of driving small, fairly noisy cars, I'm ready to go to something a little quieter.

Also the TSX gets a little better gas mileage than the V-6 6s. I know that financially, this advantage is offset by the TSX's requirement of premium fuel but my point is that it should use less gas and therefore you can feel a little more socially responsible knowing that you are leaving some petrol for the next guy (in his F150 probably).

Reliablilty is also an issue although the Mazda may turn out to be very good in this respect. It's just too early to tell. The TSX is young too but Acura has a pretty good reputation there.

The Mazda probably wins in raw performance numbers but that's not all that important to me (my mature and responsible nature again). The Acura is quick enough and it clearly has the edge in refinement and luxury.

So right now I'm leaning toward the TSX (imagine that) but I'm still researching. That's why I'm on this board.
Old 11-18-2004, 10:29 PM
  #30  
Troutslap Mod-DUH-rator
 
dzuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,018
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i read in motor trend about how they are experiencing reliablility issues with the mazda 6 already.

nuff said.
Old 11-18-2004, 11:47 PM
  #31  
2*Much .NOT. Enough
 
nagidizy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NM
Age: 72
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Godwhacker
= bad transmissions.

(sorry, needed to finish the algebraic equation there)

Everyone I have known who owned a Ford product has complained about the transmission not holding up over time.
[snip ...]
You know, blanket statements really bite. I won't debate that "everyone" you've known has complained; I can't speak for the people you know.
But know this: my 1996 Contour SE (yup, Ford) has 180,000 miles on the original tranny (MTX) with nary a problem in the past. I got 165K or so out of the clutch, and only replaced it as a precaution. So now you know someone who hasn't complained about their Ford tranny. I suspect there might be others. Are you familiar with the less-than-stellar quality of some Acura TL automatics?

This will be, of course, heresy on this forum, but dynamically speaking, if I get a TSX, it will be at best a lateral move in terms of performance, if not down. Let the flames begin if they must. But strict performance numbers aren't the be-all and end-all of car purchases for many people. The TSX is far superior when it comes to quality, reliabilty, interior design, precision, and a dozen other factors. As someone else mentioned earlier, a good aspect of this forum is that folks aren't afraid to express appreciation for other cars/brands, even though they may have plunked their hard-earned cash down for a TSX.

Likewise, I think an unbiased look at the interior of the Mazda 6 will show it to be of decent quality given the price point and target demographics. Is the TSX interior better? Oh yeah, there's no doubt it is. It also costs several thousand dollars more. Is the Mazda as reliable as the TSX? So far, it looks like it isn't even close. But there are many people cross-shopping the Mazda with the TSX, people who aren't necessarily driven by economics to "settle for" the Mazda.

Montag's comments are pretty much right on the mark, or at least describe my take on the subject, with the exception that I am considering the Mazda 3 but no longer thinking of the 6. Others still high on the list are the Subaru Legacy XT Limited, and the VW Passat GLS TDI. And of course the Yugo, the Bentley ...
Old 11-19-2004, 12:11 AM
  #32  
Old fart
 
TSX 'R' US's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Rockford, IL
Posts: 20,455
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by jcg878
The other day I went on a Patriots board and asked who was going to win the Super Bowl - Pats or Eagles. I don't know why they all said the Pats were a lock





if it was between the Mazda6 hatchback vs the TSX...I'm gonna be in trouble...
Old 11-19-2004, 12:34 AM
  #33  
Burning Brakes
 
AlterZgo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 950
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
I'm looking at these 2 cars as well. For those who think the TSX is much more expensive, you have to remember that the TSX comes fully loaded with the only real option being nav. OTOH, you can fully option out a Mazda6 and you still won't have stuff like HIDs, nav, electroluminescent gauges, etc.

The main reasons why I like the Mazda6 is because it, like the TSX, is not a big midsize car like the Camry or Accord, yet it still has a good amt of interior space. Another BIG factor is the fact that you can choose amongst sedan, hatchback and wagon. As a person with a new baby and who enjoys doing things like mt biking, skiing, etc., the 5 door hatchback is very appealing.

The things holding me back right now about the Mazda6 are:
* no nav
* no HIDs
* Ford V6 engine (I know 2 Ford Contour owners whose V6 engines failed just outside the warranty period).

The Mazdaspeed 6 comes with HIDs and nav is an option. It also comes with a high powered turbocharged engine and AWD. But, no hatchback.

I'm also looking at the Subaru Legacy GT sedan and wagon. I think I would probably get a Subaru Legacy GT wagon over a Mazda6. But, right now, the TSX is still on the top of my list of cars to consider. The TSX just seems to exude refinement and quality. Since I plan on keeping my next car for at least 10 years, the TSX seems more likely to give me 10 trouble free years than the other cars.
Old 11-19-2004, 12:41 AM
  #34  
Moderator Alumnus
 
sauceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Windsor-Quebec corridor
Age: 47
Posts: 7,709
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
I haven't ever considered the 6 seriously, if not to do some little cross-shopping in order to get the price on the TSX down a little.

I've had confirmation that I took the right route (for me) when I owned a gas guzzling 6 V6 in a drag race.

Plus, I always enjoy being in the TSX to give a bad surprise to any cocky M6V6 guy who thinks of himself to be completely untouchable since he's in Fortified V6 City.
Old 11-19-2004, 12:49 AM
  #35  
such a dirty birdy
 
majormojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada, eh?
Posts: 1,868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AlterZgo, I think that's a pretty fair conclusion. If you're looking for a long-term vehicle, odds are in favour of the TSX being more reliable and the styling probably won't look as dated. Having said that, I think the ext styling of the 6 is bit nicer than the TSX today. I haven't followed up to see if it has been an issue, but when I looked at the 6 over a year ago, it seemed like the faux Titanium finish on the interior plastic would rub off and get marked up easily. Interior and overall refinement, TSX is better hands down.

The 6 wagon sure is appealing though, one of the best looking wagons out there.
Old 11-19-2004, 02:22 AM
  #36  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nagidizy
You know, blanket statements really bite. I won't debate that "everyone" you've known has complained; I can't speak for the people you know.
But know this: my 1996 Contour SE (yup, Ford) has 180,000 miles on the original tranny (MTX) with nary a problem in the past. I got 165K or so out of the clutch, and only replaced it as a precaution. So now you know someone who hasn't complained about their Ford tranny. I suspect there might be others. Are you familiar with the less-than-stellar quality of some Acura TL automatics?

This will be, of course, heresy on this forum, but dynamically speaking, if I get a TSX, it will be at best a lateral move in terms of performance, if not down. Let the flames begin if they must. But strict performance numbers aren't the be-all and end-all of car purchases for many people. The TSX is far superior when it comes to quality, reliabilty, interior design, precision, and a dozen other factors. As someone else mentioned earlier, a good aspect of this forum is that folks aren't afraid to express appreciation for other cars/brands, even though they may have plunked their hard-earned cash down for a TSX.

Likewise, I think an unbiased look at the interior of the Mazda 6 will show it to be of decent quality given the price point and target demographics. Is the TSX interior better? Oh yeah, there's no doubt it is. It also costs several thousand dollars more. Is the Mazda as reliable as the TSX? So far, it looks like it isn't even close. But there are many people cross-shopping the Mazda with the TSX, people who aren't necessarily driven by economics to "settle for" the Mazda.

Montag's comments are pretty much right on the mark, or at least describe my take on the subject, with the exception that I am considering the Mazda 3 but no longer thinking of the 6. Others still high on the list are the Subaru Legacy XT Limited, and the VW Passat GLS TDI. And of course the Yugo, the Bentley ...

The Ford Contour SE was a fine performing car. I could see why you would feel it would be a lateral to the TSX .
Old 11-19-2004, 02:23 AM
  #37  
Not an Ashtray
 
darth62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic south of Burbank
Age: 62
Posts: 1,818
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AlterZgo
I'm looking at these 2 cars as well. For those who think the TSX is much more expensive, you have to remember that the TSX comes fully loaded with the only real option being nav. OTOH, you can fully option out a Mazda6 and you still won't have stuff like HIDs, nav, electroluminescent gauges, etc.

The main reasons why I like the Mazda6 is because it, like the TSX, is not a big midsize car like the Camry or Accord, yet it still has a good amt of interior space. Another BIG factor is the fact that you can choose amongst sedan, hatchback and wagon. As a person with a new baby and who enjoys doing things like mt biking, skiing, etc., the 5 door hatchback is very appealing.

The things holding me back right now about the Mazda6 are:
* no nav
* no HIDs
* Ford V6 engine (I know 2 Ford Contour owners whose V6 engines failed just outside the warranty period).

The Mazdaspeed 6 comes with HIDs and nav is an option. It also comes with a high powered turbocharged engine and AWD. But, no hatchback.

I'm also looking at the Subaru Legacy GT sedan and wagon. I think I would probably get a Subaru Legacy GT wagon over a Mazda6. But, right now, the TSX is still on the top of my list of cars to consider. The TSX just seems to exude refinement and quality. Since I plan on keeping my next car for at least 10 years, the TSX seems more likely to give me 10 trouble free years than the other cars.

In all honesty, I really dislike the HIDs. I liked the bright halogens on my last Accord better. No sharp cutoffs.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:24 AM
  #38  
Racer
 
TheOne305's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tacoma
Age: 47
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wsklar
I wanted the Nav, still couldn't figure out why the 2004 Mazda 3 had a NAV option but the Mazda 6. If the 6 had Nav I may have one now.
probably has to do with Mazda 3 is built in Japan and the Mazda 6 built in the USA.Thats what i notice on the sticker.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:38 AM
  #39  
Racer
 
pandimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North of Los Angeles
Age: 47
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exactly.. Basically the problem with the 3 having navi, and the 6 is the retooling of the factorys. it would cost them too much to do it currently.
Old 11-19-2004, 04:51 AM
  #40  
Advanced
 
ianz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for me when i test drove the mazda6 was the steering wheel, it's hideous! plus the mazda logo really doesn't help. The fully loaded mazda6 was too close to the price of the tsx for it to have any advantages, not to mention the gas mileage you lose for getting a v6 will eventually offset it. The red interior lights just pushed me more towards audi, which IMO mazda copied.


Quick Reply: 2005 TSX vs. 2005 Mazda6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.