'06 TSX Gets Better MPG w/ 93 Octane
#1
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'06 TSX Gets Better MPG w/ 93 Octane
After plugging the 128th fill-up for my '06 TSX into my Excel spreadsheet, I noticed that I either run 92 or 93 octane; depending on which local fueling station I stop at.
With that said, I took the average MPG of my 92 fill-ups and compared it to my 93 octane fill-ups just to see if there was a difference between 1 octane level. For those that want to read up on octane ratings, go here.
92 Octane Results
Total Fillups: 76
Average MPG: 25.55
93 Octane Results
Total Fillups: 52
Average MPG: 27.16
This means that I average 1.61 more miles per gallon when running 93 octane.
For those that are statistical whizzes, was my sampling large enough to accurately justify a difference?
With that said, I took the average MPG of my 92 fill-ups and compared it to my 93 octane fill-ups just to see if there was a difference between 1 octane level. For those that want to read up on octane ratings, go here.
92 Octane Results
Total Fillups: 76
Average MPG: 25.55
93 Octane Results
Total Fillups: 52
Average MPG: 27.16
This means that I average 1.61 more miles per gallon when running 93 octane.
For those that are statistical whizzes, was my sampling large enough to accurately justify a difference?
#4
Poser / Fanboi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knox
For those that are statistical whizzes, was my sampling large enough to accurately justify a difference?
I'm not a statistician by trade but I think the sample size calculation would determine if the power was sufficient. I think I could do that too, but it might take me a little while to figure out.
#5
still plays with cars
There are too many other variables like gas supplier, time of year, ethanol or not, etc. for those numbers to be statistically relevant. With 10.5:1 compression, I highly doubt the mileage difference is due to one octane point.
#6
To know if there is any statistical validity to your sampling, you would also have to provide the standard deviation. in excel just do a =stdev() around your samples. then you can run a t-test to see. but judging by the numbers and high sampling rate i would say you are definitely on to something =)
also you have to try to eliminate as many variables as possible... ie the brands of the gas... or perhaps you got more 93 in the winter and more 92 in the summer.
either way, this is as scientific of a test i've seen on these boards. you made me proud =)
also you have to try to eliminate as many variables as possible... ie the brands of the gas... or perhaps you got more 93 in the winter and more 92 in the summer.
either way, this is as scientific of a test i've seen on these boards. you made me proud =)
#7
still plays with cars
Originally Posted by nbtx
There are too many other variables like gas supplier, time of year, ethanol or not, etc. for those numbers to be statistically relevant. With 10.5:1 compression, I highly doubt the mileage difference is due to one octane point.
Trending Topics
#9
Poser / Fanboi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nbtx
There are too many other variables like gas supplier, time of year, ethanol or not, etc. for those numbers to be statistically relevant. With 10.5:1 compression, I highly doubt the mileage difference is due to one octane point.
#10
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by nbtx
Who were the two suppliers?
#12
For some reason I cannot PM you (maybe cuz my account is new?). But my email address is gebby1160@hotmail.com
#13
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by muncher
well at least you can say that one location gives better mileage than the other... and that's really what matters, right?
I'll send the data to those who have provided their e-mail addresses.
#14
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Portland, Maine
Age: 39
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 6MT - I keep all my fuel data in a spreadsheet and I average about 1 - 1.5 less mpg when I fill up with 91 octane as opposed to 93 octane. That's regardless of whether its winter or summer. Unfortunately almost all gas stations that carried 93 in my area are switching to 91 so now I have to go either to Mobil or Sunoco to get 93.
#15
Originally Posted by Knox
Price is what usually matters because the stations are so close. Food City, as noted above, does a "Fantastic Friday" promo where premium (92 octane) is the same price as mid-grade which usually results in a $.10/gallon savings. So, I usually stop every Friday to top off.
I'll send the data to those who have provided their e-mail addresses.
I'll send the data to those who have provided their e-mail addresses.
Food City is selling mid-grade as premium on "Fantastic Friday".
#16
still plays with cars
Originally Posted by Sock
That presents a new hypothesis:
Food City is selling mid-grade as premium on "Fantastic Friday".
Food City is selling mid-grade as premium on "Fantastic Friday".
87 octane from all their pumps. Mileage difference between 93 and 87 might be as much as the claimed 1.5 mpg, but you'd never see that much difference between 92 and 93.
#17
Make a hole, coming thru!
Your gas stations sound like BJ's and Costco for me ... great price, but questionable source and quality. After switching to Shell (see the other thread(s)), even without using a calculator, I saw increased mileage, confirming (for me) that the warehouse stores have lower quality fuel.
Doesn't sound like EITHER is a top tier gas source, so I'd be skeptical of even quality control from month to month at those locations. I seem to recall reading on Car Talk or somewhere that places like "the Quickie Mart" (what I call "Stop 'n Robs") get gas where they can, cheapest, to make any kind of profit margin. Variations in supplier quite likely invalidate any statistical trends of buying 92 at one place, and 93 at another.
I could be fulla of course.
Doesn't sound like EITHER is a top tier gas source, so I'd be skeptical of even quality control from month to month at those locations. I seem to recall reading on Car Talk or somewhere that places like "the Quickie Mart" (what I call "Stop 'n Robs") get gas where they can, cheapest, to make any kind of profit margin. Variations in supplier quite likely invalidate any statistical trends of buying 92 at one place, and 93 at another.
I could be fulla of course.
#19
Poser / Fanboi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mattlissy
Does both stations use 10% ethanol. I wonder if 100% gasoline vs. 90% gasoline would make a difference in MPG? Both 93 Octane rating of course.
#20
still plays with cars
Originally Posted by hunterk1
You bet it makes a difference, ethanol contains (citation) 23.5 MJ/L while gasoline weighs in 34.8 MJ/L. So it contains 67.5% of the energy that gas does on a volumetric basis. Energy density is the same reason why diesels get better millage, that fuel is more energy dense.
reason is a diesel does not run against manifold vacuum like a gas engine; hence less pumping loss.
#21
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry for the delay is getting the data out guys. Life comes at you fast sometimes.
I have posted the data and other info on my blog here .
I have posted the data and other info on my blog here .
#23
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington,DC
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Costco
Why is the Costco gas station so much cheaper than other gas stations?
I always thought the gas station idea at Costco was just an afterthought… you know, a way for those guys to make a few more bucks. When I placed a telephone call to Costco headquarters in Issaquah, Washington, I found that I was dead wrong. Costco takes its gas very seriously. So seriously in fact, that they actually have a VP of Gasoline on their executive roster. (I wonder if they have a VP of Pizza-by-the-Slice?) I tried to reach the VP of Gasoline, but evidently he must’ve been out brokering a huge petroleum deal with Rotten Robbie’s, because my call ended up getting routed to a general information monkey. I must not be the first person who’s called with this question because the customer service rep read me a prepared script. It went something like this: “Costco is able to keep its gas prices so low because we don’t acquire our gas from just one source. We purchase gasoline from many sources (BP, 76, Arco to name a few) – wherever we can get it cheapest at that time. This way, we can pass the savings on to you.” So, if you don’t mind waiting in lines that hearken back to the gas crisis of ’73, you too can save a few clams at the Costco gas station.
http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.ph...ticleid=22544\
CBS News Report you might find interesting
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/...in788939.shtml
Why is the Costco gas station so much cheaper than other gas stations?
I always thought the gas station idea at Costco was just an afterthought… you know, a way for those guys to make a few more bucks. When I placed a telephone call to Costco headquarters in Issaquah, Washington, I found that I was dead wrong. Costco takes its gas very seriously. So seriously in fact, that they actually have a VP of Gasoline on their executive roster. (I wonder if they have a VP of Pizza-by-the-Slice?) I tried to reach the VP of Gasoline, but evidently he must’ve been out brokering a huge petroleum deal with Rotten Robbie’s, because my call ended up getting routed to a general information monkey. I must not be the first person who’s called with this question because the customer service rep read me a prepared script. It went something like this: “Costco is able to keep its gas prices so low because we don’t acquire our gas from just one source. We purchase gasoline from many sources (BP, 76, Arco to name a few) – wherever we can get it cheapest at that time. This way, we can pass the savings on to you.” So, if you don’t mind waiting in lines that hearken back to the gas crisis of ’73, you too can save a few clams at the Costco gas station.
http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.ph...ticleid=22544\
CBS News Report you might find interesting
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/...in788939.shtml
#24
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington,DC
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BJ's
I think they also take it pretty seriously since they have a VP of fuel and automotive operations..
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_n13781476
I think they also take it pretty seriously since they have a VP of fuel and automotive operations..
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_n13781476
#25
Race Director
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by aascsm
BJ's
I think they also take it pretty seriously since they have a VP of fuel and automotive operations..
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_n13781476
I think they also take it pretty seriously since they have a VP of fuel and automotive operations..
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...6/ai_n13781476
#27
Poser / Fanboi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, I'm back. Here are some results -
Grouping into 92 & 93 only (i.e. no station effect), there is a statistically significant difference. The F-test says the variances are equal and the 2-tailed t-test for equal variances is significant at p=0.0091. So the 93 fuel really is giving you about 1.5mpg better mileage; the means and standard deviations are
92RON - 25.5 ± 3.3 mpg (n=79)
93RON - 27.1 ± 3.6 mpg (n=53)
I didn't compute the (statistical) retrospective power, but I probably could. Give me a couple of days, I've been doing statistics for some grant applications all day and I need a break.
However it gets more interesting from there. I then compared the two largest station groups within each octane group (Food City, 92RON; Weigel's, 93RON), I found that the improvement in mileage must come from somewhere else, because, strangely enough,
92RON, Food City - 25.1 ± 3.1 mpg (n=74)
93RON, Weigel's - 24.9 ± 3.4 mpg (n=16)
plus they are statistically the same. So the improvement seen in the 93RON fuel appears to derive solely from the other sources. If I then compare the other sources alone (i.e. exclude Weigel's) I get:
93RON (no Weigel's) - 28.0 ± 2.1 mpg (n=37)
This is definitely statistically different from the whole 92RON group (p=0.002).
Bottom line: Don't buy Weigel's anymore!
Grouping into 92 & 93 only (i.e. no station effect), there is a statistically significant difference. The F-test says the variances are equal and the 2-tailed t-test for equal variances is significant at p=0.0091. So the 93 fuel really is giving you about 1.5mpg better mileage; the means and standard deviations are
92RON - 25.5 ± 3.3 mpg (n=79)
93RON - 27.1 ± 3.6 mpg (n=53)
I didn't compute the (statistical) retrospective power, but I probably could. Give me a couple of days, I've been doing statistics for some grant applications all day and I need a break.
However it gets more interesting from there. I then compared the two largest station groups within each octane group (Food City, 92RON; Weigel's, 93RON), I found that the improvement in mileage must come from somewhere else, because, strangely enough,
92RON, Food City - 25.1 ± 3.1 mpg (n=74)
93RON, Weigel's - 24.9 ± 3.4 mpg (n=16)
plus they are statistically the same. So the improvement seen in the 93RON fuel appears to derive solely from the other sources. If I then compare the other sources alone (i.e. exclude Weigel's) I get:
93RON (no Weigel's) - 28.0 ± 2.1 mpg (n=37)
This is definitely statistically different from the whole 92RON group (p=0.002).
Bottom line: Don't buy Weigel's anymore!
#28
I worked in the accounting dept of a major oil company a few years back and it wasn't unusual for us to trade gasoline with another oil company if it was beneficial to both to balance supplies in different area. It cost money to pump fuel 1,000mi through a pipeline. Also, oil refining is not something done by local small business so if there is only one refinery in your area they are likely supplying fuel to all the nearby stations. The trace additives the different brands brag about may be slightly different but it's highly likely they are added as the fuel goes in the tanker. JMPO of course.
There are two refineries side-by-side near where we live and we often ride by them when out on our bikes. I've never seen a tanker going in or out of either one with an oil company name on the side. My suspicion is that the trucks are privately owned and haul fuel much like trucks haul anything else. I also lucked into a tour of one of them and the engineer showing us around mentioned that they supply Costco. Obviously one or the other has to supply Costco. It's possible of course that some stations may be mixing 87 with their premium fuel to make a few extra bucks but I think most states have people who go around checking for such things. I doubt any refiner would buy into such a scheme so the station owner would have to work it out with the trucker -- certainly possible I suppose.
There are two refineries side-by-side near where we live and we often ride by them when out on our bikes. I've never seen a tanker going in or out of either one with an oil company name on the side. My suspicion is that the trucks are privately owned and haul fuel much like trucks haul anything else. I also lucked into a tour of one of them and the engineer showing us around mentioned that they supply Costco. Obviously one or the other has to supply Costco. It's possible of course that some stations may be mixing 87 with their premium fuel to make a few extra bucks but I think most states have people who go around checking for such things. I doubt any refiner would buy into such a scheme so the station owner would have to work it out with the trucker -- certainly possible I suppose.
#29
Just another wrinkle on the statistical stuff. Gasoline expands when warmer and the volume is adjusted for temperature when sold in bulk. You'll get a little more fuel if you buy from a cooler tank (say underground vs above during the summer).
#31
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hunterk1
Ok, I'm back. Here are some results -
Grouping into 92 & 93 only (i.e. no station effect), there is a statistically significant difference. The F-test says the variances are equal and the 2-tailed t-test for equal variances is significant at p=0.0091. So the 93 fuel really is giving you about 1.5mpg better mileage; the means and standard deviations are
92RON - 25.5 ± 3.3 mpg (n=79)
93RON - 27.1 ± 3.6 mpg (n=53)
I didn't compute the (statistical) retrospective power, but I probably could. Give me a couple of days, I've been doing statistics for some grant applications all day and I need a break.
However it gets more interesting from there. I then compared the two largest station groups within each octane group (Food City, 92RON; Weigel's, 93RON), I found that the improvement in mileage must come from somewhere else, because, strangely enough,
92RON, Food City - 25.1 ± 3.1 mpg (n=74)
93RON, Weigel's - 24.9 ± 3.4 mpg (n=16)
plus they are statistically the same. So the improvement seen in the 93RON fuel appears to derive solely from the other sources. If I then compare the other sources alone (i.e. exclude Weigel's) I get:
93RON (no Weigel's) - 28.0 ± 2.1 mpg (n=37)
This is definitely statistically different from the whole 92RON group (p=0.002).
Bottom line: Don't buy Weigel's anymore!
Grouping into 92 & 93 only (i.e. no station effect), there is a statistically significant difference. The F-test says the variances are equal and the 2-tailed t-test for equal variances is significant at p=0.0091. So the 93 fuel really is giving you about 1.5mpg better mileage; the means and standard deviations are
92RON - 25.5 ± 3.3 mpg (n=79)
93RON - 27.1 ± 3.6 mpg (n=53)
I didn't compute the (statistical) retrospective power, but I probably could. Give me a couple of days, I've been doing statistics for some grant applications all day and I need a break.
However it gets more interesting from there. I then compared the two largest station groups within each octane group (Food City, 92RON; Weigel's, 93RON), I found that the improvement in mileage must come from somewhere else, because, strangely enough,
92RON, Food City - 25.1 ± 3.1 mpg (n=74)
93RON, Weigel's - 24.9 ± 3.4 mpg (n=16)
plus they are statistically the same. So the improvement seen in the 93RON fuel appears to derive solely from the other sources. If I then compare the other sources alone (i.e. exclude Weigel's) I get:
93RON (no Weigel's) - 28.0 ± 2.1 mpg (n=37)
This is definitely statistically different from the whole 92RON group (p=0.002).
Bottom line: Don't buy Weigel's anymore!
From my own calculations I realized that the difference in price for Weigel's wasn't enough for me to leave Food City gasoline.
#32
Make a hole, coming thru!
Wow, Hunterk1. All I can say is Wow.
I've heard anecdotally that buying gas in the morning versus evening can give you a little bit more, due ... to the pump's measurement mechanism? (I can't imagine gas "warms up" underground during the day, but ... I could be wrong.) Back when it was $1.75, who cared, but now ... I absolutely fill up in the morning. I did that once with my Jeep, drove 2-3 miles to work, and ... by midday the 18 yo 20-gallon tank had cracked. Had to replace it. Now I fill up and then drive 22 miles to work, so no worries.
After a tankful or two that I got 25.6 MPG out of (more city driving? more aggressive? a little of both I think), I'm back up to 28-30 MPG.
I've heard anecdotally that buying gas in the morning versus evening can give you a little bit more, due ... to the pump's measurement mechanism? (I can't imagine gas "warms up" underground during the day, but ... I could be wrong.) Back when it was $1.75, who cared, but now ... I absolutely fill up in the morning. I did that once with my Jeep, drove 2-3 miles to work, and ... by midday the 18 yo 20-gallon tank had cracked. Had to replace it. Now I fill up and then drive 22 miles to work, so no worries.
After a tankful or two that I got 25.6 MPG out of (more city driving? more aggressive? a little of both I think), I'm back up to 28-30 MPG.
#33
in the 24th and a half...
Originally Posted by Knox
Wow! Awesome data buddy. Thanks.
From my own calculations I realized that the difference in price for Weigel's wasn't enough for me to leave Food City gasoline.
From my own calculations I realized that the difference in price for Weigel's wasn't enough for me to leave Food City gasoline.
1) The 93 octane pump(s) other than Weiigel's) is/are possibly calibrated to deliver at or slightly over measured amount; the 92 octane unit (and Weigel's 93) is on the low end and delivering the legal minimum. Hypothosis check: When was each unit inspected last and what is the fine for underdelivery (the theory being that with all pumps aimed legally low, sooner or later one will exceed the legal allowance on the low side and get caught).
2) Is it possible that when you fill up with 93 9except Weigel's) vs. 92 (and Weigel's) you end up driving in a more fuel efficient manner (highway cruise, fewer lights, less traffic, etc.). Hypothosis check: What difference in your daily drives make you choose one over the other (probably answered by your discount Friday comment) becuae of your locations/duties?
#34
Instructor
I always do 93 for my baby, but a week ago I filled her to the top and let the gas go down to 0 on the range and I got the best gas mileage ever. I changed my lead footedness and only accelerate quickly a minimal amount of times imho. Also tried my best not to drive faster than 70 on the freeway. 70% of course of these miles are highway miles but I got about 31 mpg for a whole tank counting 480 miles for the tank not too shabby for me...
#35
Poser / Fanboi
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 53
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Knox
Wow! Awesome data buddy. Thanks.
Originally Posted by davidspalding
Wow, Hunterk1. All I can say is Wow.
Originally Posted by davidspalding
I've heard anecdotally that buying gas in the morning versus evening can give you a little bit more, due ... to the pump's measurement mechanism?
Originally Posted by fcatwo
I worked in the accounting dept of a major oil company a few years back[...]
Originally Posted by DuckDodgers
Actually, I have a couple of thoughts:[...]
#36
Advanced.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DuckDodgers
Actually, I have a couple of thoughts:
1) The 93 octane pump(s) other than Weiigel's) is/are possibly calibrated to deliver at or slightly over measured amount; the 92 octane unit (and Weigel's 93) is on the low end and delivering the legal minimum. Hypothosis check: When was each unit inspected last and what is the fine for underdelivery (the theory being that with all pumps aimed legally low, sooner or later one will exceed the legal allowance on the low side and get caught).
2) Is it possible that when you fill up with 93 9except Weigel's) vs. 92 (and Weigel's) you end up driving in a more fuel efficient manner (highway cruise, fewer lights, less traffic, etc.). Hypothosis check: What difference in your daily drives make you choose one over the other (probably answered by your discount Friday comment) becuae of your locations/duties?
1) The 93 octane pump(s) other than Weiigel's) is/are possibly calibrated to deliver at or slightly over measured amount; the 92 octane unit (and Weigel's 93) is on the low end and delivering the legal minimum. Hypothosis check: When was each unit inspected last and what is the fine for underdelivery (the theory being that with all pumps aimed legally low, sooner or later one will exceed the legal allowance on the low side and get caught).
2) Is it possible that when you fill up with 93 9except Weigel's) vs. 92 (and Weigel's) you end up driving in a more fuel efficient manner (highway cruise, fewer lights, less traffic, etc.). Hypothosis check: What difference in your daily drives make you choose one over the other (probably answered by your discount Friday comment) becuae of your locations/duties?
#37
T.DoT P.I.M.P. lol
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 41
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by fcatwo
Just another wrinkle on the statistical stuff. Gasoline expands when warmer and the volume is adjusted for temperature when sold in bulk. You'll get a little more fuel if you buy from a cooler tank (say underground vs above during the summer).
BTW: You guys are amazing, this is nice data collection and calculation to shut those people who said Octane 87 is literally no differences than Octane 91.
#38
Make a hole, coming thru!
Originally Posted by chuson
... Those people who said Octane 87 is literally no differen(t)S than Octane 91.
#39
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
Here's the other way to look at your data:
I tracked my mileage like this for 4 years with my former car, and I'm also with my 06 but don't have near the data points you do. I saw that weather affects mileage quite a bit. The most efficient (as I've experienced it) is warm weather, but not so warm you have to run the A/C all the time (however I've noticed that with the TSX the A/C does not seem to have nearly the impact as it did in my Civic). Winter usually tanks MPG. So this graph here is your average MPG on a given month, regardless of the year. This should track reasonably well to the average temperature you have in TN on a given month.
What's interesting about your data is that 93 octane is really only better than 92 Jul - Jan. Feb - June seems to be a push. Interesting also that 92 did not react to the climate changes like 93 did. I was just looking at pure octane ratings, not where you got it.
What would be interesting to add to your analysis is what kind of gas is being used at the stations you frequent - to see if they change seasonally (some do, depending on the climate).
You have great data here - enjoyed looking at it. However I think if you want to really draw some conclusions, you'll have to isolate more variables. For example, you'll want to use the same station, and even the same pump. The probem I had with long-term MPG analysis is the fact there ARE so many variables to isolate.
However you've got me thinking I should start looking for the 93 octane stations...
I tracked my mileage like this for 4 years with my former car, and I'm also with my 06 but don't have near the data points you do. I saw that weather affects mileage quite a bit. The most efficient (as I've experienced it) is warm weather, but not so warm you have to run the A/C all the time (however I've noticed that with the TSX the A/C does not seem to have nearly the impact as it did in my Civic). Winter usually tanks MPG. So this graph here is your average MPG on a given month, regardless of the year. This should track reasonably well to the average temperature you have in TN on a given month.
What's interesting about your data is that 93 octane is really only better than 92 Jul - Jan. Feb - June seems to be a push. Interesting also that 92 did not react to the climate changes like 93 did. I was just looking at pure octane ratings, not where you got it.
What would be interesting to add to your analysis is what kind of gas is being used at the stations you frequent - to see if they change seasonally (some do, depending on the climate).
You have great data here - enjoyed looking at it. However I think if you want to really draw some conclusions, you'll have to isolate more variables. For example, you'll want to use the same station, and even the same pump. The probem I had with long-term MPG analysis is the fact there ARE so many variables to isolate.
However you've got me thinking I should start looking for the 93 octane stations...
#40
Old Man Yelling at Clouds
Originally Posted by Knox
The gas stations are literally side-by-side so there should not be differences in driving behavior based on where I fill-up. But, you did answer the ultimate question, Food City is my station of choice due to "Fantastic Friday's" when 92 is the same price as 89 ($.10 cheaper).