Weapon R Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2008 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
sfrederiksen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Weapon R Intake

Just wondering, has anyone tried (or even notice) this intake?

http://www.sromagazine.com/shop/2007...f14bad8d2d4736
Old 02-05-2008 | 09:36 PM
  #2  
JMJ3rd's Avatar
'06 RL Tech
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 718
Likes: 38
From: Beaumont Texas/The Right Side of Texas
Looks good, I wonder if...
Old 02-05-2008 | 11:14 PM
  #3  
datnvan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
really not going to give you a whole lot of power unless you get full turboback exhaust and a tune. they flow better but with that comes more dirt.
Old 02-06-2008 | 01:21 AM
  #4  
sfrederiksen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Flow better but more dirt? Isn't that the case with getting an intake for ANY car, whether turbo or not? How do you know how much power it will or won't give? Factory turboed mazda's gain 20hp from an intake alone, what makes the RDX different? Even you said factory cars run rich, an intake will lean out the mixture some, which in itself increases output.
Old 02-06-2008 | 03:36 PM
  #5  
datnvan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
i doubt the rdx will make 20hp on intake alone. realistically, 10-12 maybe. on evo's some ppl actually lost power by adding intake alone. every car's ECU will act differently to increase flow. that's what I was saying about getting a full turboback along with the intake to maximize extra power to be had in increasing total flow. you are not going to feel any difference with 10hp alone. better to spend that $ on a tune/reflash.
Old 02-06-2008 | 04:11 PM
  #6  
mau108's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 70
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Originally Posted by sfrederiksen
Flow better but more dirt? Isn't that the case with getting an intake for ANY car, whether turbo or not? How do you know how much power it will or won't give? Factory turboed mazda's gain 20hp from an intake alone, what makes the RDX different? Even you said factory cars run rich, an intake will lean out the mixture some, which in itself increases output.

Just wanna let you know adding an intake won't lean out the mixture as the ECU will dump even more fuel to account for more Oxygen.
Old 02-06-2008 | 04:12 PM
  #7  
mau108's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 70
From: Toronto, ON, Canada
Originally Posted by datnvan
i doubt the rdx will make 20hp on intake alone. realistically, 10-12 maybe. on evo's some ppl actually lost power by adding intake alone. every car's ECU will act differently to increase flow. that's what I was saying about getting a full turboback along with the intake to maximize extra power to be had in increasing total flow. you are not going to feel any difference with 10hp alone. better to spend that $ on a tune/reflash.
10hp is quite a lot, especially when you consider people spening thousands and thousands on their NA build (im talking specifically about the h22 off a lude don't have practice with other motors) with only a 10-20hp gain.
Old 02-07-2008 | 02:51 AM
  #8  
sfrederiksen's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
That's your opinion, I expect

mau: According to cp-e, they designed the MAF sensor plug on the intake to trick the ECU to thinking it's running on a stock box, so that you have gains without running the engine anymore richer than it is.

http://www.cp-e.com/2101.html?open=0

Go there, read the explanation on the mass air sensor for the mazdaspeed 3, then click on teh dyno graph link on the top right. They had a gain of 16hp, to the wheels..
Old 02-07-2008 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
lilfeat's Avatar
Meat Popsicle
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
From: Chicagoland, Illinois
Cool, please let us know how it works after you get it set up.
Old 02-07-2008 | 11:26 AM
  #10  
MMike1981's Avatar
big shot.
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 10
god i wish we had a catback n downpipe.
Old 02-07-2008 | 08:22 PM
  #11  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by MMike1981
god i wish we had a catback n downpipe.
Ditto that.

Also agree with DatnVan. I believe DatnVan had a modified EVO. I had a 07 GTI with APR Stage II and intake didn't do a whole lot. When I read the CP-E thread, I was actually amazed that they claim 20 HP on the intake. I just didn't remember if it was 20 to the crank or wheels.
Old 02-07-2008 | 11:44 PM
  #12  
datnvan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
sfrederiksen said they did 16 to the wheels. i can believe that, just don't think you'll see those gains on the rdx. of course, you never know till someone dyno's.
Old 02-08-2008 | 12:38 PM
  #13  
hondata's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 238
Likes: 70
Originally Posted by sfrederiksen
an intake will lean out the mixture some, which in itself increases output.
A correctly designed intake should actually increase the flow of air into the engine. Engines like the RDX, that use a mass air flow sensor will see the additional air and automatically add the correct fuel to maintain the air fuel ratio. If the intake does not increase the airflow, then it is a waste of money.

Intakes that are sized differently from stock around the mass air flow sensor can make the car run richer or leaner in all driving conditions.

As the intake performs such a critical role in the determination of the air fuel ratio, any aftermarket intake should be tested in conjunction with the available exhausts (which tend to lean out the mixture) and in particular with the reflash we offer that:

- leans the fuel a little at mid to high load
- advances the ignition
- Advances the cam angle
- and increases the boost.

We have tested the reflash with the Church Automotive exhaust system. It runs a safe air fuel ratio.

No company to date, has an intake for us to test.
Old 02-08-2008 | 01:08 PM
  #14  
mav238's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 971
Likes: 2
From: Hometown - Vancouver
My personal take on this is:

More airflow into the engine "generally" makes a little more power, but if it is simply dragging more "warm" air into the engine, it may actually make the engine run less efficiently.

So I would definitely also upgrade the existing intercooler unit to a more efficient one (if one exists in the market, I doubt it). plus slap on a higher throughput cat-back exhaust system.

But if you guys are really serious on improving the engine power performance with these kind of mods, you might as well go the full shabang, and select those pieces carefully to make sure they are compatible with each other (not having one produce the power increase and the other to decrease it). That's why they have dynos to assist in tuning the engines.

Getting aftermarket mods is the easy part, but getting all the different mods to "jive" harmoniously together to generate a tangible increase in performance is another thing.
Old 02-08-2008 | 01:40 PM
  #15  
datnvan's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by hondata
A correctly designed intake should actually increase the flow of air into the engine. Engines like the RDX, that use a mass air flow sensor will see the additional air and automatically add the correct fuel to maintain the air fuel ratio. If the intake does not increase the airflow, then it is a waste of money.

Intakes that are sized differently from stock around the mass air flow sensor can make the car run richer or leaner in all driving conditions.

As the intake performs such a critical role in the determination of the air fuel ratio, any aftermarket intake should be tested in conjunction with the available exhausts (which tend to lean out the mixture) and in particular with the reflash we offer that:

- leans the fuel a little at mid to high load
- advances the ignition
- Advances the cam angle
- and increases the boost.

We have tested the reflash with the Church Automotive exhaust system. It runs a safe air fuel ratio.

No company to date, has an intake for us to test.

that's what I've been saying the whole time. high quality intake, turboback exhaust (downpipe, test pipe (or free flow cat), and catback) and a reflash/tune will give you safe, reliable, substantial gains in power. if you want to go a bit further, a larger O2 turbo outlet, larger/solid intake/intercooler piping, and larger front mount intercooler (if one exists or can be fabbed). a larger, more free flowing I/C will throw off your A/F ratio so best to get it before your tune.

the good thing about turbo cars is the modding steps are pretty much all the same.
Old 02-08-2008 | 09:45 PM
  #16  
spongebobnopants's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by datnvan
that's what I've been saying the whole time. high quality intake, turboback exhaust (downpipe, test pipe (or free flow cat), and catback) and a reflash/tune will give you safe, reliable, substantial gains in power. if you want to go a bit further, a larger O2 turbo outlet, larger/solid intake/intercooler piping, and larger front mount intercooler (if one exists or can be fabbed). a larger, more free flowing I/C will throw off your A/F ratio so best to get it before your tune.

the good thing about turbo cars is the modding steps are pretty much all the same.
I was at the Chicago auto show today and saw our engine on display. The exhaust does a 180 right out of the turbo into what looks like a pre-cat. The thing could probably get huge gains from an aftermarket DP. As for a FMIC. you'd have to run lots dead pipe to get it down there. It looks like there is space up top for a larger one though.

Has anyone data logged how quick the OEM IC heat soaks?
Old 02-11-2008 | 01:28 PM
  #17  
DreamRDX's Avatar
AWD + Turbo = FTW
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities
So has anybody tried this intake yet?
Old 02-11-2008 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
MMike1981's Avatar
big shot.
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 10
how does one go about getting both the CHURCH exhaust system and the proper reflash. i was on temple of vtech and church's website didnt see anything about it, maybe im just missing it.
Old 02-11-2008 | 03:59 PM
  #19  
scottRDX's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 112
Likes: 3
From: Denver, Colorado
I just placed a call at Church Automotive today and left a message. I have the same questions as you guys do. I'll keep you posted when I get a reply.
Old 02-11-2008 | 04:33 PM
  #20  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
Please do. Like OP said, nothing on the Chruch site.
Old 02-11-2008 | 04:43 PM
  #21  
CaSHMeRe's Avatar
... the CaSH ...
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by SinCity
Please do. Like OP said, nothing on the Chruch site.
i'm personally waiting on CP-E's intake to come out. I have had some of the their products on my mazdaspee3 and i LOVED them. All american quality made stuff, and great customer service. here is a vid i found of the CPE Prototype Intake. Chruch's exhuast must be nice ... also waiting on info!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=tQCk2ShJ4Ss
Old 02-11-2008 | 10:54 PM
  #22  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
I forgot. Weapon R stuff was craptastic for a '07 GTI.
Old 04-12-2008 | 11:23 PM
  #23  
john50's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Any update from Church Automotive on the CAT-BACK availability? I looked at their website today, and couldn't find anything.
Old 05-15-2008 | 11:47 AM
  #24  
DanRDX's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 4
Just wondering, has anyone tried (or even notice) this intake?

I actually just ordered mine from JC Whitney....free shipping. Can't wait to install, will post result (ie. sound, increased MPG etc)
Old 05-15-2008 | 02:47 PM
  #25  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DanRDX
I actually just ordered mine from JC Whitney....free shipping. Can't wait to install, will post result (ie. sound, increased MPG etc)
Do keep us posted. Curious on your opnions.
Old 05-15-2008 | 02:54 PM
  #26  
DanRDX's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by SinCity
Do keep us posted. Curious on your opnions.
Will do.... Do you have one...I am sure I am not the only on that is trying to avoid spending $300 for a CPE intake
Old 05-15-2008 | 03:00 PM
  #27  
wwest's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Redmond WA
Originally Posted by hondata
A correctly designed intake should actually increase the flow of air into the engine. Engines like the RDX, that use a mass air flow sensor will see the additional air and automatically add the correct fuel to maintain the air fuel ratio. If the intake does not increase the airflow, then it is a waste of money.

Intakes that are sized differently from stock around the mass air flow sensor can make the car run richer or leaner in all driving conditions.

NOT...!!!!


Modern day, for at least the past 4-5 years for most marques, engine control systems continuously re-calibrate, "retune" the MAF/IAT signals based on the output signal of the upstream oxygen sensor during idle or during "cruise" with light engine loading.




As the intake performs such a critical role in the determination of the air fuel ratio, any aftermarket intake should be tested in conjunction with the available exhausts (which tend to lean out the mixture) and in particular with the reflash we offer that:

- leans the fuel a little at mid to high load
- advances the ignition
- Advances the cam angle
- and increases the boost.

We have tested the reflash with the Church Automotive exhaust system. It runs a safe air fuel ratio.

No company to date, has an intake for us to test.
...
Old 05-15-2008 | 07:04 PM
  #28  
john50's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Wrong.

The Hondata post just before this is several weeks old.

Hondata recently posted dyno runs with and without the CP-E intake, with and without the reflash.

I agree that the CP-E intake seems very pricie, given that this CIA is priced at about 50% less than the CP-E.

But I haven't seen any data (i.e. third party dyno runs) to show that this system is comparable.

If CP-E was even close to this pricing, I'd go with the CP-E intake.
Old 05-15-2008 | 07:19 PM
  #29  
wwest's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Redmond WA
Originally Posted by john50
Wrong.

The Hondata post just before this is several weeks old.

Hondata recently posted dyno runs with and without the CP-E intake, with and without the reflash.

Yes, but regarding those posted dyno runs Hondata willingly admitted that each time after changing the configuration and prior to each dyno run the engine ECU's previously "learned" parameters were reset, out of necessaty I might add.

So all the dyno runs were done with the factory default parameters loaded into the engine ECU and with no "drive cycles" for which the ECU was to have "learned" any new parameter adjustments needed for the new configuration


I agree that the CP-E intake seems very pricie, given that this CIA is priced at about 50% less than the CP-E.

But I haven't seen any data (i.e. third party dyno runs) to show that this system is comparable.

If CP-E was even close to this pricing, I'd go with the CP-E intake.
Bottom line is that the dyno runs were perfectly valid for the comparitive dyno run testing, purposes Hondata stated, but potentially completely invalid for subsequent on the road use.
Old 05-16-2008 | 12:35 AM
  #30  
BleuM&M's Avatar
User-approved
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 1
From: Indy
Originally Posted by wwest
Bottom line is that the dyno runs were perfectly valid for the comparitive dyno run testing, purposes Hondata stated, but potentially completely invalid for subsequent on the road use.
Potentially. Remove that word from all your remarks and admit your true thoughts. Now you feel better. Or maybe not so much. Make the rest of us feel better and cite your logic and sources. You haven't and can't because they don't exist except in your misinformed opinions. That's OK, because the world needs Naysayers too.

If you insist upon hiding behind the 'potential' safety blanket, rational logic dictates you cannot deny the reverse would be true - subsequent road use will prove better. Prove it wrong.

Oh.
Old 05-16-2008 | 01:00 AM
  #31  
BleuM&M's Avatar
User-approved
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 416
Likes: 1
From: Indy
Not only that, but you take phrases out of context and attempt to drive wedges the size of California redwoods into the perceived faults using your Porsche-driven(?) world-view. It isn't working here, WildWest. Different strokes, you know? I mean, who was it brought up a Miller-cycle engine in this forum? Not to mention more brainstorms from other eras.

What is eating your soul to the point you have to make such displays here? Let it out, be specific, because I'm sure someone here can either help you or knows of someone who could help you.
Old 05-16-2008 | 12:13 PM
  #32  
wwest's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Redmond WA
Originally Posted by BleuM&M
Potentially. Remove that word from all your remarks and admit your true thoughts. Now you feel better. Or maybe not so much. Make the rest of us feel better and cite your logic and sources. You haven't and can't because they don't exist except in your misinformed opinions. That's OK, because the world needs Naysayers too.

If you insist upon hiding behind the 'potential' safety blanket, rational logic dictates you cannot deny the reverse would be true - subsequent road use will prove better. Prove it wrong.

Oh.
The "potentially" is there because NO ONE at this point in time knows what the dyno tests might find if a "drive cycle" were completed after making a configuration change and before the subsequent dyno testing. While my "guesstimate" would be a negative one I willingly admit I simply do not know what the results might be if the engine ECU were allowed to adapt to the various pertinent parameters for the "new" configuration.

And by the way most manufactuer's spell out what constitutes a full drive cycle and the reasons for same within their vehicle shop/repair manuals. Toyota, Scion, and Lexus manuals, all models/years are available to review for a fee at techinfo.toyota.com.

RATIONAL thoughts do not need to be proven, right or wrong.
Old 05-16-2008 | 06:40 PM
  #33  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DanRDX
Will do.... Do you have one...I am sure I am not the only on that is trying to avoid spending $300 for a CPE intake
Nope. But if I can avoid spending $300 for something comparable, then that is a no-brainer.
Old 05-19-2008 | 11:24 AM
  #34  
MINIFVR's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
10 hp is a lot for an intake on a naturally aspirated car. 10 hp on a turbo is possible I guess. What you really want to do for a turbo car is get a new exhaust, as mentioned above. You could get 2x the hp gain from turbo car then a N/A car. Exhaust is the way to go!
Old 05-23-2008 | 11:16 AM
  #35  
CaSHMeRe's Avatar
... the CaSH ...
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
so, did anyone get this intake yet ? i would love to see user opinions ...
Old 05-23-2008 | 07:26 PM
  #36  
DanRDX's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by CaSHMeRe
so, did anyone get this intake yet ? i would love to see user opinions ...
If you are referring to the weapon r secret weapon intake, mine is coming next week sometime. I ordered it from JC Whitney b/c they offer free shipping. I wish I had access to a Dyno...On another note if you remove the resonator box, the tube before the air filter box you get to hear more tubro swooshing as well...the car feels like it has a little more pep, but could be mind over matter.

Has anyone else tried that.
Old 05-29-2008 | 02:33 PM
  #37  
CaSHMeRe's Avatar
... the CaSH ...
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by DanRDX
If you are referring to the weapon r secret weapon intake, mine is coming next week sometime. I ordered it from JC Whitney b/c they offer free shipping. I wish I had access to a Dyno...On another note if you remove the resonator box, the tube before the air filter box you get to hear more tubro swooshing as well...the car feels like it has a little more pep, but could be mind over matter.

Has anyone else tried that.
what air filter did you go with ?
Old 05-29-2008 | 03:20 PM
  #38  
DanRDX's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 93
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by CaSHMeRe
what air filter did you go with ?
I got the weapon R intake on Tuesday. But my car was rear-ended on Sunday night. Everything is ok, car is sitting at the body shop waiting to be repaired. So have not installed the intake as yet...stay tuned
Old 06-07-2008 | 10:10 AM
  #39  
MINIFVR's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by datnvan
i doubt the rdx will make 20hp on intake alone. realistically, 10-12 maybe. on evo's some ppl actually lost power by adding intake alone. every car's ECU will act differently to increase flow. that's what I was saying about getting a full turboback along with the intake to maximize extra power to be had in increasing total flow. you are not going to feel any difference with 10hp alone. better to spend that $ on a tune/reflash.
10-12 hp is a LOT of hp for just an intake! You would feel that. The throttle response would be better as well.
Old 06-07-2008 | 10:49 AM
  #40  
SinCity's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 562
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by DanRDX
I got the weapon R intake on Tuesday. But my car was rear-ended on Sunday night. Everything is ok, car is sitting at the body shop waiting to be repaired. So have not installed the intake as yet...stay tuned

That sux....sorry to hear that Dan.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:26 PM.