RDX's biggest downfall
#1
RDX's biggest downfall
Don't get me wrong, I really like what I see in the RDX...............but
90% of the power goes to the front wheels..................WHY!!!!!!!!!!!
If this were the opposite, I'd be in love!
just my
90% of the power goes to the front wheels..................WHY!!!!!!!!!!!
If this were the opposite, I'd be in love!
just my
#2
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's your bit%$?
90% of power goes to front wheels when cruising, where front wheel drive is optimal.
Torque is distributed to rear wheels when necessary up to 70%, such as acceleration, cornering or when VSA is active.
90% of power goes to front wheels when cruising, where front wheel drive is optimal.
Torque is distributed to rear wheels when necessary up to 70%, such as acceleration, cornering or when VSA is active.
#3
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 49
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There's no need for more torque to the rear wheels when you're just cruising along in a straight line. SHAWD only sends torque to the back when it's useful, that's all... in addition to acceleration & cornering, it also sends more torque (up to 45%, i believe) to the rear when going uphill.
#4
As C&D says, it feels VERY much like a FWD car while cornering. I see this as a result of the 90% going to the front.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
#5
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
As C&D says, it feels VERY much like a FWD car while cornering. I see this as a result of the 90% going to the front.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
Please don't judge a vehicle without properly reading the reviews or understanding how SH-AWD or for that matter many other AWD systems work.
#6
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
I actually thought one of the mags (don't remember which) said that it handled "neutral" like a RWD car due to the SH-AWD...up until the limits of handling where it started to understeer.
#7
Originally Posted by vishnus11
Please don't judge a vehicle without properly reading the reviews or understanding how SH-AWD or for that matter many other AWD systems work.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
I actually thought one of the mags (don't remember which) said that it handled "neutral" like a RWD car due to the SH-AWD...up until the limits of handling where it started to understeer.
#9
Pete,
I'm sure that the feeling of FWD has more to to the the weight distribution than that drivetrain. Due to Acura's chassis platforms, we need to place the engine above and slightly ahead of the front wheel centerline, BMW for example places the engine behind the front wheels.
For SH-AWD to function at its best, you need to keep the throttle pinned though the corner. This allows the car to send that engine torque to the outside rear wheel to reduce understeer. If you "chicken lift" through the corner there is no torqe to transfer, and the car will naturally understeer.
I'm sure that the feeling of FWD has more to to the the weight distribution than that drivetrain. Due to Acura's chassis platforms, we need to place the engine above and slightly ahead of the front wheel centerline, BMW for example places the engine behind the front wheels.
For SH-AWD to function at its best, you need to keep the throttle pinned though the corner. This allows the car to send that engine torque to the outside rear wheel to reduce understeer. If you "chicken lift" through the corner there is no torqe to transfer, and the car will naturally understeer.
#10
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 49
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
As C&D says, it feels VERY much like a FWD car while cornering. I see this as a result of the 90% going to the front.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
#11
Originally Posted by jaobrien6
Hmmm... I'll have to check the article again when I get home. I don't remember that statement.
".....the RDX behaves like a front-drive vehicle and understeer is its defining characteristic."
#13
well motortrend says that the turning is the best thing about the RDX and it "walks all over the X3". So that is something to consider on topic of steering. and found the grip of the tires "almost scary" that it was gripping so well...
so really the steering of the RDX could go either way, so dont think its lacking in that department by any means...
so really the steering of the RDX could go either way, so dont think its lacking in that department by any means...
#14
Three Wheelin'
Simple way to end this debate: wait for the RDX to come out and drive one a few times for yourself. Get an open-minded salesperson who will let you "really drive" the demonstator and you will see for yourself that the Car and Driver article is classic reporting of preconceived notions instead of the truth. The same garbage was spewed about the RL and I can tell you for a fact that the RL handles nothing like a FWD car (I should know, I drove a Legend coupe for 8 years prior to getting my RL). Bottom line: Trust the seat of your pants on these matters and not some possibly biased car mag reporter.
#15
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 49
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True enough. In the end, all the matters is your own opinion of the car (and this doesn't just apply to handling, but everything: acceleration, smoothness of the engine, ergonomics, noise, styling, etc.). That's what will determine if you'll be happy with it, not what a magazine says.
#16
I had the opportunity to drive the X3 with pro drivers on an autoX course with several of it's rivals. The X3 killed, let me say that again, KILLED all of them. However, I hate the X3 everywhere else. Loud (not in a good way) exhaust, cheap looking interior, and no luxury. But handle it does!
With what I see in the RDX, I believe even if it can't hang with the X3 while being driven 90-100%, it is still a far better car. Also, I have been waiting for Honda to do a Turbo. Maybe an S2000 turbo is next!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will make final judgment after I drive it, but I do fear understeer!
With what I see in the RDX, I believe even if it can't hang with the X3 while being driven 90-100%, it is still a far better car. Also, I have been waiting for Honda to do a Turbo. Maybe an S2000 turbo is next!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I will make final judgment after I drive it, but I do fear understeer!
#17
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Another thing to look at...according to C&D, the weight distribution will be 52/48 f/r (Acura's numbers). To me, that is RWD territory and very significant for a FWD based car, 90% torque to the front or not.
With most cars, RWD included, understeer will be the the defining characteristic and this is due mostly to safety (when a car understeers, people are more likely to let off the gas which would dial back the understeer). So with a very good weight distribution and SH-AWD, I think Acura has a pretty good handler in their corner and the understeer may be due to different "tuning" of the SH-AWD system...Acura/Honda staying on the safe side.
But then again, enough of the mag racing...we'll know for sure when they release this car and test drives are done.
With most cars, RWD included, understeer will be the the defining characteristic and this is due mostly to safety (when a car understeers, people are more likely to let off the gas which would dial back the understeer). So with a very good weight distribution and SH-AWD, I think Acura has a pretty good handler in their corner and the understeer may be due to different "tuning" of the SH-AWD system...Acura/Honda staying on the safe side.
But then again, enough of the mag racing...we'll know for sure when they release this car and test drives are done.
#18
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
With most cars, RWD included, understeer will be the the defining characteristic and this is due mostly to safety (when a car understeers, people are more likely to let off the gas which would dial back the understeer). So with a very good weight distribution and SH-AWD, I think Acura has a pretty good handler in their corner and the understeer may be due to different "tuning" of the SH-AWD system...Acura/Honda staying on the safe side.
*when I refer to the Pilot's AWD as poor, I mean in performance, not quality. and I know that the Pilot was not designed to be sporty.
#19
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
Just wanted to add that I know understeer is engineered into 99% of cars, but a RWD and a "good" AWD car should be able to overcome this understeer with ones right foot(in certain driving conditions). A poor AWD car will understeer more with added throttle. .
#20
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
A poor AWD car will understeer more with added throttle. This is what the Honda Pilot does, and I hope the RDX does not.
*when I refer to the Pilot's AWD as poor, I mean in performance, not quality. and I know that the Pilot was not designed to be sporty.
*when I refer to the Pilot's AWD as poor, I mean in performance, not quality. and I know that the Pilot was not designed to be sporty.
Another thing to realize is that the Pilot is probably a lot more front-heavy than the RDX, which I would not consider front-heavy at all, not to mention the pilot probably has more "comfort" oriented rims/tires and suspension and lack of SH-AWD.
Front heaviness will also contribute to understeer more than a balanced setup because the weight up front will have more of an effect on inertia forcing the car to keep going forward when the front wheels are turned...ie understeer.
#21
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
As C&D says, it feels VERY much like a FWD car while cornering. I see this as a result of the 90% going to the front.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
TO ME, feeling like a FWD car in the corners in not a good thing.
"In normal operation, 90 percentof the power goes to the front wheels, but this can vary up to 70 percent to the rear. At the rearaxle, the SH-AWD can send as much as 100 percent of available torque to one wheel, which Acura says improves handling by overdriving the outside rear wheel in a corner."
#22
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Maybe you should get checked for A.D.D? [/b]
#23
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 49
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can anyone clarify something for me. I haven't re-read the C&D article yet... did they actually drive it? The article is tagged as a "Preview", and from what I remember of their descriptions, it didn't sound to me like they actually drove it.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
#24
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Pete you only read the first half of the sentence??? Maybe you should get checked for A.D.D?
[/b]
[/b]
It is nice to see that SOME people can debate without personal attacks.
#25
Originally Posted by jaobrien6
Can anyone clarify something for me. I haven't re-read the C&D article yet... did they actually drive it? The article is tagged as a "Preview", and from what I remember of their descriptions, it didn't sound to me like they actually drove it.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
#26
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
I happen to "think" that the understeer that was felt was due to less aggressive throttle being applied during cornering than required to really get SH-AWD to do its work.
Again, mag racing's fine and all, but it's actually not.
Again, mag racing's fine and all, but it's actually not.
#27
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
WOW!?!........................what an a**hole!
It is nice to see that SOME people can debate without personal attacks.
It is nice to see that SOME people can debate without personal attacks.
Funny I thought the same of you for starting a thread based on half a quote.
p.s. I wasn't debating you I was correcting you. Welcome to the forum by the way, stick around and actually read some posts and you might learn something.
#28
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Oh but that's not a personal attack??
Funny I thought the same of you for starting a thread based on half a quote.
Funny I thought the same of you for starting a thread based on half a quote.
Grow the F#$% up.
#29
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York
Age: 54
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
A personal attack on a car? What did I quote in the opening post? I gave what I called my .
Grow the F#$% up.
Grow the F#$% up.
#30
Senior Moderator
Jeez, lighten up, everybody. This discussion is going nowhere fast and will be locked if you can't keep it on topic.
Totally true, sir. Who drives their car, especially a typical small SUV buyer (e.g. potentially me) at 9/10?
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Again, mag racing's fine and all, but it's actually not.
#31
My only car is a Bus
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The MDX is a mostly FWD vehicle. The RL is a mostly FWD vehicle. Having driven both models hundreds of times I don't see much problem with them. The whole point of Honda's AWD/SH-AWD system is you get FWD fuel economy when you are doing things like driving straight down the road. How does RWD or AWD help you in those situations? The SH-AWD will adapt itself to wheel and throttle input.
The objections here to 'understeer bias' are only coming up, it seems, because someone wrote it in an article. In the real world, where driving actually happens, I doubt many people would even notice. Besides, in an SUV one shouldn't be driving it as hard as a sports car anyway cause the thing is gonna flip over one day.
The objections here to 'understeer bias' are only coming up, it seems, because someone wrote it in an article. In the real world, where driving actually happens, I doubt many people would even notice. Besides, in an SUV one shouldn't be driving it as hard as a sports car anyway cause the thing is gonna flip over one day.
#32
Instructor
That is very very very true!!!!
Originally Posted by jaobrien6
True enough. In the end, all the matters is your own opinion of the car (and this doesn't just apply to handling, but everything: acceleration, smoothness of the engine, ergonomics, noise, styling, etc.). That's what will determine if you'll be happy with it, not what a magazine says.
#33
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by 98AccordEx
Oh but that's not a personal attack??
Funny I thought the same of you for starting a thread based on half a quote.
p.s. I wasn't debating you I was correcting you. Welcome to the forum by the way, stick around and actually read some posts and you might learn something.
Funny I thought the same of you for starting a thread based on half a quote.
p.s. I wasn't debating you I was correcting you. Welcome to the forum by the way, stick around and actually read some posts and you might learn something.
I'm eager to see a head to head comparo of the RDX, X3, and CX-7. I really love the smooth styling of the CX-7 and its a good amount cheaper than the RDX. This new "CUV" market should be interesting.
#34
Three Wheelin'
Allow me to quote the Road and Track first drive, "Where you would normally expect an SUV weighing nearly 4000 lb. to understeer, the RDX has grip all the way to the exit. Only in very tight cormers did the RDX "push" the laws of physics."
I agree with Mr. Deeno that the Car and Driver reporter probably didn't push the car through the corners hard enough to let the SH-AWD do it's thing.
I agree with Mr. Deeno that the Car and Driver reporter probably didn't push the car through the corners hard enough to let the SH-AWD do it's thing.
#35
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Leesburg, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 36,474
Received 249 Likes
on
175 Posts
Originally Posted by pistolpete17
I will quote it for you:
".....the RDX behaves like a front-drive vehicle and understeer is its defining characteristic."
".....the RDX behaves like a front-drive vehicle and understeer is its defining characteristic."
Uh.. Hello, it's an SUV! If you want something to carve up the twisties you're looking at the wrong vehicle.
#36
Acura/Honda Fan
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Coast
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sh-awd
Having driven a new generation RL with SHAWD for over a year now, the trick to make the car stick is in manual shift mode, as Colin said, "keep your foot in it" and it will amaze you on how well it sticks. So to keep the speed down keep the car in manual shift mode and 3rd or 4th gear will work wonders for you in the turns. In fact the car will beg for more speed in the clover leafs (sp?) and on ramps. Have Fun!
#37
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Northern VA
Age: 43
Posts: 7,601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sh-awd is great but the biggest downfall as w/ the cl and tl automatic is the shitty ass gear ratio.
2.697
1.606
1.071
0.766
0.612
final 1.889
WHAT THE HELL is up w/ 4th and 5th. if they built this against the x3 damn can't they get the gear ratio right? power will be completely cut once it hits 4th gear.
2.697
1.606
1.071
0.766
0.612
final 1.889
WHAT THE HELL is up w/ 4th and 5th. if they built this against the x3 damn can't they get the gear ratio right? power will be completely cut once it hits 4th gear.
#38
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by NOVAwhiteTypeS
sh-awd is great but the biggest downfall as w/ the cl and tl automatic is the shitty ass gear ratio.
2.697
1.606
1.071
0.766
0.612
final 1.889
WHAT THE HELL is up w/ 4th and 5th. if they built this against the x3 damn can't they get the gear ratio right? power will be completely cut once it hits 4th gear.
2.697
1.606
1.071
0.766
0.612
final 1.889
WHAT THE HELL is up w/ 4th and 5th. if they built this against the x3 damn can't they get the gear ratio right? power will be completely cut once it hits 4th gear.
Because, above all else, it's a Honda.
And if it's a Honda, you can be sure they will sacrifice performance for that extra bit of fuel economy.
I get 17mpg on premium with 60% highway driving from my M45...if I'm lucky. No way in hell a company like Honda would have the balls to pull such an act in regards to fuel economy.
#40
'12 TL (prev '04 TSX 6MT)
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
Because, above all else, it's a Honda.
And if it's a Honda, you can be sure they will sacrifice performance for that extra bit of fuel economy.
I get 17mpg on premium with 60% highway driving from my M45...if I'm lucky. No way in hell a company like Honda would have the balls to pull such an act in regards to fuel economy.
And if it's a Honda, you can be sure they will sacrifice performance for that extra bit of fuel economy.
I get 17mpg on premium with 60% highway driving from my M45...if I'm lucky. No way in hell a company like Honda would have the balls to pull such an act in regards to fuel economy.