Rdx Killer
05-15-2007, 03:02 PM
#81
male lawyers don't buy rav4's. they get porsche cayenne turbo's. Hell, female lawyers get something in the lines of q7's, a4 wagons, and ML500's.
Now not everyone who passes the BAR exam will eventually become a partner and make boatloads of money but I'm sure they'll make enough to get something a little better and more luxurious than a Rav4.
If my wife got me a rav4, and i wanted an rdx... I'd be on this site trolling too. Trying my best to get RDX owners to agree that they have a crappy car therefore, justifying my ownership of a chic car.
Now not everyone who passes the BAR exam will eventually become a partner and make boatloads of money but I'm sure they'll make enough to get something a little better and more luxurious than a Rav4.
If my wife got me a rav4, and i wanted an rdx... I'd be on this site trolling too. Trying my best to get RDX owners to agree that they have a crappy car therefore, justifying my ownership of a chic car.
05-15-2007, 06:37 PM
#83
Acuras since 1988
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Lancaster, PA
Age: 64
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I put 276 miles on my RDX today and got 22.6 mpgs. I'm a happy guy. I'm getting better milage it seems now that I have more mileage. So there nanny nanny poo poo. and quit saying we are immature here.
05-15-2007, 07:54 PM
#84
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 42
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kaiserseal
2006 Toyota RAV4: Making My Devil and Angel Happy
Of the seven SUVs in our long-term fleet (nine if you count the R500 and Compass), the RAV4 is clearly the one I'd want the keys to every night. It has the Goldilocks "just right" size, reasonably communicative steering and despite the RAV's historical mom image, I think it looks sleekly muscular. Best of all, the RAV's V6 offers one of the best power to fuel-economy trade-offs out there. It's the type of engine that appeases both the Devil and Angel perched upon my shoulder, whispering into my ear to keep me centered between power-hungry car guy and mpg-hungry green guy.
It's easy enough when puttering along in the city to forget that there's 269 horses stabled under the hood -- at least until it comes time to pass a dawdling minivan. Throughout the weekend, the RAV's abundant power kept surprising me every time it downshifted and pinned me to my seat. After filling up this morning, I took out our fuel log to see if the RAV's gas mileage claims were accurate. Since January 17, we have averaged 22.586 mpg, which is dead on with the EPA's new 2008 combined fuel economy estimates for the 3.5-liter V6. If I assume this means the new EPA testing is now accurate, that is only one mpg worse than my mother's new Honda CR-V that has 103 fewer horses. It's also about 3 mpg's better than what we've achieved (19.79 mpg) in our long-term Mitsubishi Outlander that has 49 fewer horses. Hybrids and alternative fuels may be the future, but the RAV4's power to fuel economy trade off is the type of mass-market efficiency that can make a difference NOW -- to both my devil and angel.
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/1020
Of the seven SUVs in our long-term fleet (nine if you count the R500 and Compass), the RAV4 is clearly the one I'd want the keys to every night. It has the Goldilocks "just right" size, reasonably communicative steering and despite the RAV's historical mom image, I think it looks sleekly muscular. Best of all, the RAV's V6 offers one of the best power to fuel-economy trade-offs out there. It's the type of engine that appeases both the Devil and Angel perched upon my shoulder, whispering into my ear to keep me centered between power-hungry car guy and mpg-hungry green guy.
It's easy enough when puttering along in the city to forget that there's 269 horses stabled under the hood -- at least until it comes time to pass a dawdling minivan. Throughout the weekend, the RAV's abundant power kept surprising me every time it downshifted and pinned me to my seat. After filling up this morning, I took out our fuel log to see if the RAV's gas mileage claims were accurate. Since January 17, we have averaged 22.586 mpg, which is dead on with the EPA's new 2008 combined fuel economy estimates for the 3.5-liter V6. If I assume this means the new EPA testing is now accurate, that is only one mpg worse than my mother's new Honda CR-V that has 103 fewer horses. It's also about 3 mpg's better than what we've achieved (19.79 mpg) in our long-term Mitsubishi Outlander that has 49 fewer horses. Hybrids and alternative fuels may be the future, but the RAV4's power to fuel economy trade off is the type of mass-market efficiency that can make a difference NOW -- to both my devil and angel.
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/1020
Wow, a subjective injection from you? What a shock.
I'm better understanding why as a late 30 year old lawyer you are driving a Rav4.
05-16-2007, 09:49 AM
#87
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Age: 42
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He absolutely loves remaining inconspicious. I can understand a thread dedicated to inciting some violence, but he doesnt even engage enough to make it worthwhile for himself.
It's pathetic really. I'd rather him engage everyone and look like he cares too much. Here is looks like a bitter little baby having to justify his purchase to the competition.
It's pathetic really. I'd rather him engage everyone and look like he cares too much. Here is looks like a bitter little baby having to justify his purchase to the competition.
05-16-2007, 01:49 PM
#88
Meat Popsicle
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicagoland, Illinois
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kaiserseal is most likely an 18 year old kid driving his moms hand me down previous generation RAV4. What adult in his right mind would register in the forum for another car and troll like this guy.
Amusing.
I like the RAV 4, we looked at it when we bought my wife's CRV.
Amusing.
I like the RAV 4, we looked at it when we bought my wife's CRV.
05-17-2007, 06:52 AM
#89
Advanced
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 56
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lilfeat
Kaiserseal is most likely an 18 year old kid driving his moms hand me down previous generation RAV4. What adult in his right mind would register in the forum for another car and troll like this guy.
Amusing.
I like the RAV 4, we looked at it when we bought my wife's CRV.
Amusing.
I like the RAV 4, we looked at it when we bought my wife's CRV.
And we have a winner, got to get back to some serious pimple popping now. Have a great weekened all..
05-17-2007, 09:27 AM
#90
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by Kaiserseal
And we have a winner, got to get back to some serious pimple popping now. Have a great weekened all..
Why is this guy still hanging around this so called "immature" forum when he said he was moving on to other more receptive ones...Look buddy... please... please... if you are simply bored and wants to elicit response from "immature" folks on this forum by trolling here... why don't you just go and get it from your kids (assuming you have them?). I bet they will probably provide better entertainment than us folks here...
Oh... and enjoy your RAV4...
don't even blink at an RDX, they are not in your class or that of your RAV4...
06-04-2009, 11:54 AM
#92
Carbon Bronze RDX
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Old Greenwich, CT
Age: 45
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I came across this old thread in a search, and thought that since we're about halfway through the hypothetical 5-year ownership period "total cost analysis" proposed by Kaiserseal, let's see how we're doing:
I'm not sure how to go back to 2007 MSRPs, but looking at current MSRPs for '09 models, the RAV4 is $32,804 "comparably equip'd" (meaning Limited V-6, 4x4, Leather package) to a base RDX that retails for $34,655. Difference of $1,851. I suspect this was roughly similar for the '07s. Kaiser may have paid $26,500 for his RAV4, but it certaintly didn't have a comparable feature list.
Using KBB trade-in figures for 2007 models as described above, with 24k miles, the RDX is worth $3k more today. So, you're actually AHEAD with the RDX, relative to MSRP.
Not sure what was assumed for this, but all my RDX has required is oil changes and a tire rotation. RDX requires synthetic, but it lasts at least 6mo under the "severe schedule." So, even assuming a worst case of paying double in oil change costs relative to the RAV4, you're maybe saving $50/yr.
Mileage is the one area where you're actually going to save money, but not nearly as much as assumed. Using Consumer Reports data (they use "real world" tests and are quite consistent in testing methodologies) they achieve overall MPG of 18 in the RDX and 22 in the RAV4. Using gas price assumptions of $2.50 and $2.70 for regular and premium respectively, you get annual savings of $545 for 15k miles, or a bit over $2700 across the 5yr period.
Let's add up the real figures:
MSRP 1,851
Deprec -1,149 (based on today)
Maint 250
Gas 2,700
Total: 3,652 extra cost of RDX over 5 years. Appologies to those that were banking on an extra $23k of savings...
I'm not sure how to go back to 2007 MSRPs, but looking at current MSRPs for '09 models, the RAV4 is $32,804 "comparably equip'd" (meaning Limited V-6, 4x4, Leather package) to a base RDX that retails for $34,655. Difference of $1,851. I suspect this was roughly similar for the '07s. Kaiser may have paid $26,500 for his RAV4, but it certaintly didn't have a comparable feature list.
Using KBB trade-in figures for 2007 models as described above, with 24k miles, the RDX is worth $3k more today. So, you're actually AHEAD with the RDX, relative to MSRP.
Not sure what was assumed for this, but all my RDX has required is oil changes and a tire rotation. RDX requires synthetic, but it lasts at least 6mo under the "severe schedule." So, even assuming a worst case of paying double in oil change costs relative to the RAV4, you're maybe saving $50/yr.
Let's add up the real figures:
MSRP 1,851
Deprec -1,149 (based on today)
Maint 250
Gas 2,700
Total: 3,652 extra cost of RDX over 5 years. Appologies to those that were banking on an extra $23k of savings...
06-05-2009, 09:37 PM
#94
4th Gear
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I drove a Rav4 V6 AWD for two weeks as a rental. When it came time to buy a luxury SUV, it didn't even cross my mind. The interior is inline with the Fords I have driven in the past, and the driving experience is anything but thrilling. Off the line acceleration? Are you serious? How often do you floor it? How often do you take the on and off ramps with spirit?
06-18-2009, 09:54 PM
#95
Me and many people are getting RDX techs for $32k or less. I doubt Toyota is giving 6k off MSRP for the RAV4.
However, I do wish they just put the 3.5 motor in the RDX. Fuel efficiency is not this car's forte. I am getting worse mileage than my recently departed 2006 GTO, around town where the SUV aerodynamics don't come into play.
However, I do wish they just put the 3.5 motor in the RDX. Fuel efficiency is not this car's forte. I am getting worse mileage than my recently departed 2006 GTO, around town where the SUV aerodynamics don't come into play.
06-18-2009, 10:22 PM
#96
I'm gonna add this to the reasons whyI want to get rid of the RDX. I dont want to be associated with this type of person.
C'mon guys. It's a friggin Acura. You hold the car up like it's some sort of icon. It's still far short from a BMW or Benz. I'm telling you - the emperor has no clothes. You can convince yourself all you want, but when all the doo dads wear off but I stand by my previous comments that the RDX it's not much more than a gussied up CR-V.
C'mon guys. It's a friggin Acura. You hold the car up like it's some sort of icon. It's still far short from a BMW or Benz. I'm telling you - the emperor has no clothes. You can convince yourself all you want, but when all the doo dads wear off but I stand by my previous comments that the RDX it's not much more than a gussied up CR-V.
06-19-2009, 09:33 AM
#97
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Age: 55
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, 58 posts so far for Acurazine from a guy who doesnt liek the RDX, and has a RAV4. lol
Sounds more like he'd rather have an RDX and wants to justify his vehical to himself. Like the short guy who hangs out with tall ppl and talks crap about them.
Sounds more like he'd rather have an RDX and wants to justify his vehical to himself. Like the short guy who hangs out with tall ppl and talks crap about them.
06-24-2009, 11:37 PM
#99
3rd Gear
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have driven both and I do not consider them to be in the same 'class' of vehicle.
To each their own...i guess.
07-06-2009, 11:30 AM
#101
.... .... .... ... ....
First, before I start know that I love Acura’s. I have owned an Integra, my wife drive's an MDX, and until last week I drove an RL. My RL, with a lousy 16MPG had to go in favor of something a bit more efficient. I previously had an RDX for a week while my RL was in for service, and really felt the loss of size from our MDX. A friend took me out in his RAV4, and a day later I bought one.
The RAV4 with 270 HP is faster than a RL, TL, and much faster than an RDX. I have been averaging 25 MPG on my commute, hitting 30MPG on a long trip with regular fuel. In the twistys it is not as sharp as the RDX, but damn close. Additionally it is bigger, I opted for the one with a third row. I have driven nothing but Honda products for about ten years and never thought I would jump ship. I am not writing this to set off RDX owners, I want to know how is it that Toyota can get this much horsepower, seat 7, and still return economy gas mileage on 87 OCTANE GAS??? My RAV4 even blows away the micro CIVIC SI in speed and MPG. Even the Civic SI needs premium gas. The final kick in the butt, the RAV4 is made in Japan and costs 25K. How does Toyota do it?
The RAV4 with 270 HP is faster than a RL, TL, and much faster than an RDX. I have been averaging 25 MPG on my commute, hitting 30MPG on a long trip with regular fuel. In the twistys it is not as sharp as the RDX, but damn close. Additionally it is bigger, I opted for the one with a third row. I have driven nothing but Honda products for about ten years and never thought I would jump ship. I am not writing this to set off RDX owners, I want to know how is it that Toyota can get this much horsepower, seat 7, and still return economy gas mileage on 87 OCTANE GAS??? My RAV4 even blows away the micro CIVIC SI in speed and MPG. Even the Civic SI needs premium gas. The final kick in the butt, the RAV4 is made in Japan and costs 25K. How does Toyota do it?
07-06-2009, 11:31 AM
#102
.... .... .... ... ....
07-20-2009, 04:41 PM
#103
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Age: 43
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
6 Posts
Just came across this thread as a buddy just bought a RDX, I have a 05 RL and my wife has a 06 RAV V6 Sport. I really like the RDX but my wife doesn't care about luxury features so I bought her a V6 Rav that is much more reliable than her old VW Cabrio, 35k miles and no problems yet. I didn't really like the tire on the back at first but when I opened up the back and saw the giant compartment below the carpet where the tire would go I was happy. I got the best of both worlds with the RL and the RAV, plus the RAV was the last 06 on the lot so I got it for $900 below invoice. I'm sure the RDX handles better then her RAV even though it's a Sport, used 09 MDX though for her in the future. She didn't like the ride of the RDX but it was a sacrifice I would make. Hers is front wheel drive so there is no comparison there anyways, not that there is any AWD system that compares to SH-AWD anyways, except BMW just came out with one. Like someone said earlier we all buy our vehicles for a reason so to each his own, I would have chosen a RDX but my wife chose the RAV, case closed. P.S. I was a little annoyed that her car was faster and had larger wheels than mine so I was able to fix one by getting some 19's for my ride. https://acurazine.com/forums/2g-rl-tires-wheels-suspension-92/new-wheels-732171/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
