Price?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 09:52 PM
  #1  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
Price?

Welp the woman saw the pictures of the RDX today and approved. So it seems that's what we'll be getting Soooo now the price? What does everybody think? I hoping 30k w/ navi
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #2  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
30K, 32K w/ Navi
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 05:16 AM
  #3  
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
Exclamation SORRY, but I think that's waaay off....

Originally Posted by Zapata
Welp the woman saw the pictures of the RDX today and approved. So it seems that's what we'll be getting Soooo now the price? What does everybody think? I hoping 30k w/ navi
.....it's more likely gonna be around 36 to 37K (fully loaded with Navi)

....just think about it. It's got SH-AWD, a V6 engine, Bluetooth, DVD-Audio, XM, HIDs, wood and leather interior, and pretty much all the other goodies from the TL......and besides this it's an SUV (which makes it more expensive than the sedan)

In any case I'm virtually positive it will not be anything less than 35K fully loaded.

Then, like the MDX, they might have different models of the RDX. For Example:
base
touring (with upgraded sound system and other goodies like heated seats etc.)
touring+Navi
In that case it might start at 30 to 31K for the base and end up at 35 to 36K for the fully loaded version!!

FYI, the MSRP on my 2003 MDX Touring/NAV/Rear-Entertainment System was $43,500....So, at 36K it would still be a substantial $7,500 difference which makes sense .....Besides, the current model MDX is now nearing it's end. The new redesigned MDX is likely to be even more expensive, leaving enough room for them to differentiate them.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #4  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,434
Likes: 638
From: Orlando, Fl
V6?
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
NJtsx's Avatar
Automobile Aficionado
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: Jersey shore
Originally Posted by vicpai
.....it's more likely gonna be around 36 to 37K (fully loaded with Navi)

....just think about it. It's got SH-AWD, a V6 engine, Bluetooth, DVD-Audio, XM, HIDs, wood and leather interior, and pretty much all the other goodies from the TL......and besides this it's an SUV (which makes it more expensive than the sedan)

In any case I'm virtually positive it will not be anything less than 35K fully loaded.

Then, like the MDX, they might have different models of the RDX. For Example:
base
touring (with upgraded sound system and other goodies like heated seats etc.)
touring+Navi
In that case it might start at 30 to 31K for the base and end up at 35 to 36K for the fully loaded version!!

FYI, the MSRP on my 2003 MDX Touring/NAV/Rear-Entertainment System was $43,500....So, at 36K it would still be a substantial $7,500 difference which makes sense .....Besides, the current model MDX is now nearing it's end. The new redesigned MDX is likely to be even more expensive, leaving enough room for them to differentiate them.
No way. if thats the case it compete too much with the MDX. i say priced like the TL.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 10:58 PM
  #6  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
no way it's that expensive. they'd price themselves right out of the market. Why the buy and MDX? Not Acura's style to nickle and dime ammenities. You get the RDX with and without NAVI. That is the only option.

You can't have this thing loaded anywhere near what the MDX sells for. Acura wants to compete to with Nissan and BMW it needs to be priced lower. Majority of the interior will be shared with other cars in the Acura lineup.

I'd be sorely disappointed if it were 35k plus.

If Acura wants to compete this vehicle should start at 29k and be 31k w/ navi. It'll be priced right under the X3 and the FX35 and still steal sales from the Murano for those who want lux car but don't want to pay 36k.



2005 BMW X3
MSRP: $30,300 - $36,300

2005 Infiniti FX35
MSRP: $34,950 - $36,450

2005 Nissan Murano Midsize SUV
MSRP: $26,850 - $30,900



Originally Posted by vicpai
.....it's more likely gonna be around 36 to 37K (fully loaded with Navi)

....just think about it. It's got SH-AWD, a V6 engine, Bluetooth, DVD-Audio, XM, HIDs, wood and leather interior, and pretty much all the other goodies from the TL......and besides this it's an SUV (which makes it more expensive than the sedan)

In any case I'm virtually positive it will not be anything less than 35K fully loaded.

Then, like the MDX, they might have different models of the RDX. For Example:
base
touring (with upgraded sound system and other goodies like heated seats etc.)
touring+Navi
In that case it might start at 30 to 31K for the base and end up at 35 to 36K for the fully loaded version!!

FYI, the MSRP on my 2003 MDX Touring/NAV/Rear-Entertainment System was $43,500....So, at 36K it would still be a substantial $7,500 difference which makes sense .....Besides, the current model MDX is now nearing it's end. The new redesigned MDX is likely to be even more expensive, leaving enough room for them to differentiate them.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:07 AM
  #7  
SPUDMTN's Avatar
has been here awhile
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
My guess is that it will absolutely MAX out at 35k (at the VERY most). Figure the top of the line RDX should be priced out at about the base price of an MDX.

However, I suspect that the MDX will be moving up market in its next iteration (which we should be looking forward to here very soon). So, this gives room in RDX pricing.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:41 AM
  #8  
soopa's Avatar
The Creator
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 37,950
Likes: 8
From: Albany, NY
I too would bet about 35K out the door. Which is pretty compareable to the rest when similarly equipped.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 04:17 AM
  #9  
biker's Avatar
Race Director
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,434
Likes: 638
From: Orlando, Fl
You gotta remember that this will be a "tarted-up" CR-V, for which the top of the line SE model is like 25K. There's no reason that even with a V6 and a few other goodies the SE doesn't have, the RDX should be much over 30K. Just like we have Accord vs. TSX debate, there'll be a CR-V vs. RDX debate when they both come out next year - except that in the case of the latter, Acura will have the HP advantage.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #10  
provench's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,858
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
I predict around 31K base and 33K with Navi ... which should be a home run IMHO.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 09:25 AM
  #11  
CGTSX2004's Avatar
Team Owner
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 24,299
Likes: 380
From: Beach Cities, CA
I'm with Prov. That sounds about right to me.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #12  
crisco's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Canada
i agree - $ RDX ~ $ TL
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 10:59 AM
  #13  
98AccordEx's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by biker
You gotta remember that this will be a "tarted-up" CR-V, for which the top of the line SE model is like 25K. There's no reason that even with a V6 and a few other goodies the SE doesn't have, the RDX should be much over 30K. Just like we have Accord vs. TSX debate, there'll be a CR-V vs. RDX debate when they both come out next year - except that in the case of the latter, Acura will have the HP advantage.
I view the CRV vs RDX being more similiar to comparing the Pilot to the MDX. I think others have it right in assuming the 3rd Gen CRV will have a V6 option on EX & SE models. If the V6 adds $3000 (similar to Accord 4 vs 6) then the CRV SE V6 would run $28,500 - no Navi.
A similar Pilot (EX w/leather - no navi) is $32,120. and a similar MDX (base - no navi) is $36,700. SO, the MDX is priced $4600 over the Pilot and if the RDX had a similar mark up the RDX base price would be $28500+4600=$33,100. Add $2000 for Navi and possible $2800 for the touring package (that's a lot for power & memory seats huh but that's what the MDX touring pack costs) and were looking at $37,900!!! Hope not?!?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #14  
DEI99662's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,808
Likes: 1
From: USA
I think it will start at $30K and go up from there.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #15  
Zapata's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cost Drivers!!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 19,392
Likes: 1
From: burbs of philly
i hope they keep it simple. It's the one thing i really appreciate Acura for doing. I hated shopping for other cars and having to sort through packages and not being able to have one thing without spending money on other things i didn't want.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:37 PM
  #16  
gocubsgo55's Avatar
101 years of heartache...
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,076
Likes: 0
From: Chicago's North Side/Champaign, IL
Biker, I agree with the debate, but I think the Pilot v.s. RDX would be a better debate when comparing it to USDM Accord vs USDM TSX. I can't wait for this thing to come, it looks like it's gonna do pretty well from what I've been reading. There's a real need for sporty, fuel efficient SUVs. Now, if only Honda brought over either VCM or i-VTEC i onto some Acura products since they said Hybrid wouldn't be an option anytime soon.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #17  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
Think the base price at cheapest will start at or above 30k. Suvs in general have a premium. It would be resonable for a tsx with awd/nav to be 30k so an suv with the newer luxuries, more power-probably end up being priced like the tl.
Reply
Old Jan 24, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #18  
heyitsme's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,426
Likes: 0
From: philly
Originally Posted by biker
You gotta remember that this will be a "tarted-up" CR-V, for which the top of the line SE model is like 25K. There's no reason that even with a V6 and a few other goodies the SE doesn't have, the RDX should be much over 30K. Just like we have Accord vs. TSX debate, there'll be a CR-V vs. RDX debate when they both come out next year - except that in the case of the latter, Acura will have the HP advantage.
Look at the pilot vs mdx, 10k difference between the two.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #19  
CL-SSS's Avatar
KBP S
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Zapata
Welp the woman saw the pictures of the RDX today and approved. So it seems that's what we'll be getting Soooo now the price? What does everybody think? I hoping 30k w/ navi
it will be mid to high 20's
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #20  
SPUDMTN's Avatar
has been here awhile
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by DEI99662
I think it will start at $30K and go up from there.
I'd like to think of it like the SUV version of the TSX...like the MDX is to the TL.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #21  
AcuraFan's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by SPUDMTN
I'd like to think of it like the SUV version of the TSX...like the MDX is to the TL.

But the MDX is quite a bit more expensive than the TL and the RDX will most likely be quite a bit more expensive than the TSX...but I doubt it'll be $36-37K.
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
jaobrien6's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Well, based on starting MSRP:

TL: $33,100
MDX: $36,900

Delta = $3800

TSX: $27,190
RDX: $27,190 + $3800 = $30,990

That's right around where a lot of people have been predicting it. I do think we'll see this car starting at $30k or so. Probably not much less, probably not much more.

John
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #23  
Professor Gascan's Avatar
Frozen Wannabe Oracle
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon
Acura always makes a point to undercut the competion (other than the RL to some extent) by offering more equipment and power for less money. I'm gonna say the RDX will start at $29,995 USD, and end up maxing out around $34K with Navi and RES. Of course, xenon (I hope), bluetooth, SH-AWD, V6 and DVD-A will all be standard.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:44 PM
  #24  
jniamehr's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Roslyn, NY
dont be sure on the xenon factor, i think if they dont they will be lagging i hope they do... i think dvd-a will be scrapped and something better will be put in
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #25  
jaobrien6's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
Something better than DVD-A? Are you thinking a different format (SACD being the only competition I know of to DVD-A), or something more "useful" like the hard drive from the concept?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
jniamehr's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Roslyn, NY
something more useful.... when will dealers begin taking orders on this thing.... i want mine first!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #27  
kensukikatayo's Avatar
Turbo + Sound = Hey-pee
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
whats better than dvd-a?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #28  
kensukikatayo's Avatar
Turbo + Sound = Hey-pee
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
other than the fact that most ppl rnt capable of burning their own dvd-a's
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 03:57 PM
  #29  
jniamehr's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Roslyn, NY
exactly, and I meant more useful... I cant even find the music I like on a DVD-A... I know how to burn a dvd-a but if all you have are mp3s, even if they are at cd-quality... THATS EXACTLY what they are... CD quality.... I think mp3 support would have been more practical...
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 02:11 AM
  #30  
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
Thumbs up What's more impressive to me....

.....than DVD-A by itself (for the reasons mentioned in above posts), is the "Centerpoint" technology by Bose, which is employed in the new RL!! ....to simulate "surround sound" as comes in Dolby Digital or DTS format DVD-As, from REGULAR CDs
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 06:02 AM
  #31  
mg7726's Avatar
She said: it's GINORMOUS!
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,913
Likes: 2
From: NYC
i just hope they put in the audio in jack and support mp3

w/o the add-on player
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 01:37 PM
  #32  
Colin's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,803
Likes: 1,015
When the TSX came out, everyone screamed that it was too much money. That nobody would pay that much for a 4 cylinder. That the price was too close the TL. That it would steal sales from the TL. This proved true (to a limited extent) for around 6 months. Then the new TL came out, and voila, the price gap and equipment gap were restored.

I'm not guaranteeing history wll repeat itself............. but.............. I suspect it will be alarmingly close to a base MDX when equipped with Nav and DVD. Then in 6 months the new MDX will arrive.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2005 | 03:15 PM
  #33  
jniamehr's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Roslyn, NY
I sure hope your wrong colin... that puts this car out of my budget range because we already have an MDX, and Im selling my RX-8 (2004, and I hate it) for this car and I dont want to spend to much
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #34  
ilitig8's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Colin
When the TSX came out, everyone screamed that it was too much money. That nobody would pay that much for a 4 cylinder. That the price was too close the TL. That it would steal sales from the TL. This proved true (to a limited extent) for around 6 months. Then the new TL came out, and voila, the price gap and equipment gap were restored.

I'm not guaranteeing history wll repeat itself............. but.............. I suspect it will be alarmingly close to a base MDX when equipped with Nav and DVD. Then in 6 months the new MDX will arrive.

I tend to agree with this, very much like the X3 and X5, the X3 is close to the X5 but the new X5 will move up the ladder and leave breathing room for the X3. I would expect the RDX, sadly, to be right around the 33-37 range.

Vandy
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #35  
Colin's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,803
Likes: 1,015
Originally Posted by ilitig8
I tend to agree with this, very much like the X3 and X5, the X3 is close to the X5 but the new X5 will move up the ladder and leave breathing room for the X3. I would expect the RDX, sadly, to be right around the 33-37 range.

Vandy
Well I've got my fingers crossed for a base of 31k, Navi at 33K and Navi/DVD at 35K.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #36  
titan's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,411
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans
Originally Posted by provench
I predict around 31K base and 33K with Navi ... which should be a home run IMHO.
I agree 100%. Price it there, and they've got a sale from me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
Jan 20, 2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
Nov 16, 2015 08:30 PM
navtool.com
1G RDX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
1
Sep 25, 2015 05:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.