3.0 mpg?
#41
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southlake, TX
Age: 37
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
I almost forgot about my own bit of testing......... granted its not the most scientific of tests, but I ran it for myself to see what happens, and this is what I came up with
![](http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m28/Shoji_Aoyama/GT2Numbers.jpg)
pulled nearly a flat 17 on 87 running on the "Sequential"
then ran a 17.25 on 93
then I tried spiked 93 with some octane booster just to see what would happen, I broke into the 16s... WTF
anyways, yes the numbers are high, but its a 2.2 on basic bolt ons, probably just enough to counteract the 100-ish pounds of stereo system in there
![](http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m28/Shoji_Aoyama/GT2Numbers.jpg)
pulled nearly a flat 17 on 87 running on the "Sequential"
then ran a 17.25 on 93
then I tried spiked 93 with some octane booster just to see what would happen, I broke into the 16s... WTF
anyways, yes the numbers are high, but its a 2.2 on basic bolt ons, probably just enough to counteract the 100-ish pounds of stereo system in there
#42
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Allentown PA
Age: 39
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by G22_Powered_YA1
I almost forgot about my own bit of testing......... granted its not the most scientific of tests, but I ran it for myself to see what happens, and this is what I came up with
![](http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m28/Shoji_Aoyama/GT2Numbers.jpg)
pulled nearly a flat 17 on 87 running on the "Sequential"
then ran a 17.25 on 93
then I tried spiked 93 with some octane booster just to see what would happen, I broke into the 16s... WTF
anyways, yes the numbers are high, but its a 2.2 on basic bolt ons, probably just enough to counteract the 100-ish pounds of stereo system in there
![](http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m28/Shoji_Aoyama/GT2Numbers.jpg)
pulled nearly a flat 17 on 87 running on the "Sequential"
then ran a 17.25 on 93
then I tried spiked 93 with some octane booster just to see what would happen, I broke into the 16s... WTF
anyways, yes the numbers are high, but its a 2.2 on basic bolt ons, probably just enough to counteract the 100-ish pounds of stereo system in there
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
#43
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southlake, TX
Age: 37
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Opi
You missed the part about miles per gallon, not quarter mile times ![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
my MPG is around the same if not a teeny bit higher on 93, but its small enough that it can be attributed to my right foot rather than the gasoline itself
#45
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Allentown PA
Age: 39
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well im plowing through my first full tank of 87 octane and Im at about 250 miles and have about a third tank left, so far im content we'll see when i finish it off and do the math
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post