'07/'08 TL, '09-'10 TSX or 2011/'12 TSX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-11-2017, 02:24 PM
  #1  
1st Gear
Thread Starter
 
failedlawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Age: 30
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'07/'08 TL, '09-'10 TSX or 2011/'12 TSX

Very recently a family member was hit and had their Mercedes totaled. So I showed them a 2011 TSX tech and of course they were amazed and wanted the car, however it had very low mileage and was way over priced and I really wanted to get a good example. Unfortunately the dealer didn't want to lower the price of it as it had 22k and they wanted 18.5k for it. Anyways they told me they would be fine with a corolla but the TSX tech is really a lot of bang for your buck and I like the car a lot.

Which car is worth buying
A 2007/8 TL example with tech package, there are a few with 90k-115k mileage.

A 2009-2010 TSX tech with 85-115k mileage.

or a 2011/2012 TSX Tech with 97k to 125k mileage.


i have read online that the graphics for the GPS in 2008 TL and 2009 TSX are the Same.

I have also read that the 2009/10 is noisier compared to the 2011 TSX.
are any of these cars worth buying with such high mileage or should i expect major issues or worse ride quality.

All of of these cars are sub 12,000, which is all that is really willing to be spent.

what do you guys suggest? Besides the corolla.
Old 01-11-2017, 02:48 PM
  #2  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
Just FYI; Honda updated the Airbag recall to include 2005-2012 TSX and 2005-2012 RL.
so, if you are considering one of these vehicles, be sure that the recall has been applied
Old 01-11-2017, 02:49 PM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,892
Received 8,584 Likes on 6,630 Posts
TL > TSX
especially the 3G



but i'm biased
Old 01-11-2017, 02:55 PM
  #4  
Pro
 
TheAcAvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver (from NoVA)
Posts: 706
Received 81 Likes on 40 Posts
I have a 2010 TSX Tech...

The 3G TL is better for sure. The only reason not to get one is MPG and overall footprint. If someone came and offered me a 3G TL with the same amount of miles for my TSX, i'd probably take the deal, but only because the TSX is just so appallingly slow sometimes. If all you want is a nice little run-about car that comfortable, care-free, highly maneuverable, and good at being crammed in tiny parking spaces, the TSX is perfect.
Old 01-11-2017, 02:57 PM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
 
thoiboi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: SoCal, CA
Posts: 46,892
Received 8,584 Likes on 6,630 Posts
Originally Posted by TheAcAvenger
I have a 2010 TSX Tech...

The 3G TL is better for sure. The only reason not to get one is MPG and overall footprint. If someone came and offered me a 3G TL with the same amount of miles for my TSX, i'd probably take the deal, but only because the TSX is just so appallingly slow sometimes. If all you want is a nice little run-about car that comfortable, care-free, highly maneuverable, and good at being crammed in tiny parking spaces, the TSX is perfect.

But you have a bloody m4 for speed
Old 01-11-2017, 03:53 PM
  #6  
Pro
 
TheAcAvenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Denver (from NoVA)
Posts: 706
Received 81 Likes on 40 Posts
Originally Posted by thoiboi
But you have a bloody m4 for speed
good point, sir

My 335 is definitely faster than the M4, but you just get used to having power, so it stands out more when you don't have it. I have to go from raging BMW asshole to putting on my blinker 5 seconds in advance and praying that joe blow on I66 or I95 is going to just take pity on me. First world problems huh? I honestly didn't feel this way when I had the RL though. I think it's a matter of having on-demand highway passing power and the TSX doesn't really have it. You cant just put your foot down and assume you'll be fine. It's great for keeping me out of tickets/jail though and for making people at work think i'm a humble, responsible human being.
Old 04-16-2017, 01:45 AM
  #7  
1st Gear
 
Leimgob0802's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Age: 34
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have no idea of it.
Old 04-16-2017, 06:15 AM
  #8  
Race Director
 
nanxun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: DMV
Posts: 10,857
Received 3,262 Likes on 2,026 Posts
Originally Posted by thoiboi
TL > TSX
especially the 3G



but i'm biased
Originally Posted by TheAcAvenger
I have a 2010 TSX Tech...

The 3G TL is better for sure. The only reason not to get one is MPG and overall footprint. If someone came and offered me a 3G TL with the same amount of miles for my TSX, i'd probably take the deal, but only because the TSX is just so appallingly slow sometimes. If all you want is a nice little run-about car that comfortable, care-free, highly maneuverable, and good at being crammed in tiny parking spaces, the TSX is perfect.
+1

I was trying to decide between a TSX (2nd gen) and a 3G TL when I was buying about 8 weeks ago. In the end, I went with the 3G TL, mostly for the extra 50-60 horses under the hood, with the understanding that my mpgs would be slightly (but only slightly) lower. I'm happy with the purchase, esp. when I'm cruising on the hwy. In the end, it depends on how your friend will be using the car. Pick the right tool for the job. :wink:
Old 04-18-2017, 10:17 AM
  #9  
Suzuka Master
 
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,863
Received 435 Likes on 342 Posts
get the gar that has the least amount of miles for said price. all of those cars are pretty well equipped so...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.